Abstract
The emission of air pollutants from various industries is a major contributor to environmental pollution. The removal of these pollutants before they are discharged into the environment has become an important means of controlling air pollution. Biochar has attracted increasing attention because of its low cost, high porosity, large specific surface area, abundant surface functional groups, and high removal capacity. The physicochemical properties of biochar are greatly affected by feedstock types, preparation, and modification conditions. For this reason, the capacity and propensity of biochar for removing air pollutants are rather variable. To understand the existing research status and grasp the latest research progress, a systematic review on the removal of different air pollutants by biochar is highly needed. Based on the recent research, this paper systematically analyzes and summarizes the preparation and modification methods of biochar commonly used for the removal of six air pollutants (SO2, H2S, CO2, Hg0, VOCs, and NH3), as well as the removal performance and mechanisms. Then, the potential influencing factors (preparation parameters, physicochemical characteristics of biochar, and removal conditions) are discussed. Finally, the regeneration of biochar, suggestions, and future perspectives are proposed.
Graphical Abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42773-022-00156-z/MediaObjects/42773_2022_156_Figa_HTML.png)
Highlights
-
1.
Common preparation and modification methods of biochar for removing air pollutants are introduced.
-
2.
Removal performance and mechanisms of biochar for air pollutants are discussed.
-
3.
The influencing factors and regeneration methods of biochar for the removal of air pollutants are explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The large-scale exploitation and combustion of fossil fuels, as well as agricultural and animal husbandry production, have produced a variety of air pollutants that are harmful to the global environment and human health. Carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), elemental mercury (Hg0), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and ammonia (NH3) are common air pollutants emitted in large quantities, mainly from industrial production, which not only pollute the environment, but also threaten human health (Niu et al. 2017; Vikrant et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017a; Kung et al. 2019; Kumar et al. 2020). Thus, a variety of measures have been developed to control and mitigate pollution by the aforementioned gases. In the case of SO2, the removal methods include flue gas desulfurization (Abdulrasheed et al. 2018) and wet washing (Illingworth et al. 2019). H2S can be treated by wet oxidation, scrubbing (Liu and Wang 2019), biological oxidation (Peluso et al. 2018), and adsorption (Sahota et al. 2018). CO2 can be removed by adsorption (Mohd et al. 2013). As regards VOCs, the commonly used methods are biodegradation and oxidation technology (Shen and Zhang 2019). Besides, some general methods are used to remove different air pollutants, such as membrane separation method for removing H2S and CO2 (Rezakazemi et al. 2014; Peluso et al. 2018), absorption method for removing CO2 and VOCs (Li and Kang 2019; Shen and Zhang 2019), and catalytic method for removing H2S, CO2, Hg0, and NH3 (Zhang et al. 2014a, 2020a; Vikrant et al. 2017; Sahota et al. 2018; Xiong et al. 2018). Adsorption method is widely used in the removal of air pollutants. The use of chemicals and catalysts, however, can increase costs and lead to secondary pollution and equipment corrosion. Biological control processes are slower to operate than their chemical equivalents, and often require elevated environmental conditions. In this respect, adsorption techniques have attracted a great deal of attention because of their relatively low cost and energy requirement, simple and clean operation (Du et al. 2019), as well as the good removal efficiency under low air pollutant concentration (Vikrant et al. 2017).
Air pollutants can be removed by adsorption to activated carbon, activated carbon fibre, carbon nanotubes, graphene and its derivatives, nanomaterials, polymers, metal–organic frameworks, and biochar (Liu et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020b). Among these adsorbents, activated carbon is the most widely used, but its large-scale application can still be limited by high cost ($1100–1700/t) (Li et al. 2016a; Fdez-Sanromán et al. 2020). It is necessary to develop low-cost adsorbents that can efficiently remove air pollutants from the environment.
Biochar is a porous and carbon-rich material obtained by pyrolysis of biomass under limited oxygen supply conditions (Lehmann 2007; Gaunt and Lehmann 2008). Due to its desirable properties, such as low cost ($90–1200/t) (Fdez-Sanromán et al. 2020), potential high adsorption capacity, enriched surface functional groups (SFG), large porosity and specific surface area (SSA) (Sun et al. 2017), biochar has been widely used for soil amendment (Yang et al. 2017a; Wang et al. 2019), nutrient recovery and heavy metal removal (Wang et al. 2015, 2018a, 2020a; Lian et al. 2019; Lucaci et al. 2019), and cultivation of microorganisms (Yang et al. 2015; Igalavithana et al. 2017).
With the aggravation of air pollution, the application of biochar in the removal of industrial air pollutants has attracted increasing attention. At present, the main research focuses on sulfur-containing gases (SO2, COS, CS2, and H2S) (Song et al. 2017b; Zhang et al. 2020c), CO2 (Igalavithana et al. 2020), toxic and harmful gases (Hg0, NH3, and VOCs) (Shan et al. 2019; Krounbi et al. 2020; Xiang et al. 2020), and there are few studies on other air pollutants (e.g., NOx and ozone). However, the removal capacity of biochar for air pollutants of different properties is quite different, as well as the factors affecting the removal performance. Previous studies on the removal of biochar for some air pollutants have been summarized by several reviews (Zhang et al. 2017b; Bamdad et al. 2018b; Dissanayake et al. 2020b; Liu et al. 2020; Gwenzi et al. 2021). However, due to the differences in the properties of different gases, it is necessary to compare and summarize the general regulations for the removal by biochar. Since the actual industrial waste gas contains a variety of complex components, interactions between these components may occur, which can inevitably affect the removal capacity and mechanisms of biochar. Besides that, many factors can also affect its removal performance. However, most of the previous reviews only discussed the influence of the physicochemical properties of biochar on the removal of one or several air pollutants with similar properties, and lacked the comparison of gases with different properties. Besides, removal conditions (e.g., reaction temperature, relative humidity, and coexisting gases) are rarely discussed and compared. Therefore, based on the recent research, this review systematically summarizes the application of biochar in the removal of six common industrial air pollutants (SO2, H2S, CO2, Hg0, VOCs, and NH3). The purposes of this review are to (1) introduce the common preparation and modification methods of biochar commonly used for air pollutants removal; (2) analyze the removal performance and mechanisms of biochar for six air pollutants with different properties; (3) discuss the factors affecting the removal of air pollutants by biochar; (4) summarize the regeneration methods of adsorbed saturated biochar; (5) put forward the perspectives for future research. This review tries to outline the entire life cycle of biochar from the perspective of biochar preparation–removal application–regeneration–waste biochar reuse, which is helpful to accelerate the industrial application of biochar in flue gas terminal treatment.
2 Methods of literature search
The current research mainly searched the literature published in the Web of Science and Google Scholar. Search keywords were mainly “biochar”, “gas”, “gas pollutant”, “acid gas”, “greenhouse gas”, “flue gas”, “metals”, “CO2”, “SO2”, “H2S”, “(element) mercury”, “Hg0”, “volatile organic compounds”, “VOCs”, “ammonia”, “NH3”, and “review”, using the combination of “and” and “or”, and manually screening the searched literature. Besides that, the references of searched literature were also consulted. Figure 1 shows that from 2014 to 2021, the numbers of literature on biochar and its removal of six air pollutants have shown a gradual increase. It is also found that the numberof literature on SO2 and NH3 is less than that of other air pollutants, which requires more in-depth research.
3 Preparation and modification of biochar for the removal of air pollutants
3.1 Preparation
The feedstocks of biochar usually include agricultural waste, food residue, sludge, animal manure, invasive plants, and seaweed (Ahmed et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2018b; Feng et al. 2021c). The common preparation methods of biochar include pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization, or microwave pyrolysis (Sajjadi et al. 2019) (Fig. 2). Differences in feedstocks and preparation methods can directly affect the physicochemical properties, and hence the adsorption capacities of biochar (Cha et al. 2016).
Gasification generally refers to the partial oxidation and combustion of biomass materials in the presence of a specific gas (air, oxygen, or steam) at a temperature of 600–1200 °C (Bamdad et al. 2018b; Wang and Wang 2019). Since the main product is gas, the yield of biochar is very small (Cha et al. 2016).
Hydrothermal carbonization refers to the process of immersing biomass materials in water under a certain pressure at 175–300 °C. Biochar produced by hydrothermal carbonization has relatively high SFG and acidity, while the presence of water during the process gives rise to materials with high moisture content (Ahmed et al. 2016; Rangabhashiyam and Balasubramanian 2019).
Microwaves are electromagnetic waves with frequencies ranging from 300 MHz to 300 GHz (Huang et al. 2016). Since microwave pyrolysis can transfer energy to biomass materials quickly and evenly, the process is more efficient, easier to control, and more economical of time and energy than other carbonization methods (Huang et al. 2015; Wahi et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2017). Biochar prepared by microwave pyrolysis is also more porous and has a higher SSA (Wahi et al. 2017) and stability (Wang et al. 2017) than the material obtained by conventional pyrolysis.
Pyrolysis is a process of thermal decomposition of biomass in the absence of oxygen or at low oxygen concentration (Rangabhashiyam and Balasubramanian 2019). There are two categories of pyrolysis: fast and slow. The former is used for bio-oil and syngas production, while the latter process is conducive to biochar synthesis (Igalavithana et al. 2020). Slow pyrolysis is characterized by a relatively slow heating rate, long residence time, wide temperature range, and high product yield (Neves et al. 2011; Lian and Xing 2017). In addition, according to the pyrolysis temperature, the pyrolysis can be divided as low-temperature pyrolysis (300–400 °C), medium-temperature pyrolysis (400–500 °C), and high-temperature pyrolysis (> 500 °C) (Ahmad et al. 2021). Generally, biochar prepared under medium or low-temperature pyrolysis has hydrophobicity and contains more SFG, however, its SSA and porosity are usually low (Das and Sarmah 2015; Usevičiūtė and Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė 2020). With the increase of pyrolysis temperature, the SSA of biochar increases, the pore structure and hydrophilicity improve, but it may lead to the loss of some SFG (Usevičiūtė and Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė 2020; Ahmad et al. 2021; Song et al. 2022). Considering the yield and physicochemical properties of biochar (e.g., SSA, pore structure, and SFG), as well as cost and operating conditions, pyrolysis seems to be the most commonly used preparation method (Rangabhashiyam and Balasubramanian 2019).
3.2 Activation/Modification
To optimize the physicochemical properties of biochar to improve its removal capacity for air pollutants, it is necessary to modify biochar in a targeted manner. The commonly used modification methods include physical activation and chemical modification (Fig. 3).
Physical activation can increase the SSA, improve pore structure, and change the SFG and polarity of biochar (Wang et al. 2017; Rangabhashiyam and Balasubramanian 2019). Various processes may be used, such as gas and plasma activation, as well as ball milling (Bae and Su 2013; Sajjadi et al. 2019). Gas (steam, O2, and CO2) activation introduces oxygen-containing functional groups (Feng et al. 2017) and produces a large number of pores, especially CO2 activation mainly produces micropores. But it may decrease the polarity and aromaticity of biochar (Bae and Su 2013; Sajjadi et al. 2019; Singh et al. 2019). Gas activation has cost advantages but also some shortcomings, such as difficulty in regulating the activation temperature and insufficient activation (Wang et al. 2017). The two-step activation was used to explore the effect on the physicochemical properties of biochar. The results showed that the one-step method was conducive to the formation of SFG and chemical adsorption sites, and the two-step method was conducive to improving the pore structure of biochar (especially the formation of micropores) and promoting its aromatization (Feng et al. 2021a). On the other hand, plasma activation increases energy density and distribution, as well as enhances activation efficiency (Karim et al. 2017; Niu et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2018b). In a plasma environment, gas is ionized and recombined on the material surface, generating new chemical bonds (Zhang et al. 2020b), and causing little damage to the surface texture of the adsorbent. Moreover, plasma activation is simpler to perform than chemical impregnation, reducing cost and time, and avoiding secondary pollution (Xu et al. 2018b). Different types of gases can be used in accordance with the requirement for increasing the numbers of specific SFG (Sajjadi et al. 2019), for example, the following gases were used in Hg0 removal: O2 (Luo et al. 2017), H2O (Zhang et al. 2019b), HCl (Luo et al. 2019), Cl2 (Wang et al. 2018b), and H2S (Zhang et al. 2019b). Ball milling is also a good activation method capable of reducing particle size and increasing SSA (Wang et al. 2017). The ball-milled biochar can then be chemically modified to open the pore structure and supplement the SFG (Shen and Zhang 2019; Lyu et al. 2020).
Chemical modification, using acid, alkali, metal, or metal oxide, is also widely practiced (Wang and Wang 2019). The process promotes the formation of micropores and improves the pollutant removal performance of biochar (Song et al. 2017a). Besides increasing the numbers of acidic or basic groups on the biochar surface, acid or alkali modification changes the SSA and pore structure (Rajapaksha et al. 2016; Wang and Wang 2019). For example, KOH modification of wood chips biochar led to a ten-fold increase in SSA (Dissanayake et al. 2020a). Metal or metal oxide modification can also increase the numbers of active sites on the surface of biochar, thereby enhancing its catalytic activity (Wang and Wang 2019). However, the chemical modification does not always have a positive outcome. Al-Wabel et al. (2019), for example, found that the maximum capacity of Conocarpus biochar for removing CO2 decreased from 197 to 9.17 mg/g after modification with K2CO3. This finding may be ascribed to pore blocking and the resultant decrease in SSA. It is therefore advisable to control modifier dosage and duration of treatment.
Physical activation usually represents low cost and simple operation, while chemical modification usually improves pore structure, increases the SSA and SFG content of biochar significantly, and is more targeted for the removal capacity, which comes with cost and additional treatment to eliminate excess chemicals (Plaza et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2016b). In brief, the relationship between cost and performance needed to be balanced when choosing the modification methods.
4 Removal performance and mechanisms of air pollutants
4.1 SO2
SO2 is involved in the formation of sulfuric acid smoke and acid rain. By decreasing the pH of soil and water, acid rain is deleterious to animal and plant growth (Iberahim et al. 2018). SO2 mainly comes from the oxidation of organic matter, volcanic eruptions, as well as the combustion of sulfur-containing biomass and fossil fuels (Roy and Sardar 2015). The removal of SO2 to biochar has attracted a great deal of attention. Table S1 shows the content and types of SFG of biochar used to remove SO2, and Table S2 shows the physicochemical properties of biochar and its removal capacity for SO2.
The capacity of biochar for removing SO2 can be greatly increased by modification. Iberahim et al. (2019), for example, reported that the optimum capacity of palm oil sludge biochar for SO2 removal increased from 9.75 to 16.65 mg/g after activation with CO2. They suggested that the mechanism was mainly physical adsorption. Earlier, Xu et al. (2016b) measured a removal capacity of 8–16 mg/g for unmodified biochar prepared from dairy manure, sewage sludge, and rice husk. The removal performance of biochars was related to the presence of K, Ca, Fe, and other mineral species, capable of promoting the conversion of SO2 to sulfite and sulfate. Subsequently, biochar prepared from forest wood residues removed up to 77 mg/g of SO2 after modification with KOH, CO2, or steam which enhanced the concentration of SFG (C–OH, C=O, O–C–O, and O=C–O), and the removal capacity was related to the ability to oxidize SO2 to SO3 (Braghiroli et al. 2019).
The capacity of biochar for removing SO2 can also be enhanced by nitrogen doping (Sun et al. 2016). Nitrogen-containing functional groups can enhance physical adsorption (van der Waals and electrostatic interactions) (Sun et al. 2016; Qu et al. 2018) as well as chemical oxidation of SO2 (Shao et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2020c). For corncob biochar modified with CO2 and methyl-diethanolamine, Shao et al. (2018) found that pore structure played a crucial role in physical adsorption, while nitrogen-containing functional groups (C–N and N–H) were involved in chemical oxidation. The best removal capacity reached 156 mg/g. Subsequent XPS analysis by Zhang et al. (2020c) indicated that the adsorbed SO2 was converted through the following sequence: SO2 → SO3 → SO42–.
In short, the removal of SO2 by biochar is effected through a combination of oxidation and physical adsorption (electrostatic and van der Waals interactions) (Fig. 4), and its dominant mechanism depends on the SSA, SFG, and pore structure of biochar (Fig. 5).
4.2 H2S, COS, and CS2
H2S is mainly generated during biogas production, fossil fuel combustion, and landfill (Peluso et al. 2018; Li et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019). H2S is highly toxic, which may corrode equipment and deactivate industrial catalysts, and has adverse effects on human health (Shang et al. 2016b; Zhang et al. 2017a). The use of biochar as an adsorbent of H2S has been widely reported. Table S2 gives a summary of the removal data.
COS and CS2 are toxic and harmful air pollutants generated during the production and transportation of fossil fuel and calcium carbide (Sun et al. 2014; Song et al. 2017b). Besides polluting the environment, these gases can poison the catalyst used in the industrial production (Sun et al. 2014). COS and CS2 are commonly removed by adsorption (Xie et al. 2011) and catalysis (Zhou et al. 2020). Since the latter process gives rise to H2S, there is a need to develop a biochar-based adsorbent capable of removing the three gases simultaneously (Song et al. 2017b).
Raw or physically activated biochars have been used to remove H2S. For sludge biochar activated by CO2, Papurello et al. (2020) reported that pyrolysis temperature, residence time, and filter bed height effected removal capacity. They suggested catalytic oxidation and sulfur deposition as the underlying mechanisms. In the case of Enteromorpha and Sargassum biochar, Han et al. (2020) postulated that functional groups (C=O, C–O, and –COO) were involved in removing H2S through acid–base neutralization and oxidation. Earlier, Shang et al. (2013) reported that H2S removal by biochar followed pseudo-first-order kinetic model, involving a combination of physical and chemical removal.
Shang et al. (2016b) used rice hull biochar, prepared by pyrolysis at 500 °C to remove H2S, reporting a maximum removal capacity of 382.70 mg/g. Subsequently, Ayiania et al. (2019) used biochar which was prepared from anaerobically digested dairy fibre to remove H2S from biogas. Removal capacity was influenced by ash content, SSA, porosity, alkalinity, nitrogen content, SFG, and mineral elements (Ca, Al, Fe, and Mg). H2S was apparently adsorbed into micropores and catalytically oxidized to sulfur and sulfate by mineral elements and nitrogen-containing functional groups. Similar findings have been reported on the removal of H2S from biogas and syngas (Hervy et al. 2018; Pelaez-Samaniego et al. 2018; Sahota et al. 2018). A mixture of woodchips and anaerobic digester residue was used to prepare biochar, which was then used as a filler to remove H2S from biogas in a continuously stirred tank reactor. Relatively high pH (7.98) and humidity (80–85%) improved the removal capacity of H2S, reaching a maximum removal capacity of 273.2 mg/g. FTIR analysis indicated that carboxyl and hydroxyl radicals were the main functional groups involved (Kanjanarong et al. 2017), and this was similar to the early research results (Shang et al. 2012). Besides that, S0 was formed in the oxygen-poor pores, while SO42– was mainly associated with biochar surface sites. S0 may be further oxidized to SO42– in an oxygen-rich environment (Xu et al. 2014; Kanjanarong et al. 2017), but this requires more in-depth research.
The removal of H2S can be enhanced by increasing the surface alkalinity of biochar through alkaline metal modification. When corn stover and maple biochars were modified with FeCl3, their H2S removal capacities increased by 22 and 1.23 times, respectively, with the modified maple biochar showing an optimum removal capacity of 269 mg/g. This observation might be ascribed to the addition of positive charge, the increase in SSA, and the enhancement of catalytic oxidation (Choudhury and Lansing 2020). The effect of nitrogen-doping on H2S removal was assessed by measuring the removal of waste gases from urban landfills to biochar. A maximum removal capacity of 332 mg/g was measured for the modified biochar due to an increase in SSA and SFG coupled with microbial proliferation, as well as the synergistic effect of removal and biodegradation (Qin et al. 2020). Sun et al. (2017) prepared biochar by pyrolysis of potato peel waste in a fluidized bed reactor at 8000 L/min kg and 500 °C for 5 min. In addition to significantly reducing pyrolysis time and carbon loss, H2S was adsorbed into the biochar pores and reacted with SFG.
Besides being a good adsorbent, biochar can also be used as a carrier to catalyze the hydrolysis of COS and CS2. Sun et al. (2018) removed COS, CS2, and H2S simultaneously using a tobacco stem biochar that had been modified with CuO and Fe2O3, giving a maximum sulfur removal capacity of 231.28 mgS/g. They proposed that COS and CS2 were catalytically converted to H2S, which was then oxidized to sulfur and sulfate. Song et al. (2017b) further suggested that the C–OH promoted the removal and hydrolysis of COS and CS2, while C=O and –COOH promoted the oxidation of H2S. Similarly, Song et al. (2017a) investigated the catalytic hydrolysis of CS2 and COS by walnut shell biochar after modification with four alkaline agents, reporting that hydrolysis efficiency decreased in the order: KOH > NaOH > KHCO3 > NaHCO3. They suggested that KOH and NaOH reacted with biochar carbon, generating micropores while KHCO3 and NaHCO3 decomposed to CO2, increasing the total pore volume (TPV) of biochar.
The H2S removal by biochar is controlled by both physical and chemical removal (Fig. 4 and Fig. S1). The principal underlying mechanism is the conversion of H2S into sulfur and sulfate through catalytic oxidation of SFG. The removal process is influenced by the physicochemical characteristics of biochar (SSA, micropore, and SFG) and removal conditions (humidity and oxygen) (Xu et al. 2014; Kanjanarong et al. 2017; Ayiania et al. 2019).
4.3 CO2
The rising concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere as a result of fossil fuel burning and land-use change is a key driver of global warming and climate change (Tate and Theng 2014; Tiwari et al. 2017). Therefore, the development of technologies for CO2 capture and storage has become necessary (Huang et al. 2015; Chatterjee et al. 2018; Hussin and Aroua 2020).
Biochar for CO2 removal has been synthesized using common feedstocks, such as agricultural or wood residues (Zhang et al. 2014b, 2016; Huang et al. 2015; Shahkarami et al. 2015; Creamer et al. 2016; Madzaki et al. 2016), and daily wastes (Ello et al. 2013; Lahijani et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2018). Pristine biochar has a low CO2 removal capacity, and hence needs to be modified. The modifying agents include metal salts (Creamer et al. 2016; Lahijani et al. 2018), gases (Shahkarami et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2016), acids (Karimi et al. 2020), and alkalis (Li et al. 2016b; Ismail et al. 2020). The research on the CO2 removal data by different biochars has been summarized (Jung et al. 2019; Kua et al. 2019; Singh et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019d; Dissanayake et al. 2020b).
The capacity of carbon materials for removing CO2 may be enhanced by alkali treatment (Chiang and Juang 2017; Ahmed et al. 2020). For example, Igalavithana et al. (2020) reported that the capacity of food waste/wood biochar for removing CO2 increased from 114 to 141 mg/g after modification with KOH. The removal isotherm was of the Freundlich type, indicative of physical and chemical processes. In the study of CO2 removal using coconut shell biochar, Du et al. (2019) found similar mechanisms.
The incorporation of metals or metal hydr(oxides) into biochar can also enhance its capacity for removing CO2. Xu et al. (2020) found that incorporation of iron oxyhydroxide into ball-milled hickory chip biochar increased CO2 removal and formation of carbonate and bicarbonate. When walnut shell biochar was impregnated with various metals, its CO2 removal capacity was enhanced in the order: Mg > Al > Fe > Ni > Ca > Na with the Mg-loaded sample showing a capacity of 80 mg/g. Kinetic analysis indicated that physical adsorption was the main mechanism, while the MgO formed reacted with adsorbed CO2 to yield carbonate (Lahijani et al. 2018). More recently, Zubbri et al. (2020) used rambutan peel biochar, modified with different magnesium salts, as adsorbents of CO2. A maximum removal capacity of 76.80 mg/g was measured and physical adsorption was suggested as the dominant mechanism.
When biochar is modified with amino compounds, its CO2 removal capacity is enhanced through the addition of nitrogen-containing functional groups. At the same time, the surface polarity, microporosity, and alkalinity of the biochar increase (Chiang and Juang 2017; Yaumi et al. 2017; Hu et al. 2020). Xu et al. (2019b) reported that the CO2 removal capacity of bagasse biochar, modified by ammonium hydroxide, was nearly 130% higher than that of the unmodified material. This finding was ascribed to the increased content of C≡N and –NH2 groups, and the enhancement of SSA. Bamdad et al. (2018a) prepared biochar with sawmill residues and modified it by nitration and aminopropyl triethoxysilane. The modified biochar had a nitrogen content of 0.24 wt% and a CO2 removal capacity of 162.8 mg/g. Similarly, Liu and Huang (2018) ascribed the high removal capacity of coffee grounds biochar, modified with KOH-treated melamine, to the increase in microporosity, and the formation of more nitrogen-containing (mainly pyrrole nitrogen) active sites.
It is generally accepted that the microporosity, SSA, and pore structure (Figs. 5 and 6) of biochar are the dominant factors affecting CO2 capture and removal through van der Waals force, electrostatic interactions, and pore-filling (Fig. 4) (Huang et al. 2015; Bamdad et al. 2018b; Wu et al. 2018; Du et al. 2019). Even so, chemical removal through covalent bonding may occur (Ahmed et al. 2020), especially for biochar that has been modified with alkali metals, and acid–base neutralization reactions occur to produce carbonate and bicarbonate (Al-Wabel et al. 2019).
a Relationship between SSA (600 °C) of biochar and its capacity for removing various air pollutants; b relationship between micropore volume of biochar and its capacity for removing CO2 and Hg0. Data from Zhang et al. 2014b, 2015b, 2016, 2017c, 2020d; Shang et al. 2016a, 2016b; Wang et al. 2018b, 2018c
4.4 Hg0
Hg0 is released into the environment through volcanic eruption, rock weathering, and other natural phenomena. It is also emitted through coal combustion and incineration of mercury-containing waste (Johari et al. 2016). Because Hg0 tends to accumulate in the biosphere and is very toxic to humans, its emission needs to be controlled (Shi et al. 2020).
Biochar has great potential for removing Hg0. Unmodified biochars can remove a small amount of Hg0 through physical adsorption (Zhang et al. 2019a). On the other hand, biochars that have been modified with metal oxides and halides are good adsorbents of Hg0, capable of oxidizing Hg0 to Hg2+ (Yang et al. 2018b). Table S2 shows the physicochemical properties of biochar and its removal capacity for Hg0, and Table S3 shows the changes in SFG of biochar before and after the removal of Hg0.
Metal oxide-modified biochar can remove Hg0 through catalytic oxidation and charge transfer (redox) reactions in which metal oxides and ions, lattice oxygen, and chemisorbed oxygen play an active role (Xu et al. 2018b, 2019c; Yi et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2019). For example, pinecone biochar impregnated with Cu–Mn oxide can promote electron transfer between Mn4+ and Mn3+, and between Cu+ and Cu2+ in which adsorbed Hg0 is oxidized to HgO by lattice oxygen, chemically adsorbed oxygen, and oxygen in the flue gas (Yi et al. 2018). Similar mechanisms were reported by other scholars (Yang et al. 2017b; Shan et al. 2019). Zhao et al. (2019) used walnut shell biochar that has been modified with FeCl3 alone, or in combination with CuSO4 and KMnO4, to remove Hg0 through physical adsorption and chemical oxidation, involving C=O, –COOH, metal oxides, metal ions, lattice oxygen, chemically adsorbed oxygen, and Cl– as well as the synergistic effect between Fe2O3 and CuO or CuFe2O4. The proposed mechanism needs to be checked as with other synergistic effects involving MnO2 and CeO2 (Yang et al. 2017b), CuOx and CeO2 (Xu et al. 2018a), and MnO2 and Fe2O3 (Jia et al. 2018). More recently, Shi et al. (2020) prepared biochar by co-pyrolysis of rice straw and CaCO3, the ‘hierarchical’ biochar was not only more effective than the conventional one but also showed a better anti-interference ability against SO2 and H2O. To solve the problem of adsorbent separation and recovery, Xu et al. (2019c) synthesized magnetic biochar by one-step pyrolysis of Fe(NO3)3, loaded wood, and polyvinyl chloride. Besides having good magnetic properties, the product had a large SSA and contained more C=O groups.
Halide modification can generate covalent-bonded halide on the biochar surface which can function as active sites in the oxidation of adsorbed Hg0. The underlying mechanism is the conversion of adsorbed Hg0 to HgX, which is then oxidized to HgX2, where X denotes Cl, Br, or I (Xu et al. 2018b). Using Sargassum biochar, modified with NH4Br, Yang et al. (2018d) showed the existence of C–Br, C=O, and Hg2+. In the meantime, Xu et al. (2019a) investigated the removal of Hg0 by Enteromorpha biochar modified with NH4Cl and NH4Br. The NH4Br-modified biochar was a better adsorbent of Hg0 than that modified with NH4Cl. The performance of halide-modifying agents with respect to Hg0 removal decreases in the sequence: I > Br > Cl, presumably because the formation and content of carbon–halogen groups are influenced by the size and reducibility of the respective halide ion (Li et al. 2016a, 2017a; Liu et al. 2018b; Xu et al. 2018b; Yang et al. 2018c). Earlier, Shen et al. (2015) used HCl, ZnCl2, and NH4Cl to modify medicinal residue biochar. The NH4Cl-modified biochar was a better adsorbent of Hg0 than its ZnCl2− and HCl-modified counterparts. They suggested that the smaller particle size of NH4Cl and the presence of N–H groups were conducive to Hg0 removal.
The effect of plasma modification and microwave-assisted modification on the capacity of biochar to remove Hg0 has also been investigated. Using H2S plasma-modified wheat straw biochar, Zhang et al. (2019b) found that removal efficiency was greatly enhanced at 30 °C when the removal process followed both pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics. At 150 °C, neither model could accurately describe the removal process due to the decrease in physical and chemical removal, and the onset of partial oxidation in the gas phase. The results indicated that C–S and carboxyl groups were the main SFG involved in the oxidation of Hg0 to HgS and HgO. Experiments using Cl2 plasma modification gave similar results. The number of active sites and functional groups on the surface of biochar was affected by discharge time, voltage, gas flow rate, and chlorine concentration. Besides that, the removal process conformed to pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Elovich kinetic models, indicating that the removal process was affected by both physical and chemical removal (Zhang et al. 2019a).
To assess the similarities and differences between gas- and plasma-modified biochar to remove Hg0, Luo et al. (2019) prepared sorghum straw biochar modified with HCl gas and HCl plasma. Both types of biochar were able to oxidize Hg0 to Hg+, but the removal capacity of the HCl plasma-modified material was four times that of the HCl gas-modified sample. Shan et al. (2019) used microwave activation and Mn–Fe oxides to modify cotton straw biochar which was then treated with ultrasound. Microwave activation promoted pore structure development and increased SSA, while ultrasonic treatment caused the active ingredients of Mn and Fe to disperse, yielding biochar with an optimal removal capacity of 531 μg/g.
In brief, catalysis and oxidation play an important role in the Hg0 removal by biochar (Fig. 4 and Fig. S2). Biochar can be modified by various means, giving rise to a variety of active sites on its surface, such as SFG, lattice oxygen, chemically adsorbed oxygen, halide ions, and metal ions, and yielding different end products (Jia et al. 2018).
4.5 VOCs
VOCs may be divided into eight categories: alkanes, aromatic hydrocarbons, alkenes, halogenated hydrocarbons, esters, aldehydes, ketones, and others. Most anthropogenic VOCs are generated during the use of fossil fuels. VOCs are important precursors in the formation of fine particulate matter, ozone, and other secondary pollutants. These substances, in turn, can cause atmospheric pollution by forming smog and photochemical smog (Ojala et al. 2011).
The removal by biochar of acetone, cyclohexane, and toluene, representing polar, non-polar, and weakly polar VOCs, respectively, has been the subject of many investigations. The physicochemical properties of biochar and its removal capacity for VOCs are shown in Table S2. For example, Zhang et al. (2019c) prepared hickory wood and peanut hull biochar to remove acetone and cyclohexane. After H3PO4 modification, the SSA of the two biochars increased by 155 and 180 times, respectively, and the hickory wood biochar had the largest capacity for removing acetone (147.77 mg/g) and cyclohexane (159.66 mg/g). Modification of hickory wood and peanut shell biochar with CO2 was also conducive to acetone and cyclohexane removal because of the accompanying increase in the SSA of the treated materials. Kinetic analysis indicated that physical adsorption played a dominant role in the VOCs removal (Zhang et al. 2020d). Using a factory-produced biochar to remove acetone, Lamplugh et al. (2020) noted that removal capacity was influenced by the SSA and average pore size of biochar, as well as the flow conditions of acetone. Kumar et al. (2020) used non-activated neem, sugarcane, and bamboo biochars to remove six different VOCs. The removal capacity was dependent on pyrolysis temperature, feedstocks, and contact time. The process followed pseudo-second-order kinetic model, suggesting that it was more consistent with chemical removal. Yang et al. (2020) used H3PO4 and K2CO3 to jointly modify waste bovine bone biochar and found that the co-modification formed a hierarchical pore structure, and greatly increased the SSA and TPV.
Regarding the removal mechanisms (Fig. 4), it is reported that physical adsorption is the main mechanism of VOCs removal on biochar, while some studies suggest that polar VOCs (acetone, ethanol, and chloroform) are physically adsorbed to the biochar surface, while non-polar and weakly polar VOCs (cyclohexane and toluene) are removed by surface adsorption and partitioning (Zhang et al. 2017c; Xiang et al. 2020). Other studies show that π–π interaction is an important biochar removal mechanism for VOCs as well, especially the removal of benzene VOCs (Sun et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020d; Feng et al. 2021b). Due to the variety and different properties of VOCs, the removal mechanisms of VOCs onto biochar still needs further research.
4.6 NH3
NH3 is a highly reactive and corrosive gas, which can damage human respiratory system. It is easy to cause serious harm when exposed to high concentration NH3 environment for a long time (Vikrant et al. 2017). NH3 may also be transferred to land or water through sedimentation, aggravating eutrophication (Ramlogan et al. 2020). Thus, reducing the concentration of NH3 in the environment is conducive to human health and environmental quality. Table S2 shows the removal capacity of NH3 on biochar.
The molecular particle size of NH3 is about 0.3 nm, and the adsorbent with a large pore size has a weak retention effect on it (Han et al. 2021). Therefore, reducing the pore size of the adsorbent and increasing the proportion of biochar micropores are conducive to improving its removal capacity. However, studies have pointed out that, the content of acidic functional groups (such as –SO3H, –COOH, and –OH) rather than the pore structure of the adsorbent plays a leading role in the removal process (Jasuja et al. 2015; Mochizuki et al. 2016; Han et al. 2021). For example, functional corn straw biochar was prepared through two-step activation to remove CO2 and NH3. Although the removal process mainly occurred in micropores with a pore size less than 7 nm, the contribution of nitrogen and oxygen-containing functional groups to the removal process was higher than that of pore structure (Feng et al. 2021a). In another study, biochar was alternately exposed to CO2 and NH3 for 1 h, and then used to remove NH3. After three consecutive exposures to CO2 and NH3 environment, the NH3 removal capacity of wood chip biochar (40.57 mg/g) was 1.5 times higher than that of only one exposure. The adsorbed CO2 by maple wood chip biochar produced carboxyl and ketone groups, which increased the adsorption affinity of biochar for NH3 (Krounbi et al. 2020). This is because NH3 is alkaline. Most adsorbents lack surface acidity and can only remove NH3 through hydrogen bond, electrostatic attraction, or Lewis’s base interaction, which leads to a weak removal capacity of adsorbents for NH3 (Nijem et al. 2015; Ramlogan et al. 2020; Han et al. 2021). Thus, increasing the content of acidic functional groups on adsorbents can improve the adsorption affinity for NH3 (Lee et al. 2017; Moribe et al. 2019; Han et al. 2021). However, it is also necessary to control the content of large volume groups, which can block the pores of the adsorbent and lead to the decline of NH3 removal capacity (Jasuja et al. 2015).
In short, increasing the numbers of acidic functional groups on biochar can promote the removal of NH3, and the content of nitrogen and oxygen-containing functional groups plays a key role in the removal process (Fig. 4). Higher micropore rate can promote the pore filling effect of NH3. At present, the research on NH3 mainly focuses on the study of ammonium in aqueous phase. Other materials such as zeolite and MOFs are usually used to remove NH3 or reduce the release of NH3 in soil or compost (Jasuja et al. 2015; Vikrant et al. 2017; Ahmad et al. 2021; Tratzi et al. 2022). There are few studies on the removal of NH3 by biochar. Thus, the removal of NH3 by biochar deserves further study.
4.7 Characteristics and mechanisms of air pollutant removal
Although the properties of air pollutants are quite different, as well as the removal performance of biochar for them, there are still some commonalities in air pollutant removal (Fig. 4). For example, physical adsorption and pore-filling are the basic removal mechanisms for air pollutants, which are mainly due to the electrostatic attraction and van der Waals force brought by large SSA. In addition, a good pore structure, especially a micropore, is the main active site for the removal of air pollutants on biochar. Therefore, it is necessary to find suitable feedstocks and preparation or modification methods to improve the SSA and micropore rate of biochar, which is particularly important for the simultaneous removal of a variety of air pollutants. SFG contributes to the chemical removal of air pollutants on biochar, so the corresponding SFG can be loaded according to the acidity and alkalinity of air pollutants. For instance, basic functional groups are conducive to the removal of acid gases such as SO2, H2S, and CO2 (Sun et al. 2016; Hu et al. 2020; Qin et al. 2020), so the biochar can be loaded with –NH2. On the contrary, acid functional groups are conducive to the removal of alkaline gases such as NH3 (Han et al. 2021), thus, the –SO3H, –COOH, and –OH are good choices. Catalysis mainly occurs in the removal of H2S and Hg0, which is mainly due to the modification of metals, in which H2S can be converted into sulfuric acid and sulfate, and Hg0 can be converted into Hg2+ (Yang et al. 2017b; Choudhury and Lansing 2020). Therefore, the use of metal salts or metal oxides as modifiers can increase the numbers of catalytic active sites on the surface of biochar. π–π interaction is an important removal mechanism for VOCs on biochar, especially the removal of benzene VOCs (Sun et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020d; Feng et al. 2021b). In addition, the partitioning of VOCs by noncarbonized substances in biochar was also reported (Zhang et al. 2017c). However, few studies have investigated the contribution of different mechanisms to the removal of air pollutants by biochar, this is worthy of further exploration.
5 Factors influencing the removal of air pollutants
5.1 Preparation parameters of biochar
The capacity of biochar for removing air pollutants is closely related to its physicochemical properties, such as SSA, pore structure, SFG, and mineral composition (Fig. 5). These properties, in turn, are related to feedstocks, preparation, and modification conditions.
5.1.1 Feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions
Feedstocks can affect the removal performance and mechanisms of pollutants by affecting the physicochemical properties of biochar. The commonly used feedstocks mainly include plants, animals, and sludge (Song et al. 2022). Previous studies have shown that biochar derived from plant often has larger SSA and better pore structure than other feedstocks, which is mainly due to the volatilization of lignin and cellulose contained in plants (Dissanayake et al. 2020b). The porosity of biochar prepared from sludge is usually the lowest, which is due to its high ash content blocking the pores (Zielińska et al. 2015). In addition, the pore size distribution of biochar prepared from different types of feedstocks is also different. For example, plant and sludge biochars have more micropores and mesopores, while animal-derived biochar is mainly mesoporous (Song et al. 2022). Different lignin and cellulose contents in plants also affect the pore structure of biochar made from them. It is reported that the pore size of biochar prepared from feedstocks rich in lignin is often large, while that of biochar prepared from feedstocks with high cellulose content is often the opposite (Li et al. 2017b). Other studies have shown that the SSA of biochar prepared from cellulose-rich feedstocks at high temperatures is much higher than that prepared from lignin-rich ones (Meng et al. 2020).
The source and content of SFG on biochar depend on the pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type. With the increase of pyrolysis temperature, the content of SFG on biochar usually decreases (Creamer and Gao 2016; Xu et al. 2018c). This is due to the decomposition of some SFG caused by high temperatures. In terms of feedstock types, cellulose in plants can be transformed into oxygen-containing functional groups such as carboxyl or ester during pyrolysis (Poo et al. 2018). Therefore, at the same pyrolysis temperature, there are more kinds of SFG on biochar from plants (Song et al. 2022), while animal feedstocks usually contain a higher content of nitrogen, which brings more nitrogen-containing functional groups to the prepared biochar (Leng et al. 2020; Wan et al. 2020). Thus, the corresponding feedstocks should be selected according to the needs of pollutant removal.
As mentioned above, pyrolysis is the most commonly used method for preparing biochar. The pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time selected for the production of biochar have a significant impact on the physical, chemical, morphological, and other characteristics of the product, including pH, surface charge, elemental composition, ash content, volatile and fixed carbon content, SSA, thermal stability, pore structure, and SFG (Yuan et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2014; Kanjanarong et al. 2017; Singh et al. 2019). An increase in carbonization temperature increases the alkaline substances, basic functional groups, ash, fixed carbon, pH, biochar stability, SSA, and microporosity of biochar. At the same time, biochar yield, acidic and organic functional groups, H/C and O/C molar ratios, and volatile substances decrease (Al-Wabel et al. 2013; Yuan et al. 2013; Ahmed et al. 2016; Cha et al. 2016; Johari et al. 2016; Lian and Xing 2017).
The heating rate may also affect the properties and composition of biochar (Tripathi et al. 2016). A low heating rate (1–10 °C/min) is favorable to pore formation by increasing the SSA, microporosity, and TPV of biochar (Angin 2013; Chen et al. 2016; Creamer and Gao 2016; Tripathi et al. 2016). A high heating rate (10–50 °C/min) tends to produce macropores, it can even lead to pore thinning and breakage as well as to inter- and intra-particle accumulation of volatiles (Angin 2013; Chen et al. 2016; Creamer and Gao 2016). In addition, a very high heating rate (> 100 °C/min) can lead to the crushing of biomass, reducing biochar yield (Tripathi et al. 2016). All in all, a low heating rate is preferable.
In terms of residence time, an extended one would favor feedstock reaction (Tripathi et al. 2016), and increase the SSA, TPV, and total organic carbon content of biochar (Yavari et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2018). However, the yield of biochar prepared at low temperatures may decrease with the extension of residence time. As the residence time increased from 1 to 5 min, the yield of Saccharina japonica biochar prepared at 380 °C decreased from 87 to 59% (Kim et al. 2012). Generally, the influence of residence time on the pyrolysis process is inseparable from that of biomass quality, pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and other parameters (Rangabhashiyam and Balasubramanian 2019).
5.1.2 Activation conditions
The removal capacity of biochar is affected by activator type and quantity, as well as by activation temperature and time. It is therefore important to use appropriate activation temperature and time in preparing biochar to optimize its removal capacity (Zhang et al. 2019d; Ding and Liu 2020). Low temperature and short activation time may lead to incomplete activation, while too high a temperature or long activation time may change the structure of biochar, cause SFG decomposition, or decrease biochar yield (Song et al. 2017a; Zhang et al. 2019d). Using palm oil sludge biochar activated with CO2, Iberahim et al. (2019) observed that its capacity for removing SO2 increased continuously with a rise in activation temperature from 300 to 600 °C, and then declined as the activation temperature was further increased. Similarly, the removal capacity of SO2 increased when the activation time increased from 30 to 60 min but then declined after 90 min. Thus, the various activation parameters need to be adjusted to conditions.
5.1.3 Other influencing factors
Although N2 is the carrier gas of choice for pyrolysis, CO2 has been used for this purpose. Indeed, biochar pyrolyzed under CO2 has a larger SSA, TPV, and microporosity than its counterpart prepared using N2 (Fan et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018a; Kim et al. 2019). Kim et al. (2019) found that the SSA and TPV of oak biochar, pyrolyzed under CO2 were twice as large as the values measured for the sample under N2. However, CO2 promoted the VOCs release from biomass during pyrolysis. Thus, the use of CO2 as carrier gas needs further research.
5.2 Characteristics of biochar
SSA, pore structure, SFG, and mineral composition are important factors influencing the capacity of biochar for removing air pollutants. The first two parameters play a part in the physical and chemical removal of air pollutants, while SFG and mineral constituents promote chemical conversions.
5.2.1 SSA
Figure 6a shows the relationship between the SSA of biochar and the removal capacity for several air pollutants. It can be found that SSA has a great impact on the removal of air pollutants by biochar. The larger the SSA, the greater the numbers of active sites capable of removing air pollutants (Zhang et al. 2017b). It was reported that, the capacity of rice hull biochar for removing H2S rose from 2.09 to 382.70 mg/g with an increase in SSA from 4.35 to 115.49 m2/g (Shang et al. 2016a). Similar results were reported for CO2 removal (Zhang et al. 2015b; Gargiulo et al. 2018).
We should mention, however, that the positive correlation of SSA with removal capacity does not always hold. Shang et al. (2016a), for example, measured an H2S removal capacity of 54.60 mg/g for camphor biochar with an SSA of 22.6 m2/g, while the SSA was 17.1 m2/g, the corresponding value was 109.3 mg/g. A similar relationship between removal capacity and biochar SSA was found in the removal of Hg0 (Xu et al. 2018c). These findings indicate that the removal of air pollutants by biochar is affected by factors other than SSA.
5.2.2 TPV and pore structure
TPV and pore structure also influence the capacity of biochar for taking up air pollutants. The larger the TPV, the greater the numbers of active adsorbing sites (Johari et al. 2016; Dissanayake et al. 2020b). Although some macromolecular VOCs may be adsorbed in the mesopores of biochar, mesopores and macropores mainly function as diffusion channels while micropores provide the active sites for physical adsorption and chemical conversions (Zhang et al. 2017b; Wang et al. 2018c; Saha and Kienbaum 2019; Feng et al. 2021a). Figure 6b shows a good correlation of the removal capacity for CO2 (R2 = 0.8920) and Hg0 (R2 = 0.5369) with micropore volume for various biochars. Braghiroli et al. (2019) suggested that the chemical oxidation of SO2 occurs in pores of less than 0.7 nm in diameter. On the other hand, CO2 is largely adsorbed in pores of less than 0.5 nm in diameter at low pressure, while at a pressure of 1 bar, adsorption is largely confined to pores that are smaller than 0.8 nm (Chiang and Juang 2017). Other research found that micropores (d < 0.7 nm) mainly provided active sites for the removal of CO2 and NH3 by biochar (Feng et al. 2021a). Different air pollutants have different molecular particle sizes, so it is necessary to match the adsorbent with corresponding pore size. Given the importance of pore structure for biochar to remove air pollutants, feedstocks rich in lignin could be selected before preparation because biochar prepared from that is generally considered to have a better pore structure (Li et al. 2014).
5.2.3 SFG
The function of SFG is to promote the removal of air pollutants (mainly chemical removal), and make the adsorbed gas molecules stabled in biochar, so it has attracted lots of attention (Fig. 5). The SFGs of biochar comprise oxygen-, nitrogen-, sulfur-, and halogen-containing functional groups (Zhang et al. 2017b; Igalavithana et al. 2020). The oxygen-containing functional groups include carboxyl, lactone, phenol, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ketone, pyrone, and chromene (Saha and Kienbaum 2019; Sajjadi et al. 2019; Dissanayake et al. 2020b). Ketone, pyrone, and chromene functional groups contribute to the surface basicity of biochar, promoting the removal of acidic air pollutants, while acidic functional groups such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, and carbonyl promote the removal of CO2 and phenol by enhancing hydrogen bonding between CO2 and adsorbent, and strengthening the electrostatic interaction between phenol and adsorbent (Chiang and Juang 2017; Saha and Kienbaum 2019; Dissanayake et al. 2020b; Feng et al. 2021b). Acidic functional groups can also promote the hydrophilic VOCs removal, the absence of them would facilitate the removal of hydrophobic VOCs (Li et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2017b). On the other hand, oxygen-containing groups promote the oxidation of adsorbed SO2, H2S, and Hg0 (Xu et al. 2016a; Fang et al. 2017; Song et al. 2017a; Yi et al. 2018). Nitrogen-containing groups are usually introduced by treating biochar with such agents as nitric acid, ammonia, urea, and amine (Chiang and Juang 2017; Dissanayake et al. 2020b; Feng et al. 2021a, b), common nitrogen-containing functional groups are pyridinic-N, pyrrolic-N, pyridinic-N-oxide, amine-N, etc. (Leng et al. 2020). Besides enhancing the physical adsorption of SO2, H2S, phenol, and CO2 through van der Waals, electrostatic, and dipole interactions (Sun et al. 2016; Sethupathi et al. 2017; Bamdad et al. 2018a; Qu et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019d; Feng et al. 2021b), nitrogen-containing functional groups enhance chemical adsorption through hydrogen bonding, acid–base neutralization, and covalent bonding (Chiang and Juang 2017; Shao et al. 2018; Ayiania et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019d; Dissanayake et al. 2020b). It was reported that, because of the acid-base effect, nitrogen-containing functional groups can promote the removal of CO2 more than oxygen-containing ones. Similarly, the existence of electrostatic repulsion and weak hydrogen bond interaction led to the greater effect of nitrogen-containing functional groups on NH3 removal (Feng et al. 2021a).
Modification of biochar with halogen compounds leads to the formation of surface carbon–halogen bonds promoting the oxidation of adsorbed Hg0 to Hg2+ (Xu et al. 2018c; Luo et al. 2019). Similarly, the basic C–S group on the surface of biochar can enhance acid–base interaction between biochar and CO2 (Igalavithana et al. 2020), as well as the chemical conversion of Hg0 (Zhang et al. 2019b).
5.2.4 Mineral constituents
Metal elements in feedstocks can be added to, or incorporated into biochar during the modification process (Wang and Wang 2019). Common metal elements are Na, Mg, K, Ca, P, Fe, and Al, while differences in type and content are related to the feedstocks (Skerman et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2017). By increasing the alkalinity of biochar, alkali metals can facilitate the removal of acidic air pollutants (Xu et al. 2017; Lahijani et al. 2018), and stabilize the adsorbed air pollutants by forming various metal salts. For example, mineral components can react with adsorbed SO2 and H2S to generate various sulfites and sulfates (Xu et al. 2014, 2016b; Hervy et al. 2018; Papurello et al. 2020), or react with adsorbed CO2 to form various carbonates and bicarbonates (Xu et al. 2016c; Al-Wabel et al. 2019). Xu et al. (2016b) found that the chemical conversion of SO2, promoted by the inherent mineral components of biochar from cow manure, sludge, and rice husk, accounted for 44–86% of the total amount of adsorbed SO2. The addition and incorporation of mineral elements and salts would stabilize the structure of biochar, an important feature in using biochar for soil remediation. By the same token, care should be taken in using biochar derived from feedstocks that contain heavy metals.
5.3 Removal conditions
5.3.1 Reaction temperature
The reaction temperature is an important factor affecting the removal of air pollutants by biochar. Low reaction temperatures tend to favor physical adsorption (Xu et al. 2016c), while high temperatures are conducive to chemical adsorption (Zhao et al. 2019). Excessively high temperatures, however, may destroy the pore structure and active sites of biochar (Zhao et al. 2019). They may also intensify the thermal motion of gas molecules, reducing their adhesion to the biochar surface. As a result, chemical adsorption is inhibited and adsorption capacity decreases (Yang et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2018c; Ding and Liu 2020). For example, Chatterjee et al. (2018) reported that the removal capacity of pine biochar for CO2 increased from 58.08 mg/g at 25 °C to 89.76 mg/g at 70 °C, and then decreased to 48.4 mg/g at 90 °C. The increase of removal capacity in the initial stage was related to the high activation energy required for chemical reactions, and the subsequent decrease was due to the decrease in physical adsorption. The reaction temperature for optimal removal varies with the type of air pollutants. The parameter is relatively high for H2S (Han et al. 2020), SO2 (Iberahim et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2020c), and Hg0 (Li et al. 2017a; Yi et al. 2018), but low for VOCs (Zhang et al. 2020d), CO2 (Chatterjee et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2018), and NH3 (Ramlogan et al. 2020).
The optimal reaction temperature for the removal of air pollutants by biochar is not only affected by the removal mechanisms, but also by the properties of gas molecules (e.g., molecular diameter). This is mainly reflected in the research on VOCs. It was reported that the removal capacity of biochar for acetone decreased as the temperature increased (Zhang et al. 2017c, 2020d), while for cyclohexane, it increased firstly and then decreased. It was attributed to the difference in molecular diameter between the two gases. Increasing the temperature was conducive to the diffusion of the larger-diameter gas molecules in the pores of the biochar, thereby promoting the increase in the removal capacity of cyclohexane (Zhang et al. 2020d).
5.3.2 Relative humidity
Relative humidity also influences the removal of air pollutants by biochar. Here again, its effect varies with air pollutant type. For SO2, H2S, NH3, and CO2, low relative humidity is conducive to the removal. In that instance, SO2 and H2S can react with O2 and H2O to form sulfite and sulfuric acid (Xu et al. 2014, 2016b), while CO2 can transform into bicarbonate and carbonate (Xu et al. 2016c). The presence of water molecules can dissociate the acidic groups on the surface of the adsorbent and protonate NH3, thus promoting the removal of NH3 (Khabzina and Farrusseng 2018). At high relative humidity, H2O and air pollutants compete for adsorption sites (Iberahim et al. 2019). A water film may also form on the surface of biochar impeding pollutant diffusion, and inhibiting the removal (Sun et al. 2018). For example, Iberahim et al. (2019) measured SO2 removal capacity of 16, 37, 29, and 23 mg/g by palm oil sludge biochar at a relative humidity of 0, 15, 30, and 60%, respectively. Similar findings have been reported for SO2 (Xu et al. 2016b; Zhang et al. 2020c), H2S (Sun et al. 2018; Han et al. 2020), NH3 (Seredych et al. 2016), and CO2 (Xu et al. 2016c).
However, relative humidity has a negative impact on Hg0 removal by biochar, which may be because Hg0 cannot react with H2O under normal conditions. At low relative humidity, Hg0 and water compete for adsorption sites, while at high relative humidity the removal of Hg0 is blocked by a water film (Xie et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2018a; Zhou et al. 2019). It was reported that, when the water content increased from 0 to 8%, the capacity for removing Hg0 by rice straw biochar decreased from 93 to 60% (Xu et al. 2018a). However, other studies reported that, because of the generation of OH radicals, low concentrations of H2O (1%) could oxidize Hg0 to HgO (Niu et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2017b). Therefore, the removal mechanisms of Hg0 under low relative humidity are worthy of further study.
5.3.3 Coexisting gases
The influence of O2, SO2, and NO on the removal of air pollutants by biochar is expressed through oxidation and competition. An example of the latter case is the inhibition of SO2 removal by O2. Zhang et al. (2020c) observed that the removal capacity of corncob biochar for SO2 decreased from 185 to 145 mg/g when the O2 content increased from 0 to 14%. This finding might be due to the oxidation of SFG by O2, resulting in a decrease in SFG content. On the other hand, O2 promotes the removal of Hg0 by biochar (Yang et al. 2018d). Xu et al. (2018a) found that when the O2 concentration increased from 0 to 15%, the efficiency of biochar in removing Hg0 increased from 46 to 95%. Several studies have shown that O2 can promote the oxidation of Hg0 to HgO by supplementing the surface and lattice oxygen of biochar (Zhao et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2018a; Yi et al. 2018).
In the case of H2S, the effect of O2 content can promote the removal at low concentrations but inhibit the removal at high concentrations. For the simultaneous removal of H2S, COS, and CS2 by tobacco stem biochar, when the O2 content was 0%, 0.5%, and 5%, respectively, Sun et al. (2018) measured a sulfur removal capacity of 231, 239, and 133 mgS/g, respectively. Similarly, Han et al. (2020) suggested that an appropriate O2 content be selected for the oxidation of H2S, and the hydrolysis of COS and CS2. A high O2 content would accelerate H2S oxidation, increase the production of sulfate and other substances, deactivate the added catalyst components, and decrease the removal performance (Sun et al. 2018). Likewise, Hervy et al. (2018) found that O2 favored the formation of acidic sulfur-rich substances, and hence reduced the capacity of food waste/coagulation–flocculation sludge biochar for removing H2S. These observations are not consistent with the finding by Iberahim et al. (2019) that the formation of sulfuric acid from H2S on the surface of biochar would promote the removal of air pollutants. Ding and Liu (2020) also found that the removal of CO2 by seaweed biochar was not affected by O2. This might be because the non-polar O2 is very stable at room temperature, and does not compete with CO2 for adsorption sites (Zhao et al. 2014).
Zhang et al. (2020c) investigated the effect of NO on the removal of SO2 by corncob biochar. A removal capacity of 162 mg/g was measured without NO. The values were 216 and 182 mg/g when the NO concentration was 500 and 1000 ppm, respectively. It would appear that at low concentrations NO reacted with SO2, while at high concentrations NO competed with SO2 for adsorption sites. Similarly, others found that low concentrations NO promoted Hg0 removal through the conversion of Hg0 to HgO or mercury nitrate (Li et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2018d). On the other hand, Ding and Liu (2020) found that NO does not affect the removal of CO2 by seaweed biochar, it may be because NO did not compete with CO2 for adsorption sites (Zhao et al. 2014).
The removal of CO2 and Hg0 by biochar is also affected by SO2. Li et al. (2015) reported that a low concentration of SO2 (100 ppm) significantly improved the removal of Hg0 by medicinal residue waste biochar, while high concentrations (700 and 1000 ppm) had an inhibitory effect. At low concentrations, SO2 is oxidized to SO3, and further converted to H2SO4, which then reacted with Hg0 and HgO to form mercury sulfate (Li et al. 2015; Shan et al. 2019). At high concentrations, SO2 consumes oxygen (Yang et al. 2018d) and competes with Hg0 for adsorption sites (Liu et al. 2012; Zhou et al. 2017). SO2 also forms sulfate on the surface of biochar, blocking the pores, covering the active sites, and reducing the SSA of biochar (He et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2020b). SO2 can also inhibit the removal of CO2 by biochar. When the concentration of SO2 increased from 0 to 1500 ppm, the CO2 removal capacity of Sargassum biochar decreased from 1.05 to 1.01 mmol/g, respectively, which was due to the competition between SO2 and CO2 for adsorption sites (Ding and Liu 2020).
Some studies explored the interference between other different gases. On the removal of H2S and CO2 by biochar, when H2S and CO2 coexisted, the removal capacity of biochar for H2S and CO2 was lower than that for H2S and CO2 alone. It was because the removal mechanisms of H2S and CO2 on biochar were similar, which could result in competitive adsorption (Sethupathi et al. 2017). Bhandari et al. (2014) explored the removal effect of NH3, H2S, and toluene by switchgrass biochar through a fixed bed experiment. The results showed that under separate removal, the breakthrough time of NH3, H2S, and toluene was 100, 70, and 80 min, respectively. While NH3 and H2S existed simultaneously, the removal rate of toluene by biochar increased to 86.7%, which indicated that the presence of NH3 and H2S could promote the removal of toluene. Qin et al. (2020) used sludge modified biochar to remove syngas containing VOCs, H2S, and NH3. The removal rate of VOCs, H2S, and NH3 was between 95 and 100%. Unfortunately, most researchers did not study the mutual interference in the removal of different gases by biochar. Since these gases may exist simultaneously in industrial production, it is worth further research to clarify the actual removal capacity of biochar under a variety of mixed gases.
In brief, coexisting gases are more reflected in the combined effects of oxidation and competition at different concentrations. Oxidation is the main reaction at low concentrations, while competitive adsorption occurs at high concentrations. The non-effect may be found in the removal gases with different properties. However, the research on the gases that may coexist in industrial production (NH3, HCl, NOx, CO, VOCs, Hg0, and H2S) is relatively less, which is worthy of further research.
6 Biochar regeneration
The regeneration or recycling of biochar after usage would save on production costs and open the way for the recovery of adsorbed air pollutants and the reuse of biochar. Heat treatment is the most commonly used method of recovering biochar containing adsorbed air pollutants (Table 1). For example, VOCs (toluene, ethanol, cyclohexane, chloroform, and acetone), physically adsorbed to hickory wood biochar, could be completely desorbed by heating at 60–115 °C with a removal efficiency of 80–90% being recorded after five cycles of adsorption–desorption (Xiang et al. 2020). Similarly, the wood residue biochar with adsorbed SO2 needed to be heated at 600 °C for 1 h for its regeneration. After four thermal regeneration cycles, the removal capacity fell to 78% as compared to the pristine biochar. However, a slight increase in SSA and micropore volume was observed (Braghiroli et al. 2019). Amine-modified wood chip biochar was also regenerated at ambient temperature to remove CO2. The CO2 removal capacity decreased by 8 and 20% after 5 and 10 times of desorption, respectively, which indicated that the modified biochar had a better regeneration performance (Bamdad et al. 2018a).
At present, there are few studies on regeneration, especially those involving chemical adsorption. It is speculated that this may be related to the large decrease in efficiency after regeneration, and the difficulty of recovering and reusing the matters generated in the chemical adsorption process. Although increasing the temperature within a certain temperature range is conducive to desorption, this approach can destroy the active sites and SFG on the surface of the biochar (Pi et al. 2017). Current practice is to combine low-temperature regeneration with high-temperature regeneration. Shan et al. (2019) firstly heated magnetic cotton straw biochar at 400 °C for 1 h under N2 atmosphere, and then regenerated it at 250 °C for 0.5 h under air atmosphere, to desorb Hg0 and supplement oxygen, respectively. After five cycles, the removal efficiency of Hg0 dropped to 78%, which showed a good regeneration performance. Iberahim et al. (2019) used heat treatment (200 and 400 °C) and water treatment (30 and 70 °C) to regenerate palm oil sludge biochar adsorbed with SO2, and found that after three cycles, heat treatment at 400 °C has the best regeneration efficiency (46.3%).
Based on the existing research, it is speculated that the regeneration may be related to the removal mechanisms and the properties of air pollutants. Physically adsorbed air pollutants are usually easier to desorb than chemically adsorbed species, which means that the desorption of physically adsorbed gas requires lower temperature and shorter time, as well as higher removal efficiency after regeneration, while chemically adsorbed ones are just the opposite. The reasons for those differences may be related to the properties of the gas (e.g., boiling point) and the binding energy between biochar and the gas (Zhang et al. 2020d; Gwenzi et al. 2021). Since the heat treatment of spent biochar is costly in terms of energy consumption, alternative cost-effective methods of regeneration need to be explored (Wang et al. 2020b).
At present, the regeneration process of biochar is usually carried out in a closed N2 environment (Braghiroli et al. 2019; Shan et al. 2019), which can prevent desorbed air pollutants from returning to the atmosphere. However, there is no similar research on how to deal with the desorbed air pollutants. To realize the closed-loop treatment of air pollutants, relevant research should be further supplemented.
7 Conclusions and future perspectives
Due to its low cost and potential removal capacity, the removal of air pollutants by biochar has received extensive attention in recent years. The present review systematically summarizes the preparation and modification methods, as well as the removal performance and mechanisms, influencing factors, and regeneration of biochar for six common air pollutants. The removal performance and mechanisms of (modified) biochar for air pollutants can be affected by many factors, such as feedstocks, preparation, and modification methods, properties of air pollutants, and removal conditions. Various mechanisms are involved during the removal process, including physical adsorption, pore filling, catalysis, and oxidation together with π–π interaction and partitioning of VOCs.
Biochar has a wide application prospect in the removal of air pollutants from industrial activities. Nevertheless, there are still some issues that need to be further studied. The following points merit further assessment and examination.
-
1.
Improving the removal capacity of biochar for specific air pollutants. The preparation and operation parameters of (modified) biochar should be further optimized based on specific requirements to achieve the best removal efficiency of air pollutants. There is also scope for exploring the dominant removal mechanisms and influencing factors, and combining adsorption with other approaches and methods, such as nanotechnology and zero-valent iron reduction technology.
-
2.
Reducing the cost of preparing and modifying biochar. Feedstocks and modifiers should be selected based on their availability, price, and requirement for fast processing. The temperature and time in the process of preparation, modification, and regeneration should be optimized to reduce energy consumption, and methods of collecting the generated bio-oil and syngas need to be developed.
-
3.
Regeneration and disposal of biochar. The actual application environment of biochar (single component or multi-component) determines its final disposal method. It is relatively easy to separate (desorb) sole pollutant and allow the spent biochar to be reused. On the other hand, it is problematic to regenerate biochar containing two or more air pollutants (or other pollutants, such as heavy metals, antibiotics, and other difficult-to-degrade pollutants), which limits the recovery and reuse of biochar. Efforts should be made to develop adsorbents with selective removal capacity for air pollutants, because this is beneficial to the recovery of useful components and reuse of biochar. For feedstocks containing heavy metals or toxic and hazardous substances, technologies for removing or passivating at the preparation stage should be further studied. For air pollutants that are difficult to recycle, more technologies should be studied to combine with biochar to eliminate pollutants, such as microbial degradation and photocatalytic oxidation technology. There is also a case for developing new methods of regenerating biochar to save on cost, energy, and ensure regeneration performance and stability of biochar. Regarding the disposal of waste biochar, there is a current study on using waste biochar that adsorbs H2S to supplement the sulfur fertilizer of the soil (Kanjanarong et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017a). Because of the risk of gas release during application, the final disposal of waste biochar used to remove air pollutants needs further research.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Abdulrasheed AA, Jalil AA, Triwahyono S, Zaini MAA, Gambo Y, Ibrahim M (2018) Surface modification of activated carbon for adsorption of SO2 and NOX: a review of existing and emerging technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:1067–1085
Ahmad Z, Mosa A, Zhan L, Gao B (2021) Biochar modulates mineral nitrogen dynamics in soil and terrestrial ecosystems: a critical review. Chemosphere 278:130378
Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo WS (2016) Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 84:76–86
Ahmed R, Liu GJ, Yousaf B, Abbas Q, Ullah H, Ali MU (2020) Recent advances in carbon-based renewable adsorbent for selective carbon dioxide capture and separation—a review. J Clean Prod 242:118409
Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, Nadeem M, Usman ARA (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol 131:374–379
Al-Wabel M, Elfaki J, Usman A, Hussain Q, Ok YS (2019) Performance of dry water- and porous carbon-based sorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Environ Res 174:69–79
Angin D (2013) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Bioresour Technol 128:593–597
Ayiania M, Carbajal-Gamarra FM, Garcia-Perez T, Frear C, Suliman W, Garcia-Perez M (2019) Production and characterization of H2S and PO43− carbonaceous adsorbents from anaerobic digested fibers. Biomass Bioenergy 120:339–349
Bae JS, Su S (2013) Macadamia nut shell-derived carbon composites for post combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 19:174–182
Bamdad H, Hawboldt K, MacQuarrie S (2018a) Nitrogen functionalized biochar as a renewable adsorbent for efficient CO2 removal. Energy Fuel 32:11742–11748
Bamdad H, Hawboldt K, MacQuarrie S (2018b) A review on common adsorbents for acid gases removal: focus on biochar. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1705–1720
Bhandari PN, Kumar A, Huhnke RL (2014) Simultaneous removal of toluene (Model Tar), NH3, and H2S, from biomass-generated producer gas using biochar-based and mixed-metal oxide catalysts. Energy Fuel 28:1918–1925
Braghiroli FL, Bouafif H, Koubaa A (2019) Enhanced SO2 adsorption and desorption on chemically and physically activated biochar made from wood residues. Ind Crop Prod 138:111456
Cha JS, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryu C, Jeon JK, Shin MC, Park YK (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15
Chatterjee R, Sajjadi B, Mattern DL, Chen WY, Zubatiuk T, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J, Egiebor NO, Hammer N (2018) Ultrasound cavitation intensified amine functionalization: a feasible strategy for enhancing CO2 capture capacity of biochar. Fuel 225:287–298
Chen T, Zhang YX, Wang HT, Lu WJ, Zhou ZY, Zhang YC, Ren LL (2014) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 164:47–54
Chen D, Li YJ, Cen KH, Luo M, Li HY, Lu B (2016) Pyrolysis polygeneration of poplar wood: effect of heating rate and pyrolysis temperature. Bioresour Technol 218:780–788
Chiang YC, Juang RS (2017) Surface modifications of carbonaceous materials for carbon dioxide adsorption: a review. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 71:214–234
Choudhury A, Lansing S (2020) Biochar addition with Fe impregnation to reduce H2S production from anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 306:123121
Creamer AE, Gao B (2016) Carbon-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 50:7276–7289
Creamer AE, Gao B, Wang SS (2016) Carbon dioxide capture using various metal oxyhydroxide-biochar composites. Chem Eng J 283:826–832
Das O, Sarmah AK (2015) The love–hate relationship of pyrolysis biochar and water: a perspective. Sci Total Environ 512–513:682–685
Ding S, Liu YX (2020) Adsorption of CO2 from flue gas by novel seaweed-based KOH-activated porous biochars. Fuel 260:116382
Dissanayake PD, Choi SW, Igalavithana AD, Yang X, Tsang DCW, Wang CH, Kua HW, Lee KB, Ok YS (2020a) Sustainable gasification biochar as a high efficiency adsorbent for CO2 capture: a facile method to designer biochar fabrication. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 124:109785
Dissanayake PD, You SM, Igalavithana AD, Xia YF, Bhatnagar A, Gupta S, Kua HW, Kim S, Kwon JH, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2020b) Biochar-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 119:109582
Du YR, Fan Z, Guo TX, Xu JP, Han ZH, Pan YF, Xiao HN, Sun YM, Yan QQ (2019) Characteristics of as-prepared biochar derived from catalytic pyrolysis within moderate-temperature ionic liquid for CO2 uptake. Can J Chem Eng 98:690–704
Ello AS, Souza LKCD, Trokourey A, Jaroniec M (2013) Coconut shell-based microporous carbons for CO2 capture. Microporous Mesopororous Mat 180:280–283
Fan BG, Jia L, Li B, Yao YX, Huo RP, Zhao R, Qiao XL, Jin Y (2018) Study on the effects of the pyrolysis atmosphere on the elemental mercury adsorption characteristics and mechanism of biomass char. Energy Fuel 32:6869–6878
Fang NJ, Guo JX, Shu S, Li JJ, Chu YH (2017) Influence of textures, oxygen-containing functional groups and metal species on SO2 and NO removal over Ce-Mn/NAC. Fuel 202:328–337
Fdez-Sanromán A, Pazos M, Rosales E, Sanromán MA (2020) Unravelling the environmental application of biochar as low-cost biosorbent: a review. Appl Sci 10:7810
Feng DD, Zhao YJ, Zhang Y, Zhang ZB, Zhang LY, Gao JM, Sun SZ (2017) Synergetic effects of biochar structure and AAEM species on reactivity of H2O-activated biochar from cyclone air gasification. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:16045–16053
Feng DD, Guo DW, Zhang Y, Sun SZ, Zhao YJ, Chang GZ, Guo QJ, Qin YK (2021a) Adsorption-enrichment characterization of CO2 and dynamic retention of free NH3 in functionalized biochar with H2O/NH3·H2O activation for promotion of new ammonia-based carbon capture. Chem Eng J 409:128193
Feng DD, Guo DW, Zhang Y, Sun SZ, Zhao YJ, Shang Q, Sun HL, Wu JQ, Tan HP (2021b) Functionalized construction of biochar with hierarchical pore structures and surface O-/N-containing groups for phenol adsorption. Chem Eng J 410:127707
Feng QW, Wang B, Chen M, Wu P, Lee XQ, Xing Y (2021c) Invasive plants as potential sustainable feedstocks for biochar production and multiple applications: a review. Resour Conserv Recyl 164:105204
Gargiulo V, Gomis-Berenguer A, Giudicianni P, Ania CO, Ragucci R, Alfe M (2018) Assessing the potential of biochars prepared by steam-assisted slow pyrolysis for CO2 adsorption and separation. Energy Fuel 32:10218–10227
Gaunt JL, Lehmann J (2008) Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environ Sci Technol 42:4152–4158
Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Wenga T, Mtisi M (2021) Biochars as media for air pollution control systems: contaminant removal, applications and future research directions. Sci Total Environ 753:142249
Han X, Chen H, Liu YX, Pan JF (2020) Study on removal of gaseous hydrogen sulfide based on macroalgae biochars. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 73:103068
Han B, Butterly C, Zhang W, He JZ, Chen DL (2021) Adsorbent materials for ammonium and ammonia removal: a review. J Clean Prod 283:124611
He C, Shen BX, Li FK (2016) Effects of flue gas components on removal of elemental mercury over Ce-Mno(x)/Ti-PILCs. J Hazard Mater 304:10–17
Hervy M, Minh PD, Gérente C, Weiss-Hortala E, Nzihou A, Villot A, Coq LL (2018) H2S removal from syngas using wastes pyrolysis chars. Chem Eng J 334:2179–2189
Hu XY, Liu LB, Luo X, Xiao GK, Shiko E, Zhang R, Fan XF, Zhou YF, Liu Y, Zeng ZG, Li CE (2020) A review of N-functionalized solid adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Appl Energy 260:114244
Huang YF, Chiueh PT, Shih CH, Lo SL, Sun LP, Zhong Y, Qiu CS (2015) Microwave pyrolysis of rice straw to produce biochar as an adsorbent for CO2 capture. Energy 84:75–82
Huang YF, Chiueh PT, Kuan WH, Lo SL (2016) Microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: heating performance and reaction kinetics. Energy 100:137–144
Hussin F, Aroua MK (2020) Recent trends in the development of adsorption technologies for carbon dioxide capture: a brief literature and patent reviews (2014–2018). J Clean Prod 253:119707
Iberahim N, Sethupathi S, Bashir MJK (2018) Optimization of palm oil mill sludge biochar preparation for sulfur dioxide removal. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:25702–25714
Iberahim N, Sethupathi S, Goh CL, Bashir MJK, Ahmad W (2019) Optimization of activated palm oil sludge biochar preparation for sulphur dioxide adsorption. J Environ Manag 248:109302
Igalavithana AD, Lee SE, Lee YH, Tsang DCW, Rinklebe J, Kwon EE, Ok YS (2017) Heavy metal immobilization and microbial community abundance by vegetable waste and pine cone biochar of agricultural soils. Chemosphere 174:593–603
Igalavithana AD, Choi SW, Dissanayake PD, Shang J, Wang CH, Yang X, Kim S, Tsang DCW, Lee KB, Ok YS (2020) Gasification biochar from biowaste (food waste and wood waste) for effective CO2 adsorption. J Hazard Mater 391:121147
Illingworth JM, Rand B, Williams PT (2019) Non-woven fabric activated carbon produced from fibrous waste biomass for sulphur dioxide control. Process Saf Environ 122:209–220
Ismail IS, Singh G, Smith P, Kim S, Yang JH, Joseph S, Yusup S, Singh M, Bansal V, Talapaneni SN, Vinu A (2020) Oxygen functionalized porous activated biocarbons with high surface area derived from grape marc for enhanced capture of CO2 at elevated-pressure. Carbon 160:113–124
Jasuja H, Peterson GW, Decoste JB, Browe MA, Walton KS (2015) Evaluation of MOFs for air purification and air quality control applications: ammonia removal from air. Chem Eng Sci 124:118–124
Jia L, Fan BG, Yao YX, Han F, Huo RP, Zhao CW, Jin Y (2018) Study on the elemental mercury adsorption characteristics and mechanism of iron-based modified biochar materials. Energy Fuel 32:12554–12566
Johari K, Saman N, Song ST, Cheu SC, Kong H, Mat H (2016) Development of coconut pith chars towards high elemental mercury adsorption performance—effect of pyrolysis temperatures. Chemosphere 156:56–68
Jung S, Park YK, Kwon EE (2019) Strategic use of biochar for CO2 capture and sequestration. J CO2 Util 32:128–139
Kanjanarong J, Giri BS, Jaisi DP, Oliveira FR, Boonsawang P, Chaiprapat S, Singh RS, Balakrishna A, Khanal SK (2017) Removal of hydrogen sulfide generated during anaerobic treatment of sulfate-laden wastewater using biochar: evaluation of efficiency and mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 234:115–121
Karim AA, Kumar M, Singh SK, Panda CR, Mishra BK (2017) Potassium enriched biochar production by thermal plasma processing of banana peduncle for soil application. J Anal Appl Pyrol 123:165–172
Karimi M, Diaz de Tuesta JL, Gonçalves CNDP, Gomes HT, Rodrigues AE, Silva JAC (2020) Integrated management of environment by employing derived compost from municipal solid wastes as a source of biochar for CO2 capture. Chem Eng Technol 43:1336–1349
Khabzina Y, Farrusseng D (2018) Unravelling ammonia adsorption mechanisms of adsorbents in humid conditions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 265:143–148
Kim SS, Ly HV, Choi GH, Kim J, Woo HC (2012) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of the alga Saccharina japonica. Bioresour Technol 123:445–451
Kim Y, Oh JI, Vithanage M, Park YK, Lee J, Kwon EE (2019) Modification of biochar properties using CO2. Chem Eng J 372:383–389
Krounbi L, Enders A, Anderton CR, Engelhard MH, Hestrin R, Torres-Rojas D, Dynes JJ, Lehmann J (2020) Sequential ammonia and carbon dioxide adsorption on pyrolyzed biomass to recover waste stream nutrients. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:7121–7131
Kua HW, Pedapati C, Lee RV, Kawi S (2019) Effect of indoor contamination on carbon dioxide adsorption of wood-based biochar—lessons for direct air capture. J Clean Prod 210:860–871
Kumar A, Singh E, Khapre A, Bordoloi N, Kumar S (2020) Sorption of volatile organic compounds on non-activated biochar. Bioresour Technol 297:122469
Kung SS, Zhang LG, Gong XY, Kung CC (2019) A sector-wide economic and environmental analysis on bioenergy production and emission consequences. Energy Explor Exploit 37:1408–1425
Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR (2018) Metal incorporated biochar as a potential adsorbent for high capacity CO2 capture at ambient condition. J CO2 Util 26:281–293
Lamplugh A, Harries M, Nguyen A, Montoya LD (2020) VOC emissions from nail salon products and their effective removal using affordable adsorbents and synthetic jets. Build Environ 168:106499
Lee JW, Barin G, Peterson GW, Xu J, Colwell KA, Long JR (2017) A microporous amic acid polymer for enhanced ammonia capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:33504–33510
Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144
Leng L, Xu S, Liu R, Yu T, Zhuo X, Leng S, Xiong Q, Huang H (2020) Nitrogen containing functional groups of biochar: an overview. Bioresour Technol 298:122286
Li L, Kang YT (2019) Bubble behaviors and CO2 absorption characteristics in nanoabsorbents. J CO2 Util 33:488–499
Li L, Liu SQ, Liu JX (2011) Surface modification of coconut shell based activated carbon for the improvement of hydrophobic VOC removal. J Hazard Mater 192:683–690
Li JF, Li YM, Wu YL, Zheng MY (2014) A comparison of biochars from lignin, cellulose and wood as the sorbent to an aromatic pollutant. J Hazard Mater 280:450–457
Li G, Shen B, Li Y, Zhao B, Wang F, He C, Wang Y, Zhang M (2015) Removal of element mercury by medicine residue derived biochars in presence of various gas compositions. J Hazard Mater 298:162–169
Li GL, Wang SX, Wu QR, Wang FY, Shen BX (2016a) Mercury sorption study of halides modified bio-chars derived from cotton straw. Chem Eng J 302:305–313
Li YL, Ruan GD, Jalilov AS, Tarkunde YR, Fei HL, Tour JM (2016b) Biochar as a renewable source for high-performance CO2 sorbent. Carbon 107:344–351
Li GL, Wang SX, Wu QR, Wang FY, Ding D, Shen BX (2017a) Mechanism identification of temperature influence on mercury adsorption capacity of different halides modified bio-chars. Chem Eng J 315:251–261
Li H, Dong X, da Silva EB, de Oliveira LM, Chen Y, Ma LQ (2017b) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–478
Li YR, Lin YT, Xu ZC, Wang B, Zhu TY (2019) Oxidation mechanisms of H2S by oxygen and oxygen-containing functional groups on activated carbon. Fuel Process Technol 189:110–119
Lian F, Xing BS (2017) Black carbon (biochar) in water/soil environments: molecular structure, sorption, stability, and potential risk. Environ Sci Technol 51:13517–13532
Lian GQ, Wang B, Lee XQ, Li L, Liu TZ, Lyu WQ (2019) Enhanced removal of hexavalent chromium by engineered biochar composite fabricated from phosphogypsum and distillers grains. Sci Total Environ 697:134119
Liu SH, Huang YY (2018) Valorization of coffee grounds to biochar-derived adsorbents for CO2 adsorption. J Clean Prod 175:354–360
Liu YX, Wang Y (2019) Removal of gaseous hydrogen sulfide by a photo-fenton wet oxidation scrubbing system. Energy Fuel 33:10812–10819
Liu J, Qu WQ, Joo SW, Zheng CG (2012) Effect of SO2 on mercury binding on carbonaceous surfaces. Chem Eng J 184:163–167
Liu ZW, Zhang FX, Liu HL, Ba F, Yan SJ, Hu JH (2018a) Pyrolysis/gasification of pine sawdust biomass briquettes under carbon dioxide atmosphere: study on carbon dioxide reduction (utilization) and biochar briquettes physicochemical properties. Bioresour Technol 249:983–991
Liu ZY, Yang W, Xu W, Liu YX (2018b) Removal of elemental mercury by bio-chars derived from seaweed impregnated with potassium iodine. Chem Eng J 339:468–478
Liu HW, Feng S, Leung AK (2019) Effects of nano-activated carbon on water and gas permeability and hydrogen sulphide removal in compacted kaolin. Appl Clay Sci 172:80–84
Liu DJ, Li CE, Wu J, Liu YX (2020) Novel carbon-based sorbents for elemental mercury removal from gas streams: a review. Chem Eng J 391:123514
Lucaci AR, Bulgariu D, Ahmad I, Lisă G, Mocanu AM, Bulgariu L (2019) Potential use of biochar from various waste biomass as biosorbent in Co(II) removal processes. Water 11:1565–1580
Luo JJ, Niu Q, Xia YX, Cao YA, Du RP, Sun SQ, Lu CY (2017) Investigation of gaseous elemental mercury oxidation by non-thermal plasma injection method. Energy Fuel 31:11013–11018
Luo JJ, Jin MC, Ye LR, Cao YA, Yan YG, Du RP, Yoshiie R, Ueki Y, Naruse I, Lin CJ, Lee YY (2019) Removal of gaseous elemental mercury by hydrogen chloride non-thermal plasma modified biochar. J Hazard Mater 377:132–141
Lyu HH, Xia SY, Tang JC, Zhang YR, Gao B, Shen BX (2020) Thiol-modified biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of inorganic Hg2+ and organic CH3Hg+. J Hazard Mater 384:121357
Madzaki H, Karim Ghani WAWA, Resitanim NZ, Alias AB (2016) Carbon dioxide adsorption on sawdust biochar. Procedia Eng 148:718–725
Meng H, Nie C, Li W, Duan X, Lai B, Ao Z, Wang S, An T (2020) Insight into the effect of lignocellulosic biomass source on the performance of biochar as persulfate activator for aqueous organic pollutants remediation: epicarp and mesocarp of citrus peels as examples. J Hazard Mater 399:123043
Mochizuki T, Kubota M, Matsuda H, D’Elia Camacho LF (2016) Adsorption behaviors of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide on activated carbon prepared from petroleum coke by KOH chemical activation. Fuel Process Technol 144:164–169
Mohd A, Karim Ghani WAWA, Resitanim NZ, Sanyang L (2013) A review: Carbon dioxide capture: biomass-derived-biochar and its applications. J Disper Sci Technol 34:974–984
Moribe S, Chen ZJ, Alayoglu S, Syed ZH, Islamoglu T, Farha OK (2019) Ammonia capture within isoreticular metal–organic frameworks with rod secondary building units. ACS Mater Lett 1:476–480
Neves D, Thunman H, Matos A, Tarelho L, Gómez-Barea A (2011) Characterization and prediction of biomass pyrolysis products. Prog Energy Combust 37:611–630
Nijem N, Fürsich K, Bluhm H, Leone SR, Gilles MK (2015) Ammonia adsorption and co-adsorption with water in HKUST-1: spectroscopic evidence for cooperative interactions. J Phys Chem C 119:24781–24788
Niu Q, Luo JJ, Xia YX, Sun SQ, Chen Q (2017) Surface modification of bio-char by dielectric barrier discharge plasma for Hg0 removal. Fuel Process Technol 156:310–316
Ojala S, Pitkäaho S, Laitinen T, Niskala Koivikko N, Brahmi R, Gaálová J, Matejova L, Kucherov A, Päivärinta S, Hirschmann C, Nevanperä T, Riihimäki M, Pirilä M, Keiski RL (2011) Catalysis in VOC abatement. Top Catal 54:1224–1256
Papurello D, Lanzini A, Bressan M, Santarelli M (2020) H2S removal with sorbent obtained from sewage sludges. Processes 8:130–138
Pelaez-Samaniego MR, Smith MW, Zhao QB, Garcia-Perez T, Frear C, Garcia-Perez M (2018) Charcoal from anaerobically digested dairy fiber for removal of hydrogen sulfide within biogas. Waste Manag 76:374–382
Peluso A, Gargiulo N, Aprea P, Pepe F, Caputo D (2018) Nanoporous materials as H2S adsorbents for biogas purification: a review. Sep Purif Rev 48:78–89
Pi XX, Sun F, Gao JH, Zhu YW, Wang LJ, Qu ZB, Liu H, Zhao GB (2017) Microwave irradiation induced high-efficiency regeneration for desulfurized activated coke: a comparative study with conventional thermal regeneration. Energy Fuel 31:9693–9702
Plaza MG, González AS, Pis JJ, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2014) Production of microporous biochars by single-step oxidation: effect of activation conditions on CO2 capture. Appl Energy 114:551–562
Poo KM, Son EB, Chang JS, Ren X, Choi YJ, Chae KJ (2018) Biochars derived from wasted marine macro-algae (Saccharina japonica and Sargassum fusiforme) and their potential for heavy metal removal in aqueous solution. J Environ Manag 206:364–372
Qin LB, Huang XM, Xue Q, Liu L, Wan Y (2020) In-situ biodegradation of harmful pollutants in landfill by sludge modified biochar used as biocover. Environ Pollut 258:113710
Qu ZB, Sun F, Liu X, Gao JH, Qie ZP, Zhao GB (2018) The effect of nitrogen-containing functional groups on SO2 adsorption on carbon surface: enhanced physical adsorption interactions. Surf Sci 677:78–82
Rajapaksha AU, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Zhang M, Vithanage M, Mandal S, Gao B, Bolan NS, Ok YS (2016) Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere 148:276–291
Ramlogan MV, Rabinovich A, Rouff AA (2020) Thermochemical analysis of ammonia gas sorption by struvite from livestock wastes and comparison with biochar and metal-organic framework sorbents. Environ Sci Technol 54:13264–13273
Rangabhashiyam S, Balasubramanian P (2019) The potential of lignocellulosic biomass precursors for biochar production: performance, mechanism and wastewater application—a review. Ind Crop Prod 128:405–423
Rezakazemi M, Amooghin EA, Montazer-Rahmati MM, Ismail AF, Matsuura T (2014) State-of-the-art membrane based CO2 separation using mixed matrix membranes (MMMs): an overview on current status and future directions. Prog Polym Sci 39:817–861
Roy P, Sardar A (2015) SO2 emission control and finding a way out to produce sulphuric acid from industrial SO2 emission. J Chem Eng Process Technol 06:1000230
Saha D, Kienbaum MJ (2019) Role of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur functionalities on the surface of nanoporous carbons in CO2 adsorption: a critical review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 287:29–55
Sahota S, Vijay VK, Subbarao PMV, Chandra R, Ghosh P, Shah G, Kapoor R, Vijay V, Koutu V, Thakur IS (2018) Characterization of leaf waste based biochar for cost effective hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas. Bioresour Technol 250:635–641
Sajjadi B, Chen WY, Egiebor NO (2019) A comprehensive review on physical activation of biochar for energy and environmental applications. Rev Chem Eng 35:735–776
Seredych M, Ania C, Bandosz TJ (2016) Moisture insensitive adsorption of ammonia on resorcinol-formaldehyde resins. J Hazard Mater 305:96–104
Sethupathi S, Zhang M, Rajapaksha AU, Lee SR, Mohamad Nor N, Mohamed AR, Al-Wabel M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2017) Biochars as potential adsorbers of CH4, CO2 and H2S. Sustainability 9:121–131
Shahkarami S, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, Soltan J (2015) Breakthrough CO2 adsorption in bio-based activated carbons. J Environ Sci 34:68–76
Shan Y, Yang W, Li Y, Liu YX, Pan JF (2019) Preparation of microwave-activated magnetic bio-char adsorbent and study on removal of elemental mercury from flue gas. Sci Total Environ 697:134049
Shang GF, Shen GQ, Wang TT, Chen Q (2012) Effectiveness and mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by camphor-derived biochar. J Air Waste Manag 62:873–879
Shang GF, Shen GQ, Liu L, Chen Q, Xu ZW (2013) Kinetics and mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by biochars. Bioresour Technol 133:495–499
Shang GF, Li QW, Liu L, Chen P, Huang XM (2016a) Adsorption of hydrogen sulfide by biochars derived from pyrolysis of different agricultural/forestry wastes. J Air Waste Manag 66:8–16
Shang GF, Liu L, Chen P, Shen GQ, Li QW (2016b) Kinetics and the mass transfer mechanism of hydrogen sulfide removal by biochar derived from rice hull. J Air Waste Manag 66:439–445
Shao JG, Zhang JJ, Zhang X, Feng Y, Zhang H, Zhang SH, Chen HP (2018) Enhance SO2 adsorption performance of biochar modified by CO2 activation and amine impregnation. Fuel 224:138–146
Shen YF, Zhang NY (2019) Facile synthesis of porous carbons from silica-rich rice husk char for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) sorption. Bioresour Technol 282:294–300
Shen BX, Li GL, Wang FM, Wang YY, He C, Zhang M, Singh S (2015) Elemental mercury removal by the modified bio-char from medicinal residues. Chem Eng J 272:28–37
Shi QQ, Wang YT, Zhang X, Shen BX, Wang FM, Zhang YF (2020) Hierarchically porous biochar synthesized with CaCO3 template for efficient Hg0 adsorption from flue gas. Fuel Process Technol 199:106247
Singh G, Lakhi KS, Sil S, Bhosale SV, Kim I, Albahily K, Vinu A (2019) Biomass derived porous carbon for CO2 capture. Carbon 148:164–186
Skerman AG, Heubeck S, Batstone DJ, Tait S (2017) Low-cost filter media for removal of hydrogen sulphide from piggery biogas. Process Saf Environ 105:117–126
Song X, Li K, Ning P, Wang C, Sun X, Tang LH, Ruan HT, Han S (2017a) Surface characterization studies of walnut-shell biochar catalysts for simultaneously removing of organic sulfur from yellow phosphorus tail gas. Appl Surf Sci 425:130–140
Song X, Ning P, Wang C, Li K, Tang LH, Sun X, Ruan HT (2017b) Research on the low temperature catalytic hydrolysis of COS and CS2 over walnut shell biochar modified by Fe–Cu mixed metal oxides and basic functional groups. Chem Eng J 314:418–433
Song G, Qin F, Yu J, Tang L, Pang Y, Zhang C, Wang J, Deng L (2022) Tailoring biochar for persulfate-based environmental catalysis: impact of biomass feedstocks. J Hazard Mater 424:127663
Sun X, Ning P, Tang XL, Yi HH, Li K, He D, Xu XM, Huang B, Lai RY (2014) Simultaneous catalytic hydrolysis of carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide over Al2O3-K/CAC catalyst at low temperature. J Energy Chem 23:221–226
Sun F, Gao JH, Liu X, Yang YQ, Wu SH (2016) Controllable nitrogen introduction into porous carbon with porosity retaining for investigating nitrogen doping effect on SO2 adsorption. Chem Eng J 290:116–124
Sun Y, Yang G, Zhang L, Sun Z (2017) Preparation of high performance H2S removal biochar by direct fluidized bed carbonization using potato peel waste. Process Saf Environ 107:281–288
Sun X, Ruan HT, Song X, Sun LN, Li K, Ning P, Wang C (2018) Research into the reaction process and the effect of reaction conditions on the simultaneous removal of H2S, COS and CS2 at low temperature. RSC Adv 8:6996–7004
Sun L, Yuan D, Liu RR, Wan SG, Lu XJ (2020) Coadsorption of gaseous xylene, ethyl acetate and water onto porous biomass carbon foam pellets derived from liquefied Vallisneria natans waste. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 95:1348–1360
Tate KR, Theng BKG (2014) Climate change—an underfoot perspective? In: Churchman GJ, Landa ER (eds) The soil underfoot—infinite possibilities for a finite resource. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–16
Tiwari D, Goel C, Bhunia H, Bajpai PK (2017) Dynamic CO2 capture by carbon adsorbents: kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Sep Purif Technol 181:107–122
Tratzi P, Ta DT, Zhang Z, Torre M, Battistelli F, Manzo E, Paolini V, Zhang Q, Chu C, Petracchini F (2022) Sustainable additives for the regulation of NH3 concentration and emissions during the production of biomethane and biohydrogen: a review. Bioresour Technol 346:126596
Tripathi M, Sahu JN, Ganesan P (2016) Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:467–481
Usevičiūtė L, Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė E (2020) Dependence of pyrolysis temperature and lignocellulosic physical–chemical properties of biochar on its wettability. Biomass Convers Biorefin 11:2775–2793
Vikrant K, Kumar V, Kim KH, Kukkar D (2017) Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): potential and challenges for capture and abatement of ammonia. J Mater Chem A 5:22877–22896
Wahi R, Zuhaidi NFQ, Yusof Y, Jamel J, Kanakaraju D, Ngaini Z (2017) Chemically treated microwave-derived biochar: an overview. Biomass Bioenergy 107:411–421
Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, Khan E, Yip ACK, Ng YH, Rinklebe J, Ok YS (2020) Customised fabrication of nitrogen-doped biochar for environmental and energy applications. Chem Eng J 401:126136
Wang JL, Wang SZ (2019) Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review. J Clean Prod 227:1002–1022
Wang B, Lehmann J, Hanley K, Hestrin R, Enders A (2015) Adsorption and desorption of ammonium by maple wood biochar as a function of oxidation and pH. Chemosphere 138:120–126
Wang B, Gao B, Fang J (2017) Recent advances in engineered biochar productions and applications. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:2158–2207
Wang B, Gao B, Wan YS (2018a) Entrapment of ball-milled biochar in Ca-alginate beads for the removal of aqueous Cd(II). J Ind Eng Chem 61:161–168
Wang T, Liu J, Zhang YS, Zhang HC, Chen WY, Norris P, Pan WP (2018b) Use of a non-thermal plasma technique to increase the number of chlorine active sites on biochar for improved mercury removal. Chem Eng J 331:536–544
Wang T, Wu JW, Zhang YS, Liu J, Sui ZF, Zhang HC, Chen WY, Norris P, Pan WP (2018c) Increasing the chlorine active sites in the micropores of biochar for improved mercury adsorption. Fuel 229:60–67
Wang B, Lee XQ, Theng BKG, Zhang LK, Cheng HG, Cheng JZ, Lyu WQ (2019) Biochar addition can reduce NOx gas emissions from a calcareous soil. Environ Pollut Bioavailab 31:38–48
Wang B, Ma YN, Lee XQ, Wu P, Liu F, Zhang XY, Li L, Chen M (2020a) Environmental-friendly coal gangue-biochar composites reclaiming phosphate from water as a slow-release fertilizer. Sci Total Environ 758:143664
Wang LW, Hou DY, Cao YN, Ok YS, Tack FMG, Rinklebe J, O’Connor D (2020b) Remediation of mercury contaminated soil, water, and air: a review of emerging materials and innovative technologies. Environ Int 134:105281
Wu XX, Zhang CY, Tian ZW, Cai JJ (2018) Large-surface-area carbons derived from lotus stem waste for efficient CO2 capture. New Carbon Mater 33:252–261
Xiang W, Zhang XY, Chen KQ, Fang J, He F, Hu X, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Gao B (2020) Enhanced adsorption performance and governing mechanisms of ball-milled biochar for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Chem Eng J 385:123842
Xie ZY, Wang F, Zhao N, Wei W, Sun YH (2011) Hydrophobisation of activated carbon fiber and the influence on the adsorption selectivity towards carbon disulfide. Appl Surf Sci 257:3596–3602
Xie Y, Li CT, Zhao LK, Zhang J, Zeng GM, Zhang XN, Zhang W, Tao SS (2015) Experimental study on Hg0 removal from flue gas over columnar MnOx-CeO2/activated coke. Appl Surf Sci 333:59–67
Xiong Z, Lei Z, Li YZ, Dong LC, Zhao YC, Zhang JY (2018) A review on modification of facet-engineered TiO2 for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 36:24–47
Xu XY, Cao XD, Zhao L, Sun TH (2014) Comparison of sewage sludge- and pig manure-derived biochars for hydrogen sulfide removal. Chemosphere 111:296–303
Xu H, Shen BX, Yuan P, Lu FJ, Tian LH, Zhang X (2016a) The adsorption mechanism of elemental mercury by HNO3-modified bamboo char. Fuel Process Technol 154:139–146
Xu XY, Huang DX, Zhao L, Kan Y, Cao XD (2016b) Role of inherent inorganic constituents in SO2 sorption ability of biochars derived from three biomass wastes. Environ Sci Technol 50:12957–12965
Xu XY, Kan Y, Zhao L, Cao XD (2016c) Chemical transformation of CO2 during its capture by waste biomass derived biochars. Environ Pollut 213:533–540
Xu XY, Zhao YH, Sima JK, Zhao L, Mašek O, Cao XD (2017) Indispensable role of biochar-inherent mineral constituents in its environmental applications: a review. Bioresour Technol 241:887–899
Xu W, Adewuyi YG, Liu YX, Wang Y (2018a) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using CuOx and CeO2 modified rice straw chars enhanced by ultrasound. Fuel Process Technol 170:21–31
Xu W, Hussain A, Liu YX (2018b) A review on modification methods of adsorbents for elemental mercury from flue gas. Chem Eng J 346:692–711
Xu Y, Deng FF, Pang QC, He SW, Xu YQ, Luo GQ, Yao H (2018c) Development of waste-derived sorbents from biomass and brominated flame retarded plastic for elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas. Chem Eng J 350:911–919
Xu W, Pan JF, Fan BW, Liu YX (2019a) Removal of gaseous elemental mercury using seaweed chars impregnated by NH4Cl and NH4Br. J Clean Prod 216:277–287
Xu XY, Zheng YL, Gao B, Cao XD (2019b) N-doped biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of CO2 and reactive red. Chem Eng J 368:564–572
Xu Y, Luo GQ, He SW, Deng FF, Pang QC, Xu YQ, Yao H (2019c) Efficient removal of elemental mercury by magnetic chlorinated biochars derived from co-pyrolysis of Fe(NO3)3-laden wood and polyvinyl chloride waste. Fuel 239:982–990
Xu XY, Xu ZB, Gao B, Zhao L, Zheng YL, Huang JS, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Cao XD (2020) New insights into CO2 sorption on biochar/Fe oxyhydroxide composites: kinetics, mechanisms, and in situ characterization. Chem Eng J 384:123289
Yang F, Lee XQ, Wang B (2015) Characterization of biochars produced from seven biomasses grown in three different climate zones. Chin J Geochem 34:592–600
Yang JP, Zhao YC, Ma SM, Zhu BB, Zhang JY, Zheng CG (2016) Mercury removal by magnetic biochar derived from simultaneous activation and magnetization of sawdust. Environ Sci Technol 50:12040–12047
Yang F, Lee XQ, Theng BKG, Wang B, Cheng JZ, Wang Q (2017a) Effect of biochar addition on short-term N2O and CO2 emissions during repeated drying and wetting of an anthropogenic alluvial soil. Environ Geochem Health 39:635–647
Yang W, Liu YX, Wang Q, Pan JF (2017b) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using wheat straw chars modified by Mn-Ce mixed oxides with ultrasonic-assisted impregnation. Chem Eng J 326:169–181
Yang JP, Zhao YC, Liang SF, Zhang SB, Ma SM, Li HL, Zhang JY, Zheng CG (2018a) Magnetic iron–manganese binary oxide supported on carbon nanofiber (Fe3−xMnxO4/CNF) for efficient removal of Hg0 from coal combustion flue gas. Chem Eng J 334:216–224
Yang W, Adewuyi YG, Hussain A, Liu YX (2018b) Recent developments on gas–solid heterogeneous oxidation removal of elemental mercury from flue gas. Environ Chem Lett 17:19–47
Yang W, Hussain A, Zhang J, Liu YX (2018c) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using red mud impregnated by KBr and KI reagent. Chem Eng J 341:483–494
Yang W, Liu ZY, Xu W, Liu YX (2018d) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using sargassum chars modified by NH4Br reagent. Fuel 214:196–206
Yang YX, Sun C, Lin BC, Huang QX (2020) Surface modified and activated waste bone char for rapid and efficient VOCs adsorption. Chemosphere 256:127054
Yaumi AL, Bakar MZA, Hameed BH (2017) Recent advances in functionalized composite solid materials for carbon dioxide capture. Energy 124:461–480
Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB, Yavari S (2017) Sorption properties optimization of agricultural wastes-derived biochars using response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ 109:509–519
Yi YY, Li CT, Zhao LK, Du XY, Gao L, Chen JQ, Zhai YB, Zeng GM (2018) The synthetic evaluation of CuO-MnOx-modified pinecone biochar for simultaneous removal formaldehyde and elemental mercury from simulated flue gas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:4761–4775
Yuan HR, Lu T, Zhao DD, Huang HY, Noriyuki K, Chen Y (2013) Influence of temperature on product distribution and biochar properties by municipal sludge pyrolysis. J Mater Cycles Waste 15:357–361
Zhang AC, Zheng WW, Song J, Hu S, Liu ZC, Xiang J (2014a) Cobalt manganese oxides modified titania catalysts for oxidation of elemental mercury at low flue gas temperature. Chem Eng J 236:29–38
Zhang X, Zhang SH, Yang HP, Feng Y, Chen YQ, Wang XH, Chen HP (2014b) Nitrogen enriched biochar modified by high temperature CO2–ammonia treatment: characterization and adsorption of CO2. Chem Eng J 257:20–27
Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H, Shao J, Chen Y, Feng Y, Wang X, Chen H (2015a) Effects of hydrofluoric acid pre-deashing of rice husk on physicochemical properties and CO2 adsorption performance of nitrogen-enriched biochar. Energy 91:903–910
Zhang X, Zhang SH, Yang HP, Shao JG, Chen YQ, Feng Y, Wang XH, Chen HP (2015b) High temperature ammonia modification of rice husk char to enhance CO2 adsorption: influence of pre-deashing. RSC Adv 5:106280–106288
Zhang X, Wu J, Yang HP, Shao JG, Wang XH, Chen YQ, Zhang SH, Chen HP (2016) Preparation of nitrogen-doped microporous modified biochar by high temperature CO2–NH3 treatment for CO2 adsorption: effects of temperature. RSC Adv 6:98157–98166
Zhang HJ, Voroney RP, Price GW, White AJ (2017a) Sulfur-enriched biochar as a potential soil amendment and fertiliser. Soil Res 55:93–99
Zhang XY, Gao B, Creamer AE, Cao CC, Li YC (2017b) Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: a review. J Hazard Mater 338:102–123
Zhang XY, Gao B, Zheng YL, Hu X, Creamer AE, Annable MD, Li YC (2017c) Biochar for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal: sorption performance and governing mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 245:606–614
Zhang HC, Wang T, Sui ZF, Zhang YS, Norris P, Sun BM, Pan WP (2019a) Plasma induced addition of active functional groups to biochar for elemental mercury removal. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 39:1449–1468
Zhang HC, Wang T, Sui ZF, Zhang YS, Sun BM, Pan WP (2019b) Enhanced mercury removal by transplanting sulfur-containing functional groups to biochar through plasma. Fuel 253:703–712
Zhang XY, Gao B, Fang J, Zou WX, Dong L, Cao CC, Zhang J, Li YC, Wang HL (2019c) Chemically activated hydrochar as an effective adsorbent for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Chemosphere 218:680–686
Zhang Z, Cano ZP, Luo D, Dou HZ, Yu AP, Chen ZW (2019d) Rational design of tailored porous carbon-based materials for CO2 capture. J Mater Chem A 7:20985–21003
Zhang HC, Wang T, Liu J, Zhang YS, Wang JW, Sun BM, Pan WP (2020a) Promotional effect of sulfur trioxide (SO3) on elemental mercury removal over Cu/ZSM-5 catalyst. Appl Surf Sci 511:145604
Zhang HC, Wang T, Zhang YS, Sun BM, Pan WP (2020b) Promotional effect of NH3 on mercury removal over biochar thorough chlorine functional group transformation. J Clean Prod 257:120598
Zhang JJ, Shao JG, Huang DR, Feng Y, Zhang X, Zhang SH, Chen HP (2020c) Influence of different precursors on the characteristic of nitrogen-enriched biochar and SO2 adsorption properties. Chem Eng J 385:123932
Zhang XY, Xiang W, Wang B, Fang J, Zou WX, He F, Li YC, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Gao B (2020d) Adsorption of acetone and cyclohexane onto CO2 activated hydrochars. Chemosphere 245:125664
Zhang XY, Miao XD, Xiang W, Zhang JK, Cao CC, Wang HL, Hu X, Gao B (2021) Ball milling biochar with ammonia hydroxide or hydrogen peroxide enhances its adsorption of phenyl volatile organic compounds (VOCs). J Hazard Mater 403:123540
Zhao Y, Shen YM, Ma GY, Hao RJ (2014) Adsorption separation of carbon dioxide from flue gas by a molecularly imprinted adsorbent. Environ Sci Technol 48:1601–1608
Zhao LK, Li CT, Li SH, Wang Y, Zhang JY, Wang T, Zeng GM (2016) Simultaneous removal of elemental mercury and NO in simulated flue gas over V2O5 /ZrO2-CeO2 catalyst. Appl Catal B Environ 198:420–430
Zhao B, O’Connor D, Zhang JL, Peng TY, Shen ZT, Tsang DCW, Hou DY (2018) Effect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar. J Clean Prod 174:977–987
Zhao R, Jia L, Yao YX, Huo RP, Qiao XL, Fan BG (2019) Study of the effect of adsorption temperature on elemental mercury removal performance of iron-based modified biochar. Energy Fuel 33:11408–11419
Zhou ZJ, Liu XW, Zhao B, Shao HZ, Xu YS, Xu MH (2016) Elemental mercury oxidation over manganese-based perovskite-type catalyst at low temperature. Chem Eng J 288:701–710
Zhou JF, Liu YX, Pan JF (2017) Removal of elemental mercury from flue gas using wheat straw chars modified by K2FeO4 reagent. Environ Technol 38:3047–3054
Zhou YM, Zhao YC, Zhang JY, Zheng CG (2019) Mercury adsorption and oxidation over magnetic biochar in oxyfuel combustion atmosphere: impact of enriched CO2 and H2O. Fuel 251:458–465
Zhou H, Wang R, Zhang H, Chen W, Lu XB (2020) Access to 1,3-oxazine-2,4-diones/1,3-thiazine-2,4-diones via organocatalytic CO2/COS incorporation into allenamides. Org Biomol Chem 18:905–911
Zielińska A, Oleszczuk P, Charmas B, Skubiszewska-Zięba J, Pasieczna-Patkowska S (2015) Effect of sewage sludge properties on the biochar characteristic. J Anal Appl Pyrol 112:201–213
Zubbri NA, Mohamed AR, Kamiuchi N, Mohammadi M (2020) Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on biochar sorbent modified by metal incorporation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:11809–11829
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977297), the Special Research Fund of Natural Science (Special Post) of Guizhou University [(2020)01], and the Key Cultivation Program of Guizhou University [2019(08)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZZ: methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation. BW: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. BKGT: writing—review and editing. XL, XZ, MC, PX: review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest nor competing interests to declare.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, Z., Wang, B., Theng, B.K.G. et al. Removal performance, mechanisms, and influencing factors of biochar for air pollutants: a critical review. Biochar 4, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00156-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00156-z