Abstract
Usually, nitrogen and argon adsorption–desorption isotherms are used at their respective boiling points for the determination of specific surface area via the BET theory of microporous materials. However, for ultra-micropores, where nitrogen and argon cannot access at cryogenic temperatures, the CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms have been considered as alternative options for the determination of specific surface area by extending BET theory, but the surface area determined by using CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms is not significant due to strong CO2-CO2 interactions. In this study, the microporous covalent organic polymers are subjected to nitrogen and CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and the results showed that a clear linear region is available in isotherms, which confirms the presence of ultra-micropores. The surface area determined by the CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms is higher than the surface area determined by N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms. These results indicate that the microporous covalent organic polymers contain ultra-micropores where only CO2 can reach, while nitrogen and argon cannot access at cryogenic conditions because their kinetic diameter is larger than CO2.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The surface area of porous materials is one of the significant properties because it significantly influences the performance of porous adsorbents in many applications including gas adsorption capacity [1,2,3,4], catalysis [5,6,7], and gas separations [8,9,10,11]. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) [12, 13] technique is one of the most prominent analyses based on argon or nitrogen gas adsorption–desorption isotherms to determine the surface of microporous materials [14], such as zeolites [15], metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [16], and covalent organic polymers (COPs).
Most of the porous materials have pore texture properties generated from their specific synthesis methods such as (1) precursor particles originated from a solution that produces agglomeration and results a porous structure, (2) synthesis of crystalline compounds such as zeolites or other through hydrothermal crystallization, where the particular arrangement of building blocks yields intra-crystalline pores of molecular size, (3) the thermal treatments including burning or evaporation which may eliminate the volatile compounds or impurities and produce pores as a result of both exist ways of eliminated materials and solid rearrangements, and (4) the selective dissolution of some components that can produce molecular size cavities [17, 18]. Therefore, most of the porous materials are classified into four major groups based on their pore size including micropores (< 2 nm), ultra-micropores (< 0.7 nm), mesopores (2 nm < pore size < 50 nm), and macropores (> 50 nm) [19, 20].
Some of the researchers have questioned the applications of BET theory to the microporous materials because the origin of this theory is based on the gas adsorption–desorption on flat surfaces of adsorbent materials. From a simulation study carried out by Walton et al. [21], they proposed that BET theory can be applied for the determination of the surface area of porous materials containing micropores with a size in the range of (7–20 × 10−10 m) [22, 23]. Hence, this work aims to investigate the application of BET theory on CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for the surface area determination for covalent organic polymers (COPs) containing ultra-micropores.
2 Materials and methods
Nitrogen-rich porous covalent triazine-based organic polymer has been used in the work for surface area determination through nitrogen as well as CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms via BET analysis. The surface area was determined using N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K and CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 273 K. The sample is outgassed at 393 K for 3 h to remove moisture contents.
3 Results and discussions
The N2 and CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms obtained were further subjected to the BET analysis as shown in Fig. 1. The results show that according to the IUPAC classification of adsorption isotherms [24], the N2 isotherm resembles the type III having sharp adsorption capacity while indicating the presence of broader pore size distributions, narrower mesopores, and wider micropores. The small hysteresis present in the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm is an indication of the capillary condensation phenomenon indicating the mesoporous nature [25]. There is no significant hysteresis observed in the CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms which is an indication of easy desorption of the CO2 molecules because of thermal vibrations of molecules that are in agreement with the reported studies [26, 27].
To investigate the application of BET theory for surface area determination using CO2 adsorption isotherms, we followed a method reported by Walton and Bae [21, 28]. The BET theory was applied to CO2 adsorption isotherm by plotting a graph between x as a function of the x axis and x/q(1 − x) as a function of the y-axis, where x is P/Po for CO2 at 273 K and q is the adsorption capacity of CO2 over COP. The intercept of the plot yields [c − 1/q], while the slope yields [1/qc] in the linear region of the plot. To satisfy these criteria of calculating surface area, two conditions must be fulfilled: (1) the value of q(P − Po) should be increased with increasing x, and (2) the y intercept in the linear region of the graph must yield a positive value, which must be greater than zero to get the meaningful value of c. Finally, the surface can be calculated using Eq. 1:
where q is the adsorption capacity of CO2 at 273 K, σo is the cross-sectional area of CO2 at 273 K, which is 21.8 × 10−10 m, and NAV is the Avogadro’s number, which is 6.022 × 1023 mol−1.
The graphical representation of this method is presented in Fig. 2. The surface area from CO2 adsorption isotherm is calculated using Eq. (1) at 273 K and from N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K which is tabulated in Table 1. We now investigate the surface area determination using CO2 adsorption isotherms only in the linear region because the linearity of the BET plot is a key factor for the determination of the accurate specific surface area of porous materials. Since the selection of a linear region in the convex or concave-shaped plot is not difficult, it can be identified easily. However, in the selection of the linear region, it must be considered that the linear range should be in the low pressure range and there should not be any overshooting in CO2 adsorption capacity. The results clearly show that the surface area calculated from CO2 adsorption isotherms at 273 K is higher than the surface area calculated using N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K. It can be considered that surface area calculated by CO2 adsorption isotherm may be accounted for the ultra-microporosity because of its small kinetic diameter than N2 molecules. However, the diffusional resistances due to the temperature of the adsorption process are one of the significant parameters which affect the reach of adsorbate molecules into the ultra-micropores. The results are in agreement with the previously reported studies [21]. In comparison with the reported literature, Sami et al. [29] and his coworkers reported the experimental investigation of the ultra-microporosity determination in a metal–organic framework (MOF-177) by employing the CO2 adsorption for BET technique. The results revealed that the absence of any ultra-micropores in the MOF-177 as the specific surface area of the MOF-177 was reduced from 1721.09 to 47.4739 m2/g when N2 and CO2 gases were used for BET technique, respectively. Similarly, in another work, Sami et al. [30] and his coworkers reported the ultra-microporosity analysis of the two metal–organic frameworks: one was unfunctionalized (MOF-200) and one was functionalized with the graphene oxide (MOF-200/GO). The results again demonstrated the loss of the specific surface areas of both metal and organic frameworks, i.e., MOF-200 (1265 m2/g) and MOF-200/GO (167 m2/g) from MOF-200 (3624 m2/g) and MOF-200/GO (3359 m2/g). This was an indication of the absence of any ultra-micropores in the MOF-177 as the surface area of the MOF-177 was reduced from 1721.09 to 47.4739 m2/g when N2 and CO2 gases were used for BET technique, respectively. However, both reported studies revealed that the reported method can be employed for the ultra-microporosity analysis.
4 Conclusion
In this study, a porous covalent organic polymer (COP) was subjected to the BET analysis to investigate the application of BET theory for specific surface area determination using N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K and CO2 adsorption isotherm at 273 K. The results showed that the surface area determined by using the CO2 adsorption isotherms was higher than the surface area determined by using the N2 adsorption isotherms. The results provided a clear indication of the presence of an ultra-microporous region in the microporous structure. The results recommend the meaningfulness of CO2 adsorption isotherms for the surface area determination in the ultra-microporosity using BET theory. Future research can be carried out to investigate the comparative effect of the kinetic diameter of the adsorbate molecule and diffusive resistance due to the temperature of the adsorption process on the ultra-microporosity.
References
Yuan D (2015) Porous materials to store clear energy gases. Adv Nanomater Appl Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801528-5.00006-3
Han SS, Goddard WA (2007) Lithium-doped metal-organic frameworks for reversible H2 storage at ambient temperature. J Am Chem Soc 129:8422–8423
Ma S, Zhou H-C (2010) Gas storage in porous metal–organic frameworks for clean energy applications. Chem Commun 46:44–53
Collins DJ, Zhou H-C (2007) Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. J Mater Chem 17:3154–3160
Vermoortele F, Vandichel M, Van de Voorde B, Ameloot R, Waroquier M, Van Speybroeck V et al (2012) Electronic effects of linker substitution on Lewis acid catalysis with metal–organic frameworks. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:4887–4890
Ma L, Abney C, Lin W (2009) Enantioselective catalysis with homochiral metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1248–1256
Nguyen HGT, Weston MH, Farha OK, Hupp JT, Nguyen ST (2012) A catalytically active vanadyl (catecholate)-decorated metal organic framework via post-synthesis modifications. CrystEngComm 14:4115–4118
Wang B, Côté AP, Furukawa H, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2008) Colossal cages in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as selective carbon dioxide reservoirs. Nature 453:207
Thallapally PK, Tian J, Radha Kishan M, Fernandez CA, Dalgarno SJ, McGrail PB et al (2008) Flexible (breathing) interpenetrated metal–organic frameworks for CO2 separation applications. J Am Chem Soc 130:16842–16843
Couck S, Denayer JF, Baron GV, Rémy T, Gascon J, Kapteijn F (2009) An amine-functionalized MIL-53 metal–organic framework with large separation power for CO2 and CH4. J Am Chem Soc 131:6326–6327
Bae YS, Snurr RQ (2011) Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:11586–11596
Lowell S, Shields JE, Thomas MA, Thommes M (2012) Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density, vol 16. Springer, Berlin
Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319
Chui SS-Y, Lo SM-F, Charmant JP, Orpen AG, Williams ID (1999) A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu3 (TMA)2 (H2O)3]n. Science 283:1148–1150
Wang H, Wang Z, Huang L, Mitra A, Holmberg B, Yan Y (2001) High-surface-area zeolitic silica with mesoporosity. J Mater Chem 11:2307–2310
Férey G (2008) Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future. Chem Soc Rev 37:191–214
Kaneko K (1994) Determination of pore size and pore size distribution: 1. Adsorbents and catalysts. J Membr Sci 96:59–89
Gregg S, Sing AKSW (1982) Surface area and porosity. Academic Press, London
Smith DM, Hua D-W, Earl WL (1994) Characterization of porous solids. MRS Bull 19:44–48
Unger K, Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KS (1991) Characterization of porous solids II, vol 62. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Walton KS, Snurr RQ (2007) Applicability of the BET method for determining surface areas of microporous metal–organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 129:8552–8556
Gelb LD, Gubbins K (1998) Characterization of porous glasses: Simulation models, adsorption isotherms, and the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis method. Langmuir 14:2097–2111
Galarneau A, Cambon H, Di Renzo F, Fajula F (2001) True microporosity and surface area of mesoporous SBA-15 silicas as a function of synthesis temperature. Langmuir 17:8328–8335
Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J et al (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069
Klumpen C, Breunig M, Homburg T, Stock N, Senker J (2016) Microporous organic polyimides for CO2 and H2O capture and separation from CH4 and N2 mixtures: interplay between porosity and chemical function. Chem Mater 28:5461–5470
Espinal L, Wong-Ng W, Kaduk JA, Allen AJ, Snyder CR, Chiu C et al (2012) Time-dependent CO2 sorption hysteresis in a one-dimensional microporous octahedral molecular sieve. J Am Chem Soc 134:7944–7951
Lee S-P, Mellon N, Shariff AM, Leveque J-M (2018) Geometry variation in porous covalent triazine polymer (CTP) for CO2 adsorption. New J Chem 42:15488–15496
Bae YS, Yazaydın AO, Snurr RQ (2010) Evaluation of the BET method for determining surface areas of MOFs and zeolites that contain ultra-micropores. Langmuir 26:5475–5483
Ullah S, Bustam MA, Assiri MA, Al-Sehemi AG, Sagir M, Kareem FAA et al (2019) Synthesis, and characterization of metal-organic frameworks-177 for static and dynamic adsorption behavior of CO2 and CH4. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 288:109569
Ullah S, Bustam MA, Al-Sehemi AG, Assiri MA, Kareem FAA, Mukhtar A et al (2020) Influence of post-synthetic graphene oxide (GO) functionalization on the selective CO2/CH4 adsorption behavior of MOF-200 at different temperatures; an experimental and adsorption isotherms study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 296:110002
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Yayasan-UTP (YUTP-0153AA-H01) research grant and the Department of Chemical Engineering at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), Malaysia, for providing state-of-the-art research facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have not any conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukhtar, A., Mellon, N., Saqib, S. et al. Extension of BET theory to CO2 adsorption isotherms for ultra-microporosity of covalent organic polymers. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2968-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2968-9