Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient Computation of Dynamic Stress Intensity Factors for Problems with Stationary Cracks Subjected to Time Dependent Loading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In the current paper, a modal analysis based model order reduction method (MOR) is applied to reduce the computational effort associated with estimating the dynamic stress intensity factors (DSIFs) in three dimensional fracture problems. In addition, a method to select appropriate modes for model reduction is also proposed.

Method

The proposed method is based on the mode acceleration method (MAM), commonly used in structural dynamics. Appropriate mode shapes for carrying out the reduction are chosen based on the magnitude of the modal stress intensity factors associated with them. The modal stress intensity factors are calculated using the displacement field associated with the stiffness normalized modes in the vicinity of the crack front. The dynamic stress intensity factors are then calculated by expressing them as a linear combination of the modal stress intensity factors.

Results

The proposed method is used to solve a representative three-dimensional fracture mechanics problem with stationary crack subjected to various dynamic loading conditions. The results indicate that the proposed method is approximately one order magnitude more accurate than the method described in literature. The results also indicate that the proposed mode selection criteria is effective in identifying contributing modes to the dynamic stress intensity factors in case of low frequency loading.

Conclusions

The results indicate that the proposed method can be used to estimate the dynamic stress intensity factors for low frequency forcing loading quite efficiently. 

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freund LB (1990) Dynamic fracture mechanics, 1st edn. Cambridge Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson TL (1994) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan SK, Tuba IS, Wilson WK (1970) On the finite element method in linear fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 2(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tracey DM (1974) Finite elements for three-dimensional elastic crack analysis. Nucl Eng Des 26(2):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuna M (2013) Finite elements in fracture mechanics, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Shih CF, de Lorenzi HG (1976) Crack extension modeling with singular quadratic isoparametric elements. Int J Fract 12(4):1573–2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barsoum RS (1976) On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Method Eng 10(1):25–37

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Murti V, Valliappan S (1986) The use of quarter point element in dynamic crack analysis. Eng Fract Mech 23(3):585–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benzley SE (1974) Representation of singularities with isoparametric finite elements. Int J Numer Method Eng 8(3):537–545

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Nejati M, Paluszny A, Zimmerman RW (2015) On the use of quarter-point tetrahedral finite elements in linear elastic fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 144:194–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aoki S, Kishimoto K, Kondo H, Sakata M (1978) Elastodynamic analysis of crack by finite element method using singular element. Int J Fract 14(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brickstad B (1983) A FEM analysis of crack arrest experiments. Int J Fract 21(3):177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ingraffea AR, Manu C (1980) Stress-intensity factor computation in three dimensions with quarter-point elements. Int J Numer Method Eng 15(10):1427–1445

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Raju IS, Newman JC (1977) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of finite-thickness fracture specimens, NASA TN. pp. D–8414

  15. Lazzarin P, Tovo R (1998) A notch intensity factor approach to the stress analaysis of welds. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 21(9):1089–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice J (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kishimoto K, Aoki S, Sakata M (1980) Dynamic stress intensity factors using J-integral and finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 13(2):387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song HS, Paulino GH (2006) Dynamic stress intensity factors for homogeneous and smoothly heterogeneous materials using the interaction integral method. Int J Solids Struct 43(16):4830–4866

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Parks DM (1974) A stiffness derivative finite element technique for determination of crack tip stress intensity factors. Int J Fract 10:487–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng Fract Mech 9(4):931–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shivakumar K, Tan P, Newman J (1988) Virtual crack closure technique for calculating stress-intensity factors for cracked three-dimensional bodies. Int J Fract 36:R43–R50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Enderlein M, Ricoeur A, Kuna M (2003) Comparison of finite element techniques for 2D and 3D crack analysis under impact loading. Int J Solids Struct 40(13):3425–3437

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kerfriden P, Passieux JC, Bordas SPA (2012) Local/global model order reduction strategy for the simulation of quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numer Meth Eng 89(2):154–179

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerfriden P, Goury O, Rabczuk T, Bordas S (2013) A partitioned model order reduction approach to rationalise computational expenses in nonlinear fracture mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 256:169–188

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Aghahosseini A, Khosravifard A, Bui TQ (2019) Efficient analysis of dynamic fracture mechanics in various media by a novel meshfree approach. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 99:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Galennea E, Andrieuxa S, Ratierb L (2007) A modal approach to linear fracture mechanics for dynamic loading at low frequency. J Sound Vib 299(1):283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tran V, Geniaut S (2013) A modal analysis for computation of stress intensity factors under dynamic loading conditions at low frequency using eXtended Finite Element Method. Eng Fract Mech 98:122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lihui X, Meng M (2020) Study of the characteristics of train-induced dynamic SIFs of tunnel lining cracks based on the modal superposition approach. Eng Fract Mech 233(0013–7944):107069

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ravi-Chandar K (2004) Dynamic fracture, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bathe KJ, Wilson EL (1972) Large eigenvalue problems in dynamic analysis. J Eng Mech Div 98:1471–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Newmark M (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85(3):67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Craig RR (1981) Structural dynamics: an introduction to computer methods, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. ABAQUS (2014) ABAQUS/Standard Documentation, Version 6.14-2, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, Providence, RI, USA

  34. Matlab (2018) Matlab R2018a programming environment. The MathWorks Inc, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sadd MH (2009) Elasticity: theory, applications, and numerics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boston, United States

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prahallad Pattanayak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Solution of a single degree of spring mass system subjected to ramp load followed by a sinusoidal load

Consider a single degree of freedom

$$\begin{aligned} \ddot{u}+\omega _{n}^{2}u=F\left( t\right) \end{aligned}$$

with \(u\left( 0 \right) = 0\) and \(\dot{u}\left( 0 \right) =0\). If the loading \(F\left( t \right)\) is of the form (see Fig. 5)

$$\begin{aligned} F(t)&= \frac{F_0 t}{t_0}, \ \ 0 \le t \le t_0 \\&=F_0 +Asin(\omega (t-t_0)), \ \ t > t_0 \end{aligned}$$

then the solution \(u\left( t \right)\) is given by:

$$\begin{aligned} u(t)&= \frac{F_0 t_0}{t_0 \omega _n^2} -\frac{F_0sin(\omega _nt)}{t_0\omega _n^3}, \ \ 0 \le \ \ t \le t_0 \\&=\frac{F_0 }{\omega _n^2} - \frac{F_0sin(\omega _nt)}{t_0\omega _n^3} +\frac{F_0sin(\omega _ n(t-t_0))}{t_0\omega _n^3} \\&\quad - A\frac{\omega _nsin(\omega (t-t_0)) -\omega (sin(\omega _n(t-t_0)))}{\omega _n (\omega ^2-\omega _n^2)}, \ \ t > \ \ t_0 \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pattanayak, P., Kulkarni, S.S. Efficient Computation of Dynamic Stress Intensity Factors for Problems with Stationary Cracks Subjected to Time Dependent Loading. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 10, 2961–2977 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00530-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00530-y

Keywords

Navigation