Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening EFL Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions of Emergency Remote Teaching During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis

  • Arena of Pandemic
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual, distant, and blended learning are not unheard of and have been practiced in the English language teaching (ELT) context for quite a while; however, the abrupt shift to online education during COVID-19 was entirely different from the actual online education (Hodge et al. in Educause Review 27, 2020), and it should rather be named as emergency remote teaching (ERT). In effect, the present mixed-methods study aimed to screen English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of ERT classes as well as discovering the probable (non)alignment between their attitudes. Hence, 20 EFL teachers and 30 learners were invited for the qualitative phase of the study who underwent semi-structured interviews. Moreover, 34 EFL teachers and 70 learners participated in the quantitative phase by responding a self-report questionnaire on their experiences with ERT classes. The data from the questionnaire helped researchers gain a general profile of the participants’ attitudes as both groups expressed satisfaction with ERT which indicated relative alignment between their perceptions. The qualitative analysis of teachers’ data manifested two thematic categories: (1) engaging online EFL learners and (2) enhancing receptive and productive skills via online instruction. Besides, EFL learners’ data revealed their belief in (1) enhancing digital competence and technological knowledge and (2) improving communicative language learning through online instruction. The findings contributed to ELT teachers’ awareness of applying online instruction to elevate EFL learners’ technological knowledge, to improve teaching receptive and productive skills, and to create an interactive learning atmosphere through meticulous selection of tasks and activities in order for the learners to be passionately engaged in classroom communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The questionnaire and transcription of interviews are accessible through email, Telegram, or Whats-app of the corresponding author. (hossein_isaee@yahoo.com).

References

  • Allen, J., Rowan, L., & Singh, P. (2020). Teaching and teacher education in the time of COVID-19. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2020.1752051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves, P., Miranda, L., & Morais, C. (2017). The influence of virtual learning environments in students’ performance. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & WożakowskaKapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine, 100(7), e24821. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024821

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402–416. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved September 19, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/66664/

  • Barbour, M., Huerta, L., & Miron, G. (2018). Virtual schools in the US: Case studies of policy, performance and research evidence. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (p. 672677). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barjesteh, H., Movafaghardestani, E., & Modaberi, A. (2021). COVID-19’s impact on digitalization of education: Incorporating visual vocabulary learning application to foster vocabulary knowledge. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basuony, M. A. K., EmadEldeen, R., Farghaly, M., El-Bassiouny, N., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2020). The factors affecting student satisfaction with online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study of an emerging Muslim country. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(3), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-092020-0301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baticulon, R. S. J., Alberto, N., Baron, M., Mabulay, R., & Rizada, L. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 615626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., & Bruner, J. S. (Eds.). (2014). Interaction in human development. Psychology Press.

  • Bozorgian, H. (2018). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of MALL instruction in Iranian EFL context. International Journal of Humanities, 25(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565–3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cutri, R. M., Mena, J., & Whiting, E. F. (2020). Faculty readiness for online crisis teaching: Transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Atwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/8286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eyitayo, O. T. (2013). Using adult learning principles as a framework for learning ICT skills needed for research projects. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12(1), 73–89. Retrieved September 18, 2022 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320655173_Using_Adult_Learning_Principles_as_a_Framework_for_Learning_ICT_Skills_Needed_for_Research_Projects

  • Fathi, J., & Ebadi, S. (2020). Exploring EFL pre-service teachers’ adoption of technology in a CALL program: Obstacle, motivators, and maintenance. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3897–3917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S. (2020). Planned online language education versus crisis-prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Stoneman, P. (Eds.). (2015). Researching social life. Sage.

  • Ginting, D. (2021). Student engagement and factors affecting active learning in English language teaching. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Lloret, M. (2020). Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 1–7. Retrieved October 12, 2022 from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2015/commentary.pdf

  • Haga, S., & Rappeneker, J. (2021). Developing social presence in online classes: A Japanese higher education context. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Research, 2, 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herndon, S. L. (2001). Using focus group interviews for preliminary investigation. In S. L. Herndon & G. L. Kreps (Eds.), Qualitative research: Applications in organizational life (pp. 63–72). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_3

  • Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Prieto, J. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Isaee, H., & Barjesteh, H. (2022). Book review: The art of public speaking. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(4), 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, K. A., & Bauer, C. F. (2020). Students’ responses to emergency remote online teaching reveal critical factors for all teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2472–2485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatoony, S., & Nezhadmehr, M. (2020). EFL teachers’ challenges in the integration of technology for online classrooms during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Iran. The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 8(2), 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirtman, L. (2009). Online versus in-class courses: An examination of differences in learning outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, A. C., Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V. L., Smith, K. C., & Meissner, H. I. (2012). Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 21, 377–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, C., & Heaviland, L. (2023). Student preferences of student-teacher communication during synchronous online classes. International Journal of Research in English Education 2023, 8(1). Retrieved March 28, 2023 from http://ijreeonline.com/files/site1/user_files_68bcd6/clayton-A-10-1031-2-cf13c0c.pdf

  • Lehman, C. (2020). Perceptions and experiences of Chinese university undergraduate students in an international program studying English online. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(3), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemay, D. J., Bazelais, P., & Dpleck, T. (2021). Transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lengkanawati, N. S., Wirza, Y., & Alicia, D. (2021). EFL learners’ view on online learning implementation during COVID-19 outbreaks. In 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020) (pp. 351–357). Atlantis Press.

  • Liguori, E., & Winkler, C. (2020). From offline to online: Challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurship education following the COVID-19 pandemic. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420916738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P. (2004). Engaging learners in online learning environments. TechTrends, 48(4), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169–179. Retrieved December 11, 2021 from http://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/download/448/301

  • Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2020). How to optimize online learning in the age of coronavirus (COVID-19): A 5-point guide for educators. Retrieved February 27, 2022 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrew-Martin-22/publication/339944395_How_to_Optimize_Online_Learning_in_the_Age_of_Coronavirus_COVID-19_A_5-Point_Guide_for_Educators/links/5e71637ca6fdcc37caf31289/How-to-Optimize-Online-Learning-in-the-Age-of-Coronavirus-COVID-19-A-5-Point-Guide-for-Educators.pdf

  • Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mocanu, G. D., Murariu, G., Iordan, D. A., Sandu, I., & Munteanu, M. O. A. (2021). The perception of the online teaching process during the COVID-19 pandemic for the students of the physical education and sports domain. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5558. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Asitya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(September), p. 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011

  • Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G. (2002). Mirror, mirror, on my screen: Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safdari, S. (2022). Experiencing Virtual online classes during the pandemic: Foregrounding Iranian EFL teachers’ and learners’ voices. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(3), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, T. E., & Lee, S. Y. (2020). College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105578.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stodel, EJ., Thompson, TL., MacDonald, CJ. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 7(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v7i3.325

  • Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, M. (2008). Effective online interaction: Mapping course design to bridge from research to practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1).

  • Tukan, F. M. E. (2020). Challenges and strategies using application in teaching online classroom during pandemic Covid-19. Elite Journal, 2(2), 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Spoel, I., Noroozi, O., Schuurink, E., & van Ginkel, S. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the COVID19- pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, J., & Jiang, F. (2020). Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet, 395(10228), 945–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30547-X

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, L., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Guan, Q., Wen, G., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2021). Students’ experience of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A province-wide survey study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 2038–2057. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2020). High school students’ experience of online learning during COVID-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education, 77, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. H. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-10 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely would like to thank all the editors, managers, and reviewers of Human Arenas for offering us the opportunity to submit this manuscript. In addition, we would like to thank the participants for contributing to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hossein Isaee, the corresponding author, was in charge of distributing the questionnaire, gathering data, and analyzing the quantitative data. He held the interview sessions, and wrote the main manuscript.

Professor Hamed Barjesteh, the co-author, translated the recorded interview into English and transcribed them, analyzed the qualitative data, prepared the results and did a major review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Isaee.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Since the researchers of this study were closely involved with the participants during the interviews, it was necessary to give them an assurance that the study would never influence their personal lives. Here are some of the ethical issues identified throughout the current study: Confidentiality: all the information the researchers have recorded were stored safely and will never accessible by a third party for whatever purpose. Confidentiality: all the information the researchers have recorded were stored safely and will never accessible by a third party for whatever purpose. Anonymity: the participants will remain anonymous throughout the study and only the researchers know who participated and what their contributions were. Informed consent: the respondents were required to fill a consent form before embarking on any further process. They were also given full information at the beginning of the study about the research and its objectives. Do no harm: The study was free of any psychological or physical harm. Only assess relevant components: the participants had the right to answer the questions partly. Cultural competence: the verbalization took place in participants’ native language.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isaee, H., Barjesteh, H. Screening EFL Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions of Emergency Remote Teaching During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis. Hu Arenas (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00353-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00353-7

Keywords

Navigation