Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Engaging learners in online learning environments

  • Features
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ausubel, D.P. (1968).Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. & Pyke, C. (2001). Student engagement with educational software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic literature.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(3), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Harper, B., & Hedberg, J. (2001). Designing real-life cases to support authentic design activities. In G., Kennedy, M., Keppell, C., McNaught, & T., Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp.73–81). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.) (2000).How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington (DC): National Academy Press. Campos, M. N., & Harasim, L. (1999). Virtual-U: Results and challenges of unique field trials.The Technology Source, 6. Available at http://horizon.unc.edu/ TS/vu/1999–07.asp [Accessed on 26 April 2003]

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier, J.C. & Klein, J.D. (1998). Effects of cooperative versus individual learning and orientating activities during computer-based instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. (2002).E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. West Sussex: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, B.E. (2000).Teaching with the Internet: Strategies and Models for K-12 Curricula. New York: Neal-Schuman Publisher.Dixon, A. (2000). Problem-based learning: Old wine in new bottles? In O.S., Tan, P., Little, S.Y., Hee, & J., Conway (Eds.), Problem-Based Learning: Educational Innovation Across Disciplines. Singapore: Temasek Centre for Problem-Based Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R.M. & Driscoll, M.P. (1988).Essentials of Learning for Instruction (Second Edition). Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall. Ge, X. & Land, S.M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions.Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M.E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a (research) paradigm. In D.H., Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., & Turoff, L. (1995).Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. Hedberg, J.G., Harper, B., & Brown, C. (1993). Reducing cognitive load in multimedia navigation.Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 157-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T.C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments.Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1996). Making system dynamics modeling accessible to pre-college science students.Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill- structured problem-solving learning outcomes.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. Jonassen, D.H. & Grabowski, B.L. (1993).Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning.Educational Technology, September-October, 20-23.

  • King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain.American Educational Research Journal 31(2), 328–368. Klemm, W.R. (1998). Eight ways to get students more engaged in online conferences.T.H.E Journal. Available at http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/ vault/A1997.cfm [Accessed 27 April 2003]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, S.M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61–78. Laurillard, D. (1988). Computers and the emancipation of students: Giving control to the learner. In P., Ramsden (Ed.),Improving Learning — New Perspectives, pp. 215-233. London: Routledge.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C.P. (2001). Learner control and task-orientation in a hypermedia learning environment: A case study of two economics departments.International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(3), 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C.P. (2003). Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) addressing the challenges of economics education: To be or not to be.International Review of Economics Education, 2(1), 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C.P. & Cheah, P.T. (2003). The role of the tutor in asynchronous discussion boards: A case study of a pre-service teacher course.Educational Media International, 40(2).

  • Lim, C.P., Tan, S.C., & Klimas, J. (2001). A problem-based approach to web-based corporate learning.Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 4(1), 1–14.Perkins, D.N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner? Educational Technology, September–October, 19-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2000). First steps in organising ICT in the Primary classroom. In M. Leask & J. Meadows (Eds.),Teaching and Learning with ICT in the Primary School, pp. 124–143. London: Routledge. Stage, F.K. (1996) Setting the context: Psychological theories of learning.Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 227-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, P. (2001). Asynchronous online learning instructor competencies.Learning Peaks. Available at: http://www.insighted.com/ instrcomp.html [Accessed 27 April 2003] Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.Learning and Instruction,4 , 295-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., Sumner, T., & Law, A. (1997) Talking about multimedia: A layered design framework.Journal of Educational Media, 23(2/3), 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, R.N. (1990). Navigation: Or the art of knowing (where you are). In J., Barker, & R.N., Tucker (Eds.),The Interactive Learning Revolution: Multimedia in Education and Training, pp. 38–52. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. (1985).Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Cher Ping Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, C.P. Engaging learners in online learning environments. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 48, 16–23 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763440

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763440

Keywords

Search

Navigation