Abstract
In this paper, we consider the magnetic Ginzburg–Landau equation:
where \(\lambda >1\) is a coupling parameter, \(\nabla _A=\nabla -iA\) and \(\Delta _A=\nabla _A\cdot \nabla _A\) are, respectively, the covariant gradient and Laplacian. We prove, by perturbation arguments, that the only possible minimizer of the magnetic Ginzburg–Landau functional with degree 1 is the radial solution for \(\lambda \) sufficiently close to 1.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alama, S., Bronsard, L., Giorgi, T.: Uniqueness of symmetric vortex solutions in the Ginzburg-Landau model of superconductivity. J. Funct. Anal. 167, 399–424 (1999)
Bethuel, F., Brezis, H., Helein, F.: Asymptotics for the minimization of a Ginzburg-Landau functional. Calc. Var. PDEs 1, 123–148 (1993)
Bethuel, F., Brezis, H., Helein, F.: Ginzburg-Landau Vortices. Birkhäuser, Basel (1994)
Berger, M., Chen, Y.: Symmetric vortices for the nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau equations of superconductivity, and the nonlinear desingularization phenomena. J. Funct. Anal. 82, 259–295 (1989)
Bethuel, F., Riviére, T.: Vortices for a variational problem related to superconductivity. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 12, 243–303 (1995)
Clemons, C.: An existence and uniqueness result for symmetric vortices for the Ginzberg-Landau equations of superconductivity. J. Differential Equations 157, 150–162 (1999)
Demoulini, S., Stuart, D.: Gradient flow of the superconducting Ginzburg-Landau functional on the plane. Comm. Anal. Geom. 5, 121–198 (1997)
Esteban, M., Lions, P.L.: Stationary solutions of nonlinear Schrodinger equations with an external magnetic field. In: Brezis, H. ed. Partial Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations. Vol. I: Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications. Birkhauser Boston, Boston, MA, pp. 401449 (1989)
Gustafson, S., Sigal, I.M.: Stability of magnetic vortices. Commun. Math. Phys. 212, 257–275 (2000)
Gustafson, S., Sigal, I.M., Tzaneteas, T.: Statics and dynamics of magnetic vortices and of Nielsen-Olesen (Nambu) strings. J. Math. Phys. 51, 015217 (2010)
Jaffe, A., Taubes, C.: Vortices and Monopoles. Birkhäuser, Basel-Boston (1980)
Ovchinnikov, Y., Sigal, I.M.: Symmetry breaking solutions to the Ginzburg-Landau equations. Sov. Phys. JETP 99, 1090 (2004)
Pacard, F., Riviere, T.: Linear and Nonlinear Aspects of Vortices. Birkhäuser, Boston (2000)
Riviere, T.: Towards Jaffe and Taubes Conjectures in the strongly repulsive limit. Manuscripta math. 108, 217–273 (2002)
Shah, P.: Vortex scattering at near critical coupling. Nucl. Phys. B 429, 259–276 (1994)
Stuart, D.: Dynamics of Abelian Higgs vortices in the near Bogomolny regime. Commun. Math. Phys. 159, 51–91 (1994)
Serfaty, S.: Coulomb gases and Ginzburg-Landau vortices. Zürich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich (2015)
Sandier, E., Serfaty, S.: Vortices in the Magnetic Ginzburg-Landau Model, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, vol. 70. Birkhäuser, Basel-Boston (2007)
Taubes, C.: Arbitrary \(n\)-vortex solutions to the first order GinzburgCLandau equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 72, 277–292 (1980)
Taubes, C.: On the equivalence of the first and second order equations for gauge theories. Commun. Math. Phys. 75, 207–227 (1980)
Ting, F., Wei, J.: Multi-vortex non-radial solutions to the magnetic Ginzburg–Landau equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 317, 69–97 (2013)
Acknowledgements
The research of J. Wei is partially supported by NSERC of Canada. The research of Y. Wu is supported by NSFC (No. 11701554, No. 11771319, No. 11971339), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017XKQY091) and Jiangsu overseas visiting scholar program for university prominent young & middle-aged teachers and presidents. This paper was completed when Y. Wu was visiting University of British Columbia. He is grateful to the members in Department of Mathematics at University of British Columbia for their invitation and hospitality.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor Michel Chipot on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
In this appendix, we shall prove Proposition 2.1.
Proof of Proposition 2.1
Let \((\varphi ,B)\) be a solution of (1.1) with \(\lambda =1\) such that its degree is N, then under Taubes’s notations and results in [19] (see also [16]), \(\varphi =e^{\frac{1}{2}(u+i\theta )}\) with \(\theta =\sum _{j=1}^m\arg (x-a_j)\) and \(B=\frac{1}{2}(\partial _1\theta +\partial _2u,\partial _2\theta -\partial _1u)\), where \((a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_m)\) is the m vortices of \((\varphi , B)\). Moreover, u also satisfies the following elliptic equation:
where \(\delta _{a_j}\) is the Dirac function at \(a_j\). Now, using this information in the energy functional \({\mathcal {E}}_1(\psi ,A)\), we have
By Levi’s monotone convergence theorem and (3.1),
On the other hand, since \(|\varphi |\le 1\) (cf. [20]), by the diamagnetic inequality (cf. [8, (2.3)]), we know that \(|\varphi |^2-1=e^{u}-1\) in \(H^1({\mathbb {R}}^2)\). Moreover, since \(u=-\sum _{j=1}^{m}\ln (1+\frac{\sigma }{|x-a_j|^2})+v\) for some \(\sigma >4m\) and smooth v which exponentially decays to zero as \(|x|\rightarrow +\infty \) (cf. [19]), \(|\nabla u|\sim \frac{1}{|x-a_j|}\) near each vortex point \(a_j\) and \(|\nabla u|\sim \frac{1}{|x|^3}\) as \(|x|\rightarrow +\infty \). Thus, we can multiply (3.1) in \({\mathbb {R}}^2\backslash \cup _{j=1}^mB_\varepsilon (a_j)\) with \(e^{u}-1\) and integrate by parts, which implies that
Let \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\) and applying Levi’s monotone convergence theorem yield that
Inserting (3.3) and (3.4) into (3.2) and recalling that \({\mathcal {E}}_1(\psi ,B)=N\pi \) since \((\varphi ,B)\)’s degree is N, we must have \(m=N\). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, J., Wu, Y. Local uniqueness of the magnetic Ginzburg–Landau equation. J Elliptic Parabol Equ 6, 187–209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41808-020-00066-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41808-020-00066-w