Skip to main content
Log in

An innovative approach for evaluating mode shapes and natural frequencies of tubular frame and damped outriggers

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A tall building comprised of tubular frame, central shear core, and outrigger-belt truss systems is considered as an equivalent flexural hollow box beam with lumped masses at each floor level. Natural frequencies and mode shapes of the un-damped hybrid system are obtained by forming mass and stiffness matrices and solving the eigenvalue problem. Previous researches did not deal with the overall intrinsic damping of the structure or the damping added by external instruments, nor they considered the hybrid structure comprised of a tubular frame with geometrical discontinuous and damped outrigger systems in free vibration studies. By utilizing the achieved frequencies, first to fifth mode shape vectors, mass matrix, and modal participant mass and considering 5% modal damping ratio for each mode, the classically damping matrix of the hybrid system is achieved to fill these gaps. Then the non-classical damping matrix of the hybrid system with damped outriggers is obtained by adding the viscosity of passive linear viscous dampers to the classical damping matrix at the level of damped outrigger-belt truss systems. The eigenvalue problem is solved, and natural frequencies and mode shapes are obtained. 3-D finite element models of two 60- and 70-story buildings with conventional and damped outrigger systems are analyzed, and comparing the results of the proposed method and those of SAP2000 models reveals the correctness, reliability, and robustness of the method. Moreover, calculating natural frequencies by the proposed method is much less time consuming in comparison with finite element models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghasemzadeh H, Rahmani Samani HR (2010) Estimating frequency of vibration for tubular tall buildings. In: 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia

  2. Mahjoub R, Rahgozar R, Saffari H (2011) Simple method for analysis of tube frame by consideration of negative shear lag. Aust J Basic Apply Sci 5(3):309–316

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jahanshahi MR, Rahgozar R, Malekinejad M (2012) A simple approach to static analysis of tall buildings with a combined tube-in-tube and outrigger-belt truss system subjected to lateral loading. Int J Eng IJE 25(3):289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taranath BS (2017) Tall building design, steel, concrete, and composite systems. Taylor & Francis, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malekinejad M, Rahgozar R (2012) A simple analytical method for computing the natural frequencies and mode shapes of tall buildings. J App Math Modell 36(8):3419–3432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamgar R, Saadatpour MM (2012) A Simple mathematical model for free vibration analysis of combined system consisting of framed tube, Shear core, belt truss and outrigger system with geometrical discontinuities. J App Math Modell 36(10):4918–4930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Malekinejad M, Rahgozar R, Malekinejad A, Rahgozar P (2016) A continuous–discrete approach for evaluation of natural frequencies and mode shapes of high-rise buildings. Int J Adv Struct Eng 8(3):269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammadnejad M, Haji Kazemi H (2017) Dynamic response analysis of a combined system of framed tubed, shear core and outrigger-belt truss. Asian J Civ Eng 18:1211–1228

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammadnejad M, Haji Kazemi H (2018) A new and simple analytical approach to determining the natural frequencies of framed tube structures. J Struct Eng Mech 65(1):111–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rahgozar P (2020) Free vibration of tall buildings using energy method and Hamilton’s principle. J Civ Eng 6(5):945–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwan AKH (1994) Simple method for approximate analysis of framed tube structures. J Struct Eng ASCE 120(4):1221–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamgar R, Rahgozar P (2020) Optimum location for the belt truss system for minimum roof displacement of steel buildings subjected to critical excitation. Steel Compos Struct J. Techno-Press. 37(4):463–479. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.37.4.000

  13. Alavi A, Rahgozar P, Rahgozar R (2018) Minimum-weight design of high-rise structures subjected to flexural vibration at a desired natural frequency. J Struct Des Tall Spec Build 27(15):e1515. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith RJ, Willford MR (2007) The damped outrigger concept for tall buildings. J Struct Des Tall Spec Build 16:501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khatibinia M, Gholami H, Kamgar R (2018) Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation. Int J Dyn Control 6(3):1094–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Y, McFarland DM, Wang Z, Spencer BF, Bergman LA (2010) Analysis of tall buildings with damped outriggers. J Struct Eng ASCE 136:1435–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Y, Zhang Z (2018) Analysis of outrigger numbers and locations in outrigger braced structures using a multi objective genetic algorithm. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 27(1):e1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang B, Takeuchi T (2017) Dynamic response evaluation of damped-outrigger systems with various heights. J Earthq Spectra 33(2):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rostami S, Shojaee S (2017) Alpha-modification of cubic B-Spline direct time integration method. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 17(10):1750118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rostami S, Shojaee S (2018) A family of cubic B-spline direct integration algorithms with controllable numerical dissipation and dispersion for structural dynamics. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 42(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamgar R, Rahgozar P (2019) Reducing static roof displacement and axial forces of columns in tall buildings based on obtaining the best locations for multi-rigid belt truss outrigger systems. Asian J Civ Eng 20(6):759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00142-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2018) The best location of belt truss system in tall buildings using multiple criteria subjected to blast loading. Civ Eng J 4(6):1338–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davari SM, Malekinejad M, Rahgozar R (2019) Static analysis of tall buildings based on Timoshenko beam theory. Int J Adv Struct Eng 11:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-00245-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2019) Seismic performance of outrigger-braced system based on finite element and component-mode synthesis methods. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00299-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amini M, Akbarpour A, Haji Kazemi H, Adibramezani M (2021) Mathematical formulation for determining lateral displacement of tubular frame and outriggers equipped with viscous dampers. Int J Integr Eng 13(1):201–217. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2021.13.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takabatake H, Kitada Y, Takewaki I, Kishida A (2019) Simplified dynamic analysis of high-rise buildings. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Simiu E, Yeo D (2019) Wind effects on structures. Wiley, NJ, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Davari SM, Malekinejad M, Rahgozar R (2021) An approximate approach for the natural frequencies of tall building with trussed-tube system. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00418-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alavi A, Mele E, Rahgozar R, Noroozinejad Farsangi E, Takewaki I, Málaga-Chuquitaype C (2021) Uniform deformation design of outrigger braced skyscrapers: a simplified method for the preliminary design stage. J Struct 31:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R (2020) Optimal location of energy dissipation outrigger in high-rise building considering nonlinear soil-structure Interaction effects. Period Polytech Civ Eng 64(3):887–903. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.14673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Babaei M, Mohammadi Y, Ghannadiasl A (2021) Calculation of vibration period of tall pyramidal buildings structures with tube systems, tube-in-tube, bundled tube and hybrid tube systems with shear wall. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00688-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Husain M, Hassan H, Mohamed HA, Elgharbawy ES (2021) The seismic response of structural outrigger systems in the tall buildings. J Appl Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-30837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Babaei M, Mohammadi Y, Ghannadiasl A (2021) Free vibration and frequency calculation in tall buildings with stepped tube-in-tube systems. Int J Acoust Vib 26(2):140–146. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2021.26.21752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi H, Ho G, Joseph L, Mathias N (2012) Outrigger design for high-rise buildings. CTBUH Outrigger working group, Council on Tall Building and Urban Habitat, Chicago, USA

  35. Chopra AK (2012) Dynamic of structures. Prentice Hall, Berkeley, California

  36. Abdel Raheem SE (2014) Dynamic characteristics of hybrid tower of cable-stayed bridges. J Steel Compos Struct 17(6):803–824. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.6.803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Matlab (2009) Mathworks Inc. Version 7.9.0529, USA

  38. ASCE/SEI 07 (2017), Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, Virginia, USA

  39. Hutchinson JR (2001) Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory. J Appl Mech 68(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1349417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. ECS (2004) Eurocode 8 - design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN1998-1. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

  41. International Conference of Building Officials (1997), Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Pasadena, CA

  42. NBCC (2015) National building code of Canada, Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada (NRCC), Ottawa, Canada

  43. Abdel Raheem SE (2013) Evaluation of Egyptian code provisions for seismic design of moment-resisting-frame multi-story buildings. Int J Adv Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6695-5-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Akbarpour.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest on behalf of all authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amini, M., Akbarpour, A., Haji Kazemi, H. et al. An innovative approach for evaluating mode shapes and natural frequencies of tubular frame and damped outriggers. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00634-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00634-6

Keywords

Navigation