Hypothesis paper: electroacupuncture targeting the gut–brain axis to modulate neurocognitive determinants of eating behavior—toward a proof of concept in the obese minipig model

Abstract

Acupuncture has thousands of years of history and perspective for the treatment of many health problems and disorders. Beneficial effects of acupuncture on obesity have been demonstrated at various levels in animals and clinical trials, with almost no adverse effect, even when combined with local electrical stimulation, i.e., electroacupuncture (EA), a way to potentiate the effects of acupuncture. However, there is still scattered evidence about the impact of EA on brain functions related to the control of eating behavior, and notably on the gut–brain axis mechanisms involved in these putative central modulations. During the past 10 years, we have described a convincing diet-induced obese minipig model, and successfully implemented brain imaging and neurocognitive approaches to challenge mechanistic hypotheses and innovative therapeutic strategies. In the present article, we propose to confront the current literature on the acupuncture and EA effects on the gut–brain axis and obesity with the latest developments in nutrition and neuroscience research using the minipig model. Our aims are to (a) elaborate functional hypotheses on the gut–brain mechanisms underlying EA effects on obesity, and especially on the role of the vagus nerve, and (b) present the rational for testing these hypotheses in the minipig model.

Introduction

Obesity involves a variety of pathogenesis affecting brain functions, gut hormones, the autonomic nervous system, low-grade inflammation and many other biological processes [1,2,3]. Alteration of the gut–brain communication plays a major role in the emergence of metabolic and behavioral disorders. The importance of the vagus nerve has been well described in these communication processes, and modulation of its activity can modify eating behavior and metabolism. Hormones such as leptin, ghrelin, incretins, or CCK transmit information related to hunger and appetite to the hypothalamus, inhibiting or promoting individual food intake (Fig. 1a). Changes in these hormone levels can impact the homeostatic regulation, but also the brain reward system [4, 5]. Specific neurotransmitters at the central level, such as dopamine, serotonin, and opioids, play a major role in food motivation and hedonism, and these systems can be altered in the context of obesity, therefore impacting food intake control [6,7,8]. As a consequence, it is hypothesized that an effective and efficient therapeutic treatment should target all these actors of the gut–brain communication and food intake control. It is the case for instance for bariatric surgery, which is the most effective therapy against morbid obesity [9, 10]. Alternative therapies or combination of approaches that would be less invasive, with less secondary effects and more possibilities to individualize the treatment, are still expected. Targeting the gut–brain axis using neuromodulation strategies is a promising research field to fight against obesity and eating disorders [11].

Fig. 1
figure1

a Schematic representation of the vagal afferent and efferent projections at the gut–brain axis level. Peripheral signals reach the solitary tract and area postrema complex (NST/AP) and/or hypothalamus via afferent vagal fibers (blue lines) and/or blood (e.g., orexigenic or anorectic hormones, pro- or anti-inflammatory factors, etc.). Vagal afferents neurons, located in the nodose ganglia, express chemoreceptors on their terminals in the gut that sense these hormones, as well as mechanoreceptors that sense distension. The NTS projects to the dorsal motor nucleus (DMN), which modulates in return, via efferent vagal fibers (purple lines), the intestinal motility and secretion, glucose production, and pancreatic and adrenal glands endocrine activity. Adapted from Guarino et al. [99] and de Lartigue [100]. b Schematic representation illustrating key brain areas involved in homeostasis, emotion and memory, hedonism and reward, cognitive control, as well as attention and cognitive conflict. Homeostatic, hedonic, limbic, and cognitive circuits regulating food intake are interconnected and modulated by nervous and hormonal food signals. Dopaminergic projections (orange lines) are indicated as an example of neurochemical modulation, since chronic impairment of vagus nerve functions can inhibit brain dopamine neurons, while vagus nerve stimulation can induce dopamine release in the striatum. Adapted from Val-Laillet et al. [11]. c Electroacupuncture performed on specific acupoints is hypothesized to modulate the vagosympathetic balance, the bilateral gut–brain communication, as well as the activity of brain areas involved in food intake control. Electroacupuncture can induce vagus nerve stimulation or blockade, with specific peripheral outcomes described in the context of obesity. For review, see Zhang et al. [13] in the human, and Wang et al. [21] in rodent models. Our main hypothesis is that such outcomes might also contribute to the modulation of brain areas involved in food intake control in obese subjects

Acupuncture and especially electroacupuncture (EA) are gaining interest in the treatment of obesity, both in humans and animals. In multiple clinical studies, significant outcomes of acupuncture or EA were found on the body mass index, weight loss, waist circumference, fat mass, total cholesterol, and plasma triglycerides [12]. Many researchers hypothesized that these therapeutic strategies modulate complex processes involving the gastrointestinal tract, related hormones, and the central and autonomic nervous systems [12, 13], also inhibiting inflammatory signals [14,15,16]. EA consists in applying a slight electric stimulation to the acupuncture needles to potentiate the expected effects of acupuncture alone. There is already evidence demonstrating the added value of EA over acupuncture and sham interventions, notably in obese subjects [17]. The effectiveness of acupuncture at abdominal and hindlimb points is related to the activation of afferent nerve fibers [18], and EA is a way to achieve this goal more easily.

In the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) theory, meridians circulate throughout the whole body and communicate with each other. Meridians and acupuncture loci (i.e., acupoints) corresponding to specific organs can be stimulated by acupuncture, with the aim of regulating “qi and blood” as well as some organ functions to treat diseases or alleviate symptoms [16]. Recent researches showed that many acupoints are located in the vicinity or even precise location of nerves bundles, muscle fascia, and blood or lymph vessels. Each acupoint is unique, not only in terms of location but also in terms of associated biophysiological effects. In this paper, we will use the Chinese names to identify the acupoints of interest, and will indicate the World Health Organization (WHO) corresponding codes in brackets. In pig acupuncture, specific names and codes are used and we will indicate them in addition to their human equivalents.

Rodents have been widely used in nutrition researches as models of obesity and metabolic disorders [19, 20]. A recent review even described the mechanisms of acupuncture therapy for simple obesity in rodent models, highlighting significant and positive effects on the regulation of lipid metabolism, inflammation, appetite, and browning of white adipose tissue [21]. However, due to the considerable metabolic and physiological differences between humans and rodents, the translation of research findings to humans remains complicated, especially for brain and behavioral research [22]. On the contrary, pigs have a gastrointestinal tract anatomy, morphology, and physiology very comparable to those of humans. Importantly, pigs and humans have most of their cerebral structures in common and their brains appear to be comparable in terms of structure, vascularization, anatomy, growth, and development [23, 24]. Pigs and especially minipigs can serve as an obesity model bridging the gap between rodents and humans [25,26,27]. In our previous researches at INRA (now INRAE from 1 January 2020), we validated a diet-induced obesity minipig model in terms of behavioral and metabolic responses [28, 29], and described for the first time in an animal model in vivo brain anomalies that were similar to those observed in obese humans [30]. As a consequence, the pig model represents an excellent opportunity to investigate the impact of acupuncture or EA on the gut–brain determinants of obesity.

In this hypothesis paper, we will first summarize the state of the art supporting an action of EA on the nervous and hormonal pathways connecting the gut to the brain, describing how modulation of the gut–brain communication can influence the central processes underlying food intake control. Second, in light of our 10-year experience in nutrition and neuroscience research in the minipig model at INRA [31], we will justify the implementation of EA in this model to investigate its outcomes in the context of obesity.

Regulation of brain responses and eating behavior by gut–brain signals: the major role of the vagus nerve

Eating behavior is regulated by several systems or functions in the brain (Fig. 1b), including the homeostatic control system (e.g., medulla, hypothalamus), the reward network (e.g., ventral tegmental area, striatum, orbitofrontal cortex), and the cognitive control system (e.g., prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex) [32]. The role of homeostasis is to balance physiological parameters by controlling food intake and energy expenditure according to the metabolic needs. The hedonic dimension of food intake sometimes overrules this regulation system, leading to food overconsumption and loss of control. This is frequently the case in the context of obesity and specific eating disorders, such as food cravings and addictions [11]. The cognitive control allows people to decline a piece of cake when they are hungry, or to prefer less palatable food items if they are healthier [33]. Compared to lean subjects, obese men have less activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a brain area implicated in the inhibition of inappropriate behavior, satiety, and meal termination [11]. In our diet-induced obese adult minipigs, similar deactivations were observed in the dorsolateral and anterior prefrontal cortices, as well as in the ventral striatum, compared with normal-weight minipigs [30]. Moreover, the anterior and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices as well as the insular cortex activity was negatively associated with the body weight [30].

The vagus afferent pathway is probably the most important link between the gut and the brain [34]. The afferent components of the vagus nerve transmit information from the gastrointestinal tract to the solitary nucleus and communicate with the efferent components of the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus (DMV) and other nuclei returning to the target organs, the vagus nerve acting as a bridge [35, 36]. Gut hormones such as ghrelin, incretins, or CCK have the ability to bind to specialized receptors on the vagus nerve and trigger afferent signals (Fig. 1a). In combination with central dopamine for example, they transmit information about the meal caloric density and composition, modulating the alternation of appetite and hunger in the brain, as well as the reward system and hedonic motivation. The disturbance of this gut–brain communication can favor the onset of weight gain and eating disorders such as food addictions [4, 5, 37]. In humans, the obesity-related functional brain anomalies described in the prefrontal cortex and striatum are often associated with a depletion of the dopaminergic system, which underpins the “reward deficit theory” [38, 39]. Interestingly, adult Yucatan minipigs that were exposed to sugar and fat in the young age through the maternal diet showed lower dopamine transporter binding potential in several brain areas as well as lower cognitive abilities during the alley maze test [40]. Deleterious nutrition in the minipig model is consequently a potent trigger for brain anomalies that are comparable to what is described in obese humans.

Previous research in the pig model showed that chronic abdominal vagal stimulation reduced food intake as a consequence of the activation of the brainstem and higher-order brain areas (prefrontal cortex, thalamus, insular cortex, superior colliculus, cingulate cortex) [41, 42] (Fig. 2a). In obese minipigs, this treatment was also associated with reduced weight gain and preference for a sweet feed [43]. Chronic vagal stimulation was also associated with increased glucose metabolism in the cingulate and prefrontal brain areas (Fig. 2a), and substantially improved insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obesity minipigs, via both peripheral and central mechanisms [42]. One of the hypotheses presented in the current paper is that it is possible to mimic the VNS-induced effects using electroacupuncture on specific acupoints in minipigs as well as in humans.

Fig. 2
figure2

Implementation of electroacupuncture (EA) in the pig model to modulate brain areas involved in food intake control and metabolism. a Pig brain schematic representation illustrating the brain areas that were found modulated with vagus nerve stimulation in obese minipigs, together with decreased food intake and weight gain, and improved insulin sensitivity. Adapted from Val-Laillet [31]. b Pig acupuncture charts illustrating the location of candidate acupoints (Pishu (#28) and the third pair of Liumai (#27); Sanwan (#35) and Dafengmen (#70); Hangou (#79) and Housanli (#63)) to modulate the gut–brain axis communication, metabolism, brain activity and eating behavior in diet-induced obese minipigs. Stimulating these acupoints is hypothesized to modulate the vagosympathetic balance and related gut–brain communication pathways, as well as the central processes presented in Fig. 1. Acupuncture charts were adapted from the textbook “Traditional Chinese veterinary acupuncture and moxibustion” [81]. Detailed information about the anatomical position and local innervation of the acupoints of interest are provided in Table 1

Impact of EA on the vagus nerve and other actors of the autonomic nervous system (ANS)

Among several biological actors that may contribute to the acupuncture’s mode of action, the autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a good candidate because it can interconnect external somatosensory inputs with internal organ responses via the central nervous system [44, 45]. Of the sympathetic and the parasympathetic nerves composing the ANS, the vagus nerve, which broadly regulates the functions of internal organs, has been a primary target for exploring the possible effect of acupuncture stimulation on internal organs [18, 46,47,48].

In healthy subjects, the sham-feeding-stimulated vagal gastric acid secretion was significantly reduced by EA at ST36, BL21, and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, but not by classic acupuncture or laser acupuncture [46]. The stimulation of gastric acid secretion by sham feeding entails mainly the central vagal component of gastric acid stimulation [49]. Lux et al. [46] suggested that EA might reduce gastric acid secretion by means of afferent visceral fibers that are related with the vagal nerve system. In addition, in a mouse model of polymicrobial peritonitis, EA at Zusanli (ST36) controlled systemic inflammation by inducing vagal activation of aromatic l-amino acid (DOPA) decarboxylase, leading to the production of dopamine in adrenal medulla. The authors suggested the existence of a novel EA-induced anti-inflammatory mechanism mediated by the sciatic and the vagus nerves, modulating the production of catecholamines in the adrenal glands (Fig. 1a), and which could be mimicked pharmacologically by selective dopamine agonists [48].

Other evidences support the idea that acupuncture or EA can modulate the vagosympathetic balance. In healthy human volunteer subjects, acupuncture stimulation at Ximen (PC4) decreased heart rate [47], an effect that was attenuated by the administration of atropine and propranolol. Therefore, the acupuncture-induced response of a decrease in heart rate was concluded to be a result of a reciprocal coordination of an increase in cardiac vagal activity and a decrease in cardiac sympathetic activity [47]. In animal experimentations using acupuncture, the subjects are very often anesthetized to facilitate handling and the acupuncture treatment, while reducing and homogenizing the individual reactivity. Interestingly, Sato et al. [50] demonstrated in anesthetized animals that cardiac vagal activity is specially depressed by anesthesia, contrary to gastric vagal activity. This point is very important for the scientific demonstration that we aim for in the minipig model, because, to modulate the gut–brain communication, these are the gastric vagal afferent which are targeted. In pigs, Takamiya et al. [51] demonstrated that EA on the limbs significantly suppressed cardiac excitability during left stellate ganglion stimulation through correction of the vagosympathetic balance (attenuation of the increase in LF/HF).

In contrast, other investigations provided evidences that different types of nerve fibers can transmit EA stimulation at the location of body trunk and hindlimb. Noguchi [52] summarized several studies in anesthetized rats (or dogs) showing that EA performed on abdominal acupoints can inhibit gastric motility by exciting the efferent fibers of the gastric sympathetic nerves. On the contrary, EA performed on the hindlimb, at Zusanli (ST36) for example, managed to increase motility by exciting the efferent fibers of the gastric vagus nerve. Comparable effects were observed for duodenal responses and a complex relationship between EA intensities and the motility changes was described. Depending on the expected effects, different types of fibers might be targeted, such as the group VI fibers of the afferent intercostal nerves in the abdominal area, or the group III fibers of the tibial nerves on the hindlimbs, which justifies calibrating precisely the EA intensity according to the target. Concerning gastric acid secretion, different authors obtained contrasted results, with inhibitory or excitatory effects, which prevented clear explanations about the somatoautonomic and endocrine mechanisms involved [52].

An example of hormonal factor regulating eating behavior: the role of leptin in gut–brain signaling

The leptin protein is central to the regulation of energy metabolism and eating behavior [53], and has a major role in the obesity etiology. High serum leptin may be an indicator of increased leptin resistance and high risk for obesity, independently from body fat [54]. Leptin might be an afferent signal of the negative feedback loop regulating adipose tissue mass [55]. It affects food/feed intake in humans [56] and pigs [57], and is considered as a signal of the nutritional status modifying the ‘perceived starvation’ during food deprivation periods [58].

The leptin actions on the central nervous system (CNS) play a major role in mediating its metabolic consequences. High levels of leptin receptor mRNA and protein are expressed in the forebrain, especially in the ventromedial hypothalamus, arcuate nucleus (ARC), and dorsomedial areas of the hypothalamus, as well as in the brainstem [59]. Leptin receptor activation of different intracellular signaling cascades in different CNS regions may provide a basis for the phenomenon of selective leptin resistance and divergent regulation of appetite and energy expenditure in the context of obesity [60]. The vagal afferent neurons play an important role in transmitting leptin signaling to the brain. Knockout leptin receptor in sensory neurons of mice increased food intake, meal size, and meal duration; furthermore, CCK- and leptin-induced satiation were reduced [61]. Leptin potentiates the post-prandial release of gastrointestinal hormones such as CCK, PYY, and GLP-1, which activate vagal afferent neurons to mediate satiation control and meal termination [62]. Leptin signaling in vagal afferent neurons is required for CCK-induced satiation [61].

EA as leverage to modify the gut–brain communication through modulation of the vagosympathetic balance and hormonal factors

As previously stated, direct bilateral vagal stimulation in the obese minipig was successful in activating the DVC and corticolimbic brain structures, reducing food intake and weight gain, as well as improving insulin sensitivity via peripheral and central mechanisms [41,42,43]. But non-invasive approaches to stimulate the vagus nerve have also been successfully tested. Kraus et al. [63] performed electrical stimulation of the nerves in the left outer auditory canal of healthy subjects, with the aim of activating vagal afferences transcutaneously (t-VNS). An improvement of well-being assessed with psychometric self-rated scales was observed after t-VNS, and the brain activation patterns observed in these volunteers shared similarities with those observed during invasive vagus nerve stimulation. This result was further confirmed by another fMRI study in humans [64], and in rats multiple t-VNS sessions had antidiabetic effects by regulating glycemia through the triggering of tidal melatonin secretion [65].

Similarly, EA stimulation may generate physiological effects on the autonomic nervous system and especially the vagus nerve, which innervates many internal organs and further triggers brain response (Fig. 1a), with the consequence of regulating metabolic parameters, homeostasis, and eventually eating behavior (Fig. 1b). A few peripheral outcomes of electroacupuncture treatment in the context of obesity are summarized in Fig. 1c. Concerning EA effects at the brain level, the first evidence came from a research demonstrating, through brain molecular biology and immunohistochemistry in rats and mice, that EA at Zusanli (ST36) triggered neuronal responses, including the expression of axonal growth-associated protein in the dorsal root ganglia, as well as increased c-Fos transcription factor in the motor nucleus of the vagus nerve (DMV) and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) [66]. The DMV and NTS play a major role in integrating visceral somatosensory signals, notably through the vagus nerve and solitary tract, and generating feedback to the splanchnic area [67]. Wang et al. [68] demonstrated in rats that EA at Zhongwan (RN12) and Weishu (BL21) induced neuronal activation in the dorsal vagal complex (DVC) and paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PVN), increased the levels of gastrin and gastrin receptors in the gastric antrum and PVN, and regulated gastric motility. A more recent study demonstrated in a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute inflammation that acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36), via the transmission of signals through the vagus nerve and the activation of the DVC, attenuated the inflammatory response assessed by TNF-α expression in the serum and spleen [69]. A comparable experiment in rats showed that EA at Zusanli (ST36) on the hindlimb, in comparison to Shousanli (LI10) on the forelimb, increased gastric acid secretion [70]. This response was abolished after sciatic denervation or vagotomy, but enhanced after sympathectomy. The authors concluded that the EA effects were dependent on the somatic nerves for the afferent pathway, as well as the vagus nerve to the stomach for the efferent pathway [70]. Other factors than somatoautonomic reflexes might be involved in this regulation process, such as hormonal and emotional factors [18].

Hormonal factors such as gut hormones leptin, ghrelin or dopamine may play a role as mentioned above. Acupuncture treatment for obesity had beneficial effect on serum leptin levels compared to no treatment or oral anorectic drug, and this effect was even increased when combined with diet therapy or exercise [71]. Five-week acupuncture treatment showed beneficial effects on insulin, leptin, ghrelin, and CCK levels in obese women compared to sham (non-penetrating) acupuncture group, even after a few weeks of treatment [72]. Compared with a food-restricted group, the EA group showed a significant body weight loss and decrease in serum leptin levels in women [73]. Finally, a clinical trial on obesity and overweight in human volunteers in Iran demonstrated a greater reduction of plasma leptin in the EA group than in the sham group [74]. Ghrelin is known to target the hypothalamus (HYP) for regulating eating behavior [75]. The roles of ghrelin feedback on the appetite regulating network are crucial for energy homeostasis and appetite [76]. Evidence suggested that the orexigenic peptides, including ghrelin and neuropeptide Y (NPY), could be down-regulated by EA, therefore decreasing food intake in rats [77]. Even more interesting is the work performed by von Deneen et al. [78] who found in fasting overweight male volunteers that different functional neural networks correlated with EA-induced effects on blood glucose, core body temperature, and hunger, respectively. The increased dopamine (DA) during acute acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) and Yinlingquan (SP9) was probably associated with modulations of the poststimulation limbic system and spinothalamic tract connectivity, with positive or negative correlations between acupuncture-induced changes in hunger and two specific networks, HYP-anterior cingulate cortex and HYP-thalamus, respectively [78].

Because of their biophysiological specificities, different acupoints induce different brain responses. In another brain imaging study, Wu et al. [79] found that acupuncture at Hegu (LI4) and Zusanli (ST36) was linked to the activation or deactivation of several limbic system structures. Interestingly, all of these structures are involved in eating behavior and food intake control (Fig. 1b). The hypothalamus plays a role in homeostasis; the nucleus accumbens is part of the reward circuit and was found to be deactivated in obese humans and minipigs [11, 30]; the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in attentional processes and decision-making; while the amygdala and hippocampal complex play a major role in associative learning, emotions, and cognitive processes. For example, the nucleus accumbens and hypothalamus signal activity was increased with acupuncture at Hegu (LI4) and Zusanli (ST36) [79], while the amygdala and hippocampus signal activity was decreased. The existence of different brain responses to acupuncture according to the acupoints selected is not surprising considering that EA stimulation at different body parts cause the activation of different nervous pathways [80]. Further studies need to focus on the specific neurophysiological mechanisms triggered by different combinations of EA stimulations, and their outcomes in terms of brain and behavioral responses.

State-of-the-art and rationale for implementing acupuncture in the minipig model

The description of acupoints in the pig relies both on anatomical analogies with the human and experimental veterinary science reports. Anatomical charts for acupuncture are available for the pig in veterinary textbooks [81]. Similarly to human acupoints, pig acupoints are located at or near muscle, blood or lymph vessels, or nerves, and have unique biophysiological effects. In veterinary medicine, acupuncture has been used to treat different diseases in pigs [82]. For instance, stimulation of points similar to human Changqiang (GV1), Yaoshu (GV2), Mingmen (GV4) and GV20 (Baihui) is the usual choice to treat impotence and penile paralysis in male boars [83], while acupuncture at Changqiang (GV1), Baihui (GV20), Pishu (BL20) and Zusanli (ST36) produced significant results for treating diarrhea and gut inflammation (for review, [84]). Other authors showed that acupuncture at a locus Dafengmen (#70) similar to the Baihui (GV20) acupoint in the human improved sleep conditions of minipigs [85], demonstrating that stimulation of similar acupoints produces similar therapeutical effects in humans and minipigs. In parallel to human trials, the minipig was also used to test the hypothesis of low hydraulic resistance channels along meridians [86] and demonstrate that blocking these channels trigger a gastric and intestinal distension [87].

Although minipigs share more anatomical similarities with human than rodents, there are still obvious anatomy (e.g., four-legged vs. two-legged) and physiology differences that make impossible to identify in the minipig every acupoint described in the human. It is sometimes tricky to identify in the pig the equivalent locus of a human acupoint. The acupoint Yintang (GV24), for instance, is located between the eyebrows in the human, but there is no equivalent in the pig acupuncture charts. However, Litscher et al. [88] investigated in the pig model whether differences in parameters of bioelectrical brain activity could be found after acupuncture at Yintang (GV24) and Renzhong (GV26). This study revealed a non-significant decrease of the bispectral index with Yintang (GV24) stimulation and an increase with Renzhong (GV26), which is in accordance with studies performed in humans. According to the TCM theory, the acupoint Yintang (GV24) is said to have sedating effects in human medicine, whereas Renzhong (GV26) is said to have stimulating effects.

All these studies demonstrate that, to implement acupuncture in pigs for research and veterinary purposes, it is necessary to combine the fundamental principles of the TCM theory with anatomical/physiological analogies between species, as well as existing veterinary reports confirming significant outcomes.

Toward a preclinical study in the diet-induced obese minipig to modulate the gut–brain axis and eating behavior

On the basis of the aforementioned state of the art, we propose implementing EA in the diet-induced obese minipig model to identify the best combination of acupoint stimulation to modulate brain areas involved in the different dimensions of food intake control (i.e., homeostasis, hedonism, and executive functions). The ultimate goal is to use EA treatment in obese people to decrease their appetite and food cravings, through the neuromodulation of specific brain areas and processes.

Based on data obtained in the human, rodent and pig models, we selected three sets of acupoint combinations of interest (Table 1; Fig. 2b) including: the pair of pig Pishu (#28) acupoints (anatomically similar to the human Pishu (BL20)) and the third pair of pig Liumai (#27) acupoints (anatomically similar to the human Weishu (BL21)), both located on the back; the three-locus pig Sanwan (#35) acupoint (anatomically similar to the human Shangwan (RN13), Zhongwan (RN12), and Xiawan (RN10)) on the abdomen and pig Dafengmen (#70) on the head (similar to Baihui (GV20) in the human); and a combination of acupoints on the hindlimbs, the pig Housanli (#63) and pig Hangou (#79) (acupoints equivalent of the human Zusanli (ST36) and Huantiao (GB30)). These acupoints were chosen according to the literature previously described in this hypothesis paper as well as to our acupuncturist’s expertise. Concerning Baihui (GV20) on the head (Dafengmen (#70) in the pig), EA at this acupoint demonstrated positive effects in rat models of depression [89] or brain ischemia [90]. Zheng et al. [89] showed that EA at Baihui (GV20) normalized responses in a sucrose-preference test and ameliorated depression-related manifestations by regulating the expression of different genes, notably in the prefrontal cortex. Wen et al. [90] showed improved cognitive abilities and fMRI BOLD brain responses in the hippocampus, cingulate gyrus, and prelimbic cortex. The prefrontal cortex and hippocampus were repeatedly found altered in minipig models of deleterious nutrition and obesity [11, 30, 40, 91], and we hypothesize that regulating their activity via EA at Baihui (GV20), in combination with EA-induced activation of the gut–brain vagal pathway, would contribute to regulate the behavioral and brain processes underlying food intake control, exactly as the more invasive vagus nerve stimulation did in the minipig model [41,42,43] (Fig. 2a).

Table 1 Precise location and anatomical information for the six acupoints selected for our preclinical study in the minipig model

It is expected that the minipig skin impedance is different from that of humans, which is also different from that of rodents. Each species requires specific methodological adjustments. In obese women, stimulation with a frequency of 5 Hz, wave duration of 1 ms, and intensity of 1.5 mA for 20 min can produce significant effects in terms of weight loss [92]. But even in humans, these parameters must be adjusted according to individual skin impedance or subject’s feeling (e.g., if the subject feels uncomfortable). In anaesthetized minipigs, rather than relying on the individual’s feedback, we will look for objectifiable criteria, such as muscle contraction. This is the case in rats for example, where Luo et al. [15] selected 2-Hz continuous wave for 10 min, with an intensity starting from 1 mA and progressively increasing until the induction of slight muscle contraction. In mice, Choowanthanapakorn et al. [93] used 2-Hz frequency, 100-μs duration, with an intensity of 1 mA for 15 min, whereas Lim et al. [69] selected 1-Hz frequency, 2-ms pulse duration, and 1-V voltage for 30 min. There is still no EA study in minipigs, but the stimulation parameters will be adapted to the model, from 1 mA with progressively increasing intensity until the induction of local muscle contraction. In obese minipigs, the needle insertion depth will be individually adapted according to ultrasonographic measurements of the subcutaneous fat thickness, since most of the acupoints selected (apart from Dafengmen (#70)) target muscle tissues (i.e., below the adiposity layer). According to a recent systematic review and meta-analysis [94], which included 77 studies focusing on electroacupuncture in obesity animal models, 36 trials used continuous waves with frequency of 1–100 Hz, and 14 studies used disperse-dense waves with frequency of 2–100 Hz. The use of continuous wave at 10 Hz was the most commonly used stimulus parameter for electroacupuncture in obese animal models. Our first electroacupuncture tests in normal-weight adult Yucatan minipigs (13-month-old and 35-kg females) demonstrated that a 2-Hz-frequency continuous wave stimulation (KWD-808I electric stimulator; Changzhou Yingdi Electronic Medical devices Co., Ltd.) was sufficient to induce slight muscle contraction on abdominal and hind leg acupoints with an intensity of 2–2.5 mA, as well as on back acupoints with an intensity of 3 mA.

Our preclinical study in the minipig model will mainly aim at describing how EA can neuromodulate specific brain areas and processes involved in food intake, motivation, and pleasure. Basic measurements (previously used in published studies in animal models and/or humans) before, during, and/or after chronic EA treatment will include feed intake and body weight measurements, bio-impedance and ultrasonography measurements to assess body composition, plasma analyses (glucose, gastrointestinal hormones, inflammation marker, cortisol, etc.), hearth rate variability (HRV) via electrocardiography (ECG) measurements to assess the vagosympathetic balance, body thermography measurements to detect any potential increase of the skin temperature during EA, and electroencephalography (EEG) measurements to assess the brain cortical electrical activity. Most important will be the brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions performed to map the brain responses to acute EA, as well as the brain responses to oral sugar sensing after chronic EA or sham treatment in obese minipigs. fMRI is a non-invasive neuroimaging approach that can be used to investigate sensory, cognitive, and hedonic integration of exteroceptive or interoceptive stimuli in healthy or pathological subjects. Our laboratory has a world-recognized 10-year experience in using functional brain imaging in the pig model for nutritional and translational research [31]. Notably, we previously described, using fMRI or nuclear brain imaging, the pig brain responses to sucrose stimulation or palatable food flavors [95, 96] and demonstrated that obese minipigs have similar brain anomalies as obese humans [30]. Behavioral correlates will be explored via dedicated behavioral tests that have been extensively implemented, validated, and published, such as food preference and motivation tests, as well as food-rewarded spatial cognitive tests [40, 91].

All the technologies required for this proof of concept and identification of the best EA acupoints combination have already been implemented in the minipig model [31]. As stated before, this encompasses metabolic, physiological, and behavioral explorations, as well as minimally invasive neurobiological measures of the vagus nerve activity [97] and brain responses to various stimuli via fMRI [96, 98]. The fact that significant positive effects of acupuncture and EA in comparison to control treatment in the pig model were demonstrated in several studies indicates the good reproducibility of these approaches in this species [84, 85]. French–Chinese research collaboration was initiated in 2019 to perform this research, of which the aim is to select the best EA strategy, to validate its neurophysiological and neurocognitive effects, and to open the way to a clinical trial in obese human patients.

What is already known on this subject?

Previous published articles in humans and rodent models demonstrated some beneficial effects of acupuncture and EA in the context of obesity, but further research, notably at the brain and behavioral levels, requires thorough explorations of EA effects in an animal model closer to humans. Rodents have a small and lissencephalic brain, with a general anatomy that is very different from that of humans, which complicates the analogy for acupuncture and neuroscience research. The location of acupoints has been described in pigs. Despite the fact that the minipig model is increasingly used for nutrition and neuroscience research, we found no publication implementing acupuncture or EA in this model and in the context of obesity.

What does this study add?

The aim of our study is to demonstrate for the first time, in an animal model closer to humans than the usual rodent models, that EA at specific acupoints can modulate the gut–brain axis communication, brain activity, as well as the neurocognitive functions related to food pleasure and motivation. French–Chinese research collaboration was initiated in 2019 to perform this research, of which the aim is to select the best EA strategy, to validate its neurophysiological and neurocognitive effects in terms of food intake control, and to open the way to a clinical trial in obese human patients.

References

  1. 1.

    Di Gregorio GB, Yao-Borengasser A, Rasouli N, Varma V, Lu T, Miles LM, Ranganathan G, Peterson CA, McGehee RE, Kern PA (2005) Expression of CD68 and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 genes in human adipose and muscle tissues: association with cytokine expression, insulin resistance, and reduction by pioglitazone. Diabetes 54:2305–2313. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW Jr (2003) Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest 112:1796–1808. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI19246

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, Sole J, Nichols A, Ross JS, Tartaglia LA, Chen H (2003) Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 112:1821–1830. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI19451

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Meier U, Gressner AM (2004) Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism: review of pathobiochemical and clinical chemical aspects of leptin, ghrelin, adiponectin, and resistin. Clin Chem 50:1511–1525. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.032482

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Monteleone P, Maj M (2013) Dysfunctions of leptin, ghrelin, BDNF and endocannabinoids in eating disorders: beyond the homeostatic control of food intake. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:312–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.10.021

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blundell JE, Lawton CL, Halford JC (1995) Serotonin, eating behavior, and fat intake. Obes Res 3(Suppl 4):471S–476S

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cota D, Tschop MH, Horvath TL, Levine AS (2006) Cannabinoids, opioids and eating behavior: the molecular face of hedonism? Brain Res Rev 51:85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.10.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Poldrack RA (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci 10:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hankir MK, Seyfried F, Miras AD, Cowley MA (2018) Brain feeding circuits after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Trends Endocrinol Metab 29:218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2018.01.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stefanidis A, Oldfield BJ (2017) Neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying bariatric surgery: insights from human studies and animal models. J Neuroendocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Val-Laillet D, Aarts E, Weber B, Ferrari M, Quaresima V, Stoeckel LE, Alonso-Alonso M, Audette M, Malbert CH, Stice E (2015) Neuroimaging and neuromodulation approaches to study eating behavior and prevent and treat eating disorders and obesity. Neuroimage Clin 8:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang Y, Li J, Mo G, Liu J, Yang H, Chen X, Liu H, Cai T, Zhang X, Tian X, Zhou Z, Huang W (2018) Acupuncture and related therapies for obesity: a network meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2018:9569685. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9569685

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang K, Zhou S, Wang C, Xu H, Zhang L (2018) Acupuncture on obesity: clinical evidence and possible neuroendocrine mechanisms. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2018:6409389. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6409389

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ismail LA, Ibrahim AA, Abdel-Latif GA, El-Haleem DA, Helmy G, Labib LM, El-Masry MK (2015) Effect of acupuncture on body weight reduction and inflammatory mediators in Egyptian obese patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 3:85–90. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Luo D, Liu L, Liang FX, Yu ZM, Chen R (2018) Electroacupuncture: a feasible Sirt1 promoter which modulates metainflammation in diet-induced obesity rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2018:5302049. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5302049

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yang H, Li Y, Cheng L, He JS (2007) Effect of electroacupuncture and diet adjusting on insulin resistance in rats with nutrition obesity. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao 5:546–549. https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20070514

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Belivani M, Dimitroula C, Katsiki N, Apostolopoulou M, Cummings M, Hatzitolios AI (2013) Acupuncture in the treatment of obesity: a narrative review of the literature. Acupunct Med 31:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2012-010247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Noguchi E (2010) Acupuncture regulates gut motility and secretion via nerve reflexes. Auton Neurosci 156:15–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2010.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Heydemann A (2016) An overview of murine high fat diet as a model for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Res 2016:2902351. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2902351

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kleinert M, Clemmensen C, Hofmann SM, Moore MC, Renner S, Woods SC, Huypens P, Beckers J, de Angelis MH, Schurmann A, Bakhti M, Klingenspor M, Heiman M, Cherrington AD, Ristow M, Lickert H, Wolf E, Havel PJ, Muller TD, Tschop MH (2018) Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 14:140–162. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang LH, Huang W, Wei D, Ding DG, Liu YR, Wang JJ, Zhou ZY (2019) Mechanisms of acupuncture therapy for simple obesity: an evidence-based review of clinical and animal studies on simple obesity. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019:5796381. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5796381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Spurlock ME, Gabler NK (2008) The development of porcine models of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr 138:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/138.2.397

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lind NM, Moustgaard A, Jelsing J, Vajta G, Cumming P, Hansen AK (2007) The use of pigs in neuroscience: modeling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:728–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vodicka P, Smetana K Jr, Dvorankova B, Emerick T, Xu YZ, Ourednik J, Ourednik V, Motlik J (2005) The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1049:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1334.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Renner S, Dobenecker B, Blutke A, Zols S, Wanke R, Ritzmann M, Wolf E (2016) Comparative aspects of rodent and nonrodent animal models for mechanistic and translational diabetes research. Theriogenology 86:406–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.055

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Koopmans SJ, Schuurman T (2015) Considerations on pig models for appetite, metabolic syndrome and obese type 2 diabetes: from food intake to metabolic disease. Eur J Pharmacol 759:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.044

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Roura E, Koopmans SJ, Lalles JP, Le Huerou-Luron I, de Jager N, Schuurman T, Val-Laillet D (2016) Critical review evaluating the pig as a model for human nutritional physiology. Nutr Res Rev 29:60–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422416000020

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Val-Laillet D, Blat S, Louveau I, Malbert CH (2010) A computed tomography scan application to evaluate adiposity in a minipig model of human obesity. Br J Nutr 104:1719–1728. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510002667

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Val-Laillet D, Guerin S, Malbert CH (2010) Slower eating rate is independent to gastric emptying in obese minipigs. Physiol Behav 101:462–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.07.014

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Val-Laillet D, Layec S, Guerin S, Meurice P, Malbert CH (2011) Changes in brain activity after a diet-induced obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19:749–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Val-Laillet D (2019) Review: impact of food, gut–brain signals and metabolic status on brain activity in the pig model: 10 years of nutrition research using in vivo brain imaging. Animal 13:2699–2713. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001745

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Farr OM, Li CS, Mantzoros CS (2016) Central nervous system regulation of eating: insights from human brain imaging. Metabolism 65:699–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2016.02.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Aron AR (2011) From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry 69:e55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Berthoud HR (2008) Vagal and hormonal gut–brain communication: from satiation to satisfaction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 20(Suppl 1):64–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01104.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Andersson U, Tracey KJ (2012) Neural reflexes in inflammation and immunity. J Exp Med 209:1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20120571

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chiu IM, von Hehn CA, Woolf CJ (2012) Neurogenic inflammation and the peripheral nervous system in host defense and immunopathology. Nat Neurosci 15:1063–1067. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3144

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    de Araujo IE, Ferreira JG, Tellez LA, Ren X, Yeckel CW (2012) The gut–brain dopamine axis: a regulatory system for caloric intake. Physiol Behav 106:394–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.02.026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Stice E, Yokum S, Burger KS, Epstein LH, Small DM (2011) Youth at risk for obesity show greater activation of striatal and somatosensory regions to food. J Neurosci 31:4360–4366. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6604-10.2011

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Baler RD (2011) Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity. Trends Cogn Sci 15:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gautier Y, Luneau I, Coquery N, Meurice P, Malbert CH, Guerin S, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE, Clouard C, Le Huerou-Luron I, Blat S, Val-Laillet D (2018) Maternal Western diet during gestation and lactation modifies adult offspring's cognitive and hedonic brain processes, behavior, and metabolism in Yucatan minipigs. FASEB J. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201701541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Malbert CH, Bobillier E, Picq C, Divoux JL, Guiraud D, Henry C (2017) Effects of chronic abdominal vagal stimulation of small-diameter neurons on brain metabolism and food intake. Brain Stimul 10:735–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Malbert CH, Picq C, Divoux JL, Henry C, Horowitz M (2017) Obesity-associated alterations in glucose metabolism are reversed by chronic bilateral stimulation of the abdominal vagus nerve. Diabetes 66:848–857. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-0847

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Val-Laillet D, Biraben A, Randuineau G, Malbert CH (2010) Chronic vagus nerve stimulation decreased weight gain, food consumption and sweet craving in adult obese minipigs. Appetite 55:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.008

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Jänig W (2006) Integrative action of the autonomic nervous system: neurobiology of homeostasis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541667

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kavoussi B, Ross BE (2007) The neuroimmune basis of anti-inflammatory acupuncture. Integr Cancer Ther 6:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735407305892

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lux G, Hagel J, Backer P, Backer G, Vogl R, Ruppin H, Domschke S, Domschke W (1994) Acupuncture inhibits vagal gastric acid secretion stimulated by sham feeding in healthy subjects. Gut 35:1026–1029. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.8.1026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nishijo K, Mori H, Yosikawa K, Yazawa K (1997) Decreased heart rate by acupuncture stimulation in humans via facilitation of cardiac vagal activity and suppression of cardiac sympathetic nerve. Neurosci Lett 227:165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00337-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Torres-Rosas R, Yehia G, Pena G, Mishra P, del Rocio T-B, Moreno-Eutimio MA, Arriaga-Pizano LA, Isibasi A, Ulloa L (2014) Dopamine mediates vagal modulation of the immune system by electroacupuncture. Nat Med 20:291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3479

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Feldman M, Richardson CT (1986) Role of thought, sight, smell, and taste of food in the cephalic phase of gastric acid secretion in humans. Gastroenterology 90:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(86)90943-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sato A, Sato Y, Schmidt RF (1997) The impact of somatosensory input on autonomic functions. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 130:1–328

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Takamiya T, Kubo Y, Benharash P, Zhou W (2018) Effect of electroacupuncture on porcine cardiac excitability induced by left stellate ganglion stimulation. Auton Neurosci 213:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2018.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Noguchi E (2008) Mechanism of reflex regulation of the gastroduodenal function by acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 5:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nem077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Friedman JM, Halaas JL (1998) Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 395:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1038/27376

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Fleisch AF, Agarwal N, Roberts MD, Han JC, Theim KR, Vexler A, Troendle J, Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA (2007) Influence of serum leptin on weight and body fat growth in children at high risk for adult obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:948–954. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1390

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Maffei M, Halaas J, Ravussin E, Pratley RE, Lee GH, Zhang Y, Fei H, Kim S, Lallone R, Ranganathan S et al (1995) Leptin levels in human and rodent: measurement of plasma leptin and ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects. Nat Med 1:1155–1161. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1195-1155

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Farooqi IS, Bullmore E, Keogh J, Gillard J, O'Rahilly S, Fletcher PC (2007) Leptin regulates striatal regions and human eating behavior. Science 317:1355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144599

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Barb CR, Kraeling RR, Rampacek GB, Hausman GJ (2006) The role of neuropeptide Y and interaction with leptin in regulating feed intake and luteinizing hormone and growth hormone secretion in the pig. Reproduction 131:1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.01108

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ahima RS, Prabakaran D, Mantzoros C, Qu D, Lowell B, Maratos-Flier E, Flier JS (1996) Role of leptin in the neuroendocrine response to fasting. Nature 382:250–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/382250a0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Morris DL, Rui L (2009) Recent advances in understanding leptin signaling and leptin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 297:E1247–1259. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00274.2009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Hall JE, da Silva AA, do Carmo JM, Dubinion J, Hamza S, Munusamy S, Smith G, Stec DE (2010) Obesity-induced hypertension: role of sympathetic nervous system, leptin, and melanocortins. J Biol Chem 285:17271–17276. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R110.113175

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    de Lartigue G, Ronveaux CC, Raybould HE (2014) Deletion of leptin signaling in vagal afferent neurons results in hyperphagia and obesity. Mol Metab 3:595–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2014.06.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Peters JH, Karpiel AB, Ritter RC, Simasko SM (2004) Cooperative activation of cultured vagal afferent neurons by leptin and cholecystokinin. Endocrinology 145:3652–3657. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2004-0221

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kraus T, Hosl K, Kiess O, Schanze A, Kornhuber J, Forster C (2007) BOLD fMRI deactivation of limbic and temporal brain structures and mood enhancing effect by transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 114:1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-007-0755-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Frangos E, Ellrich J, Komisaruk BR (2015) Non-invasive access to the vagus nerve central projections via electrical stimulation of the external ear: fMRI evidence in humans. Brain Stimul 8:624–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wang S, Zhai X, Li S, McCabe MF, Wang X, Rong P (2015) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation induces tidal melatonin secretion and has an antidiabetic effect in Zucker fatty rats. PLoS ONE 10:e0124195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124195

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kim MH, Park YC, Namgung U (2012) Acupuncture-stimulated activation of sensory neurons. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 5:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2012.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Travagli RA, Hermann GE, Browning KN, Rogers RC (2006) Brainstem circuits regulating gastric function. Annu Rev Physiol 68:279–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040504.094635

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Wang H, Liu WJ, Shen GM, Zhang MT, Huang S, He Y (2015) Neural mechanism of gastric motility regulation by electroacupuncture at RN12 and BL21: a paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus-dorsal vagal complex-vagus nerve-gastric channel pathway. World J Gastroenterol 21:13480–13489. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13480

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lim HD, Kim MH, Lee CY, Namgung U (2016) Anti-inflammatory effects of acupuncture stimulation via the vagus nerve. PLoS ONE 11:e0151882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151882

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Noguchi E, Hayashi H (1996) Increases in gastric acidity in response to electroacupuncture stimulation of the hindlimb of anesthetized rats. Jpn J Physiol 46:53–58. https://doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.46.53

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Park KS, Park KI, Suh HS, Hwang DS, Jang JB, Lee JM (2017) The efficacy and safety of acupuncture on serum leptin levels in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Integr Med 11:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2017.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gucel F, Bahar B, Demirtas C, Mit S, Cevik C (2012) Influence of acupuncture on leptin, ghrelin, insulin and cholecystokinin in obese women: a randomised, sham-controlled preliminary trial. Acupunct Med 30:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2012-010127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Cabioglu MT, Ergene N (2006) Changes in serum leptin and beta endorphin levels with weight loss by electroacupuncture and diet restriction in obesity treatment. Am J Chin Med 34:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X06003588

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Darbandi S, Darbandi M, Mokarram P, Owji AA, Zhao B, Ghayor-Mobarhan M, Abdi H, Saberfiroozi M, Nematy M, Safarian M, Parizadeh MR, Shakeri MT, Soukhtanloo M, Abbasi P, Salehmoghadam M, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Ferns G (2013) Effects of body electroacupuncture on plasma leptin concentrations in obese and overweight people in Iran: a randomized controlled trial. Altern Ther Health Med 19:24–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kalra SP, Kalra PS (2004) Overlapping and interactive pathways regulating appetite and craving. J Addict Dis 23:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J069v23n03_02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Kalra SP, Bagnasco M, Otukonyong EE, Dube MG, Kalra PS (2003) Rhythmic, reciprocal ghrelin and leptin signaling: new insight in the development of obesity. Regul Pept 111:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-0115(02)00305-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Tian N, Wang F, Tian DR, Zou Y, Wang SW, Guan LL, Shi YS, Chang JK, Yang J, Han JS (2006) Electroacupuncture suppresses expression of gastric ghrelin and hypothalamic NPY in chronic food restricted rats. Peptides 27:2313–2320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2006.03.010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    von Deneen KM, Qin W, Liu P, Dong M, Chen P, Xie H, Zhang Y, Gold MS, Liu Y, Tian J (2015) Connectivity study of the neuromechanism of acute acupuncture needling during fMRI in "overweight" subjects. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015:384389. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/384389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Wu MT, Hsieh JC, Xiong J, Yang CF, Pan HB, Chen YC, Tsai G, Rosen BR, Kwong KK (1999) Central nervous pathway for acupuncture stimulation: localization of processing with functional MR imaging of the brain preliminary experience. Radiology 212:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl04133

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Sato A, Sato Y, Suzuki A, Uchida S (1993) Neural mechanisms of the reflex inhibition and excitation of gastric motility elicited by acupuncture-like stimulation in anesthetized rats. Neurosci Res 18:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0102(93)90105-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yu C (1995) Traditional Chinese veterinary acupuncture and moxibustion. China Agriculture, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Chan WW, Chen KY, Liu H, Wu LS, Lin JH (2001) Acupuncture for general veterinary practice. J Vet Med Sci 63:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.63.1057

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lin JH, Panzer R (1992) Acupuncture for reproductive disorders. Probl Vet Med 4:155–161

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Habacher G, Pittler MH, Ernst E (2006) Effectiveness of acupuncture in veterinary medicine: systematic review. J Vet Intern Med 20:480–488. https://doi.org/10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[480:eoaivm]2.0.co;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Takeishi K, Horiuchi M, Kawaguchi H, Deguchi Y, Izumi H, Arimura E, Kuchiiwa S, Tanimoto A, Takeuchi T (2012) Acupuncture improves sleep conditions of minipigs representing diurnal animals through an anatomically similar point to the acupoint (GV20) effective for humans. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012:472982. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/472982

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Zhang WB, Tian YY, Li H, Tian JH, Luo MF, Xu FL, Wang GJ, Huang T, Xu YH, Wang RH (2008) A discovery of low hydraulic resistance channel along meridians. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 1:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2005-2901(09)60003-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Zhou WT, Jia SY, Zhang YQ, Tian YY, Wang GJ, Huang T, Pang L, Zhou YS, Sun XY, Zhang WB (2013) Pathological changes in internal organs after blocking low hydraulic resistance channels along the stomach meridian in pigs. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:935687. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/935687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Litscher G (2010) 10 Years evidence-based high-tech acupuncture part 3: a short review of animal experiments. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 7:151–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nen034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Zheng Y, He J, Guo L, Yao L, Zheng X, Yang Z, Xia Y, Wu X, Su Y, Xu N, Chen Y (2019) Transcriptome analysis on maternal separation rats with depression-related manifestations ameliorated by electroacupuncture. Front Neurosci 13:314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Wen T, Zhang X, Liang S, Li Z, Xing X, Liu W, Tao J (2018) Electroacupuncture ameliorates cognitive impairment and spontaneous low-frequency brain activity in rats with ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 27:2596–2605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Val-Laillet D, Besson M, Guerin S, Coquery N, Randuineau G, Kanzari A, Quesnel H, Bonhomme N, Bolhuis JE, Kemp B, Blat S, Le Huerou-Luron I, Clouard C (2017) A maternal Western diet during gestation and lactation modifies offspring's microbiota activity, blood lipid levels, cognitive responses, and hippocampal neurogenesis in Yucatan pigs. FASEB J 31:2037–2049. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201601015R

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Zhou X, Xing B, He G, Lyu X, Zeng Y (2018) The effects of electrical acupuncture and essential amino acid supplementation on sarcopenic obesity in male older adults: a randomized control study. Obes Facts 11:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1159/000491797

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Choowanthanapakorn M, Lu KW, Yang J, Hsieh CL, Lin YW (2015) Targeting TRPV1 for body weight control using TRPV1(−/−) mice and electroacupuncture. Sci Rep 5:17366. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17366

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Fan XL, Yu ML, Fu SP, Zhuang Y, Lu SF (2019) Effectiveness of acupuncture in treatment of simple obesity in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019:5459326. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5459326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Clouard C, Jouhanneau M, Meunier-Salaun MC, Malbert CH, Val-Laillet D (2012) Exposures to conditioned flavours with different hedonic values induce contrasted behavioural and brain responses in pigs. PLoS ONE 7:e37968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037968

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Coquery N, Meurice P, Janvier R, Bobillier E, Quellec S, Fu M, Roura E, Saint-Jalmes H, Val-Laillet D (2018) fMRI-based brain responses to quinine and sucrose gustatory stimulation for nutrition research in the minipig model: a proof-of-concept study. Front Behav Neurosci 12:151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00151

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Val-Laillet D, Guerin S, Malbert CH (2014) Using encapsulated freeze-dried lipids to trigger a gastrointestinal vagal reflex: validation in a pig model. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:596–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12301

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Coquery N, Menneson S, Meurice P, Janvier R, Etienne P, Noirot V, Val-Laillet D (2019) fMRI-based brain responses to olfactory stimulation with two putatively orexigenic functional food ingredients at two different concentrations in the pig model. J Food Sci 84:2666–2673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14772

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Guarino D, Nannipieri M, Iervasi G, Taddei S, Bruno RM (2017) The role of the autonomic nervous system in the pathophysiology of obesity. Front Physiol 8:665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    de Lartigue G (2016) Role of the vagus nerve in the development and treatment of diet-induced obesity. J Physiol 594:5791–5815. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP271538

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Kabalak AA, Akcay M, Akcay F, Gogus N (2005) Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative vomiting following pediatric tonsillectomy. J Altern Complement Med 11:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Li HJ, Zhao Y, Wen Q, Liu J, Lu JQ, Liu MY, Xia Q, Li N (2018) Comparison of clinical effects of electroacupuncture of abdominal and limb acupoints in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 43:725–729. https://doi.org/10.13702/j.1000-0607.170351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Shao XM, Shen Z, Sun J, Fang F, Fang JF, Wu YY, Fang JQ (2015) Strong manual acupuncture stimulation of "Huantiao" (GB 30) reduces pain-induced anxiety and p-ERK in the anterior cingulate cortex in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015:235491. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/235491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This collaborative project received funding from INRAE and the Guangzhou Rui Xingtang Chinese medicine clinic limited liability company. Xuwen Zhang received a grant from the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine to perform this work at INRAE, France.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hanwei Chen or David Val-Laillet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The preclinical project in the minipig model described in this hypothesis paper was designed in accordance with the current ethical standards of the European Community (Directive 2010/63/EU), Agreement No. C35-275-32 and Authorization No. 35-88. The Regional Ethics Committee in Animal Experiment of Brittany has validated and approved the entire procedure described for this project (no. 2019080810171624-V2 APAFIS #21708). Legal authorization for this project was obtained from the French Ministry of Research.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Chen, H. & Val-Laillet, D. Hypothesis paper: electroacupuncture targeting the gut–brain axis to modulate neurocognitive determinants of eating behavior—toward a proof of concept in the obese minipig model. Eat Weight Disord 26, 61–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-00864-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Obesity
  • Vagus nerve
  • Brain activity
  • Brain imaging
  • Pig model