Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 244–255 | Cite as

A method to estimate aquifer artificial recharge from a hill dam in Tunisia

  • Zouheira Ibn Ali
  • Ibtissem Triki
  • Lamia Lajili-Ghezal
  • Moncef Zairi


In arid and semi-arid areas, artificial recharge is a key technology in groundwater resources management, and a reliable estimate of artificial recharge is necessary to its sustainable development. Several methods are available to estimate the artificial recharge; however, most of them require field data or model parameters, thus limiting their applications. To overcome this limitation, we presented an analytical method to estimate the artificial recharge through monitoring the water release by piezometer and analysing the controlling factors of the artificial recharge from a hill dam in Tunisia. A total of 97 measurements of water flow in the streambed recorded from 4 gauging stations were analysed. Results indicated that the average infiltration velocity ranged from 0.043 to 0.127 m/d and the infiltration index varied from 7.6 to 11.8 L/(s•km). Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis shows that the infiltration index, the stream gradient, the thickness of unsaturated zone, the number of infiltration pond, the stream geometry, and the water flow rate were found to be the main factors in determining the infiltration. The high correlation coefficients (0.908 for the number of infiltration pond and 0.999 for the stream geometry) mean that the number of infiltration pond and the stream geometry are the most influential factors. Time variations of groundwater level were used to analyze the recharge effects on the piezometry of aquifer. The analysis showed that during the artificial recharge, the water table increased at a rate of 5 mm/d and that the increase was limited to the area surrounding the recharge site. Based on the results of the study, building infiltration ponds along streambed and improving the potential of rainwater harvesting over the study area are recommended.


arid zone water shortage dam water release infiltration index piezometry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors are immensely grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editorial team of the Journal of Arid Land for their comments and suggestions that enhanced the quality of the paper.


  1. Alaoui A, Eugster W. 2004. Dual-porosity modeling of groundwater recharge: testing a quick calibration using in situ moisture measurements, Areuse River Delta, Switzerland. Hydrogeology Journal, 12(4): 464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison G B, Gee G W, Tyler S W. 1994. Vadose-zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58(1): 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreo B, Vías J, Durán J J, et al. 2008. Methodology for groundwater recharge assessment in carbonate aquifers: application to pilot sites in southern Spain. Hydrogeology Journal, 16(5): 911–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bel Hadj Salem S, Chkir N, Zouari K, et al. 2012. Natural and artificial recharge investigation in the Zéroud Basin, Central Tunisia: impact of Sidi Saad Dam storage. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(4): 1099–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besbes M, Delhomme J P, De Marsily G. 1978. Estimating recharge from ephemeral streams in arid regions: a case study at Kairouan, Tunisia. Water Resources Research, 14(2): 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blasch K W, Ferré T P A, Vrugt J A. 2010. Environmental controls on drainage behavior of an ephemeral stream. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(7): 1077–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulain N, Cappelaere B, Séguis L, et al. 2009. Water balance and vegetation change in the Sahel: a case study at the watershed scale with an eco-hydrological model. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(12): 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Candela L, Elorza F J, Jiménez-Martínez J, et al. 2012. Global change and agricultural management options for groundwater sustainability. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 86: 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlson M A, Lohse K A, McIntosh J C, et al. 2011. Impacts of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial basin. Journal of Hydrology, 409(1–2): 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chartier M P, Rostagno C M, Pazos G E. 2011. Effects of soil degradation on infiltration rates in grazed semiarid rangelands of northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(7): 656–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook P G. 2013. Estimating groundwater discharge to rivers from river chemistry surveys. Hydrological Processes, 27(25): 3694–3707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahan O, Tatarsky B, Enzel Y, et al. 2008. Dynamics of flood water infiltration and ground water recharge in hyperarid desert. Ground Water, 46(3): 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Descroix L, Laurent J P, Vauclin M, et al. 2012. Experimental evidence of deep infiltration under sandy flats and gullies in the Sahel. Journal of Hydrology, 424–425: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dogramaci S, Firmani G, Hedley P, et al. 2015. Evaluating recharge to an ephemeral dryland stream using a hydraulic model and water, chloride and isotope mass balance. Journal of Hydrology, 521: 520–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fellows C S, Valett H M, Dahm C N. 2001. Whole-stream metabolism in two montane streams: contribution of the hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography, 46(3): 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flint A L, Flint L E, Kwicklis E M, et al. 2002. Estimating recharge at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA: comparison of methods. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 180–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flint A L, Ellett K M. 2004. The role of the unsaturated zone in artificial recharge at San Gorgonio Pass, California. Vadose Zone Journal, 3(3): 763–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fulton S A. 2012. Technical report great artesian basin resource assessment. In: Department of Land Resource Management. Report 14/2012A. Darwin, UK.Google Scholar
  19. General Water Resources Direction (DGRE). 1995. Annual report of the exploitation and piezometry of deep aquifers, Ministry of Agriculture and Hydraulic Resources, Tunis, Tunisia. (in French)Google Scholar
  20. Goodrich D C, Williams D G, Unkrich C L, et al. 2004. Comparison of methods to estimate ephemeral channel recharge, Walnut Gulch, San Pedro River basin, Arizona. In: Hogan J F, Phillips F M, Scanlon B R. Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States. Washington, DC: AGU, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene E A. 1997. Tracing recharge from sinking streams over spatial dimensions of kilometers in a karst aquifer. Ground Water, 35(5): 898–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harte P T, Kiah R G. 2009. Measured river leakages using conventional streamflow techniques: the case of Souhegan River, New Hampshire, USA. Hydrogeology Journal, 17(2): 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harvey J W, Wagner B J, Bencala K E. 1996. Evaluating the reliability of the stream tracer approach to characterize stream-subsurface water exchange. Water Resources Research, 32(8): 2441–2451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Healy R W, Cook P G. 2002. Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoehn E. 1998. Solute exchange between river water and groundwater in headwater environments. In: Hydrology, Water Resources and Ecology in Headwaters: Proceedings of the HeadWater’98 Conference held at Meran/Merano, Italy, April 1998. Meran/Merano, Italy: IAHS Publication, 248: 165–172.Google Scholar
  26. Huntington J L, Niswonger R G. 2012. Role of surface-water and groundwater interactions on projected summertime streamflow in snow dominated regions: an integrated modeling approach. Water Resources Research, 48(11): W11524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiménez-Martínez J, Longuevergne L, Le Borgne T, et al. 2013. Temporal and spatial scaling of hydraulic response to recharge in fractured aquifers: insights from a frequency domain analysis. Water Resources Research, 49(5): 3007–3023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M. 2006. Measuring methods for groundwater–surface water interactions: a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10: 873–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keese K E, Scanlon B R, Reedy R C. 2005. Assessing controls on diffuse groundwater recharge using unsaturated flow modeling. Water Resources Research, 41(6): W06010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koch J C, McKnight D M, Neupauer R M. 2011. Simulating unsteady flow, anabranching, and hyporheic dynamics in a glacial meltwater stream using a coupled surface water routing and groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research, 47(5): W05530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Konkul J, Rojborwornwittaya W, Chotpantarat S. 2014. Hydrogeologic characteristics and groundwater potentiality mapping using potential surface analysis in the Huay Sai area, Phetchaburi province, Thailand. Geosciences Journal, 18(1): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar M, Kumari K, Singh U K, et al. 2009. Hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment of Muktsar, Punjab: conventional graphical and multivariate statistical approach. Environmental Geology, 57(4): 873–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kung W J, Yeh H F, Lin H I, et al. 2013. An approach to evaluate groundwater recharge from streamflow and groundwater records. Geosciences Journal, 17(3): 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lange J. 2005. Dynamics of transmission losses in a large arid stream channel. Journal of Hydrology, 306(1–4): 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leduc C, Favreau G, Shroeter P. 2001. Long term rise in a Sahelian water table: the Continental Terminal in South West Niger. Journal of Hydrology, 243 (1–2): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee L J E, Lawrence D S L, Price M. 2006. Analysis of water-level response to rainfall and implications for recharge pathways in the Chalk aquifer, SE England. Journal of Hydrology, 330(3–4): 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu B X, Shao M A. 2016. Response of soil water dynamics to precipitation years under different vegetation types on the northern Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 8(1): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCallum J L, Cook P G, Berhane D, et al. 2012. Quantifying groundwater flows to streams using differential flow gaugings and water chemistry. Journal of Hydrology, 416–417: 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald M G, Harbaugh A W. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. In: U.S. Geological Survey. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigation, Book 6 Chapter A1, U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report, 83–875.Google Scholar
  40. National Institute of Meteorology (NIM). 2006. Tables of Monthly Climatic Data. Tunisia: Mograne Station. (in French)Google Scholar
  41. Nazoumou Y, Besbes M. 2000. Use of a reservoir model to simulate artificial groundwater recharge. Journal of Water Science, 13(4): 379–404. (in French)Google Scholar
  42. Neuman S P. 1975. Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 11(2): 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oude Essink G H P. 1998. MOC3D adapted to simulate 3D density-dependent groundwater flow. In: Proceedings of the MODFLOW’98 Conference. Golden, Colorado, USA, 291–303.Google Scholar
  44. Park C, Seo J, Lee J, et al. 2014. A distributed water balance approach to groundwater recharge estimation for Jeju Volcanic Island, Korea. Geosciences Journal, 18(2): 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rushton K R. 2005. Estimating recharge for British aquifers. Water and Environment Journal, 19(2): 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SCET. 2002. Project of Water Resources Study in South-eastern districts of Zaghouan City–The Nadhour-Saouafsyncline. In: Report of General Water Resources Direction, Ministry of Agriculture and Hydraulic Resources. Tunis, Tunisia, 1–190. (in French)Google Scholar
  47. Scibek J, Allen D M. 2006. Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and groundwater levels. Water Resources Research, 42(11): W11405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaban A, Khawlie M, Abdallah C. 2006. Use of remote sensing and GIS to determine recharge potential zone: the case of Occidental Lebanon. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(4): 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shanafield M, Cook P G. 2014. Transmission losses, infiltration and groundwater recharge through ephemeral and intermittent streambeds: a review of applied methods. Journal of Hydrology, 511: 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shiraki K, Shinomiya Y, Shibano H. 2006. Numerical experiments of watershed-scale soil water movement and bedrock infiltration using a physical three-dimensional simulation model. Journal of Forest Research, 11(6): 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Šimunek J, Van Genuchten M T, Šejna M. 2005. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Riverside, California: University of California Riverside, 1–240.Google Scholar
  52. Sophocleous M. 2002. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sorman A U, Abdulrazzak M J. 1993. Infiltration-recharge through wadi beds in arid regions. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 38(3): 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Triki I, Trabelsi N, Hentati I, et al. 2014. Groundwater levels time series sensitivity to pluviometry and air temperature: a geostatistical approach to Sfax region, Tunisia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(3): 1593–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tu Y C, Ting C S, Tsai H T, et al. 2011. Dynamic analysis of the infiltration rate of artificial recharge of groundwater: a case study of Wanglong Lake, Pingtung, Taiwan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63(1): 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walker G R, Zhang L, Ellis T W, et al. 2002. Estimating impacts of changed land use on recharge: review of modelling and other approaches appropriate for management of dryland salinity. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yeh G T, Fang Y L, Zhang F, et al. 2010. Numerical modeling of coupled fluid flow and thermal and reactive biogeochemical transport in porous and fractured media. Computational Geosciences, 14(1): 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yeh H F, Lee C H, Hsu K C, et al. 2009. GIS for the assessment of the groundwater recharge potential zone. Environmental Geology, 58(1): 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zammouri M, Feki H. 2005. Managing releases from small upland reservoirs for downstream recharge in semi-arid basins (Northeast of Tunisia). Journal of Hydrology, 314(1–4): 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer - Verlag GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zouheira Ibn Ali
    • 1
  • Ibtissem Triki
    • 1
  • Lamia Lajili-Ghezal
    • 2
  • Moncef Zairi
    • 1
  1. 1.Water, Energy and Environment Laboratory (LR3E), National School of Engineering of Sfax (ENIS)University of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Higher School of Agriculture, MograneMograneTunisia

Personalised recommendations