Abstract
Spawned by the heightened competition in mainstream education, supplementary tutoring outside regular school time has rapidly expanded as a common practice of students seeking to gain a competitive edge in school. It is widely known that students from low socioeconomic status (SES) families lag behind their high-SES peers in academic performance. This study examines whether extra lessons reinforce or weaken the family effect on educational inequality. We use the Programme for International Student Assessment 2009 data to analyze the effect of family SES on the likelihood and intensity of students’ extra lesson attendance in four Chinese regions: Shanghai, Taiwan (Chinese Taipei), Hong Kong, and Macao. The research confirms that (1) high-SES students are more likely than low-SES students to receive extra lessons, and (2) among the students who participated, high-SES students also invested more time each week in such lessons. However, the study has also found substantial regional differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Georgian number refers to the percentage of respondents in the sample of university students who claimed they received some form of private tutoring.
We use only items with the same wording from previous cycles to maintain consistency.
Proper sampling weights were used to create the SES dummy variable.
This index is constructed by the PISA team on a continuous scale. The positive value indicates a better attitude toward school (OECD 2010, p. 295).
In Shanghai and Taiwan, the test language is Chinese. In Hong Kong, students can choose English or Chinese, depending on the test given to the students. In Macao, students can choose English, Chinese, or Portuguese, depending on the test given to the students.
The participation rate is calculated by subtracting the proportion of students who chose “Do not attend” from 100 %.
The survey item first appeared in PISA 2003, which focused on students’ math learning. Students were asked to provide out-of-school learning information for math only. Starting with PISA 2006, hours of participation in science and test language classes were also included in the survey.
We acknowledge that this is a rough estimate and do not claim statistical significance.
A recent study in Hong Kong observes such a hike in participation between grade 9 and grade 12 students (Zhan et al. 2013).
References
Ammermueller, A., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Peer effects in European primary schools: Evidence from the progress in International Reading Literacy Study. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 315–338.
Bari, F. (2012, January 9). Shadow education. Pakistan Today. Retrieved January 9, 2012 from http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/01/the-shadow-education/?printType=article.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Bray, M. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare: A Journal of Comparative Education, 36(4), 515–530.
Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring?. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M. (2010). Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 3–13.
Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: Conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22(6), 611–620.
Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank.
Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity. Boston: Sense.
Bray, M., Zhan, S., Lykins, C., Wang, D., & Kwo, O. (2014). Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education. Economics of Education Review, 38(1), 24–37. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.10.002.
Campbell, C., & Lee, J. (2003). Social mobility from a kinship perspective: Rural Liaoning, 1789–1909. International Review of Social History, 48(1), 1–26.
Campbell, C., & Lee, J. (2008). Kin networks, marriage, and social mobility in late imperial China. Social Science History, 32(2), 175–214.
Campbell, C., & Lee, J. Z. (2011). Kinship and the long-term persistence of inequality in Liaoning, China, 1749–2005. Chinese Sociological Review, 44(1), 71–104.
Choi, Á., Calero, J., & Escardíbul, J.-O. (2011). Hell to touch the SKY? Private tutoring and academic achievement in Korea. In A. C. Ruiz (Ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación (pp. 118–134). Asociación de Economía de la Educación. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/h/aec/ieed06/06-07.html. Accessed Sept 2013.
Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. F. (2009). National income, income inequality, and the importance of schools: A hierarchical cross-national comparison. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 626–658.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, Supplement 1, S95–S120.
Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 14–24.
Government of Macao Special Administrative Region Statistics and Census Service. (2013). Overall unemployment rate. Retrieved from http://www.dsec.gov.mo/TimeSeriesDatabase.aspx?KeyIndicatorID=24. Accessed Sept 2013.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 89–200). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hao, Y., & Clark G. (2012). Social mobility in China, 1645–2012: A surname study. Unpublished paper. Retrieved from http://www.maxhaoeconucdavis.com/uploads/1/4/2/7/14270803/yu_hao_job_market_paper.pdf. Accessed Sept 2013.
International Monetary Fund. (2012). World Economic Outlook Database. Retrieved October, 2012 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/index.aspx. Accessed Sept 2013.
Jang, S. (2011). The effects of after-school programs on students’ assessment and shadow education expenditures. Seoul: Seoul National University.
Japan Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sport. (2008). Report on children’s out-of-school learning activities. Tokyo: Japan Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sport. In Japanese.
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259–296.
Kwo, O., & Bray, M. (2011). Facing the shadow education system in Hong Kong. IIAS Newsletter, 56, 20.
Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776.
Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lee, C. (1996). Children and private tuition. Youth Poll Series No. 34. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups.
Lee, J. (2007). Two Worlds of private tutoring: The prevalence and causes of after-school mathematics tutoring in Korea and the United States. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1207–1234.
Lee, T. H. C. (2012). Learning for one’s self: Traditional education in china. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong. In Chinese.
Liu, J. (2012). Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 46–52.
Luk, H. K. B. (2003). From under banyan trees to in front of computers: Stories of education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Step Forward Multi Media Co. In Chinese.
Nath, S. R. (2011,August). Shadow education in Bangladesh. Paper presented at a seminar organized by UNESCO in conjunction with the National Academy of Educational Management, Dhaka.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. n.d. China Statistical Database. Retrieved from http://219.235.129.58/reportView.do?Url=/xmlFiles/en/fa65478bb01a4da384021a8fe87fb54a.xml&id=cbd4741b389d453db424eeaf184b3613&bgqDm=20124000&i18nLang=en_US. Accessed Sept 2013.
OECD. (2009). PISA data analysis manual: SPSS (2nd ed.). Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do; student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report.
Ohinata, A., & van Ours, J. C. (2011). How immigrant children affect the academic achievement of native Dutch children. Bonn: IZA.
Paviot, L., Heinsohn, N., & Korkman, J. (2008). Extra tuition in southern and eastern Africa: Coverage, growth, and linkages with pupil achievement. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(2), 149–160.
Silova, I., Būdienė, V., & Bray, M. (2006). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring. Open Society Institute.
Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.
Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 303–313.
Tsang, M. C., Ding, X., & Shen, H. (2010). Urban-rural disparities in private tutoring of lower secondary students. Economics of Education Review (Chinese), 2, 7–11. In Chinese.
Ünal, H., Özkan, E. M., Milton, S., Price, K., & Curva, F. (2010). The effect of private tutoring on performance in mathematics in Turkey: A comparison across occupational types. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5512–5517. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.899.
Wang, D. (2011). The dilemma of time: Student-centered teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 157–164.
World Bank. (2013). Macao SAR, China. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/macao-sar-china.
Xue, H., & Ding, Y. Q. (2009). A positivistic study on the private tutoring of students in urban China. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(1), 115–128. In Chinese.
Zhan, S., Bray, M., Wang, D., Lykins, C., & Kwo, O. (2013). The effectiveness of private tutoring: Students’ perceptions in comparison with mainstream schooling in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(4), 495–509.
Zhang, Y. (2013). Does private tutoring improve students’ National College entrance exam performance? A case study from Jinan, China. Economics of Education Review, 32, 1–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Wang, D. The Family Socioeconomic Effect on Extra Lessons in Greater China: A Comparison between Shanghai, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 363–377 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0187-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0187-0