Abstract
This paper examines private tutoring systems in three East Asian countries (Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia) with the purpose of examining the relationship between those systems and formal education systems. The study of private tutoring systems in each nation can be used to reveal the inadequacies of the formal education system in meeting the ideal of equal opportunity of education in relation to high-stakes examinations. In each nation, the private tutoring system functions as a “shadow education market” to absorb unmet demand for additional education in a parasitic relationship with the formal system. Governments have enacted various policies to respond to the growing private tutoring systems which have proven largely ineffective and often led to further expansion. Pedagogical and curricular practices in the private tutoring systems have functioned to increase “anxiety” and “insecurity” in regard to the formal education system with the purpose of expanding the market. Studies of mass schooling systems and equal opportunity are incomplete without due consideration toward the role of the private tutoring system. Efforts toward education policy-making and reform to further the ideal of equal opportunity of education must be informed by such research on private tutoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asahi. (2002). Juku and businesses on the look-out for golden times-The five-day school week (Koki Nerau Juku ya Kigyo: Gakko Itsukasei). Retrieved May 20, 2009 from http://mytwon.asahi.com.
Bae, J. S. (2009). Will “hagwon curfew” work? The Korea Times. Retrieved on May 24, 2009 from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/04/117_43860.html.
Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bereday, G. (1964). Comparative methods in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Bray, M., & Bunly, S. (2005) Balancing the books: Household financing of basic education in cambodia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Byun, S. Y. (2008). Assessing the effects of the high school equalization policy on shadow education in South Korea: A propensity score matching approach. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Research, Seoul, Korea.
Cavanagh, S. (2009). Out-of school classes provide edge. Education Week. Published April 21, 2009. Accessed on May 17, 2009 at http://www.edweek.org/login.html?source=http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2009/04/22/29nar-southkorea_ep.h28.html&destination=http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2009/04/22/29nar-southkorea_ep.h28.html&levelId=2100.
Clayton, T. (2000). Education and the politics of language: Hegemony and pragmatism in Cambodia, 1979–1989. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Cummings, W. K. (1983). Education and equality in Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cummings, W. K., & Altbach, P. G. (Eds.). (1997). The challenge of Eastern-Asian education: Lessons for America. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dang, H. A., & Rogers, F. H. (2008). The growing phenomenon of private tutoring: Does it deepen human capital, widen inequalities, or waste resources? World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 161–200.
Dawson, W. (2008). Civic education in Japan: Political socialization in the Japanese middle school. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Publishing.
Dawson, W. (2009). “The tricks of the teacher”: Shadow education and corruption in Cambodia. In S. Heyneman (Ed.), Buying your way into heaven: Education and corruption in international perspective (pp. 51–73). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dierkes, J. (2008). Japanese shadow education: The consequences of school choice. In M. Forsey, S. Davies, & G. Walford (Eds.), The globalisation of school choice? (pp. 231–248). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Dore, R. (1976). The diploma disease: Education, qualification and development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Duggan, S. J. (1996). Education, teacher training and prospects for economic recovery in Cambodia. Comparative Education, 32(3), 361–375.
Economic Institute of Cambodia (EIC). (2006). Local public services: Performance and unofficial fees. Phnom Penh: Deline, S., Chamroeun, H., Sethy, Y.
Fujita, H. (2005). Re-examining compulsory education (Gimukyôiku wo Toinaosu). Tokyo: Chikuma Shoten.
Han, J. S. (2005). State private tutoring. Seoul: Hakjisa.
Kim, J. L. (2001). Decision of unconstitutionality over banning private tutoring and expansion of shadow education market. In Education of Korea commentary 2000. Seoul: Korea Educational Development Institute.
Kim, T. (2002). Shadow education: School quality and demand for private tutoring in Korea. KEDI: KEDI School Working Paper Series, Seoul.
Kim, M. (2003). Private institute education: Competition and anxiety of the South Korean middle class. Seoul, Korea: Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Research.
Kim, H. J. (2004). Analyzing the effects of the high school equalization policy and the college entrance system on private tutoring expenditure in Korea. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Research, Seoul, Korea.
Kim, S. W., & Lee, J. H. (2008). Private tutoring and the demand for education in South Korea. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin. unpublished manuscript.
Komiyama, H. (2000). Juku: Before the era of downsizing schools (Juku: Gakkô Surimuka Jidai wo Maeni). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Lee, C. J. (2005). Perspective—Korean education fever and private tutoring. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 2(1), 99–107.
Lee, C. J., & Jang, H. M. (2008a). History of government policy to shadow education. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Research, Seoul, Korea.
Lee, C. J., & Jang, S. H. (2008b). After-school Program: Is it alternatives to private tutoring? Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Research, Seoul, Korea.
LeTendre, G. (1994). Distribution tables and private tests: The failure of middle school reform in Japan. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 126–136.
Mehl, M. (2005). Private academies of Chinese learning in Meiji Japan: The decline and transformation of the Kangaku Juku. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
MEXT. (1985). Report on the situation of academic Juku (Gakushu Juku ni Kansuru Jittai Chosa). Tokyo: Monbusho Hokokusho.
MEXT. (1993). Report on the situation of academic Juku (Gakushu Juku ni Kansuru Jittai Chosa). Tokyo: Monbusho Hokokusho.
MEXT. (2008). Report on the situation of academic learning activities of children (Kodomo no gakkogai de no gakushu katsudo ni kansuru jittai chosa hokoku). Tokyo: Monbukagakusho Hokokusho.
Meyer, J. W. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.
MOE&HRD. (2006). 2006 After-school management plan. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Education.
Roesgaard, M. H. (2006). Japanese education and the cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the Juku. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
Rohlen, T. P. (1980). The Juku phenomenon: An exploratory essay. Journal of Japanese Studies, 6(2), 207–242.
Russell, N. U. (2002). The role of the private sector in determining national standards: How Juku undermine Japanese educational authority. In G. Decoker (Ed.), National standards and school reform in Japan and the United States. New York: Teachers College Press.
Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (2002). Employment and work of university graduates in Japan and Germany. In U. Teichler & G. Trommsdorff (Eds.), Challenges of the 21st century in Japan and German (pp. 91–105). Lengerich: Pabst Publisher.
Southgate, D. E. (2007). Determinants of shadow education: A cross-national perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, TBA, New York, New York City. Retrieved March 4, 2009 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p182363_index.html.
Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.
Takayama, K. (2008). A nation at risk crosses the Pacific: Transnational borrowing of the U.S. Crisis Discourse in the Debate on Education Reform in Japan. Comparative Education Review, 51(4), 423–446.
Tsuneyoshi, R. (2001). The Japanese model of schooling: Comparisons with the United States. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
White, M. (1987). The Japanese educational challenge: A commitment to children. New York: Free Press.
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2008). Teaching in Cambodia. Washington, DC: Benveniste, L., Marshall, J., & Araujo, M. C.
World Bank Edstats. (2009). Retrieved May 20, 2009 from www.worldbank.org/education/edstats.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by the Hanyang University Faculty Research Fund for field research and data collection in Cambodia, Japan, and South Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawson, W. Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 11, 14–24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9058-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9058-4