Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Reported Adverse Events After Interchanging Between TNF-α Inhibitor Biosimilars in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Observational studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients interchanging between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor biosimilars withdraws from the new treatment because of adverse effects. We aim to analyze adverse events related to interchanging from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor reference products to biosimilars and between biosimilars reported in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

Methods

We extracted all cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term “Product substitution issue (PT)” for TNF-α inhibitors. Then, we analyzed and categorized all adverse events reported in more than 1% of cases. We compared the adverse events reported according to reporter qualification, type of switch, and type of TNF-α inhibitor using Chi2 tests. We conducted a network analysis coupled with a clustering approach to identify syndromes of co-reported adverse events.

Results

In the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, 2543 cases and 6807 adverse events related to TNF-α inhibitor interchangeability have been reported up to October 2022. Injection-site reactions were the most reported adverse events with 940 cases (37.0%), followed by modifications in drug effect in 607 cases (23.9%). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal disorders linked to the underlying disease were reported in 505 (20.0%), 145 (5.7%), and 207 (8.1%) cases, respectively. Adverse events non-related to the underlying disease were nonspecific (n = 458, 18.0%), neurologic (n = 224, 8.8%), respiratory (n = 132, 5.2%), and psychological disorders (n = 64, 2.5%). Injection-site reactions and infection-related symptoms (e.g., nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection) were more reported by non-healthcare professionals while adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., drug ineffective, arthralgia, psoriasis) were more reported by healthcare professionals. The proportions of injection-site reactions were higher when switching between biosimilars of the same reference product, but the proportions of adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy) were more reported when switching from a reference product. The main differences in the proportions of reported cases between adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept were driven by symptoms related to the underlying targeted diseases, except for a higher reporting rate of injection-site pain with adalimumab. Adverse events evocative of hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 192 (7.6%) cases. Most of the network clusters concerned non-specific adverse events or were related to reduced clinical efficacy.

Conclusions

This analysis highlights the burden of patient-reported adverse events when interchanging between TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars, notably injection-site reactions, non-specific adverse events, and symptoms related to reduced clinical efficacy. Our study also highlights differences in reporting patterns between patients and healthcare professionals and depending on the type of switch. The results are limited by missing data, the lack of precision of the coded Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms, and by the variability of reporting rate of adverse events. Thus, incidence rates of adverse events cannot be inferred from these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Medicines Agency. Biosimilar medicines: overview. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/biosimilar-medicines-overview. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

  2. Biosimilar product information. FDA; 2022. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-product-information. Accessed 2 Dec 2022

  3. Jourdain H, Hoisnard L, Sbidian E, Zureik M. TNF-alpha inhibitors biosimilar use in France: a nationwide population-based study using the French National Health Data System. Sci Rep. 2022;12:19569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Afzali A, Furtner D, Melsheimer R, Molloy PJ. The automatic substitution of biosimilars: definitions of interchangeability are not interchangeable. Adv Ther. 2021;38:2077–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Biosimilars in the EU: information guide for healthcare professionals. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/leaflet/biosimilars-eu-information-guide-healthcareprofessionals_en.pdf Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

  6. Mysler E, Azevedo VF, Danese S, Alvarez D, Iikuni N, Ingram B, et al. Biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching: what is the rationale and current experience? Drugs. 2021;81:1859–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Salam T, Duhig A, Patel AA, Cameron A, Voelker J, Bookhart B, et al. Physicians’ perspectives regarding non-medical switching of prescription medications: results of an internet e-survey. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0225867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schellekens H. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: clinical implications and future prospects. Clin Ther. 2002;24:1720–40 (discussion 1719).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruiz-Argüello MB, Maguregui A, Ruiz Del Agua A, Pascual-Salcedo D, Martínez-Feito A, Jurado T, et al. Antibodies to infliximab in Remicade-treated rheumatic patients show identical reactivity towards biosimilars. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1693–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lauret A, Moltó A, Abitbol V, Gutermann L, Conort O, Chast F, et al. Effects of successive switches to different biosimilars infliximab on immunogenicity in chronic inflammatory diseases in daily clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:1449–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitz EMH, Boekema PJ, Straathof JWA, van Renswouw DC, Brunsveld L, Scharnhorst V, et al. Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 12-month multicentre observational prospective cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47:356–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Avouac J, Moltó A, Abitbol V, Etcheto A, Salcion A, Gutermann L, et al. Systematic switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab in inflammatory chronic diseases in daily clinical practice: the experience of Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;47:741–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gentileschi S, Barreca C, Bellisai F, Biasi G, Brizi MG, De Stefano R, et al. Switch from infliximab to infliximab biosimilar: efficacy and safety in a cohort of patients with different rheumatic diseases. Response to: Nikiphorou E, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, et al. Clinical effectiveness of CT-P13 (Infliximab biosimilar) used as a switch from Remicade (infliximab) in patients with established rheumatic disease. Report of clinical experience based on prospective observational data. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:1677–83 (Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16:1311–2).

  14. Scherlinger M, Germain V, Labadie C, Barnetche T, Truchetet M-E, Bannwarth B, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in real-life: the weight of patient acceptance. Jt Bone Spine. 2018;85:561–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bakalos G, Zintzaras E. Drug discontinuation in studies including a switch from an originator to a biosimilar monoclonal antibody: a systematic literature review. Clin Ther. 2019;41:155-73.e13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbier L, Ebbers HC, Declerck P, Simoens S, Vulto AG, Huys I. The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of switching between reference biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars: a systematic review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;108:734–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tweehuysen L, van den Bemt BJF, van Ingen IL, de Jong AJL, van der Laan WH, van den Hoogen FHJ, et al. Subjective complaints as the main reason for biosimilar discontinuation after open-label transition from reference infliximab to biosimilar infliximab. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:60–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kristensen LE, Alten R, Puig L, Philipp S, Kvien TK, Mangues MA, et al. Non-pharmacological effects in switching medication: the nocebo effect in switching from originator to biosimilar agent. BioDrugs. 2018;32:397–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment, 2023. https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2023_guidelines_web.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2022

  20. Fusaroli M, Raschi E, Gatti M, De Ponti F, Poluzzi E. Development of a network-based signal detection tool: the COVID-19 Adversome in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.740707. Accessed 8 Dec 2022.

  21. Park JP, Jung B, Park HK, Shin D, Jung JA, Ghil J, et al. Interchangeability for biologics is a legal distinction in the USA, not a clinical one. BioDrugs. 2022;36:431–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Colloca L, Barsky AJ. Placebo and nocebo effects. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:554–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, Nowbar AN, Thompson DM, Arnold AD, et al. Side effect patterns in a crossover trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1210–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Casassus B. Risks of reformulation: French patients complain after Merck modifies levothyroxine pills. BMJ. 2018;360: k714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fleischmann R, Jairath V, Mysler E, Nicholls D, Declerck P. Nonmedical switching from originators to biosimilars: does the nocebo effect explain treatment failures and adverse events in rheumatology and gastroenterology? Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7:35–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, Lorentzen M, Bolstad N, Haavardsholm EA, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2304–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khan SU, Kleiman NS. Statin related muscle symptoms: is it time to move on. BMJ. 2022;379: o2939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen HP, Blauvelt A, Rifkin RM, Danese S, Gokhale SB, Woollett G. Switching reference medicines to biosimilars: a systematic literature review of clinical outcomes. Drugs. 2018;78:463–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen HP, Hachaichi S, Bodenmueller W, Kvien TK, Danese S, Blauvelt A. Switching from one biosimilar to another biosimilar of the same reference biologic: a systematic review of studies. BioDrugs. 2022;36:625–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Dutt K, Srinivasan A, Van Langenberg D. The nocebo effect in a non-medical switching program from originator to biosimilar infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease. BioDrugs. 2022;36:639–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Colloca L, Panaccione R, Murphy TK. The clinical implications of nocebo effects for biosimilar therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01372. Accessed 22 Dec 2022.

  32. Faasse K, Martin LR. The power of labeling in nocebo effects. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:379–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Svensberg K, Nordeng H, Gaffari S, Faasse K, Horne R, Lupattelli A. Perceived sensitivity to medicines: a study among chronic medicine users in Norway. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41:804–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bennett CL, Schoen MW, Hoque S, Witherspoon BJ, Aboulafia DM, Hwang CS, et al. Improving oncology biosimilar launches in the EU, the USA, and Japan: an updated policy review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e575–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Petit J, Antignac M, Poilverd R-M, Baratto R, Darthout S, Desouches S, et al. Multidisciplinary team intervention to reduce the nocebo effect when switching from the originator infliximab to a biosimilar. RMD Open. 2021;7: e001396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Rupert DJ, Jordan AM, Ziemian MA, Brown RM, Fleming NS, Lefebvre RC. Understanding US physician and pharmacist attitudes toward biosimilar products: a qualitative study. BioDrugs. 2022;36:645–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Vigibase for giving us access to the data. The data supplied to VigiBase come from a variety of sources and the likelihood of a causal relationship is not the same in all reports. The information does not represent the opinions of the Uppsala Monitoring Center or the WHO. We thank Coline Oudin and Alizee Norah for their work and interesting discussion on the project. This work has been partially supported by MIAI @ university Grenoble Alpes, (ANR-19-P3IA-0003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Khouri.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were received for the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest/competing interests

Orhon Pauline, Marion Robert, Claire Bernardeau, Alex Hlavaty, Michele Fusaroli, Matthieu Roustit, Jean-Luc Cracowski, and Charles Khouria have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are made available by the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The codes used during the current study are made available by the corresponding author on request.

Authors’ contributions

CK: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing (original draft), writing (review and editing); OP: investigation, formal analysis, writing (original draft); AH: formal analysis; MR, CB, MF, MR, J-LC; writing (review and editing). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1599 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pauline, O., Robert, M., Bernardeau, C. et al. Assessment of Reported Adverse Events After Interchanging Between TNF-α Inhibitor Biosimilars in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database. BioDrugs 37, 699–707 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-023-00603-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-023-00603-8

Navigation