Abstract
In this article I present some results from a 5-year longitudinal investigation with young students about the genesis of embodied, non-symbolic algebraic thinking and its progressive transition to culturally evolved forms of symbolic thinking. The investigation draws on a cultural-historical theory of teaching and learning—the theory of objectification. Within this theory, thinking is conceived of as a form of reflection and action that is simultaneously material and ideal: It includes inner and outer speech, sensuous forms of imagination and visualisation, gestures, rhythm, and their intertwinement with material culture (symbols, artifacts, etc.). The theory articulates a cultural view of development as an unfolding dialectic process between culturally and historically constituted forms of mathematical knowing and semiotically mediated classroom activity. Looking at the experimental data through these theoretical lenses reveals a developmental path where embodied forms of thinking are sublated or subsumed into more sophisticated ones through the mediation of properly designed classroom activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an interesting study of the historical evolution of variables and their symbolic representation, see Ely and Adams (2012).
References
Arzarello, F., & Edwards, L. (2005). Gesture and the construction of mathematical meaning. In Proceedings of the 29th PME conference (pp. 123–54). Melbourne: PME.
Barbin, E. (2006). The different readings of original sources. Oberwolfach, Report No. 22/2006, 17–19.
Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem-solving tool: continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra, perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115–36). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (2011). Early algebraization. New York: Springer.
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–705). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Descartes, R. (1954). The geometry. New York: Dover. Original work published 1637.
Eco, U. (1988). Le signe [the sign]. Bruxelles: Éditions Labor.
Ely, R., & Adams, A. (2012). Unknown, placeholder, or variable: What is x? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(1), 19–38.
Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19–25.
Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Puig, L. (2007). Educational algebra: A theoretical and empirical approach. New York: Springer Verlag.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Hoch, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2006). Structure sense versus manipulation skills. In Proceedings of the 30th PME conference (pp. 305–12). Prague: PME.
Howe, R. (2005). Comments on NAEP algebra problems. Retrieved on 24.03.12 http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/events/2005/0914_algebra/Howe_Presentation.pdf
Høyrup, J. (2002). Lengths, widths, surfaces. New York: Springer.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kieran, C. (1989). A perspective on algebraic thinking. Proceedings of the 13th PME conference (v. 2, pp. 163-171). Paris: PME.
Kieran, C. (1990). A procedural-structural perspective on algebra research. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th PME conference (pp. 245–53). Assisi: PME.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
Leontyev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
Malafouris, L., & Renfrew, C. (Eds.). (2010). The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.
Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49.
Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students' emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268.
Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.
Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70.
Radford, L. (2006). The cultural-epistomological conditions of the emergence of algebraic symbolism. In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 conference of the international study group on the relations between the history and pedagogy of mathematics & ESU 4 - revised edition (pp. 509-24). Uppsala, Sweden.
Radford, L. (2008a). Iconicity and contraction. ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 83–96.
Radford, L. (2008b). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education (pp. 215–34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Radford, L. (2009a). No! He starts walking backwards! ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 467–480.
Radford, L. (2009b). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.
Radford, L. (2010). The eye as a theoretician: Seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 2–7.
Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp. 303–22). Berlin: Springer.
Radford, L. (2012a). On the development of early algebraic thinking. PNA, 6(4), 117–133.
Radford, L. (2012b). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 101–118.
Radford, L., Bardini, C., & Sabena, C. (2007). Perceiving the general. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 507–530.
Radford, L., & Puig, L. (2007). Syntax and meaning as sensuous, visual, historical forms of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 145–164.
Radford, L., & Roth, W. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 227–245.
Rideout, B. (2008). Pappus reborn. Pappus of alexandria and the changing face of analysis and synthesis in late antiquity. Master of Arts in History and Philosophy of Science Thesis. University of Canterbury.
Rivera, F. D. (2010). Second grade students' preinstructional competence in patterning activity. Proceedings of the 34th PME conference (pp. 81–88). Belo Horizonte: PME.
Roth, W., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural historical perspective on teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Serfati, M. (1999). La dialectique de l’indéterminé, de viète à frege et russell. In M. Serfati (Ed.), La recherche de la vérité (pp. 145–174). Paris: ACL – Les éditions du kangourou.
Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Bell, A., & Lins, R. (2001). Perspectives on school algebra. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Unguru, S. (1975). On the need to rewrite the history of Greek mathematics. Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, 15, 67–114.
Valero, M. (2004). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In P. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Viète, F. (1983). The analytic art. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1591).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Collected works (vol. 1). New York: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In V. D. Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–54). Oxford: Blackwell. Original work published 1934.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press.
Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2009). Developing mathematics understanding and abstraction: The case of equivalence in the elementary years. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 76–95.
Acknowledgments
This article is a result of various research programs funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC/CRSH). I wish to thank the reviewers for their insightful comments. A previous version of this article was presented at ICME12, as a Regular Lecture.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radford, L. The Progressive Development of Early Embodied Algebraic Thinking. Math Ed Res J 26, 257–277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0087-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0087-2