Abstract
The disproportionate focus on classroom teachers and their instruction—teacher effectiveness—in order to confront and address under-achievement and disadvantage appears as a contemporary education policy theme in Australia. Phrases such as ‘high performing schooling systems’, ‘the best teachers’, ‘high performing countries’, ‘quality teaching’, ‘under-performing schools’, ‘the right change’, ‘operationally feasible’, ‘targeting of reforms’, ‘degrees of under-performance’, ‘educational drivers’, ‘teacher quality and improved teaching’ and ‘external standards and governance’ are constantly mentioned and given continual attention and prominence by policy-makers. The paper questions and critiques a policy-making direction that uses teacher effectiveness research to force and steer reform in education. The distinctive and narrow concern with teacher effectiveness works to the specific exclusion of breadth and scope concerning debate about broader education related issues and questions, for example, matters of student achievement, exclusion and disadvantage. This article uses a qualitative research approach informed by critical theory to examine three influential private sector reports on education and schooling: The McKinsey Report ( 2007 )—How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top, The Nous Group ( 2011 )—Schooling Challenges and Opportunities and The Grattan Institute ( 2012 )—Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. The article subjects the reports to close critical scrutiny and examination and finds that classroom teachers are positioned so that their specific and explicit instruction becomes the differentiating ‘variable’ in matters of student achievement and success.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (2009). Reading capital. London: Verso.
Ball, S. (2001). Labour, learning and the economy. In Michael Fielding (Ed.), “education education education” Taking Education Really Seriously. Four Years’ Hard Labour. London: Routledge Falmer. 45–56.
Ball, S. (2006). Education policy and social class. The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London and New York: Routledge.
Ballou, D., Sanders, W., & Wright, P. (2004). Controlling for Student Background in Value-Added Assessment of Teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 29(1), 37–65.
Baltodano, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and the demise of public education: The corporatization of schools of education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(4), 487–507. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.673025.
Barber, M. and Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. (McKinsey and Company).
Bayart, Jean-Francois. (2007). Global subjects. A Political Critique of Globalization. U.K: Polity Press.
Biddle, Bruce J. (2012). Splendid Contributions and Flawed Conclusions. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 179–181.
Blum, D., & Ullman, C. (2012). The globalization and corporatization of education: the limits and liminality of the market mantra. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(4), 367–373.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Firing Back. Against The Tyranny Of The Market 2. London: Verso.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). The forms of capital. In S. Ball (Ed.), The Routledge falmer reader in sociology of education. Routledge Falmer: London and New York.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, & Passeron, Jean-Claude. (2000). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.
Briggs, D. C. (2008). Synthesizing causal inferences. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 15–22.
Coffield, F. (2012). Why the McKinsey reports will not improve school systems. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 131–149.
Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories. Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of bio-politics. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2011). The government of self and others. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gale, T. (2006). How did we ever arrive at the conclusion that teachers are the problem? A critical reading in the discourses of Australian schooling. In B. Doecke, M. Howie, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), ‘Only connect …’ English teaching, schooling and democracy (pp. 99–119). Kent Town: AATE and Wakefield Press.
Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2003). Engaging teachers. Towards a radical democratic agendafor schooling. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Gale, T., & Cross, R. (2007). Nebulous gobbledegook: The politics of influence on how and what to teach in Australian schools. In A. Berry, A. Clemans & A. Kostogriz (Eds.), Dimensions of Professional Learning. Professionalism, Practice and Identity (pp. 5–22). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Giroux, H. (2011). On critical pedagogy. London: Continuum.
Gorard, S., & Smith, E. (2010). Equity in education. An international comparison of pupil perspectives. U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hattie, J., and Bowles, T. (2013) A winning formula: how to pick the best teachers, http://theconversation.com/a-winning-formula-how-to-pick-the-best-teachers-20721.
Jensen, B. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. Melbourne, Australia: Grattan Institute.
Kelly, A. (2012). Sen and the art of educational maintenance: evidencing a capability, as opposed to an effectiveness, approach to schooling. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(3), 283–296.
Larsen, Marianne A. (2010). Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: a comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 207–231.
Lingard, B., & Ozga, J. (2007). The Routledge falmer reader in education policy and politics. London and New York: Routedge.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New scalar politics: implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502.
Nous Group. (2011). Schooling Challenges and Opportunities. A Report for the Review of Funding for Schooling Panel. Melbourne: Nous Group.
Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010). School socio-economic composition and student outcomes in Australia: Implications for educational policy. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 72–85.
Ranson, S. (2007). Public Accountability In The Age Of Neo-Liberal Governance. In B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The Routledge falmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 198–219). Routedge: London and New York.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Oxon: Routledge.
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485. doi:10.1080/03050068.2013.770943.
Skourdoumbis, A. (2012a). Teach for Australia (TFA): can it overcome educational disadvantage? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 305–315.
Skourdoumbis, A. (2012b). Classroom teacher effectiveness research and inquiry, and its relevance to the development of public education policy: an Australian context. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 967–985.
Skourdoumbis, A., & Gale, T. (2012). Classroom Teacher Effectiveness Research: A Conceptual Critique. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 892–906.
Tan, C. (2012). The culture of education policy making: curriculum reform in Shanghai. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 153–167.
Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling. Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference. Let’s be realistic. Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. (2012). New directions for school leadership and the teaching profession. Discussion Paper. Accessed from: http://www.education.vic.gov.au/.
Windle, J. (2010). Anyone can make it, but there can only be one winner: modeling neoliberal learning and work on reality television. Critical Studies in Education, 51(3), 251–263.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skourdoumbis, A. International ‘benchmarking’ studies and the identification of ‘education best practice’: a focus on classroom teachers and their practices. Aust. Educ. Res. 41, 411–423 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0142-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0142-8