Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does improving school level attendance lead to improved school level achievement? An empirical study of indigenous educational policy in Australia

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current federal government policy initiatives in Aboriginal education and social welfare reform are based on assumptions about the relationship between increased attendance and increased student performance on standardized tests. There are empirical assumptions underlying these policy interventions and their accompanying public debates. Our aim here is to empirically explore the relationships between patterns of student attendance and patterns of student achievement in schools with significant cohorts of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander students at the school level. Based on an analysis of the publicly available data reported on the ‘MySchool’ website, we find that reforms and policies around attendance have not and are unlikely to generate patterns of improved achievement. Questions about the rationale and rhetoric of government policy focused at the school level as opposed to the need to focus on pedagogy and curriculum are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The same logic underlies teachers’ and teachers’ unions’ stated concerns about ‘appropriate’ student behavior as necessary prior to any improvement in student outcomes, institutional and teacher quality.

  2. Retrieved from the ACARA website 27/9/12: http://www.acara.edu.au/reporting/national_report_on_schooling/student_engagement/attendance.html.

  3. All multi-level models were conducted using MlWin 2.25.

  4. It is also possible to model the interaction of ICSEA, Remote and ATSI by including interaction effect parameters into the model. Doing so essentially lowers the level of effect of the Remote categories while increasing the overall effects of the others two – with some overall improvement in the model fit statistics; however, this also adds another seven parameters to the model (ICSEA x P; ICSEA x R; ICSEA x VR; ICSEA x ATSI; ATSI x P; ATSI x R; ATSI x VR). For parsimony these interactions have not been included here.

  5. Data from ACARA were only available for gain cohorts within one school, consequently schools which do not cover either end of the gain cohort year range are not included (e.g. all high schools in Queensland do not include Year 7, and thus do not have ACARA gain scores by school).

  6. These estimates are obtained from a basic three level null model as described above, with each level of variances calculated as a proportion of the overall (summed) variance of all three levels. See Goldstein (2003); Bryk and Raudenbush (1992).

References

  • Berry, K. J., & Martin, T. W. (1974). The synecdochic fallacy: A challenge to recent research and theory building in sociology. Pacific Sociological Review, 17(2), 139–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowey, W., Harper, H., Dunn, B., & Wolgemuth, J. (2009). How important is school attendance in learning to read? Paper presented at the Australian Assoication for Research in Education Annual Conference, Canberra.

  • Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 1146–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1998). Modelling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 310–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Cazden, C. B., Coopes, R., Klenowski, V., Ladwig, J., Lester, J., Macdonald, S., Phillips, J., Shield, P.G., Theroux, P., Tones, M. J., Villegas, M., & Woods, A. (2011). A formative evaluation of the Stronger Smarter Learning Communities Project. 2011 report. Brisbane/Canberra: Queensland University of Technology and Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/47539/. Acccessed 15 December 2011.

  • Macklin, J. (2012). Building Stronger Futures for Aboriginal people in the Northern Territory. http://www.jennymacklin.fahcsia.gov.au/node/1969. Accessed 30 November 2012.

  • MacLeod, J. (2008). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S. (2011). Designing better schools for culturally and linguistically diverse children: A science of performance model for research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA). (2010). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Action Plan, 2010-2014. Carlton South, VIC: MCEECDYA. Retrieved from: http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/verve/_resources/A10-945_IEAP_web_version_final2.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2012.

  • Newmann, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, N. (2009). Up from the mission: Selected writings. Collingwood, VIC: Black Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riele, K. (2006). Youth at risk: Further marginalizing the marginalized? Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarra, C. (2005). Strong and smart: Reinforcing Aboriginal perceptions of being Aboriginal at Cherbourg State School. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Murdoch University, Perth, WA.

  • Townsend, T. (2001). Satan or savior? An analysis of two decades of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12(1), 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. C. (1988). Louts and Legends: Male youth culture in an inner-city school. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by funding from the Commonwealth Government, Department of Employment, Education and Workplace Relations for the evaluation of the SSLC project, 2009–2013. The authors acknowledge the ideas and support of the research team: Courtney Cazden, Rhonda Coopes, Val Klenowski, John Lester, Shelley MacDonald, Jean Phillips, Pamela Theroux, Malia Villegas, and Annette Woods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James G. Ladwig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ladwig, J.G., Luke, A. Does improving school level attendance lead to improved school level achievement? An empirical study of indigenous educational policy in Australia. Aust. Educ. Res. 41, 171–194 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0131-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0131-y

Keywords

Navigation