Skip to main content
Log in

End Plate–Stiffener Connection for SHS Column and RHS Beam in Steel-Framed Building Modules

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the mechanical performance of beam-to-column connections for steel-framed building modules with RHS and SHS sections of relatively small member sizes. In the experimental program, three forms of connections are tested under static bending, including a completely welded connection (W), a bolted end plate connection (EP) and the proposed end plate–stiffener connection (ST), and the failure modes, moment–rotation behaviours and strain responses were recorded during experiments. Results show that ST connection exhibited superior connection strength, stiffness and ductility compared with the EP connection. In addition, a detailed finite element analysis was conducted to model the connection behaviours, considering bolt pretension, contact behaviours and detailed bolt geometry, showing good comparison with experiments. Furthermore, a parametric study was performed on the end plate thickness and stiffener thickness for the proposed end plate–stiffener connection. Such results finally enable a comparative study to investigate the performance of module during road transportation, highlighting the effects of connection stiffness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS (Release 16.1) [Computer software]. (2015). ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.

  • ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). (2013). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10. ASCE, Reston, VA.

  • ASTM. (2016). Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM 370, West Conshohocken, PA.

  • Balc, R., Chira, A., & Chira, N. (2012). Finite element analysis of beam to column end plate bolted connection. Acta Technica Napocensis: Civil Engineering & Architecture, 55(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structure—Part 1–8: Design of joints. EN 1993-1-8, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Farnsworth, D. (2014). Modular tall building design at Atlantic Yards B2. In CTBUH 2015 Shanghai conference (pp 492–499).

  • Garrison, J., & Tweedie, A. (2008). Modular architecture manual—Prepared by Garrison Architects for Kullman Buildings Corp. New Jersey, USA: Kullman Buildings Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giriunas, K., Sezen, H., & Dupaix, R. B. (2012). Evaluation, modeling, and analysis of shipping container building structures. Engineering Structures, 43, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., Shi, G., Bai, Y., & Shi, Y. (2014). Seismic performance of prefabricated steel beam-to-column connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 102, 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMO (International Maritime Organization). (2014). IMO/ILO/UNECE code of practice for packing of cargo transport units (CTU Code). MSC.1/Circ.1497. IMO, London, UK.

  • Innella, F., Luo, F. J., & Bai, Y. (2018). Capacity of screw connections between plasterboard panels and cold-formed steel for modular buildings. ASCE Journal of Architectural Engineering, 24(4), 04018031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, M., Judge, R., & Jones, S. W. (2016). Current UK trends in the use of simple and/or semi-rigid steel connections. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 6, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, A. W., Chen, W., Hao, H., & Bi, K. (2018). Structural response of modular buildings—An overview. Journal of Building Engineering, 16, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M., Goodier, C., & Ogden, R. (2014). Design in modular construction. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. M., & Richards, J. (2010). Modular design for high-rise buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Structures and Buildings, 163(3), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, F. J., Yang, X., & Bai, Y. (2016). Member capacity of pultruded GFRP tubular profile with bolted sleeve joints for assembly of latticed structures. Journal of Composites for Construction, 20(3), 04015080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., & Scott, M. H. (2000). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modular Building Institute (MBI). (2017). Permanent modular construction annual report. Virginia, USA: Modular Building Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. (1990). AISC design guide 4, extended end-plate moment connections—Seismic and wind applications. Chicago, IL: AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Parkes, J., Bai, Y., Styles, A., & Wang, A. (2017). Handbook for the design of modular structures. Monash University. ISBN: 978-0-646-96498-0. https://mccb.org.au/mccb/book.

  • Oberg, E., Jones, F. D., Holbrook, L. H., & Ryffel, H. H. (2004). Machinery’s handbook (27th ed.). NY: Industrial Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, J. A., Wardenier, J., Kurobane, Y., Dutta, D. & Yeomans, N. (1992). Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading. CIDECT.

  • Rogan, A. L., Lawson, R. M., & Bates-Brkjak, N. (2000). Value and benefits assessment of modular construction. Ascot, UK: Steel Construction Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAA. (1998). “Steel structures”, Australian standards, AS4100. Sydney: Standards Association of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G., Fan, H., Bai, Y., Yuan, F., Shi, Y. J., & Wang, Y. Q. (2012). Improved measure of beam-to-column joint rotation in steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70, 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., & Bradford, M. A. (2008). Numerical simulation of steel pretensioned bolted end-plate connections of different types and details. Engineering Structures, 30(10), 2677–2686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Li, S., & Chen, H. (2004). Finite element analysis and tests on bolted end-plate connections in steel portal frames. Advances in Structural Engineering, 7(3), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styles, A. J., Luo, F.J., Bai, Y., & Murray-Parkes, J.B. (2016). Effects of joint rotational stiffness on structural responses of multistorey modular buildings. In International conference on smart infrastructure and construction (ICSIC), Cambridge, UK.

  • Sumner, E., & Murray, T. (2001). Experimental investigation of the MRE 1/2 end-plate moment connection. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, December.

  • Sumner, E., & Murray, T. (2002). Behavior of extended end-plate moment connections subject to cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128, 501–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamboli, A. R. (1993). Handbook of structural steel connection design and details. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Spencer, B. (2013). Experimental and analytical behavior of blind bolted moment connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 82, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. T., Clarke, M. J., Hancock, G. J., & Murray, T. M. (1998). Design model for bolted moment end plate connections joining rectangular hollow sections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(2), 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Wu, C., Nie, X., Bai, Y., & Zhu, L. (2016). Bonded sleeve connections for joining tubular GFRP beam to steel member: Numerical investigation with experimental validation. Composite Structures, 157, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo, Y., & Zha, X. (2017). FEM and experimental study on mechanical property of container building with holes. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(1), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the industry partners of the Modular Construction Codes Board and the State Government of Victoria through the Manufacturing Productivity Networks program; and the technical support from Mr. Goh Hoo for his experience in the analysis of module transport; and assistance from Mr. Long Goh, Mr. Philip Warner and Mr. Mark Taylor in the Civil Engineering Laboratory of Monash University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Bai.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, F.J., Ding, C., Styles, A. et al. End Plate–Stiffener Connection for SHS Column and RHS Beam in Steel-Framed Building Modules. Int J Steel Struct 19, 1353–1365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00214-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00214-6

Keywords

Navigation