Abstract
This paper addresses the influence of the elastic rotor blade deformation and the aerodynamic interference from the fuselage on the rotor aerodynamics, including rotor noise characteristics. A BO105 main rotor/fuselage configuration is chosen for the numerical simulations. An unsteady aerodynamic code based on free wake three-dimensional panel method (UPM) is used to account for nonlinear effects associated with the mutual interference between main rotor and fuselage. Airbus Helicopters’ (formerly: Eurocopter) rotor code (HOST) is coupled with this aerodynamic code (UPM) to account for the effect of elastic blade deformation. The effect of the fuselage is simulated using two fuselage models in aerodynamic code, (1) potential theory in the form of a panelized fuselage and (2) an analytic fuselage influence formulation derived from isolated fuselage simulation. The advantage of (2) is in its computational efficiency. The aerodynamic modelling is then coupled with an aero-acoustic post-processing tool based on the Ffowcs-Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) approach for evaluating the noise propagation to the far-field. This toolchain is then evaluated in different flight conditions to assess the usability of this approach in the design process. In descending flight, the acoustic prediction is completed at a very mature level, as the blade vortex interaction is well captured. In climb, the major noise peak is underpredicted, while the overall directivity agreement is well matched. In forward flight, due to a phase shift in the airloads prediction, parts of the loading noise directivity are not well captured. The onset of transonic effects further degrades the results obtained at the front of the rotor. For the investigated flight cases, the analytical fuselage formulation brought very similar results to the panelized fuselage model, therefore proving its worthiness for further accelerating the simulation in these flight conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ADV:
-
Advancing side
- APSIM:
-
DLR FW–H code APSIM
- BET:
-
Blade element theory
- BPF:
-
Blade passing frequency
- BVI:
-
Blade vortex interaction
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamics
- CSD:
-
Computational structural dynamics
- FUS:
-
Fuselage
- FLOWer:
-
DLR structured multi-block computational fluid dynamics code
- FUS:
-
Fuselage
- FW–H:
-
Ffowcs-Williams/Hawkings acoustic analogy
- HART II:
-
Higher harmonic control aero-acoustics test campaign
- HELINOVI:
-
HELIcopter NOise and VIbration test campaign
- HOST:
-
Airbus Helicopters’ comprehensive code
- HSI:
-
High-speed impulsive
- MR:
-
Main rotor
- OSPL:
-
Overall sound pressure level
- RET:
-
Retreating side
- RPM:
-
Rotor rotational speed (1/min)
- Rev:
-
Revolution
- UPM:
-
Unsteady panel method with three-dimensional free wake model
- \(A_{0}\) :
-
Peak value of vertically induced velocity by fuselage
- \(c_{\infty }\) :
-
Speed of sound (m/s)
- \(C_{\text{T}}\) :
-
Thrust coefficient
- \(c_{n} M^{2}\) :
-
Normal force coefficient
- \(M_{x}\) :
-
Rotor hub roll moment, positive starboard up (Nm)
- \(M_{y}\) :
-
Rotor hub pitch moment, positive nose up (Nm)
- \(M_{\text{h}}\) :
-
Hover tip Mach number
- \(r\) :
-
Radial coordinate (m)
- \(T\) :
-
Thrust (N)
- \(S\) :
-
Shape function for induced velocity
- \(V_{\infty }\) :
-
Flight speed, m/s
- \(v_{izf}\) :
-
Velocity vertically induced by the fuselage
- \(x,y,z\) :
-
Horizontal, lateral and vertical coordinate
- α eff :
-
Effective rotor shaft angle of attack, wind tunnel corrected (°)
- \(\beta\) :
-
Blade flap angle (°)
- \(\psi\) :
-
Azimuth angle (°)
- \(\theta\) :
-
Blade pitch angle (°)
- \(\theta_{\text{FP}}\) :
-
Flight path angle (negative value: descent) (°)
References
Smith, M.J., Lim, J.W., van der Wall, B.G., Baeder, J.D.: The HART II international workshop: an assessment of the state of the art in CFD/CSD prediction. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 4(4), 345–372 (2013)
van der Wall, B.G.: A comprehensive rotary-wing data base for code validation: the HART II international workshop. Aerounaut. J. 1154(1163), 91–102 (2011). [Erratum in 115 (1165), pp 220, 2011]
Ffowcs-Williams, J.E., Hawkings, D.L.: Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A264, 321–342 (1969)
Tanabe, Y., Sugawara, H.: Construction and validation of an analysis tool chain for rotorcraft active noise reduction. In: 38th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Sept 4–7, 2012
van der Wall, B.G., Lim, J.W., Jung, S.N., Bailly, J., Baeder, J.D., Boyd Jr., D.D.: An assessment of comprehensive code prediction state-of-the-art using the HART II international workshop data. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 4(3), 223–252 (2013)
Yin, J., van der Wall, B.G., Oerlemans, S.: Acoustic wind tunnel tests on helicopter tail rotor noise (HELINOVI). J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 53(3), 226–239 (2008)
Langer, H.-J., Dieterich, O., Oerlemans, S., Schneider, O., van der Wall, B.G., Yin, J.: The EU HELINOVI project—wind tunnel investigations for noise and vibration reduction. In: 31st European Rotorcraft Forum, Florence, Italy, 2005, Sept 13–15
Yin, J., van der Wall, B.G., Oerlemans, S.: Representative test results from HELINOVI aeroacoustic main rotor/tail rotor/fuselage test in DNW. In: 31st European Rotorcraft Forum, Florence, Italy, 2005, Sept 13–15
Ahmed, S.R., Vidjaja, V.T.: Unsteady panel method calculation of pressure distribution on BO105 model rotor blades. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 43(1), 47–56 (1998)
Yin, J., Ahmed, S.R.: Helicopter main-rotor/tail-rotor interaction. J. Am. Helicopter Soc. 45(4), 293–302 (2000)
Yin, J.: Prediction- and its validation-of the acoustics of multiblade rotors in forward flight utilising pressure data from a 3-D free wake unsteady panel method. In: 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994
Yin, J.: Main rotor and tail rotor blade vortex interaction under the influence of the fuselage. In: 38th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012, Sept 4–7
Benoit, B., Dequin, A.-M., Kampa, K., von Grünhagen, W., Basset, P.-M., Gimonet, B.: HOST, a general helicopter simulation tool for Germany and France. In: AHS 56th Annual Forum and Technology Display, Virginia Beach, VA, 2000, May 2–4
Raddatz, J., Fassbender, J.: Block structured Navier-Stokes solver FLOWer in: MEGAFLOW—numerical flow simulation for aircraft design. Numer. Fluid Mech. Multidiscip. Design 89(1), 27–44 (2005)
Yin, J., Delfs, J.: Improvement of DLR aero-acoustic code (APSIM) and its validation with analytical solution. In: 29th European Rotorcraft Forum, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 2003, Sept 16–18
van der Wall, B.G., Bauknecht, A., Jung S.N., You, Y.-H.: Fuselage-rotor mutual interference: a step towards interactional aerodynamics in comprehensive codes. In: 5th Decennial Aeromechanics Specialists Conference, Fisherman’s Wharf, San Francisco, CA, 2014, Jan 22–24
van der Wall, B.G., Bauknecht, A., Jung, S.N., You, Y.-H.: Semi-empirical modeling of fuselage-rotor interference for comprehensive codes: fundamental model. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 5(4), 387–401 (2014)
van der Wall, B.G., Bauknecht, A., Jung, S.N., You, Y.-H.: Semi-empirical physics-based modeling of fuselage rotor and fuselage-wake interferences for comprehensive codes. In: 70th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Montreal, Canada, 2014, May 20–22
Jacob, H.G.: Rechnergestützte Optimierung statistischer und dynamischer Systeme. Springer, Berlin (1982)
van der Wall, B.G.: Analytical Formulation of Unsteady Profile Aerodynamics and its Application to Simulation of Rotors. ESA-TT-1244, Braunschweig (1992)
Dietz, M., Kessler, M., Krämer, E.: Aeroelastic simulations of isolated rotor using weak fluid-structure coupling. In: High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering ‘06, Vols, pp. 407–420. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, J., van der Wall, B.G. & Wilke, G.A. Investigation of a simplified aerodynamic modelling technique for noise predictions using FW–H propagation. CEAS Aeronaut J 7, 551–566 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-016-0208-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-016-0208-1