Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DNA barcoding of fungi: a case study using ITS sequences for identifying aquatic hyphomycete species

  • Published:
Fungal Diversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aquatic hyphomycetes are a polyphyletic group of fungi that play a crucial role in organic matter turnover in streams. They have been traditionally identified based on the morphology of conidia collected in stream water or obtained from leaves colonized in nature upon aeration in the laboratory. Therefore, species identification is limited by our ability to induce conidium production and to establish pure cultures. Conidial shapes are believed to be the result of convergent evolution, so similar conidia may be produced by different conidiogenesis processes, which may prevent unambiguous identification. Currently, a great effort in fungal taxonomy is being made at introducing a set of criteria based on comparisons of selected nucleotide sequences instead of or in addition to phenotypic characters. We examined the suitability of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rRNA gene region or its subregions (ITS1 and ITS2) to identify aquatic hyphomycetes, by sequencing and comparing these regions in 94 fungal isolates belonging to 19 species collected in Portuguese streams with different environmental conditions during 8 years. Sequences of ITS1, ITS2 and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rRNA genes of the Portuguese isolates of aquatic hyphomycetes and those from the GenBank exhibited taxonomic cohesiveness, the isolates grouped with their respective species but all Tricladium species did not group within the Tricladium genus. Cohesiveness was not observed between isolates with respect to location, condition of stream or date of collection. Evolutionary divergences (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences; Kimura 2-parameter distance) between con-specific isolates were shallow and a deep divergence between species was generally observed. The NJ trees based on ITS1 or ITS2 rRNA gene sequences had lower statistical support for some internal nodes, we therefore propose ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rRNA gene as barcode for identifying species of aquatic hyphomycetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW, Blackwell M (1996) Introductory mycology, IVth edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral HO, Krieglsteiner GJ (1985) Bausteine zu einer Askomyzeten-Flora der BR Deutschland: In Süddeutschland gefundene inoperculate Discomyzeten mit taxonomischen, ökologischen und chorologischen Hinweisen. Beih Z Mykol 6:1–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher F (2005) Freshwater fungal communities. In: Dighton J, White JF, Oudemans P (eds) The fungal community: its organization and role in the ecosystem. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 39–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher F (2007) Molecular approaches applied to aquatic hyphomycetes. Fungal Biol Rev 21:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher F (2009) Reproduction and dispersal in aquatic hyphomycetes. Mycoscience 50:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher F, Kendrick B (1974) Dynamics of the fungal population on leaves in a stream. J Ecol 63:761–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Bärlocher F, Charette N, Letourneau A, Nikolcheva LG, Sridhar KR (2010) Sequencing DNA extracted from single conidia of aquatic hyphomycetes. Fungal Ecol 3:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baschien C, Marvanová L, Szewzyk U (2006) Phylogeny of selected aquatic hyphomycetes based on morphological and molecular data. Nova Hedwig 83:311–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belliveau M, Bärlocher F (2005) Molecular evidence confirms multiple origin of aquatic hyphomycetes. Mycol Res 109:1407–1417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J, Marvanová L, Gulis V (2009) Evolutionary relationships between aquatic anamorphs and teleomorphs: Tricladium and Varicosporium. Mycol Res 113:1322–1334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Descals E (1997) Ingoldian fungi: some field and laboratory techniques. Boll SocHist Nat Balears 40:169–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Descals E (2005) Techniques for handling Ingoldian fungi. In: Graça MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Netherlands, pp 129–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner MO, Gulis V, Kuehn KA, Chauvet E, Suberkropp K (2007) Fungal decomposers of plant litter in aquatic ecosystems. In: Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (eds) The Mycota, vol IV, Environmental and microbial relationships. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Godeas AM (1985) Hifomicetes (Deuteromycotina) acuáticos de Tierra del Fuego I. Physis (Buenos Aires) Secc B 43:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulis V, Marvanová L, Descals E (2005) An illustrated key to the common temperate species of aquatic hyphomycetes. In: Graça MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO (eds) Methods for studying litter decomposition. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 130–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajibabaei M, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Hebert PDN (2006) A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol Ecol Notes 6:959–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BG (2008) Phylogenetic trees made easy: a how-to manual, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (2001) The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycol Res 105:1422–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 54:852–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond 270:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method of estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau A, Seena S, Marvanová L, Bärlocher F (2010) Potential use of barcoding to identify aquatic hyphomycetes. Fungal Divers 40:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieckfeldt E, Seifert KA (2000) An evaluation of the use of ITS sequences in the taxonomy of the Hypocreales. Stud Mycol 45:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvanová L (1997) Freshwater hyphomycetes: a survey with remarks on tropical taxa. In: Janardhanan KK, Rajendran C, Natarajan K, Hawksworth L (eds) Tropical mycology. Science Publishers Inc, Enfield, pp 169–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvanová L (2007) Aquatic hyphomycetes and their meiosporic relatives: slow and laborious solving of a jig-saw puzzle. In: Ganguli BN, Deshmukh SK (eds) Fungi multifaceted microbes. Anamaya Publishers, New Delhi, pp 128–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvanová L, Pascoal C, Cássio F (2003) New and rare hyphomycetes from streams of northwest Portugal. Part I. Cryptog Mycolog 243:39–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson RH, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Larsson KH, Kõljalg U (2006) Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: a fungal perspective. PLoS ONE 1:e59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson KH (2008) Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinformatics 4:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoal C, Marvanová L, Cássio F (2005) Aquatic hyphomycete diversity in streams of Northwest Portugal. Fungal Divers 19:109–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman A (2007) Report of the planning workshop for all fungi DNA barcoding. Inoculum 58:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sati SC, Tiwari N (1992) A new species of Tricladium from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Mycol Res 96:229–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert KA, Samson RA, deWaard JR, Houbraken J, Lévesque CA, Moncalvo J-M, Gerry Louis-Seize, Hebert PDN (2007) Prospects for fungus identification using CO1 DNA barcodes, with Penicillium as a test case PNAS USA 104:3901–3906

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer CA, Descals E, Kohlmeyer B, Marvanová L, Padgett D, Porter D, Raja HA, Schmit JP, Thorton HA, Voglymayer H (2007) Fungal biodiversity in aquatic habitats. Biodivers Conserv 16:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VS (2005) DNA barcoding: perspectives from a “Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy” (PEET) debate. Syst Biol 54:841–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suberkropp K, Klug MJ (1976) Fungi and bacteria associated with leaves during processing in a woodland stream. Ecology 57:707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward RD (2009) DNA barcode divergences among species and genera of birds and fishes. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1077–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Weber RWS (2007) Introduction to fungi, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic, San Diego, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

L. Marvanová was supported by the project MSM0021622416.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal

    Sahadevan Seena, Cláudia Pascoal & Fernanda Cássio

  2. Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Tvrdého 14, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic

    Ludmila Marvanová

Authors
  1. Sahadevan Seena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cláudia Pascoal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ludmila Marvanová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernanda Cássio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahadevan Seena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seena, S., Pascoal, C., Marvanová, L. et al. DNA barcoding of fungi: a case study using ITS sequences for identifying aquatic hyphomycete species. Fungal Diversity 44, 77–87 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0056-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0056-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation