Abstract
Multi-response optimization of composites was performed using the Taguchi-based desirability approach. Parameters, namely tool rotation speed (900 rpm, 1120 rpm, and 1400 rpm), feed rate (20 mm/min, 40 mm/min, and 60 mm/min), graphene nanoplates (GNPs) content (6.5 vol.%GNPs, 11 vol.%GNPs, and 17.4 vol.%GNPs) each at three levels were considered to optimize and enhance tensile strength and hardness using Taguchi’s L9 orthogonal array. Besides Taguchi’s analysis and the developed regression model, the artificial neural network was used to validate the results. A confirmation test was compared with the predicted value of composite desirability (\(d_G\)), and a comparison was drawn between experimental and predicted values. From ANOVA, results inferred that vol.%GNPs significantly impacts \(d_G\). The obtained tensile strength and hardness values effectively reflect the macrostructural, microstructural studies and XRD results. Fracture analysis of the confirmation sample showed no dimples but continuous deep ridges with sharp, torn edges indicating brittle failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Halil A, Yusuf O, and Mehmet T, Mater. Des. 27 (2006) 799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.024
Hashim J, Looney L, and Hashmi M S J, J Mater Process Tech 92–93 (1999) 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00118-1
Sergi A, Khan R H U, Irukuvarghula S, Meisnar M, Makaya A, and Attallah M M, Adv. Powder Technol. 33 (2022) 103411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.103411
Liu L, Li W, Tang Y, Shen B, and Hu W, Wear 266 (7), (2009) 733–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.08.009
Feng W, Huimin L, and Bin Y, Mater. Charact. 54 (2005) 446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2005.01.011
Dhanashekar M, and Senthil Kumar V S, Procedia Eng. 97 (2014) 412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.265
Premnath A, Silicon 12 (2020) 665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00178-6
Qianhao Z, Hongmei C, Jing Z, Ling W, Shujin C, and Yunxue J, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 14 (2021) 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.05
Aafaq A A, and Jailani H S, Arab J Sci Eng 48 (2023) 3647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07247-w
Sathiskumar R, Murugan N, Dinaharan I, and Vijay S J, Mater. Charact. 84 (2013) 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2013.07.001
Patil N A, Nasir M K B S, Pedapati S R, and Mamat O B, Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 52 (2021) 1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.20200029
Derringer G, and Suich R, J. Qual. Technol. 12 (1980) 214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
Singaravel B, and Selvaraj T, J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 15 (2016) 1. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686716500013
Puviyarasan M, and Senthil Kumar V S, Arab J Sci Eng 40 (2015) 1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-015-1654-5
Rejil C M, Dinaharan I, Vijay S J, and Murugan N, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 552 (2012) 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.049
Sharma A, Sharma V M, and Paul J, T NONFERR METAL SOC 29 (2019) 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65108-3
Shunmugasundaram M, Nagarajan S M, Reddy Y, Chaurasiya P K, Kumar A, and Rajak U, Arab J Sci Eng 47 (2021) 8601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06352-6
Pinar A M, Arab J Sci Eng 38 (2013) 705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0372-5
Sivaiah P, and Chakradhar D, Measurement 134 (2019) 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.067
Gul M, Shah A N, Aziz U, Naveed Husnain M A, Mujtaba T K, Ahmad R, and Hanif M F, Energy Sources A: Recovery Util EnvironEff. 44 (1), (2022) 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.163899
Pant M, Singari R M, Arora P K, Moona G, and Kumar H, Mater. Res. Express 7 (2020) 115307. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abc8bd
KOLAKOT\(\dot{I}\), Aditya: J. Therm. Eng. 6(5), 712–723 (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.796761
Balamugundan B, Karthikeyan L, and Senthilkumar V S, Procedia Eng. 38 (2012) 1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.157
Simar, A., Avettand-Fènoël, M.-N.: 7. Friction Stir Processing for Architectured Materials, pp. 195–229. Springer, (2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11942-3_7
Komarasamy M, Kumar N, Tang Z, Mishra R S, and Liaw P K, Mater. Res. Lett. 3 (2015) 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2014.958586
Saini N, Pandey C, Thapliyal S, and Dwivedi D K, Silicon 10 (2018) 1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9710-2
Abdullah Aafaq A, and Siddhi Jailani H, Materials Today: Proceedings (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.323
Sharma A, Sharma V M, and Paul J, J. Compos. Mater. 54 (2020) 45. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831985942
Ragu Nathan S, Suganeswaran K, Kumar S, Thangavel P, and Gobinath V K, J. Manuf. Process 90 (2023) 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.08
Acknowledgements
We the author acknowledge ‘Virtue Meta Solutions’ Hyderabad, Telangana, India for providing scanning electron microscope and optical microscope to make this research possible. Also, we the authors thank ‘ShiKag’s Engineering Labs’ Hyderabad, Telangana, India for enabling the use of UTM and Viker’s microhardness tester for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aafaq, A.A., Jailani, H.S. Friction Stir Processing of Al 2124 Reinforced Graphene Metal Matrix Composites and Multi Characteristic Optimization Through Desirability Approach Integrated with ANN. Trans Indian Inst Met (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-024-03270-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-024-03270-7