Skip to main content
Log in

Potential Hexose Fermenting Yeast for Conversion of Sugary and Starchy Raw Materials into Ethanol

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nineteen yeast isolates retrieved from molasses and grapes were studied for tolerance to temperature, ethanol and sugar along with optimization of fermentation parameter and ethanol production using different carbon sources. All the isolates were able to grow up to 40 °C temperature. Total 11 isolates, i.e., M1, M5, M6, M7, M8, M11, M12, M15, M18, M19 and G1 tolerated 18–20% (w/v) glucose, while isolates M1, M2, M5, M12, M15 and M20 were able to tolerate 12–15% (v/v) ethanol. Maximum 1.72 g/100 gsubstrate/h ethanol productivity, using 15% (w/v) glucose at 30 °C, was obtained in case of isolate M12 followed by 1.37, 1.29, 1.25 and 1.20g/100 gsubstrate/h by isolates M3, M6, M5 and M15, respectively. Total eight promising isolates were selected for optimization of fermentation parameters. The temperature shift from 30 to 35 °C, increased ethanol production in case of all the isolates by a factor ranging from minimum 8.85% in isolate M3 to maximum 26.22% in isolate M7. Isolate M15 showed 8.43% (v/v) ethanol at 35 °C as compared to 7.25% (v/v) at 30 °C. Maximum ethanol production was achieved at pH 4.8 in all the promising isolates which was decreasing with increasing pH from 4.8 to 5.5 and above. Isolate M20 produced 9.30% ethanol with molasses as compared to 8.1% (v/v) achieved using pure glucose as carbon source under optimized conditions. Maximum 10.72% and 9.65% (v/v) ethanol were produced by isolate M20 using hydrolysates of rice and wheat, respectively. Appearance of 101.51% fermentation efficiency during bioconversion of rice hydrolysate into ethanol by isolate M20 clearly indicated the occurrence of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, F., R.A. Peinado, C. Millan, J.M. Ortega, and J.C. Mauricio. 2006. Relationship between ethanol tolerance, H+-ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains. International Journal of Food Microbiology 110: 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandre, H., I. Rousseaux, and C. Charpentier. 1994. Ethanol adaptation mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 20: 173–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC. 1975. Official methods of analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A.A. 2008. Ethanol production potential of local yeast strains isolated from ripe banana peels. African Journal of Biotechnology 7(20): 3749–3752.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caspeta, L., Y. Chen, P. Ghiaci, A. Feizi, S. Buskov, and B.M. Hallström. 2014. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science 346(6205): 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caspeta, L., Y. Chen, and J. Nielsen. 2016. Thermotolerant yeasts selected by adaptive evolution express heat stress response at 30 °C. Scientific Reports 6: 27003. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., B. Ghosh, and R.R. Ray. 2011. Isolation and characterization of local yeast strains from waste fruit juices, jaggery and dahi samples. International Journal of Chemical Sciences 9(2): 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeote, V., B. Blondin, S. Dequin, and J. Sablayrolles. 2001. Stress effect of ethanol on fermentation kinetics by stationary-phase cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Letters 23(9): 677–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasmalla, M.A.A., R. Yang, M. Nikoo, and S. Man. 2012. Production of ethanol from Sudanese sugar cane molasses and evaluation of its quality. Journal of Food Processing and Technology 3(7): 163. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7110.1000163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, A.J., L.W.F. Taylor, and C.M. Hamas. 1984. Selection of yeast able to produce ethanol from glucose at 40 °C. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19: 361–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kajiwara, S., K. Suga, H. Sone, and K. Nakamura. 2000. Improved ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by increases in fatty acid unsaturation via metabolic engineering. Biotechnology Letters 22: 1839–1843.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olowonibi, O.O. 2017. Isolation and characterization of palm wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae potentially useful as bakery yeasts. European Journal of Experimental Biology 7: 11. https://doi.org/10.21767/2248-9215.100011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osho, A. 2005. Ethanol and sugar tolerance of wine yeasts isolated from fermenting cashew apple juice. African Journal of Biotechnology 4(7): 660–662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qvirist, L.A., C. De Filippo, F. Strati, I. Stefanini, M. Sordo, T. Andlid, and D. Cavalieri. 2016. Isolation, identification and characterization of yeasts from fermented goat milk of the Yaghnob Valley in Tajikistan. Frontiers in Microbiology 7: 1690.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sangwan, S., S. Gupta, P. Singh, and N. Chawla. 2014. Fuel ethanol production from molasses by indigenous yeast isolates. Sugar Tech 16(4): 422–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N., K.L. Kalra, H.S. Oberoi, and S. Bansal. 2007. Optimization of fermentation parameters for production of ethanol from kinnow waste and banana peels by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Indian Journal of Microbiology 47: 310–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thammasittirong, S.N.R., T. Chamduang, U. Phonrod, and K. Sriroth. 2012. Ethanol production potential of ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Polish Journal of Microbiology 61(3): 219–221.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tikka, C., H.P. Osuru, N. Atluri, P.C.V. Raghavulu, N.K. Yellapu, I.S. Mannur, and M. Bhaskar. 2013. Isolation and characterization of ethanol tolerant yeast strains. Bioinformation 9(8): 421–425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Togarepi, E., N. Mapiye, C. Muchanyereyi, and P. Dzomba. 2012. Optimization of fermentation parameters for ethanol production from Ziziphus mauritiana fruit pulp using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NA33). International Journal of Biochemistry Research and Review 2(2): 60–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • You, K.M., C. Rosenfield, and D.C. Knipple. 2003. Ethanol tolerance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on cellular oleic acid content. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69(3): 1499–1503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Sangwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sangwan, S., Sharma, M.K., Kumar, V. et al. Potential Hexose Fermenting Yeast for Conversion of Sugary and Starchy Raw Materials into Ethanol. Sugar Tech 21, 320–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0688-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0688-x

Keywords

Navigation