Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of carbon sources on the growth and ethanol production of native yeast Pichia kudriavzevii ITV-S42 isolated from sweet sorghum juice

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of non-Saccharomyces yeast species in fermentation processes is widely acknowledged. Within this group, Pichia kudriavzevii ITV-S42 yeast strain shows particularly desirable characteristics for ethanol production. Despite this fact, a thorough study of the metabolic and kinetic characteristics of this strain is currently unavailable. The aim of this work is to study the nutritional requirements of Pichia kudriavzevii ITV-S42 strain and the effect of different carbon sources on the growth and ethanol production. Results showed that glucose and fructose were both assimilated and fermented, achieving biomass and ethanol yields of 0.37 and 0.32 gg−1, respectively. Glycerol was assimilated but not fermented; achieving a biomass yield of 0.88 gg−1. Xylose and sucrose were not metabolized by the yeast strain. Finally, the use of a culture medium enriched with salts and yeast extract favored glucose consumption both for growth and ethanol production, improving ethanol tolerance reported for this genre (35 g L−1) to 90 g L−1 maximum ethanol concentration (over 100%). Furthermore Pichia kudriavzevii ITV-S42 maintained its fermentative capacity up to 200 g L−1 initial glucose, demonstrating that this yeast is osmotolerant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Y x/s :

Biomass yield (g biomass g−1 substrate)

Y Et/s :

Ethanol yield (g ethanol g−1 substrate)

Y Et/x :

Specific ethanol yield (g ethanol g−1 biomass)

µ max :

Specific growth rate maximum (h−1)

V p :

Specific ethanol production rate (g ethanol g−1 biomass h−1)

V s :

Specific glucose consumption rate (g glucose consumption g−1 biomass h−1)

X :

Final biomass production (g L−1)

X 0 :

Initial biomass production (g L−1)

S 0 :

Initial glucose concentration (g L−1)

S :

Final glucose concentration (g L−1)

P :

Final ethanol concentration (g L−1)

t :

Time (h)

Q p :

Ethanol productivity (g L−1 h−1)

References

  1. Walker MG (1998) Yeast physiology and biotechnology. Wiley, England

    Google Scholar 

  2. Panchal CJ (1990) Yeast strain selection. Biotechnology and bioprocessing series. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jolly NP, Augustyn OPH, Pretorius IS (2006) The role and use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production. S Afr J Enol Vitic 27(1):15–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolf K (1996) Nonconventional yeast in biotechnology. A handbook. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (2011) The yeasts, a taxonomic study. Elsevier, 5th edn, vol. 1

  6. Amore R, Kotter P, Kuster C, Ciriacy M, Hollenberg CP (1991) Cloning and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the NAD(P)H-dependent xylose reductase-encoding gene (XYL1) from the xylose-assimilating yeast Pichia stipitis. Gene 109:89–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Evy AA, Jaseetha AS, Nilanjana D (2013) Atrazine degradation in liquid culture and soil by a novel yeast Pichia kudriavzevii strain Atz-EN-01 and its potential application for bioremediation. JAPS 3(06):035–043

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andreas MH, Annette A, Nils-Gunnar C, Ulf S, Thomas AA (2012) Degradation of phytate by Pichia kudriavzevii TY13 and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii TY14 in Tanzanian togwa. Int J Food Microbiol 153:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao H, Shao Z, Jiang Y, Dole S, Zhao H (2014) Exploiting Issatchenkia orientalis SD108 for succinic acid production. Microb Cell Fact 3(1):121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santosh S, Meikandhan T, Saurabh S, Vidhya R (2013) Biodiesel production from a newly isolated Pichia kudriavzevii strain. Fuel 106:690–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandeep SD, Harinder SO, Simranjeet KS, Dhiraj N, Dinesh K, Satinder KU (2011) Enhanced ethanol production from sugarcane juice by galactose adaptation of a newly isolated thermotolerant strain of Pichia kudriavzevii. Bioresour Technol 102:5968–5975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harinder SO, Neha B, Simranjeet KS, Sandeep SD, Ujjal K, Chadha BS, Vinod KB (2012) Ethanol production from alkali-treated rice straw via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii HOP-1. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Díaz-Nava LE (2014) Aislamiento y selección de levaduras para la producción de etanol durante la fermentación espontánea de jugo de sorgo dulce. Masters Thesis. ITV, Veracruz, Mexico

  14. Strehaiano P (1984) Phénomenes d’inhibition et fermentation alcoolique. Doctoral Thesis. IPN. Toulouse, France

  15. Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles JM, Blondin B (2007) Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(8):2432–2439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Colville CA, Seatter MJ, Jess TJ, Gould GW, Thomas HM (1993) Kinetic analysis of the liver-type (GLUT2) and brain-type (GLUTS) glucose transporters in Xenopus oocyte substrate specificities and effects of transport inhibitors. Biochem J 290:701–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larpent JP (1991) Biotechnologie des levures. Paris, France, pp 97–120

  18. Paalme T, Elken R, Vilu R, Korhola M (1997) Growth efficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose/etanol media with a smooth change in the dilution rate (A-stat). Enzyme Microb Tech 20:174–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruinenberg PM, de Bot PHM, van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA (1984) NADH-linked aldose reductase: the key to anaerobic alcoholic fermentation of xylose by yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 19:256–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlson M, Osmond BC, Botstein D (1981) Mutants of yeast defective in sucrose utilization. Genetics 98:25–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lages F, Lucas C (1997) Contribution to the physiological characterization of glycerol active uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1322:8–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallardo JCM, Souza CS, Cicarelli RMB, Oliveira KF, Morais MR, Laluce C (2011) Enrichment of continuous culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with the yeast Issatchenkia orientalis in the production of ethanol at increasing temperatures. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38(3):405–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2007) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuel industry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 18:213–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishino H, Miyazaki S, Tohjo Am K (1985) Effect of osmotic pressure on the growth rate and fermentation activity of wine yeasts. J Enol Vitic 36:170–174

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aguilar-Uscanga MG (1998) Caractérisation cinétique et metabolique d’ une souche de Brettanomyces. Doctoral Thesis. I. P. N. Toulouse, France

  26. Ortiz-Muñiz B, Carvajal-Zarrabal O, Torrestiana-Sánchez B, Aguilar-Uscanga MG (2010) Kinetic study on ethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITV-01 yeast isolated from sugar cane molasses. J Chem Tech Biotechnol 85:1361–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mendes-Ferreira A, Mendes-Faia A, Leão C (2004) Growth and fermentation patterns of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different ammonium concentrations and its implications in winemaking industry. J Appl Microbiol 97(3):540–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sablayrolles J, Dubois C, Manginot C, Barre P, Roustan JL (1996) Effectiveness of combined ammoniacal nitrogen and oxygen additions for completion of sluggish and stuck wine fermentations. J Ferment Bioeng 82(4):377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thaillandier P, Ramon Portugal F, Fuster A, Strehaiano P (2007) Effect of ammonium concentration on alcoholic fermentation kinetics by wine yeasts for high sugar content. Food Microbiol 24:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the economic support from the National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico (CONACyT-SAGARPA, Project 173411) and the critical reading of Patricia Margaret Hayward-Jones, M.Sc. and Dulce María Barradas-Dermitz, M.Sc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Aguilar-Uscanga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz-Nava, L.E., Montes-Garcia, N., Domínguez, J.M. et al. Effect of carbon sources on the growth and ethanol production of native yeast Pichia kudriavzevii ITV-S42 isolated from sweet sorghum juice. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 40, 1069–1077 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1769-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1769-z

Keywords

Navigation