The dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone is a crucial industrial process in the production of caprolactam and adipic acid, both of which serve as important precursors in nylon textiles. This endothermic reaction is constrained by thermodynamic equilibrium and involves a complex reaction network, leading to a heightened focus on catalysts and process design. Copper-based catalysts have been extensively studied and exhibit exceptional low-temperature catalytic performance in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation, with some being commercially used in the industry. This paper specifically concentrates on research advancement concerning active species, reaction mechanisms, factors influencing product selectivity, and the deactivation behaviors of copper-based catalysts. Moreover, a brief introduction to the new processes that break thermodynamic equilibrium via reaction coupling and their corresponding catalysts is summarized here as well. These reviews may offer guidance and potential avenues for further investigations into catalysts and processes for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation.
Cyclohexanone is a vital intermediate in the production of ε-caprolactam and adipic acid, which serve as the main raw materials for nylon 6 (PA6) and nylon 66 (PA66), respectively. Besides polyamide fibers, cyclohexanone is utilized in the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals [1,2,3], as shown in Fig. 1a. Currently, the global nylon market predominantly comprises PA6 and PA66, accounting for about 86% of total consumption . The production of ε-caprolactam and adipic acid constitutes 80% of the total consumption of cyclohexanone . In 2022, the worldwide cyclohexanone market was valued at US$8.34 billion. By 2023, it is projected to rise to US$8.72 billion, with an expected compound annual growth rate of 4.5% , as illustrated in Fig. 1b. Efficient production of high-purity cyclohexanone is paramount to meet the demands of the rapidly expanding industry.
Cyclohexanol dehydrogenation is a crucial industrial process in the production of cyclohexanone. However, its reaction network is complex, as illustrated in Fig. 2; the entire network encompasses several steps, including aromatization of cyclohexanol to phenol, dehydration of cyclohexanol to cyclohexene, and condensation of cyclohexanone to cyclohexylidencyclohexanone, in addition to dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone . The heterogeneous catalytic gas-phase cyclohexanol dehydrogenation at atmospheric pressure is an endothermic reaction (ΔH = 65 kJ/mol) and is limited by thermodynamic equilibrium . The equilibrium conversion of cyclohexanol dehydrogenation at various temperatures is listed in Table 1 . Increasing the reaction temperature serves to promote forward reaction and can enhance the conversion of cyclohexanol. However, simultaneously, it will intensify the side reactions of dehydration and aromatization, resulting in a higher demand for the design of suitable catalysts and processes to achieve both high activity and selectivity for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation.
Previous works primarily utilized the ZnO/CaO catalyst for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation [10, 11]. The conversion of cyclohexanol via a ZnO/CaO catalyst was high (approximately 70%–80%), and the selectivity of cyclohexanone was < 98% at reaction temperatures ranging from 350 °C to 400 °C. However, the active component ZnO grains tended to grow at high temperatures, leading to a decrease in catalytic performance and a consequent reduction in the lifespan of the ZnO/CaO catalyst. Recently, copper-based catalysts have gained widespread attention due to their excellent low-temperature catalytic performance in the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone [12,13,14,15]. The conversion of cyclohexanol could approach equilibrium values, with the selectivity of cyclohexanone usually exceeding 99% at reaction temperatures between 200 °C and 300 °C. In comparison with the ZnO/CaO catalyst, copper-based catalysts exhibit a higher reaction rate and require less catalyst loading when processing the same amount of cyclohexanol, resulting in correspondingly smaller equipment size. Moreover, copper sources are cheap and readily available, and the lower reaction temperatures conserve energy in terms of a reduced heating load, making copper-based catalysts a popular choice in the industry.
Researchers have made continuous efforts to synthesize high-performance copper-based catalysts for the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone and to investigate their structure–performance relationship. In this paper, we summarized the discussions on active species, factors influencing product selectivity, and the strategy for improving catalyst stability. Additionally, we propose novel processes that couple with the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to break the thermodynamic equilibrium conversion of cyclohexanol and utilize the generated hydrogen, along with investigations on corresponding catalysts. The study concludes with a brief discussion regarding the challenges associated with cyclohexanol dehydrogenation.
Copper-Based Catalysts for the Cyclohexanol Dehydrogenation
Discussion on the Active Species
The catalytic performance of Cu-based catalysts in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation is summarized in Table 2. As demonstrated, persistent research efforts have led to an excellent catalytic performance in copper-based catalysts. Although much debate surrounds the identification of active species for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation over copper-based catalysts, the topic remains controversial.
Some researchers believe that Cu+ species act as active sites for the aromatization of cyclohexanol to phenol, whereas Cu0 sites serve as active sites for the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone [12, 16,17,18,19]. The catalyst activity increased linearly with an increasing amount of reversibly adsorbed CO in the Cu–ZnO–Al2O3 catalyst, leading to the conclusion that metallic copper species served as the primary active sites for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation . Ji et al.  compared Cu/SiO2 and Cu–ZnO/SiO2 catalysts, suggesting that following reduction, the former contained only Cu0 species, whereas both Cu0 and Cu+ species were present on the surface of the reduced Cu–ZnO/SiO2 catalyst. They demonstrated that the conversion of cyclohexanol was 83% using the Cu/SiO2 catalyst at 300 °C, with selectivities of 93.4% for cyclohexanone and 0.6% for phenol. In contrast, the conversion was 92.0% over Cu–ZnO/SiO2, with selectivities of 78.6% for cyclohexanone and 14.2% for phenol. This suggests that Cu+ species facilitated the phenol generation, whereas Cu0 was the primary active site for the cyclohexanol dehydrogenation to cyclohexanone.
The promoted Cu–MgO catalysts also provided evidence for the role of Cu0 species. With the introduction of Cr2O3, the proportion of Cu0 increased, and the catalytic performance was considerably enhanced . The conversion of cyclohexanol over the Cu–MgO–Cr2O3 catalyst reached 64.3%, and the selectivity of cyclohexanone exceeded 99% at 250 °C. However, another type of active site was proposed in Cu–MgO catalysts. It has been demonstrated that the basic sites of MgO in close proximity to Cu0 sites played a critical role in facilitating the dehydrogenation of alcohols [17, 18]. The basic sites could act as nucleophiles to abstract the proton from the O–H group of cyclohexanol, forming a negatively charged alkoxide intermediate. Following Cα–H elimination, this intermediate produced cyclohexanone, which eventually desorbed from the catalyst surface along with the H2 molecule [14, 17, 27]. The reaction mechanism of cyclohexanol dehydrogenation over Cu–MgO catalysts is illustrated in Fig. 3.
However, some researchers have proposed that Cu+ species exhibit higher activity in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation compared to Cu0 species [1, 7, 21, 22, 28]. Fridman et al.  investigated the influence of copper oxidation states on catalytic activity. The reduced Cu–Mg catalyst contained only Cu0 species on the surface, while both Cu0 and Cu+ species coexisted on the surface of the reduced Cu–Zn–Al catalyst. Cu–Zn–Al demonstrated a cyclohexanone formation but a much slower rate of phenol formation compared to the Cu–Mg catalyst, indicating that Cu0 species catalyzed both dehydrogenation and aromatization reactions, while Cu+ sites catalyzed only cyclohexanol dehydrogenation to cyclohexanone. The adsorption behavior of cyclohexanol on Cu0 and Cu+ species was also studied using in situ FTIR . As shown in Fig. 4, it is demonstrated that cyclohexanol adsorbed molecularly onto Cu+ at room temperature, forming cyclohexanol alcoholate, which was considered the intermediate for cyclohexanone formation. However, for Cu0 species, dissociative adsorption was observed only at temperatures of 50 °C or higher. Cyclohexanol adsorption on Cu0 was accompanied by the formation of both cyclohexanol alcoholate and phenolate species, which explained the low product selectivity.
The studies involving modulated Cu+/Cu0 ratios of catalysts supported the aforementioned opinions. Cyclohexanol conversion improved proportionally with the increasing ratio of Cu+/Cu0, while the selectivity of cyclohexanone remained relatively stable at around 80% over a series of Cu/Al2O3 catalysts . Adding certain reducible metal oxides, such as ZnO, Cr2O3, and La2O3, as promoters to the copper-based catalysts can also modulate the Cu+/Cu0 ratio and enhance the catalytic performance in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation [18, 20, 30, 31]. La2O3 species promoted the dispersion of copper species, increased the Cu+/Cu0 ratio, and stabilized the Cu+ species of Cu–ZnO–Cr2O3 catalyst during the reduction and reaction processes, resulting in 15% and 11.5% increase in cyclohexanol conversion and cyclohexanone selectivity, respectively .
Sancheti et al.  also supported the notion of Cu+ species as active sites. They utilized an unreduced CuZnMg catalyst and achieved 55.0% cyclohexanol conversion and 99.2% cyclohexanone selectivity at 260 °C. By examining the catalyst's characterizations before and after the reaction, it was discovered that some Cu2+ species were reduced to a lower valence during the reaction, forming the Cu+/Cu2+ redox couple [32, 33]. Figure 5 presents the plausible reaction mechanism of cyclohexanol dehydrogenation over such a structure: (i) cyclohexanol was adsorbed on copper oxide, and the hydroxyl group interacted with lattice oxygen and Cu+; (ii) this interaction led to the dissociated chemisorption of the hydroxyl group, where the oxygen formed a bond with Cu+ and hydrogen was abstracted as a proton by lattice oxygen; (iii) α–H was transferred to Cu2+ species to produce cyclohexanone; (iv) Cu+–O bond was broken, cyclohexanone desorbed, and free hydrogen was generated .
Recent experimental studies and DFT (Density Functional Theory) calculations have suggested the existence of a synergistic effect between Cu0 and Cu+ species; this effect plays a crucial role in alcohol dehydrogenation [34, 35]. It was discovered that C–O bonds in alcohols preferentially adsorbed onto Cu+ sites, whereas Cu0 facilitated the transfer of H atoms over the CuAl-mixed metal oxide (CuAl–MMO) catalyst during the 2-propanol dehydrogenation. The corresponding reaction mechanism unfolded as follows: 2-propanol adsorbed on Cu+ sites; the O–H and C–H bonds broke, and the H atoms transferred to Cu0 sites, forming metal hydride; finally, the product desorbed. The cleavage of the O–H bond in 2-propanol was determined to be the rate-determining step in the dehydrogenation process.
Thus far, no consensus has been reached on the precise roles of Cu0 and Cu+ species in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. This may be attributed to the fact that most of the published reports date back to the beginning of the twentieth century when in situ or operando experiments on catalyst structure and reactions were not well developed. Additionally, the chemical states of copper species can easily change during the reaction and exposure to air. However, due to the importance of this reaction within the industry, further investigation into the behavior of active species and their reaction mechanisms is imperative to provide guidance for catalyst development. For example, the preparation of copper-based catalysts with varying surface Cu0 and Cu+ distribution while maintaining consistent textural properties and particle sizes. Moreover, it has been reported that the composition of reducing agents during activation and the composition of the feed stream during the reaction can lead to instantaneously gas-induced dynamic transitions over commercial Cu/ZnO catalysts. In situ time-resolved XAFS (X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure) spectra, operando synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction, modulated-excitation infrared spectroscopy, and quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectra for the catalyst collected at different stages with time on stream provide excellent opportunities for monitoring the dynamic behaviors of both geometric structure and electronic environment of copper sites [36,37,38,39,40]. By examining the morphology and surface chemistry via in situ or operando experiments and combining theoretical DFT calculations, it is possible to gain valuable insights into the catalytic behaviors of active sites and the structure–performance relationship of the catalysts.
Factors Influencing the Product Selectivity
The reaction network of cyclohexanol dehydrogenation is complex, as illustrated in Fig. 2. There are numerous side reactions, such as the aromatization of cyclohexanol to phenol, dehydration of cyclohexanol to cyclohexene, and condensation of cyclohexanone to cyclohexylidencyclohexanone. Therefore, the factors influencing product selectivity are among the essential aspects to be investigated.
The primary byproducts are cyclohexene and phenol. It is generally believed that the dehydration reaction is catalyzed by the surface acid sites of the catalyst. Doping copper-based catalysts with alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, or transition metals can neutralize some acidic sites, thereby reducing the formation of cyclohexene. It was discovered that the intensity of strong acid sites decreased when Mn was added to the Cu–Si catalyst, resulting in a significant decrease in cyclohexene selectivity from 14.6% to 1.2% . Chary et al.  suggested that cyclohexene might be generated on medium–strong acid sites. As the copper loading increased, the amount of medium–strong acid sites decreased and then increased, with the selectivity of cyclohexene changing synchronously.
It has also been reported that cyclohexanol can undergo dehydration reactions not only at acidic sites but also at basic sites . The yield of cyclohexene linearly increased with the growing amount of both total acidity and total basicity, and a correlation commonly observed in a series of metal phosphates, metal oxides, and sulfates  as well as the Cu/Al2O3–ZrO2 catalysts .
The product distribution is also influenced by the different structures of copper when combined with a secondary component. It has been found that when the catalyst precursor contains CuxCo3−xO4 spinel species, the copper and cobalt could transfer to CoCu alloy after reduction, which can prevent the formation of phenol. The authors attributed this to the fact that precursors containing CuxCo3−xO4 spinel species exhibit the highest H2 chemisorption and inhibit the formation of multipoint adsorbed complexes on the surface, which serve as intermediates for phenol generation .
There is some debate regarding the pathway of phenol formation. Some studies suggest that phenol can be formed directly from cyclohexanol (direct route, Eq. 1) [7, 20], while others propose that phenol could be produced simultaneously from cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone (consecutive route, Eq. 2) . Romero et al.  conducted a kinetics study of these two possible reaction routes for phenol generation over the copper–zinc oxide catalyst. Their finding demonstrated that the phenol generation rate aligned well with the consecutive route kinetic model, indicating that phenol was produced from cyclohexanone.
Stability of the Copper-Based Catalysts
Simón et al.  examined the deactivation behaviors of commercial copper–chromite and copper–zinc oxide catalysts used in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. After a 350 h reaction at a high liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) and 250 °C, a 50% reduction in activity was observed. Based on their characterizations, it was suggested that coke deposits on copper species and copper sintering were the main causes of deactivation. Notably, coke deposition on the copper–zinc oxide was severer, resulting in the blockage of pores.
A kinetic model was further developed for the commercial copper–zinc oxide catalyst, taking into account deactivation and considering the influence of hydrogen and cyclohexanone in the feed stream . A coke deposit of about 7 wt% was demonstrated, increasing with higher cyclohexanone content and decreasing as hydrogen concentration increased. It was observed that the soft coke consisted of high-molecular weight aliphatic oligomers. Combined with the kinetic study and catalyst characterizations, it was suggested that H2 likely inhibited coke formation due to a reduction in the concentration of coke precursors.
Cr2O3 can be employed as a structural additive to the Cu–Mg–Al catalyst, promoting copper dispersion and enhancing the catalyst's stability . Additionally, with the inclusion of a ZnO promoter, the Cu–ZnO–MgO catalyst displayed remarkable thermal and structural stability during the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol. Cyclohexanol conversions remained constant in the range of 51%–55%, and the selectivity of cyclohexanone was nearly 99% even after 125 h at 260 °C (Fig. 6). The spent catalyst could be easily regenerated by calcining at 500 °C in an air flow inside the reactor and reused for at least four cycles, demonstrating the robust and stable structure of the catalyst .
Adjusting the preparation methods or preparation conditions can also enhance the dispersion of active copper species and increase resistance to copper sintering. Jeon et al.  optimized the precipitation pH values during the preparation of Cu/SiO2 catalysts to reduce surface acid sites, effectively suppressing side reactions and oligomer deposits that deactivated the active species. This led to superior catalytic performance and stability compared to commercial Cu–MgO and Cu–ZnO catalysts. It has also been reported that the Cu/SiO2 catalyst prepared by using the ammonia evaporation method exhibited outstanding stability during the ethanol dehydrogenation reaction. The ethanol conversion was over 90% with a selectivity of 99% to acetaldehyde throughout the 500 h time on stream at 280 °C . This excellent performance can be attributed to the strong interaction between copper and SiO2, resulting from the formation of an intermediate copper phyllosilicate phase.
New Processes for the Cyclohexanol Dehydrogenation
The dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol faces challenges due to thermodynamic equilibrium limitations and the formation of oligomers from condensation reactions, which can cover active species. Furthermore, the hydrogen released during the reaction is not effectively utilized . To tackle these challenges, researchers have proposed alternative processes for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation, such as the oxidative dehydrogenation process using various oxidants [49,50,51,52,53,54] and reaction coupling processes involving different hydrogenation reactions [17, 18, 41, 55].
Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexanol
In order to utilize the hydrogen generated during the reaction, a gaseous oxidant was introduced into the feed stream, converting the direct dehydrogenation process into an oxidative dehydrogenation process . This approach not only overcomes the thermodynamic equilibrium limitation but also offers the advantage of using environmentally friendly, cost-effective oxidants, such as oxygen, which can inhibit the formation of oligomer deposits and consequently improve catalyst stability. Given these benefits, the oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol has garnered significant interest in recent years.
Cyclohexanol can undergo both dehydrogenation and oxidative dehydrogenation reactions over CuO–ZnO catalysts when oxygen or air is added to the feed, as demonstrated in Eq. 3) . The catalyst remains stable at a low mole ratio of oxygen to cyclohexanol at 240 °C. As the mole ratio of oxygen to cyclohexanol increases, the conversion of cyclohexanol also rises, and the selectivity of cyclohexanone consistently remains above 99%. Furthermore, due to the endothermic nature of cyclohexanol's direct dehydrogenation, the LHSV of cyclohexanol is typically limited to a range of 0.5–2.0 h−1 constrained by the low external heat supply in a practical reactor. However, for the oxidative dehydrogenation process, the thermal effect can be modulated by adding oxidants to the feed stream, benefiting from the coupling with the exothermic reaction of converting hydrogen to water. In this scenario, the processing capacity of the reactor can be improved.
In addition to copper-based catalysts, other catalyst systems have also been developed for the oxidative dehydrogenation of the cyclohexanol process. The titanosilicate molecular sieve with an open 12-membered-ring channel system (ETS-10) and considerable basicity was employed for the oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol . Utilizing O2 as the oxidant, ETS-10 achieved 100% selectivity to cyclohexanone and 75% cyclohexanol conversion at reaction temperatures below 200 °C. However, noticeable deactivation of the catalyst could be observed during a period of 120 min. The deactivation was accelerated with increased basicity or decreased oxygen/cyclohexanol ratio, as the formation of cyclohexanone oligomers blocked partial microporous structures. This was further evidenced by the complete regeneration of the catalyst after calcination. Cobalt oxides encapsulated in SBA15 were also used in this process and exhibited a 42% cyclohexanol conversion at room temperature, using tert-butyl hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant in a batch reactor . Due to the confined and uniformly dispersed cobalt species, the catalyst was able to be used up to four times without any significant change in its catalytic activity.
Gold has been reported to exhibit a strong activation capability on the Cα–H bond of alcohols. Recently, Hensen and coworkers  applied a series of highly dispersed gold nanoparticles supported on Cu-doped spinel oxides catalysts in the oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol, using O2 as the oxidant. The conversion of cyclohexanol and the selectivity of cyclohexanone were achieved at 70% and 92%, respectively, at 260 °C using the Au/MgCuCr2O4 catalyst. The catalyst exhibited excellent stability over 100 h of reaction (Fig. 7a). During the reaction, the 3 nm Au nanoparticles barely changed due to the strong metal-support interaction. The study proposed a synergistic catalysis of Au/MgCuCr2O4 catalyst for the oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol; this involved the basic Mg–O sites facilitating alcohol deprotonation, the gold nanoparticles selectively cleaving the C–H bond, and the Cu–O sites removing H atoms in the form of water.
Hensen  further investigated the active sites of the Au/MgCuCr2O4 catalysts and revealed their reaction mechanism by modulating the Cu contents. A conversion of 99.1% and a cyclohexanone selectivity of 90.2% were achieved over the stable Au/Mg0.25Cu0.75Cr2O4 catalyst at 300 °C. During the reaction, it was demonstrated that the surface Cu2+ species were reduced and migrated to the metallic gold nanoparticles, forming Au–Cu alloy species. This migration of Cu resulted in the creation of defects (oxygen vacancies) on the support. Based on these findings, a possible reaction mechanism is shown in Fig. 8. Oxygen vacancies could activate molecular O2 to form active oxygen species, although it cannot be ruled out that the Cu species in the Au–Cu alloy may also promote oxygen activation. These active oxygen species were involved in the activation of O–H bonds in cyclohexanol, while gold played a role in activating Cα–H bond.
ZnCr2O4 was also used as a support to disperse and stabilize gold due to its strong interaction. In conjunction with various characterizations, it was demonstrated that gold supported on a high-temperature (≥ 700 °C) calcined ZnCr2O4 support exhibited superior selectivity, with a cyclohexanone yield of 91% at 300 °C, and remained stable during a 90 h reaction (Fig. 7b) . The near-complete removal of Lewis acid sites via high-temperature calcination reduced side reactions and inhibited the deposition of cyclohexene oligomers that deactivated the active species surface.
Ordered mesoporous silica with extra-large spherical cages (EP-FDU-12) was also used to obtain highly stable and dispersed gold species, achieving exceptional performance and superior stability (> 550 h) in the oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol (Fig. 7c) . Following the reaction, no considerable growth of Au particles was observed, and the formation of carbon deposits on the AuNPs/EP-FDU-12 catalyst was minimal. This suggests that the large and opened three-dimensional mesoporous networks facilitated the diffusion of products, thus suppressing coke formation.
However, in certain oxidative dehydrogenation processes, the usage of O2 (strong oxidant) resulted in the production of numerous unwanted byproducts [60, 61]. Over the past two decades, CO and CO2 have garnered considerable interest as soft oxidants in oxidative dehydrogenation, facilitating the suppression of total oxidation [60, 62, 63]. Kumar et al.  conducted the cyclohexanol dehydrogenation reaction in the presence of CO and revealed that methanol was produced along with cyclohexanone, as demonstrated in Eqs. 4 and 5. A 90% conversion and 67.8% selectivity of cyclohexanone were achieved at 250 °C using the Cu–ZnO catalyst. The equations for oxidative dehydrogenation processes using different oxidants are shown below, and the catalytic performance is summarized in Table 3.
Reaction Coupling Processes with Hydrogenation Reactions
To optimize the utilization of hydrogen generated during cyclohexanol dehydrogenation, certain reaction coupling processes have been developed. These processes involve using unsaturated organic compounds alongside cyclohexanol as reactants in the feed. The heat released by the hydrogenation reaction can then be harnessed for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. This approach facilitates easy temperature control and optimal hydrogen mass balance, eliminating the need for an external supply of H2 and ultimately leading to reduced operational costs and energy savings [41, 65, 66].
The coupling of furfural hydrogenation and cyclohexanol dehydrogenation in vapor-phase conditions over Cu–MgO catalysts is a highly efficient and environmentally friendly process for synthesizing furfuryl alcohol and cyclohexanone, as demonstrated in Eq. 6 [18, 67]. Compared to independent reactions, the yield of furfuryl alcohol and cyclohexanone in the coupled reaction was improved by 18% and 7%, respectively, at 200 °C. It has also been proposed that the introduction of chromium could enhance Cu dispersion and stabilize Cu+ species during reduction, resulting in exceptional catalytic performance.
Utilizing Cu–Zn–Al, 2-methylfuran, instead of furfuryl alcohol, was obtained alongside cyclohexanone, as shown in Eq. 7 . The catalytic performances of both reactions improved, and no noticeable deactivation was observed during the 250 h reaction. The enhancement of 2-methylfuran selectivity in the coupling process could be attributed to the presence of activated hydrogen species on the catalyst surface resulting from dehydrogenation. Furthermore, the Cu–Mn–Si catalyst was introduced, exhibiting excellent catalytic performance in this coupling reaction . The enhanced Cu dispersion, the presence of medium–strong acid sites due to manganese addition, and the interface between Cu and MnO contributed to the superior catalytic performance. The conversion of cyclohexanol and furfural was 66.8% and 99.1%, respectively, with selectivity for both cyclohexanone and 2-methylfuran exceeding 91% at 279 °C.
Direct catalytic coupling of nitrobenzene hydrogenation and cyclohexanol dehydrogenation (Eq. 8) was investigated using a Cu/MgO–SBA15 catalyst . Although the catalyst exhibited excellent thermal stability, a rapid condensation reaction between cyclohexanone and aniline occurred. Competitive adsorption between the two reactants was observed, which negatively affected the selective reaction's efficiency.
Considerable progress has been made in researching new processes for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. These advancements offer benefits such as high cyclohexanol conversion, improved energy efficiency, optimal hydrogen utilization, and enhanced environmental sustainability. However, challenges still remain in these new processes. For instance, cyclohexanol may become over-oxidized, and the occurrence of various side reactions may increase, leading to additional energy requirements during subsequent separation processes, reduced product quality, and potential impacts on downstream polymer synthesis.
Conclusion and Outlook
Cyclohexanol dehydrogenation to cyclohexanone is a vital industrial process used in the production of nylon materials, which hold a substantial share in the global commercial market. However, its reaction network is complex and limited by thermodynamic equilibrium. Considerable advancements have been made in copper-based catalysts for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation, leading to the realization of their applications in several industrial processes. Nonetheless, challenges persist in identifying active sites, understanding reaction mechanisms, and improving product selectivity and catalyst stability. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the active species, factors influencing product selectivity, and studies on deactivation. It suggests that more detailed and careful mechanistic investigations involving in situ or operando characterizations, isotopic tracer technology, and computational studies could provide insights and new possibilities in cyclohexanol dehydrogenation and guide the development of industrial catalysts. Furthermore, this review introduces new processes of oxidative dehydrogenation and reaction coupling processes with hydrogenation reactions. These novel processes offer several advantages, such as breaking the equilibrium conversion, ensuring high energy efficiency, achieving optimal hydrogen utilization, and promoting environmental sustainability. However, the cost of separation and the occurrence of side reactions should be considered, as they may pose challenges to downstream product utilization in industrial applications.
Tangale NP, Niphadkar PS, Deshpande SS et al (2013) Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol over Cu/Al2O3 catalysts prepared with different precipitating agents. Appl Catal A 467:421–429
Simón E, Rosas JM, Santos A et al (2013) Coke formation in copper catalyst during cyclohexanol dehydrogenation: kinetic deactivation model and catalyst characterization. Chem Eng J 214:119–128
Wang YQ, Ye JX, Wang SH et al (2016) Synthesis of mesoporous titanium silicalite-1 with high stability in cyclohexanone ammoximation. Trans Tianjin Univ 22(3):254–260
Global nylon market report from the SEIR. http://www.d-long.com/eWebEditor/uploadfile/2020070317415598028202.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2023
Cyclohexanone industry development report. http://www.chinabgao.com. Accessed 11 March 2023
Global cyclohexanone market from the prophecy market insights. https://www.prophecymarketinsights.com/market_insight/Global-Cyclohexanone-Market-4236. Accessed 11 March 2023
Fridman VZ, Davydov AA (2000) Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol on copper-containing catalysts. J Catal 195(1):20–30
Lin YM, Wang I, Yeh CT (1988) Activity stability of a copper(II) oxide–zinc(II) oxide catalyst for oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone. Appl Catal 41:53–63
Kabo GJ, Yursha IA, Frenkel ML et al (1988) Thermodynamic properties of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone. J Chem Thermodyn 20(4):429–437
Aramendia MA, Borau V, Jimenez C et al (1995) The selectivity of sodium carbonate-doped zinc phosphate in the gas-phase dehydrogenation-dehydration of cyclohexanol. J Catal 151(1):44–49
Brocker FJ, Hesse M, Markl R (2000) Process for dehydrogenating secondary cyclic alcohols:U.S. Patent 6 162 758
Sivaraj C, Reddy BM, Rao PK (1988) Selective dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone on Cu–ZnO–Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal 45(1):L11–L14
Chary KVR, Sagar GV, Naresh D et al (2005) Characterization and reactivity of copper oxide catalysts supported on TiO2–ZrO2. J Phys Chem B 109(19):9437–9444
Marella RK, Madduluri VR, Lakkaboyana SK et al (2020) Hydrogen-free hydrogenation of nitrobenzene via direct coupling with cyclohexanol dehydrogenation over ordered mesoporous MgO/SBA-15 supported Cu nanoparticles. RSC Adv 10(64):38755–38766
Yang L, Fan Y, Chen Y (1993) Studies on the structure and catalytic properties of ZnO/CaCO3 catalysts for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. Petrochem Technol 22(6):370–374
Nagaraja BM, Siva Kumar V, Shashikala V et al (2004) Effect of method of preparation of copper–magnesium oxide catalyst on the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol. J Mol Catal A 223(1–2):339–345
Patil KN, Manikanta P, Nikam RR et al (2023) Effect of precipitating agents on activity of co-precipitated Cu–MgO catalysts towards selective furfural hydrogenation and cyclohexanol dehydrogenation reactions. Results Eng 17:100851
Nagaraja BM, Padmasri AH, Seetharamulu P et al (2007) A highly active Cu-MgO-Cr2O3 catalyst for simultaneous synthesis of furfuryl alcohol and cyclohexanone by a novel coupling route—combination of furfural hydrogenation and cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. J Mol Catal A 278(1–2):29–37
Simón E, Rosas JM, Santos A et al (2012) Study of the deactivation of copper-based catalysts for dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone. Catal Today 187(1):150–158
Ji DH, Zhu WC, Wang ZL et al (2007) Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol on Cu–ZnO/SiO2 catalysts: the role of copper species. Catal Commun 8(12):1891–1895
Sancheti SV, Yadav GD (2021) CuOZnO-MgO as sustainable and selective catalyst towards synthesis of cyclohexanone by dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol over monovalent copper. Mol Catal 506:111534
Popova M, Dimitrov M, Santo VD et al (2012) Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol on copper containing catalysts: the role of the support and the preparation method. Catal Commun 17:150–153
Sagar GV, Rao PVR, Srikanth CS et al (2006) Dispersion and reactivity of copper catalysts supported on Al2O3–ZrO2. J Phys Chem B 110(28):13881–13888
Chary KVR, Sagar GV, Srikanth CS et al (2007) Characterization and catalytic functionalities of copper oxide catalysts supported on zirconia. J Phys Chem B 111(3):543–550
Ramankutty CG, Sugunan S, Thomas B (2002) Study of cyclohexanol decomposition reaction over the ferrospinels, A1−xCuxFe2O4 (A=Ni or Co and x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 1), prepared by ‘soft’ chemical methods. J Mol Catal A 187(1):105–117
Chary KVR, Seela KK, Sagar GV et al (2004) Characterization and reactivity of Niobia supported copper oxide catalysts. J Phys Chem B 108(2):658–663
Wang F, Shi RJ, Liu ZQ et al (2013) Highly efficient dehydrogenation of primary aliphatic alcohols catalyzed by Cu nanoparticles dispersed on rod-shaped La2O2CO3. ACS Catal 3(5):890–894
Shi QJ, Liu N, Liang Y (2007) Preparation of MgO-supported Cu2O catalyst and its catalytic properties for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. Chin J Catal 28(1):57–61
Fridman V (2004) Dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol on copper-containing catalysts II. The pathways of the cyclohexanol dehydrogenation reaction to cyclohexanone on copper-active sites in oxidation state Cu0 and Cu+. J Catal 222(2):545–557
Siva Kumar V, Sreevardhan Reddy S, Padmasri AH et al (2007) Role of CO/CO2 co-feeding in the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone over Cu–ZnO based catalysts. Catal Commun 8(6):899–905
Mageed AK, Dayang Radiah AB, Salmiaton A et al (2019) Nitrogen doped graphene-supported trimetallic CuNiRu nanoparticles catalyst for catalytic dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone. J King Saud Univ Sci 31(4):878–885
Konsolakis M, Lykaki M (2020) Recent advances on the rational design of non-precious metal oxide catalysts exemplified by CuOx/CeO2 binary system: implications of size, shape and electronic effects on intrinsic reactivity and metal-support interactions. Catalysts 10(2):160
Davó-Quiñonero A, Bailón-García E, López-Rodríguez S et al (2020) Insights into the oxygen vacancy filling mechanism in CuO/CeO2 catalysts: a key step toward high selectivity in preferential CO oxidation. ACS Catal 10(11):6532–6545
Ren YY, Yang YS, Chen LF et al (2022) Synergetic effect of Cu0−Cu+ derived from layered double hydroxides toward catalytic transfer hydrogenation reaction. Appl Catal B 314:121515
Cheng SQ, Weng XF, Wang QN et al (2022) Defect-rich BN-supported Cu with superior dispersion for ethanol conversion to aldehyde and hydrogen. Chin J Catal 43(4):1092–1100
Li XN, Yang XF, Zhang JM et al (2019) In situ/operando techniques for characterization of single-atom catalysts. ACS Catal 9(3):2521–2531
He XH, Wang Y, Zhang X et al (2019) Controllable in situ surface restructuring of Cu catalysts and remarkable enhancement of their catalytic activity. ACS Catal 9(3):2213–2221
Tu WF, Ren PC, Li YJ et al (2023) Gas-dependent active sites on Cu/ZnO clusters for CH3OH synthesis. J Am Chem Soc 145(16):8751–8756
Li DD, Xu F, Tang XA et al (2022) Induced activation of the commercial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst for the steam reforming of methanol. Nat Catal 5(2):99–108
Martin O, Mondelli C, Cervellino A et al (2016) Operando synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction and modulated-excitation infrared spectroscopy elucidate the CO2 promotion on a commercial methanol synthesis catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(37):11031–11036
Zheng HY, Zhu YL, Huang L et al (2008) Study on Cu–Mn–Si catalysts for synthesis of cyclohexanone and 2-methylfuran through the coupling process. Catal Commun 9(3):342–348
Chary KVR, Seela KK, Naresh D et al (2008) Characterization and reductive amination of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone over Cu/ZrO2 catalysts. Catal Commun 9(1):75–81
Bautista FM, Campelo JM, Garcı́a A, et al (2003) Influence of acid–base properties of catalysts in the gas-phase dehydration–dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol on amorphous AlPO4 and several inorganic solids. Appl Catal A 243(1):93–107
Cesar DV, Peréz CA, Salim VMM et al (1999) Stability and selectivity of bimetallic Cu–Co/SiO2 catalysts for cyclohexanol dehydrogenation. Appl Catal A 176(2):205–212
Romero A, Santos A, Ruiz G et al (2011) Phenol production kinetic model in the cyclohexanol dehydrogenation process. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(14):8498–8504
Bai GY, Wang HL, Ning HS et al (2008) Effect of carriers and additives on the activity and stability of copper-based catalysts for the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol. React Kinet Catal Lett 94(2):375–383
Jeon GS, Chung JS (1994) Preparation and characterization of silica-supported copper catalysts for the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone. Appl Catal A 115(1):29–44
Zhang HW, Tan HR, Jaenicke S et al (2020) Highly efficient and robust Cu catalyst for non-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde and hydrogen. J Catal 389:19–28
Gao BJ, Zhang LQ, Chen T (2015) TEMPO immobilized on polymer microspheres-catalyzed oxidation of cyclohexanol by molecular oxygen. Chin J Catal 36(8):1230–1235
Gao YN, Hensen EJM (2018) Highly active and stable spinel-oxide supported gold catalyst for gas-phase selective aerobic oxidation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone. Catal Commun 117:53–56
Gao YN, Hensen EJM (2020) Gas-phase selective oxidation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone over Au/Mg1-xCuxCr2O4 catalysts: on the role of Cu doping. J Catal 384:218–230
Niwa T, Naya SI, Tada H (2020) Low-temperature selective aerobic oxidation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone over n-type metal oxide-supported Au nanoparticles. Catal Commun 144:106089
Xue YX, Chen JL, Shao J et al (2020) Synthesis, catalytic activity and the structural transformation of dimeric mono-Fe(III)-substituted Keggin-type polyoxotungstates in the oxidation of cyclohexanol with H2O2. Mol Catal 492:111010
Silva IF, Vital J, Ramos AM et al (1998) Oxydehydrogenation of cyclohexanol over carbon catalysts. Carbon 36(7–8):1159–1165
Siddiqui N, Khatun R, Mishra VK et al (2021) Selective transfer hydrogenation of biomass derived furanic molecules using cyclohexanol as a hydrogen donor over nanostructured Cu/MgO catalyst. Mol Catal 513:111812
Valente A, Lin Z, Brandão P et al (2001) Gas-phase oxidative dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol over ETS-10 and related materials. J Catal 200(1):99–105
Taghavimoghaddam J, Knowles GP, Chaffee AL (2012) Preparation and characterization of mesoporous silica supported cobalt oxide as a catalyst for the oxidation of cyclohexanol. J Mol Catal A 358:79–88
Gao YN, Zhang L, van Hoof AJF et al (2019) A robust Au/ZnCr2O4 catalyst with highly dispersed gold nanoparticles for gas-phase selective oxidation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone. ACS Catal 9(12):11104–11115
Li RH, Yan XQ, Zhu XH et al (2017) Gold nanoparticles confined in ordered mesopores: size effect and enhanced stability during gas-phase selective oxidation of cyclohexanol. Catal Today 298:269–275
Burri DR, Choi KM, Han DS et al (2006) CO2 utilization as an oxidant in the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over MnO2-ZrO2 catalysts. Catal Today 115(1–4):242–247
Li C, Zhang QJ, Zeng AW (2019) A novel method for synthesizing p-benzoquinone by direct catalytic oxidation of benzene with hydrogen peroxide over copper-doped TS-1. Trans Tianjin Univ 25(5):517–526
Mimura N, Saito M (2000) Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over Fe2O3/Al2O3 catalysts in the presence of carbon dioxide. Catal Today 55(1–2):173–178
Mimura N, Saito M (2000) Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene in the presence of CO2. Appl Organomet Chem 14(12):773–777
Li SW, Yang C, Yin Z et al (2017) Wet-chemistry synthesis of cobalt carbide nanoparticles as highly active and stable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Res 10(4):1322–1328
Zheng HY, Zhu YL, Bai ZQ et al (2006) An environmentally benign process for the efficient synthesis of cyclohexanone and 2-methylfuran. Green Chem 8(1):107–109
Zhang ZH, Sun ZH, Yuan TQ (2022) Recent advances in the catalytic upgrading of biomass platform chemicals via hydrotalcite-derived metal catalysts. Trans Tianjin Univ 28(2):89–111
Nagaraja BM, Padmasri AH, Raju BD et al (2011) Production of hydrogen through the coupling of dehydrogenation and hydrogenation for the synthesis of cyclohexanone and furfuryl alcohol over different promoters supported on Cu–MgO catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 36(5):3417–3425
We are grateful for the support from Clariant International Ltd., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22022811, 21938008, and U21B2096), and the Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations.
Conflict of interest
Xinbin Ma is an editorial board member for Transactions of Tianjin University and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, J., Hou, S., Wang, Y. et al. Progress in Processes and Catalysts for Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexanol to Cyclohexanone. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 29, 196–208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-023-00358-x