Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive carbon nanotube models using the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been reported that a carbon nanotube (CNT) is one of the strongest materials with its high failure stress and strain. Moreover, the nanotube has many favorable features, such as high toughness, great flexibility, low density, and so on. This discovery has opened new opportunities in various engineering applications, for example, a nanocomposite material design. However, recent studies have found a substantial discrepancy between computational and experimental material property predictions, in part due to defects in the fabricated nanotubes. It is found that the nanotubes are highly defective in many different formations (e.g., vacancy, dislocation, chemical, and topological defects). Recent parametric studies with vacancy defects have found that the vacancy defects substantially affect mechanical properties of the nanotubes. Given random existence of the nanotube defects, the material properties of the nanotubes can be better understood through statistical modeling of the defects. This paper presents predictive CNT models, which enable to estimate mechanical properties of the CNTs and the nanocomposites under various sources of uncertainties. As the first step, the density and location of vacancy defects will be randomly modeled to predict mechanical properties. It has been reported that the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method performs probability analysis efficiently and accurately. In this paper, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation with a modified Morse potential model is integrated with the EDR method to predict the mechanical properties of the CNTs. To demonstrate the feasibility of the predicted model, probabilistic behavior of mechanical properties (e.g., failure stress, failure strain, and toughness) is compared with the precedent experiment results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. H. Baughman, A. A. Zakhidov and W. A. D. Heer, Carbon nanotubes-the route toward applications, Science, 297 (2002) 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Srivastava, C. Wei and K. Cho, Nanomechanics of carbon nanotubes and composites, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 56 (2003) 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Ajayan and T. Ebbesen, Nanometre-size tubes of carbon, Reports on Progress in Physics, 60 (1997) 1025–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Dekker, Carbon nanotubes as molecular quantum wires, Physics Today, 52 (1999) 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Harris, Carbon nanotubes and related structures: new materials for the 21st century, Cambridge University Press (1999).

  6. J. P. Lu, Elastic properties of carbon nanotubes and nanoropes, Physical Review Letters, 79 (1997) 1297–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. I. Yakobson, M. P. Campbell, C. J. Brabec and J. Bernholc, High strain rate fracture and C-chain unraveling in carbon nanotubes, Computafional Materials Science, 8 (1997) 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Yao and V. Lordi, Young’s modulus of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Journal of Applied Physics, 84 (1998) 1939–1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Xin, Z. Jianjun, Ou-Yang and Zhong-can, Strain energy and Young’s modulus of single-wall carbon nanotubes calculated from electronic energy-band theory, Physical Review B, 62 (2000) 13692–13696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Belytschko, S. P. Xiao, G. C. Schatz and R. S. Ruoff, Atomistic simulations of nanotube fracture, Physical Review B, 65 (2002) 235430–235438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Ogata and Y. Shibutani, Ideal tensile strength and band gap of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B, 68 (2003) 165409–165412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Mielke, D. Troya, S. Zhang, J. Li, S. Xiao and R. Car, The role of vacancy defects and holes in the fracture of carbon nanotubes, Chemical Physics Letters, 390 (2004) 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Sammalkorpi, A. Krasheninnikov and A. Kuronen, Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes with vacancies and related defects, Physical Review B, 70 (2004) 245416–245423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. W. Wong, P. E. Sheehan and C. M. Lieber, Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes, Science, 277 (1997) 1971–1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. P. Salvetat, G. A. D. Briggs, J. M. Bonard, R. R. Bacsa, A. J. Kulik, T. Stöckli, N. A. Burnham and L. Forró, Elastic and shear moduli of single-walled carbon nanotube ropes, Physical Review Letters, 82 (1999) 944–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. F. Yu, O. Lourie, M. J. Dyer, K. Moloni, T. F. Kelly, and R. S. Ruoff, Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load, Science, 287 (2000) 637–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Zhou, R. M. Fleming, D. W. Murphy, C. H. Chen, R. C. Haddon, A. P. Ramirez and S. H. Glarum, Defects in carbon nanostructures, Science, 263 (1994) 1744–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Smith and D. Luzzi, The physics of electronic and atomic collisions, NY, AIP Conf. Proc. (1995).

  19. P. M. Ajayan, V. Ravikumar and J. C. Charlier, Surface reconstructions and dimensional changes in single-walled carbon nanotubes, Physical Review Letters, 81 (1998) 1437–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Banhart, Irradiation effects in carbon nanostructures, Reports on Progress in Physics, 62 (1999) 1181–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. E. Horvátha, K. Kertésza, L. Pethőa, A. A. Koósa, L. Tapasztóa, Z. Vértesya, Z. Osvátha, A. Darabontb, P. Nemes-Inczeb, Z. Sárközib and L. P. Biróa, Inexpensive, upscalable nanotube growth methods, Current Applied Physics, 6 (2006) 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kleiber and H. T. D, The stochastic finite element method, New York, Wiley (1992).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Rahman and B. N. Rao, A perturbation method for stochastic meshless analysis in elastostatics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 50 (2001) 1961–1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Yamazaki and M. Shinozuka, Neumann expansion for stochastic finite element analysis, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114 (1988) 1335–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. M. Hasofer and N. C. Lind, Exact and invariant secondmoment code for-mat, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics, 100 (1974) 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. D. Youn, Z. Xi and P. Wang, Eigenvector dimensionreduction (EDR) method for sensitivity-free uncertainty quantification, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 37 (2008) 13–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Rahman and H. Xu, A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 19 (2004) 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B. D. Youn and K. K. Choi, A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization, Computers and Structures, 82 (2004) 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. R. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response surface methodology, New York, Wiley (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Johnson, S. Kotz and N. Balakrishnan, Continuous univariate distributions, New York, Wiley (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Tersoff, New empirical approach for the structure and energy of covalent systems, Physical Review B, 37 (1988) 6991–7000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D. W. Brenner, Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films, Physical Review B, 42 (1990) 9458–9471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D. W. Brenner, O. A. Shenderova, J. A. Harrison, S. J. Stuart, B. Ni and S. B. Sinnott, A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14 (2002) 783–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. K. Rappé, C. J. Casewit, K. S. Colwell, W. A. Goddard III and W. M. Skiff, UFF, a full periodic-table force-field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10024–10035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S. P. Xiao and W. Y. Hou, Studies of size effects on carbon nanotubes’ mechanical properties by using different potential functions, Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostruc tures, 14 (2006) 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. A. V. Krasheninnikov, K. Nordlund, M. Sirvio, E. Salonen, and J. Keinonen, Formation of ion-irradiation-induced atomic-scale defects on walls of carbon nanotubes, Physical Review B, 63 (2001) 245405–245410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. C. T. White, D. H. Robertson and J. W. Mintmire, Helical and rotational symmetries of nanoscale graphitic tubules, Physical Review B, 47 (1993) 5485–5488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Wei, K. Cho and D. Srivastava, Tensile strength of carbon nanotubes under realistic temperature and strain rate, Physical Review B, 67 (2003) 115407–115412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byeng D. Youn.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Maenghyo Cho

Zhimin Xi is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Michigan — Dearborn. He received his B.S. and M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Beijing University of Science and Technology and his Ph.D from University of Maryland — College Park. He is the one-time winner of the Best Paper Award from ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference (IDETC) in 2008. His research interests are robust/reliability based design, multi-scale materials and product design, and model validation & verification.

Byeng D. Youn is an Assistant Professor in the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Seoul National University, South Korea. He received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Inha University, his M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from KAIST, Korea and his Ph.D from the University of Iowa, USA. He is the two-time winner of the Best Paper Award from ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference (IDETC) in 2001 and 2008. His research interests include computer model verification and validation, prognostics and health management, reliability analysis and reliability-based design, and energy harvester design.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xi, Z., Youn, B.D. Predictive carbon nanotube models using the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. J Mech Sci Technol 26, 1089–1097 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0225-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0225-x

Keywords

Navigation