Skip to main content
Log in

Eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method for sensitivity-free probability analysis

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method for probability analysis that makes a significant improvement based on univariate dimension reduction (DR) method. It has been acknowledged that the DR method is accurate and efficient for assessing statistical moments of mildly nonlinear system responses in engineering applications. However, the recent investigation on the DR method has found difficulties of instability and inaccuracy for highly nonlinear system responses while maintaining reasonable efficiency. The EDR method integrates the DR method with three new technical components: (1) eigenvector sampling, (2) one-dimensional response approximation, and (3) a stabilized Pearson system. First, 2N+1 and 4N+1 eigenvector sampling schemes are proposed to resolve correlated and asymmetric random input variables. The eigenvector samples are chosen along the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix of random parameters. Second, the stepwise moving least squares (SMLS) method is proposed to accurately construct approximate system responses along the eigenvectors with the response values at the eigenvector samples. Then, statistical moments of the responses are estimated through recursive numerical integrations. Third, the stabilized Pearson system is proposed to predict probability density functions (PDFs) of the responses while eliminating singular behavior of the original Pearson system. Results for some numerical and engineering examples indicate that the EDR method is a very accurate, efficient, and stable probability analysis method in estimating PDFs, component reliabilities, and qualities of system responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bjerager P (1988) Probability integration by directional simulation. J Eng Mech 114:1285–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher CG (1988) Adaptive sampling—an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure. Struct Saf 5:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Chen W (2002) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. Proceedings of the DETC-DAC34127 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada, September 2002

  • Engelund S, Rackwitz R (1993) A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct Saf 12:255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J Eng Mech 100:111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Du X (2006) Uncertainty analysis by dimension reduction integration and saddlepoint approximations. J Mech Des 128:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1995) Continuous univariate distributions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jung DH, Lee BC (2002) Development of a simple and efficient method for robust optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 53:2201–2215

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber M, Hien TD (1992) The stochastic finite element method. Wiley, New York, NY

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY, Huang WH, Jeng MC, Doong JL (1997) Study of an assembly tolerance allocation model based on Monte Carlo simulation. J Mater Process Technol 70:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (1989) Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995) Response surface methodology: process and product in optimization using designed experiments. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Niederreiter H, Spanier J (2000) Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R, Fiessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9:489–494

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Rao BN (2001) A perturbation method for stochastic meshless analysis in elastostatics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:1961–1991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Xu H (2004) A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab Eng Mech 19:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo HS, Kwak BM (2003) An improved reliability analysis using design of experiments and an application to tolerance design. The 5th world congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Lodo do Jesolo, Italy, May 19–23, 2003

  • Sobol IM (1998) On quasi-Monte Carlo integrations. Math Comput Simul 47:103–112

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese P, Braswell RN, Wang B, Zhang C (1996) Statistical tolerance analysis using FRPDF and numerical convolution. Comput-Aided Des 28(9):723–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y-T (1994) Computational methods for efficient structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis. AIAA J 32:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Rahman S (2004) A generalized dimension-reduction method for multidimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:1992–2019

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki F, Shinozuka M (1988) Neumann expansion for stochastic finite element analysis. J Eng Mech 114:1335–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK (2004) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Du L (2004a) Adaptive probability analysis using an enhanced hybrid mean value (HMV+) method. J Struct Multidiscipl Optim 28(4):319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, Gu L, Yang R-J (2004b) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of side impact. J Struct Multidiscipl Optim 26(3–4):272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youn BD, Choi KK, K Yi (2005) Performance moment integration for quality assessment in reliability-based robust design optimization. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines 33:185–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byeng D. Youn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youn, B.D., Xi, Z. & Wang, P. Eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method for sensitivity-free probability analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 37, 13–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0210-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0210-7

Keywords

Navigation