Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced Bioethanol Production from Blue Agave Bagasse in a Combined Extrusion–Saccharification Process

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an improved process for bioethanol production using a recently developed combined extrusion–saccharification technology. Blue agave bagasse (BAB) was pretreated via a thermo-mechano-chemical process (co-rotational twin-screw, reactive extrusion) to increase the availability of cellulose and hemicellulose for enzymatic saccharification. Then, several commercial enzyme preparations, boosted with accessory enzymes (exoglucanase, endoglucanase, hemicellulase, xylanase, and β-glucosidase), were tested with extruded BAB at 5 % consistency in a stirred vessel. The enzyme blend that produced the highest saccharification yield was evaluated at different BAB consistencies. The obtained concentration of sugars increased up to 69.5 g/L (73 % yield) when a 20 % BAB mixture was used. When the enzyme blend was fed into the extruder and with a residence time of 2 min, the yield reached 15 % of the maximum theoretical of C6 sugars along this step. This extruded and pre-saccharified BAB was further hydrolyzed and used for fermentation. The pre-saccharification step significantly enhanced cellulose degradation and ethanol production. Our results indicate that the enzymatic saccharification of BAB, coupled with reactive extrusion, produces an excellent substrate for bioethanol production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang B, Wyman CE (2008) Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2:26–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Saucedo-Luna J, Castro-Montoya AJ, Martínez-Pacheco MM, Sosa-Aguirre CR, Campos-García J (2011) Efficient chemical and enzymatic saccharification of the lignocellulosic residue from Agave tequilana bagasse to produce ethanol by Pichia caribbica. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:725–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vandenbossche V, Brault J, Vilarem G, Hernández- Meléndez O, Vivaldo-Lima E, Hernández-Luna M, Bárzana E, Duque A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M, Mata J, Castellón E, Rigal L (2014) A new lignocellulosic biomass deconstruction process combining thermo-mechano-chemical action and bio-catalytic enzymatic hydrolysis in a twin-screw extruder. Ind Crop Prod 55:258–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh R, Shukla A, Tiwari A, Srivastava M (2014) A review on delignification of lignocellulosic biomass for enhancement of ethanol production potential. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:713–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernández-Salas JM, Villa-Ramírez MS, Veloz-Rendón JS, Rivera-Hernández KN, González RA, Plascencia-Espinosa MA, Trejo-Estrada SR (2009) Comparative hydrolysis and fermentation of sugarcane and agave bagasse. Bioresour Technol 100:1238–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perez-Pimienta JA, López-Ortega MG, Chavez-Carvayar JA, Varanasi P, Stavila V, Chen G, Singh S, Simmons BA (2015) Characterization of agave bagasse as a function of ionic liquid pretreatment. Biomass Bioenerg 75:180–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caspeta L, Caro-Bermúdez MA, Ponce-Noyola T, Martínez A (2014) Enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loading for the conversion of agave bagasse to fuel ethanol. Appl Energy 113:277–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maurya DP, Singla A (2015) An overview of key pretreatment processes for biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol. 3 Biotech 5:597–609

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SH, Teramoto Y, Tanaka N, Endo T (2007) Improvement of enzymatic saccharification of woody biomass by nano-fibrillation using extruder. In: The 57th Annual Meeting of The Japan Wood Research Society

  10. Pilli TD, Severini C, Baiano A, Derossi A, Arhaliass A, Legrand J (2005) Effects of operating conditions on oil loss and properties of products obtained by co-rotating twin-screw extrusion of fatty meal: preliminary study. J Food Eng 70:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thymi S, Krokida MK, Pappa A, Maroulis ZB (2005) Structural properties of extruded corn starch. J Food Eng 68:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mosier NS, Wyman CE, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balat M, Balat H (2008) Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:551–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosier NS, Ladisch CM, Ladisch M (2002) Characterization of acid catalytic domains for cellulose hydrolysis and glucose degradation. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:610–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodrigues AM, Ostergaard Haven M, Lindedam J, Felby C, Gama M (2015) Celluclast and Cellic CTec2: saccharification/fermentation of wheat straw, solid–liquid partition and potential of enzyme recycling by alkaline washing. Enzym Microb Technol 79:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcos M, García-Cubero MT, González-Benito G, Coca M, Bolado S, Lucas S (2013) Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis conditions of steam-exploded wheat straw for maximum glucose and xylose recovery. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:237–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim HG, Son HJ, Jeong MJ, Sim SJ, Park DJ, Yang JK, Yoo SB, Yeo JK, Karigar CS, Choi MS (2011) Enzymatic saccharification of Salix viminalis cv. Q683 biomass for bioethanol production. J For Sci 27:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ovando LS, Waliszewski KN, Pardio VT (2005) The effect of hydration time and ethanol concentration on the rate of hydrolysis of extracted vanilla beans by commercial cellulase preparation. Int J Food Sci Technol 40:1011–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cornejo-Mazón M, Hernández-Sanchez H, Gutiérrez-López GF, Dorantes-Alvarez L, Cortés-Sanchez AJ, Jiménez-Aparicio A, Gimeno-Seco M, Moreno A, Jaramillo-Flores ME (2012) Production and partial characterization of an exopolysaccharide from Ustilago maydis in submerged culture. Afr J Biotechnol 11:7079–7087

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lamsal B, Yoo J, Brijwani K, Alavi S (2010) Extrusion as a thermo-mechanical pre-treatment for lignocellulosic ethanol. Biomass Bioenerg 34:1703–1710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bailey MJ, Biely P, Poutanen K (1992) Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J Biotechnol 23:257–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu JY, Wang GS (2009) Specific surface to evaluate the efficiencies of milling and pretreatment of wood for enzymatic saccharification. Chem Eng Sci 64:474–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun XF, Xu F, Sun RC, Fowler P, Baird MS (2005) Characteristics of degraded cellulose obtained from steam-exploded wheat straw. Carbohydr Res 340:97–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar R, Wyman CE (2009) Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology? Bioresour Technol 100:4193–4202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dinand E, Vignon M, Chanzy H, Heux L (2002) Mercerization of primary wall cellulose and its implication for the conversion of cellulose I to cellulose II. Cellulose 9:17–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gusakov AV, Salanovich TN, Antonov AI, Ustinov BB, Okunev ON, Burlingame R, Emalfarb M, Baez M, Sinitsyn AP (2007) Design of highly efficient cellulase mixtures for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1:1028–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Selig MJ, Knoshaug EP, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Decker SR (2008) Synergistic enhancement of cellobiohydrolase performance on pretreated corn stover by addition of xylanase and esterase activities. Bioresour Technol 99:4997–5005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Qin E (2010) High consistency enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Dissertation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver

  33. Ioelovich M, Morag E (2012) Study of enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass at increased solids loading. Bioresources 7:4672–4682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hodge DB, Karim MN, Schell DJ, MacMillan JD (2008) Soluble and insoluble solids contributions to high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Bioresour Technol 99:8940–8948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN (2004) Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 115:1115–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2001) Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Enzym Microb Technol 28:835–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the European Community, Seventh Framework Program, under grant agreement no. 227498 (BABETHANOL PROJECT). It is also part of a research project carried out through the Bioenergy Thematic Network (“Red Temática de Bioenergía”) with partial support from the Mexican Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT), grant no. 260457. The authors wish to thank Advanced Enzyme Technologies, Novozyme, Enmex, Genecore, and Lallemand for kindly supplying enzymes and yeast. We also thank PATRON Spirits Company and Consejo Regulador del Tequila (CRT) for the supply of raw BAB. Technical training and discussions with several members of the BABETHANOL team (INPT, CIEMAT, INSA, and VTT, mostly) are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carmina Montiel or Eduardo Bárzana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montiel, C., Hernández-Meléndez, O., Vivaldo-Lima, E. et al. Enhanced Bioethanol Production from Blue Agave Bagasse in a Combined Extrusion–Saccharification Process. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 1005–1014 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9747-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9747-x

Keywords

Navigation