Skip to main content
Log in

Selective ion suppression as a pre-separation method in ion mobility spectrometry using a pulsed electron gun

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal for Ion Mobility Spectrometry

Abstract

Ion mobility spectrometry is a well-known method for fast trace gas detection. Detection limits in the very low ppb- and even ppt-range, fast response times down to a second and good separation power combined with a reasonable instrumental effort make ion mobility spectrometry more and more attractive. Aiming for higher separation power we investigate the ion specific lifetime of different ion species in a field free reaction region of a drift tube ion mobility spectrometer equipped with a pulsed non-radioactive electron gun. When turning off the electron gun ionization stops and the total ion concentration in the reaction region starts to decrease, while different ion species have different decay times. By varying the time delay between the end of the ionization and the injection pulse transferring all remaining ions of one polarity from the reaction region into the drift region the individual decay times can be measured. Our experimental data show that the lifetime of ion species in a field free reaction region mainly depends on ion-ion-recombination and charge transfer reactions leading to significant lifetime differences. Therefore, short-lived ions can be effectively suppressed in the reaction region by introducing a sufficient time delay between the end of the ionization and the injection pulse. This allows detecting even smallest concentrations of long-lived ions in a complex short-lived background. From our experimental data it can be also concluded that wall losses and the ion transport within the sample gas stream out of the reaction region just play a minor role in the ion loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eiceman GA, Karpas Z (2005) Ion mobility spectrometry. CRC Press

  2. Borsdorf H, Eiceman GA (2006) Ion mobility spectrometry: principles and applications. Appl Spectroscopy Rev 41:323–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borsdorf H, Mayer T, Zarejousheghani M, Eiceman GA (2011) Recent developments in ion mobility spectrometry. Appl Spectroscopy Rev 46:472–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunzer F, Ulrich A, Baether W (2010) A novel non-radioactive electron source for ion mobility spectrometry. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 13:9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wieser J, Murnick DE, Ulrich A, Huggins HA, Liddle A, Brown WL (1997) Vacuum ultraviolet rare gas excimer light source. Rev Sci Instrum 68:1360–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morozov A, Heindl T, Skrobol C, Wieser J, Kruecken R, Ulrich A (2008) Transmission of ∼10 keV electron beams through thin ceramic foils: measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of electron energy distribution functions. Eur Phys J D 48:383–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morozov A, Heindl T, Kruecken R, Ulrich A, Wieser J (2008) Conversion efficiencies of electron beam energy to vacuum ultraviolet light for Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe excited with continuous electron beams. J Appl Phys 103:103301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guharay SK, Dwivedi P, Hill HH Jr (2008) Ion mobility spectrometry: ion source development and applications in physical and biological sciences. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 36:1458–1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunzer F, Zimmermann S, Baether W (2010) Application of a non-radioactive pulsed electron source for ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem 82:3756–3763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baether W, Zimmermann S, Gunzer F (2010) Investigation of the influence of voltage parameters on decay times in an ion mobility spectrometer with a pulsed non-radioactive electron source. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 13:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunzer F, Baether W, Zimmermann S (2011) Investigation of dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) with an ion mobility spectrometer using a pulsed electron source. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 14:99–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hill CA, Thomas CLP (2005) Programmable gate delayed ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry: a study with low concentrations of dipropylene-glycol-monomethyl-ether in air. Analyst 130:1155–1161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanu AB, Gribb MM, Hill HH Jr (2008) Predicting optimal resolving power for ambient pressure ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem 80:6610–6619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morozov A, Kruecken R, Ulrich A, Wieser J (2006) Spatial distribution of fluorescent light emitted from neon and nitrogen excited by low energy electron beams. J Appl Phys 100:093305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jungblut H (1981) Experimental investigation of ion mobility, recombination, and charge carrier multiplication in electro-negative gases. Dissertation FU Berlin

  16. von Engel A (1965) Ionized gases. Oxford Univ. Press

  17. Loeb LB (1955) Basic processes of gaseous electronics. Univ. of California Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Zimmermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cochems, P., Gunzer, F., Langejuergen, J. et al. Selective ion suppression as a pre-separation method in ion mobility spectrometry using a pulsed electron gun. Int. J. Ion Mobil. Spec. 15, 31–39 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-011-0084-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12127-011-0084-7

Keywords

Navigation