Skip to main content
Download PDF

Personalized management of differentiated thyroid cancer in real life – practical guidance from a multidisciplinary panel of experts

Endocrine volume 70, pages 280–291 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The standard of care for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) includes surgery, risk-adapted postoperative radioiodine therapy (RaIT), individualized thyroid hormone therapy, and follow-up for detection of patients with persistent or recurrent disease. In 2019, the nine Martinique Principles for managing thyroid cancer were developed by the American Thyroid Association, European Association of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and European Thyroid Association. In this review, we present our clinical practice recommendations with regard to implementing these principles in the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term follow-up of patients with DTC.

Methods

A multidisciplinary panel of five thyroid cancer experts addressed the implementation of the Martinique Principles in routine clinical practice based on clinical experience and evidence from the literature.

Results

We provide a suggested approach for the assessment and diagnosis of DTC in routine clinical practice, including the use of neck ultrasound, measurement of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone and calcitonin, fine-needle aspiration, cytology, and molecular imaging. Recommendations for the use of surgery (lobectomy vs. total thyroidectomy) and postoperative RaIT are also provided. Long-term follow-up with neck ultrasound and measurement of serum anti-thyroglobulin antibody and basal/stimulated thyroglobulin is standard, with 123/131I radioiodine diagnostic whole-body scans and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography suggested in selected patients. Management of metastatic DTC should involve a multidisciplinary team.

Conclusions

In routine clinical practice, the Martinique Principles should be implemented in order to optimize clinical management/outcomes of patients with DTC.

Introduction

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), most commonly the papillary histotype, accounts for the majority of thyroid cancer cases [1]. The standard of care for DTC includes surgery, risk-adapted postoperative radioiodine therapy (RaIT), and individualized thyroid hormone therapy tailored to the patient’s risk of relapse [2]. These approaches lead to excellent responses in >80% of patients [2]. However, as DTC carries a significant risk of disease persistence and recurrence, long-term active follow-up is essential [3, 4]. In 2015, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) recommended less intense treatment strategies for many DTC patients, including observation or thyroid lobectomy without RaIT [3], which resulted in controversy and significant differences in clinical practice [5]. In 2019, a joint statement from the ATA, European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), and European Thyroid Association (ETA) defined the indications and practical issues of RaIT and agreed on a set of nine principles (the so-called “Martinique Principles”; Fig. 1) [6]. A multidisciplinary panel of five thyroid cancer experts debated the implementation of the Martinique Principles in routine clinical practice, with discussion undertaken via conference call and electronic communication. This paper presents our shared practical recommendations regarding DTC diagnosis, treatment with surgery and RaIT, and long-term follow-up.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The Martinique principles summarizing the major points of discussion during the first Martinique meeting. Reproduced with permission from R.M. Tuttle et al. Thyroid (2019) [6]. RaIT radioiodine therapy

Full size image

Differentiated thyroid cancer diagnosis

Thyroid nodules are frequently detected in the general population and usually have a low risk of malignancy. When a thyroid nodule is detected (either clinically or incidentally), medical history and physical examination, measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and neck ultrasonography are advised. In addition, measurement of serum calcitonin should be considered to further delineate the possibility of medullary thyroid carcinoma, despite there being a lack of general consensus with regard to routine serum calcitonin measurement [3]. In the presence of reduced or low-normal TSH levels, thyroid scintigraphy is recommended as malignancy is very unlikely in autonomously functioning (“hot”) nodules [7]. Notably, although autonomous nodules are almost invariably accompanied by decreased TSH levels (i.e., <0.1–0.4 mUI/L) when iodine supply is adequate, the bulk of autonomous tissue may be insufficient to suppress the TSH level in iodine-depleted thyroids, especially in the early phases of autonomy [8]. As a consequence, the decision on whether or not to use thyroid scans should take into account the patient’s geographic location and the iodine supply in that area. Independently from the patient’s iodine status and the TSH levels, a thyroid scan is also recommended in people with a large multinodular goiter to select suspicious nodules for fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and in people with cytologically indeterminate nodules (i.e., follicular proliferation) to identify a benign compensated functioning adenoma [9].

In nonautonomous nodules, FNA is currently recommended based on ultrasound characteristics. Considerable effort has been made toward the standardization of both ultrasound and FNA cytology reports, with the development of different ultrasound and cytological reporting systems [i.e., TIRADS for ultrasound and the Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology (SIAPEC)] [10, 11]. Despite such efforts, up to 25% of nodules are still considered to be “cytologically indeterminate”, requiring in many cases diagnostic surgery to definitely confirm or exclude malignancy (with a prevalence for malignant nodules of about 30%). Immunocytochemistry, molecular testing (i.e., mutation analysis, microRNA) [12, 13], and imaging techniques, including 99mTc-methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile (MIBI) scintigraphy and 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) [14,15,16,17] may be useful in these cases to avoid unnecessary surgeries. Indeed, none of such methods had both near-perfect sensitivity and specificity. Notwithstanding, test performance strongly depends on population-dependent variations in cytology, tumor genetics, and the prevalence of malignancy as well as on the costs and feasibility of the desired diagnostic protocol in the local patient population. Accordingly, the choice of one or more additional test should be a deliberate and multidisciplinary one [18].

Figure 2 summarizes our suggested approach to assessing thyroid nodules in routine clinical practice.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diagnostic algorithm for patients presenting with thyroid nodules. 18F-FDG-PET/CT 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, DTC differentiated thyroid carcinoma, FNA fine-needle aspiration, MIBI methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile, PEI percutaneous ethanol injection, RAI radioiodine, SIAPEC Italian Societies of Endocrinology and Pathology, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone

Full size image

Key points and practical indications

  • Primary diagnostic assessments include neck ultrasound, serum TSH, FNA cytology, and (optional) calcitonin measurement.

  • Thyroid scintigraphy (with 99mTc pertechnetate or 123I) is recommended when TSH levels are reduced (<0.3–0.4 mIU/L) and can be considered for TSH levels up to 1.0–1.5 mIU/L depending on local iodine supply.

  • FNA should not be performed in autonomously functioning thyroid nodules confirmed by thyroid scintigraphy, with possible exceptions being clinically or ultrasonographically highly suspicious nodules.

  • Using a standardized system to report thyroid ultrasound findings is recommended to provide consistent communication; however, the ultrasonographers’ expertize remains pivotal to translate ultrasound results into clinical actions.

  • Based on our experience, FNA is suggested when any one of these ultrasound features is present: hypoechoic nodule; nodule with blurred/irregular margins; nodules with microcalcifications (<2 mm); or nodule that is taller than it is wide.

  • In the absence of clearly suspicious ultrasound features, FNA cytology should be considered based on diameter (i.e., >1–2 cm), clinical history, and physical examination.

  • Molecular testing and molecular imaging based on 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET/CT may help in refining the diagnosis in selected cases of nodules with indeterminate cytology.

Thyroid surgery

According to the 2015 ATA guidelines, lobectomy may be sufficient for a unifocal intrathyroidal low-risk carcinoma of <4 cm diameter in patients with no prior head and neck radiation, familial thyroid carcinoma, or clinically detectable cervical lymph node metastases, whereas in other cases, total or near total thyroidectomy is recommended [3]. Approximately 20–50% of patients with DTC have cervical lymph node metastases, mostly in the central neck (i.e., VI Robbins’ level) [19]. Central compartment dissection is a well-established treatment of clinical N1a (cN1a) and, coupled with lateral dissection, N1b (cN1b) disease, although its role as prophylaxis in cN0 disease is unclear [3]. Additional factors, including lesion location, multifocality, bilaterality, thyroid capsule invasion, and BRAFV600E and TERT mutation status, should also be considered to refine surgical planning [20,21,22].

Overall, we agree with the ATA 2015 recommendations on neck dissection and total thyroidectomy in intermediate- to high-risk DTC; however, the use of lobectomy for low- to intermediate-primary tumors ≤4 cm may be too broad. Current controversies on the extent of surgery probably arise from heterogeneous studies [23]. Notably, the risk for local and distant metastases increases with increasing size of the papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), especially if the tumor size exceeds 2 cm, as has been described in an observational study involving 366 patients with PTC [24].

Moreover, data from the United States National Cancer Data Base showed that patients with papillary DTC sized 2.0–3.9 cm had improved survival when treated with total thyroidectomy [25]. Accordingly, the Swiss consensus on low-risk papillary DTC limited the definition of low-risk DTC, treatable with lobectomy, to cancer with low-risk ATA 2015 characteristics but with tumor size <2 cm [26].

Key points and practical indications

  • More evidence is needed before generalizing the current trend towards use of lobectomy for low-risk primary tumors ≤4 cm in clinical practice. Thus, it may be safer to restrict lobectomy to low-risk tumors <2 cm.

  • In other cases (i.e., low-risk >2 cm, intermediate- and high-risk DTC), we recommend (near) total thyroidectomy as the first-line procedure, followed by RaIT (discussed below).

  • Central compartment dissection is a well-established treatment of cN1a tumors; however, because its role as prophylaxis in cN0 tumors is uncertain we recommend its use should be avoided in this setting (especially in T1-2 tumors).

  • Lateral neck dissection is only indicated in cN1b tumors (coupled with central neck dissection).

Postoperative radioiodine therapy

Following surgery, the risk of structural disease recurrence and/or persistence should be assessed using the three-tier (low, intermediate, and high) stratification suggested by the ATA in 2009 [27] and modified in 2015 [3], while the risk of mortality from thyroid cancer is estimated using the AJCC/TNM staging system [28]. RaIT has long been the standard of care following primary surgery for all patients with DTC, except those with unifocal PTC < 1 cm and no high-risk characteristics [4]. Based on 2015 ATA guidelines, routine RaIT is recommended for high-risk patients, suggested for intermediate-risk patients, and restricted to selected low-risk patients [3]. However, Tuttle et al. recognized that the actual goal of RaIT (i.e., ablation of thyroid remnant, adjuvant therapy, and treatment of known disease) can only be determined once the postoperative disease status has been assessed [6]. Then, a comprehensive assessment of risk and postoperative disease status is needed to decide whether RaIT is necessary or if observation will be sufficient. Patients with evidence of persistent disease after appropriate initial surgery may be the only candidates for ‘treatment of known disease’, regardless of initial risk stratification. In other cases, patients may be candidates for observation, remnant ablation, or adjuvant treatment based on careful risk assessment, as well as patients’ preferences. However, there are currently no reliable, universally accepted, precise recommendations to guide the proper assessment of postoperative disease status. Until precise, evidence-based guidelines are available, multidisciplinary teams should establish local standards to guide clinical management that considers the availability and quality of pre- and post-operative imaging and thyroglobulin (Tg) measurements, the experience of operating surgeon, and local clinical concerns [3]. In this setting, it should be considered that whole body scintigraphy (WBS) with single-photon emission computed tomography/CT (SPECT/CT) obtained after administration of therapeutic 131I-radioiodine (RAI) activity (i.e., >1.1 GBq) and preablation stimulated Tg measurement remain the most accurate tools for postoperative DTC restaging and are also included in ATA risk stratification system [3].

Accordingly, our panel members agreed on recommending adjuvant RaIT for all patients with high- and intermediate-risk cancer, since it allows for early diagnosis of residual disease and reduces the risk of recurrence [29,30,31,32]. In addition, as the risk of local and distant metastases increases with increasing size of the PTC, especially in tumors >2 cm, the same approach is suggested in low-risk DTC patients with a primary tumor >2 cm [26]. Importantly, patients who receive RaIT for ablation or adjuvant purposes with no signs of persistent disease (i.e., undetectable Tg, negative ultrasound and, if performed, negative diagnostic WBS) could be fully reassured and simply monitored every 1–2 years by clinical examination and basal Tg measurement avoiding Tg stimulation tests or periodic neck ultrasound examination during follow-up. Finally, adjuvant treatment is not routinely recommended for low-risk patients with a primary tumor <2 cm; however, if additional risk factors (i.e., isthmic location, known BRAF mutation) or increased Tg antibody (TgAb) levels are present or a preference for maximum-intensity treatment is expressed by patients, RaIT for remnant ablation is an option.

Key points and practical indications

  • RaIT has three distinct goals: remnant ablation, adjuvant treatment, or treatment of known residual or recurrent disease.

  • For low-risk DTC patients with a primary tumor size <2 cm and neither additional risk factors nor elevated TgAb, we recommend observation; routine RaIT is not indicated. Patients who request maximum-intensity treatment, after being informed about their low but existing risk for recurrence, can be treated with RaIT for remnant ablation.

  • For patients with low-risk DTC and a primary tumor size of 2–4 cm or additional risk factors, and for patients with intermediate- or high-risk DTC, routine adjuvant RaIT is recommended.

  • Pretreatment stimulated Tg and posttreatment Dx-WBS-SPECT/CT should always be obtained and serve as platform for restaging and follow-up planning.

Postoperative RaIT for remnant ablation or adjuvant treatment

We generally recommend reducing the daily intake of iodine-containing food for 2 weeks before initiating RaIT [33,34,35,36]. Dietary recommendations are listed in Table 1. This is particularly relevant for patients with euthyroid status stimulated with recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) [37]. Measurement of urine iodine content may also be useful, as an association between high urinary iodine excretion and the failure of RaIT has been reported [38].

Table 1 Recommendations for reducing iodine intake
Full size table

Conflicting data area reported on RAI activities that should be used for ablative purpose [39,40,41,42]. In general, RAI activities of around 1.1–2.2 GBq are used for remnant ablation in selected patients with low-risk DTCs. In these settings, rhTSH use should be preferred considering the better patient quality of life and the lower radiation exposure [39, 43,44,45,46].

The optimal RAI activity and stimulation method for adjuvant treatments in patients with intermediate-risk DTC are currently unknown [6]. Accordingly, the use of thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or rhTSH and administered RAI activity should be decided on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary setting. Our panel recommends rhTSH-stimulated administration of 2.2–3.7 GBq of RAI in intermediate-risk patients. Administration of ≥3.7 GBq of RAI is recommended in high-risk patients, preferentially after THW as, according to ATA 2015 guidelines, more controlled data from long-term outcome studies are needed before rhTSH preparation for RAI adjuvant treatment can be recommended for routine practice [3]. However, rhTSH stimulation is mandatory when physiologic TSH stimulation is precluded (e.g., pituitary diseases) or when THW is clinically contraindicated.

Key points and practical indications

Postoperative ablation/adjuvant RaIT administration (suggested RAI activities and stimulation protocols):

  • Low-risk DTC (<2 cm): selective ablation RaIT (1.1–2.2 GBq) with rhTSH stimulation.

  • Low-risk (>2 cm) and intermediate-risk DTC: adjuvant RaIT (2.2–3.7 GBq) with rhTSH stimulation.

  • High-risk DTC: adjuvant RaIT (≥3.7 GBq) with THW stimulation.

Long-term follow-up

Follow-up of DTC after primary treatment has evolved from standard to a more individualized approach that is currently based on ongoing risk assessment [3, 47]. Initial risk assessment is continuously modified and refined by the inclusion of assessments of response to therapy and disease course [3]. Serum Tg measurements [1, 48, 49], neck ultrasound [50, 51], and 123/131I-RAI Dx-WBS [51] are commonly used as primary tools for DTC follow-up.

Unstimulated and/or stimulated serum Tg measurement is currently the yardstick for monitoring patients with DTC after primary therapy. However, its usefulness is limited in patients who are positive for TgAb since serum Tg levels can be underestimated when measured using immunometric assays [52, 53].

Neck ultrasound offers several advantages and is a reliable method for detection of loco-regional persistent or recurrent DTC (i.e., thyroid bed and cervical lymph nodes), but is not without limitations [51]. Indeed, the number of neck ultrasounds providing false positive results, which increases the risk of unnecessary and expensive additional procedures, are far from negligible [54,55,56]. Accordingly, the use of neck ultrasound should be limited (particularly in low-risk DTC) and, in the absence of TgAb, reserved for patients with unstimulated serum Tg levels ≥1 ng/mL [55, 57].

According to ATA 2015 guidelines, Dx-WBS can be useful for patients with a high- or intermediate-risk of persistent disease, but should not be routinely used for the follow-up of other patients [3]. The use of Dx-WBS in low-risk patients is generally discouraged if serum Tg is undetectable and neck ultrasound is negative at the first response assessment. However, an analysis by Gonzalez-Carvalho et al. of a large series of patients followed for up to 25 years suggested that routine Dx-WBS is useful at the first follow-up (6–12 months after RaIT) in all cases [58]. Moreover, there is agreement on the relevant role of Dx-WBS in patients who are positive for TgAb [59], or with extra-thyroid uptake at post-therapy-WBS (pT-WBS) or large thyroid remnants precluding pT-WBS, and in selected cases based on individual risk profiles (e.g., isthmus location of malignant nodule). To date, the use of rhTSH and hybrid SPECT/CT has been shown to reduce patient discomfort and significantly improve the diagnostic performance of Dx-WBS using either 131I or 123I [60,61,62].

18F-FDG-PET/CT is the recommended first-line diagnostic procedure for anaplastic and other aggressive thyroid cancers, and is an important second-line procedure for DTC follow-up [3]. In the latter setting, 18F-FDG-PET/CT is especially recommended in patients with increasing Tg levels, negative ultrasound, and RAI imaging results [3]. Serum Tg thresholds used to select patients for PET/CT imaging vary widely in literature and should be optimized locally, taking into account patient characteristics and the serum Tg and TgAb assays used. Interestingly, evaluation of Tg doubling time can be used in addition to 18F-FDG-PET/CT (Fig. 3) [63]. Current data also suggest a role for 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with negative ultrasound and Dx-WBS who have increasing TgAb levels [64,65,66]. In addition, 18F-FDG-PET-CT is advised in patients with metastatic DTC, poorly DTC histotypes; to identify patients at highest risk for rapid progression and for evaluating the response to systemic and/or local treatments [1, 3].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Assessment of patients with recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) in relation to thyroglobulin (Tg) level [63]. 18FDG-PET/CT 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography, Dx-WBS diagnostic whole-body scan, Tg-DT thyroglobulin doubling time

Full size image

Key points and practical indications

  • Follow-up after primary treatment is currently based on dynamic risk stratification, with neck ultrasound and measurement of Tg levels (either unstimulated or after TSH stimulation) being standard.

  • Dx-WBS is especially suggested in patients with:

    • - intermediate- or high-risk DTC;

    • - extra-thyroid RAI uptake on pT-WBS;

    • - large thyroid remnants reducing reliability of pT-WBS;

    • - positive TgAb, limiting the validity of Tg as a DTC tumor marker.

  • 18F-FDG-PET-CT should be considered for patients with negative post-treatment WBS or diagnostic WBS and neck ultrasound despite:

    • - elevated basal or stimulated serum Tg levels (>5.5 ng/ml or >10 ng/ml, respectively) or serum Tg doubling time is <1 year (regardless of initial value);

    • - increasing TgAb.

  • In addition, 18F-FDG-PET-CT should be always considered:

    • - in patients with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer;

    • - in patients with metastatic disease to identify those at highest risk for rapid disease progression;

    • - for evaluating the response to systemic and/or local treatments in patients with advanced disease.

Metastatic DTC patients

Loco-regional and distant metastases can be detected at diagnosis, during postoperative assessment with 123/131I-RAI Dx-WBS, following RaIT, or during follow-up [3, 67]. Distant metastases are more frequent in patients with high-risk DTC [59]; however, they can also be found in patients with low-risk DTC [68, 69]. A summary of the risk factors associated with a worse prognosis in metastatic DTC is shown in Table 2 [70].

Table 2 Factors associated with worse prognosis in patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Full size table

Management of metastatic DTC should involve a multidisciplinary team and should be based both on local and systemic treatments [3, 71, 72]. In patients with RAI-avid metastatic disease, RaIT remains the treatment of choice [3], providing a favorable impact on overall survival and disease-free survival [73,74,75,76]. The administered RAI activity can be determined empirically or based on a dosimetric approach [72, 77, 78]. The empiric approach uses a fixed activity (i.e., 3.7–11.1 GBq), which is selected based on disease stage, age, burden of disease, and kidney function [61]. In addition, important limiting factors such as reduced bone marrow reserve (mainly in patients >70 years) and hampered lung function (especially in patients with disseminated lung metastases and in pediatric patients) should also be taken into account when choosing empiric activity [72]. This approach is simple, effective, and widely used in clinical practice. The potential limitations include over- or under-treatment and a hypothetical progressive loss of efficacy after repeated treatment [59, 72, 78,79,80].

The dosimetric approach uses patient-tailored activities according to the principles of As High As Safely Administrable [81] and/or As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) [34]. This approach is complex to implement, but offers a number of important theoretical advantages, including high rates of therapeutic success with a single treatment, the possibility of adjusting the radiation activity to the target volume, and increased safety for nontarget organs and tissues. Currently, due to a lack of consistent evidence, it is challenging to confirm a preference for the empiric or dosimetric strategy for RaIT [3]. However, the latter approach may be preferable in special conditions (e.g., renal failure, diffuse miliary lung metastases, and reduced bone marrow reserve) in order to reduce toxicity [82,83,84,85].

To date, regardless of the strategy used, THW is indicated in patients preparing for RaIT [3], with the use of rhTSH reserved for patients whose endogenous TSH stimulation is precluded (e.g., pituitary diseases) or clinically contraindicated [2, 4, 72, 86,87,88]. Note, if the dosimetric approach is chosen, RaIT must be performed in the same functional status (i.e., hypothyroidism or euthyroidism) that was used for dosimetric calculations.

In patients with RAI-avid metastatic DTC, RaIT should be repeated until a complete response is achieved (i.e., no abnormal RAI uptake at Dx- or pT-WBS and stimulated Tg levels below the functional sensitivity cut-off in absence of TgAb) or there is an adequate and durable response (i.e., slow or no progression of disease) as previously described [89, 90].

Conversely, RaIT should be stopped in patients with unresponsive, RaIT-refractory disease (Table 3) [72, 90]. In this light, some criteria were proposed in literature (e.g., negative RAI imaging, cumulative activity >22.2 GBq) [91, 92]. However, none of the proposed criteria is considered “sacrosanct” [90] and a comprehensive assessment that integrates all of the clinical, biochemical, and imaging data collected during patient management and follow-up should be done before stopping RaIT [90, 93].

Table 3 Definition and initial management of radioiodine therapy-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Full size table

Key points and practical indications

  • Management of metastatic DTC should involve a multidisciplinary team and should be based on both local therapy (e.g., surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and external beam radiation therapy) and systemic treatment (e.g., RaIT, levothyroxine suppressive therapy, targeted therapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy).

  • In patients with RAI-avid metastatic disease, RaIT may improve overall and disease-free survival and remains the treatment of choice.

  • RAI activity to be administered can be determined empirically (3.7–11.1 GBq) or based on a dosimetric (individualized) approach; individualized dosimetry is preferable in selected cases (e.g., renal failure, diffuse miliariform lung metastases, reduced bone marrow reserve, and pediatric patients).

  • THW is recommended to prepare patients with metastatic DTC for RaIT; however, rhTSH is mandatory when endogenous stimulation is precluded (i.e., pituitary diseases) or clinically contraindicated.

  • The definition of RaIT-refractory patients (Table 3) is evolving toward an individualized and dynamic definition that can integrate all of the clinical, biochemical, and instrumental data collected during patient management and follow-up.

Conclusions

The Martinique Principles should be implemented in routine clinical practice in order to optimize clinical management/outcomes in patients with DTC. Based on the clinical experience of five thyroid cancer experts, we provide a suggested approach for assessing and diagnosing thyroid nodules in clinical practice, as well as our recommendations for the use of surgery and postoperative RaIT, and long-term follow-up of patients with DTC. The multidisciplinary approach is particularly important in the management of patients with metastatic DTC, which should be individualized according to disease status and comorbidities. Comprehensive assessment of patients with suspected RaIT-refractory disease is recommended before stopping RaIT.

References

  1. L. Lamartina, G. Grani, C. Durante, I. Borget, S. Filetti, M. Schlumberger, Follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer - what should (and what should not) be done. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14(9), 538–551 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Giovanella, L.H. Duntas, Management of endocrine disease: the role of rhTSH in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer: pros and cons. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 181(4), R133–R145 (2019)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. B.R. Haugen, E.K. Alexander, K.C. Bible, G.M. Doherty, S.J. Mandel, Y.E. Nikiforov, F. Pacini, G.W. Randolph, A.M. Sawka, M. Schlumberger, K.G. Schuff, S.I. Sherman, J.A. Sosa, D.L. Steward, R.M. Tuttle, L. Wartofsky, 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 26(1), 1–133 (2016)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Luster, S.E. Clarke, M. Dietlein, M. Lassmann, P. Lind, W.J. Oyen, J. Tennvall, E. Bombardieri, M. European Association of Nuclear, guidelines for radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 35(10), 1941–1959 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O. Maas, F. Forrer, M. Maas, C.M. Panje, J. Blautzik, M. Bruhlmeier, I. Engel-Bicik, L. Giovanella, A. Haldemann, M.E. Kamel, S. Kneifel, C. Rottenburger, N. Schaefer, M.A. Walter, S. Weidner, P.M. Putora, Variations in radioiodine ablation: decision-making after total thyroidectomy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 47(3), 554–560 (2020)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R.M. Tuttle, S. Ahuja, A.M. Avram, V.J. Bernet, P. Bourguet, G.H. Daniels, G. Dillehay, C. Draganescu, G. Flux, D. Fuhrer, L. Giovanella, B. Greenspan, M. Luster, K. Muylle, J.W.A. Smit, D. Van Nostrand, F.A. Verburg, L. Hegedus, Controversies, consensus, and collaboration in the use of 131I therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a joint statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association. Thyroid 29(4), 461–470 (2019)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Giovanella, F. D’Aurizio, A. Campenní, R.M. Ruggeri, S. Baldari, F.A. Verburg, P. Trimboli, L. Ceriani, Searching for the most effective thyrotropin (TSH) threshold to rule-out autonomously functioning thyroid nodules in iodine deficient regions. Endocrine 54(3), 757–761 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Giovanella, A.M. Avram, I. Iakovou, J. Kwak, S.A. Lawson, E. Lulaj, M. Luster, A. Piccardo, M. Schmidt, M. Tulchinsky, F.A. Verburg, E. Wolin, EANM practice guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for RAIU and thyroid scintigraphy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 46(12), 2514–2525 (2019)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Giovanella, L. Ceriani, G. Treglia, Role of isotope scan, including positron emission tomography/computed tomography, in nodular goitre. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 28(4), 507–518 (2014)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Castellana, C. Castellana, G. Treglia, F. Giorgino, L. Giovanella, G. Russ, P. Trimboli, Performance of five ultrasound risk stratification systems in selecting thyroid nodules for FNA. A meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz170

  11. F. Nardi, F. Basolo, A. Crescenzi, G. Fadda, A. Frasoldati, F. Orlandi, L. Palombini, E. Papini, M. Zini, A. Pontecorvi, P. Vitti, Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 37(6), 593–599 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.P. Hodak, D.S. Rosenthal, C. American Thyroid Association Clinical Affairs, Information for clinicians: commercially available molecular diagnosis testing in the evaluation of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration specimens. Thyroid 23(2), 131–134 (2013)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Y.E. Nikiforov, N.P. Ohori, S.P. Hodak, S.E. Carty, S.O. LeBeau, R.L. Ferris, L. Yip, R.R. Seethala, M.E. Tublin, M.T. Stang, C. Coyne, J.T. Johnson, A.F. Stewart, M.N. Nikiforova, Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96(11), 3390–3397 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Campenní, L. Giovanella, M. Siracusa, A. Alibrandi, S.A. Pignata, S. Giovinazzo, F. Trimarchi, R.M. Ruggeri, S. Baldari, 99mTc-Methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile scintigraphy is a useful tool for assessing the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle cytology. Thyroid 26(8), 1101–1109 (2016)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Campenní, M. Siracusa, R.M. Ruggeri, R. Laudicella, S.A. Pignata, S. Baldari, L. Giovanella, Differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology by (99m)Tc-MIBI scan: a new quantitative method for improving diagnostic accuracy. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 6147 (2017)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Campenní, P. Trimboli, L. Giovanella, Re: “Diagnostic performance of technetium-99m methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile for differentiation of malignant thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis” by Kim et al. (Thyroid 2018;28:1339–1348). Thyroid 29(6), 896–897 (2019)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Giovanella, A. Campenní, G. Treglia, F.A. Verburg, P. Trimboli, L. Ceriani, M. Bongiovanni, Molecular imaging with 99mTc-MIBI and molecular testing for mutations in differentiating benign from malignant follicular neoplasm: a prospective comparison. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 43(6), 1018–1026 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. E.J. de Koster, L.F. de Geus-Oei, O.M. Dekkers, I. van Engen-van Grunsven, J. Hamming, E.P.M. Corssmit, H. Morreau, A. Schepers, J. Smit, W.J.G. Oyen, D. Vriens, Diagnostic utility of molecular and imaging biomarkers in cytological indeterminate thyroid nodules. Endocr. Rev. 39(2), 154–191 (2018)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. K.T. Robbins, A.R. Shaha, J.E. Medina, J.A. Califano, G.T. Wolf, A. Ferlito, P.M. Som, T.A. Day; A.H. Committee for Neck Dissection Classification, S. Neck, Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 134(5), 536–538 (2008)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Campenní, L. Giovanella, M. Siracusa, M.E. Stipo, A. Alibrandi, M. Cucinotta, R.M. Ruggeri, S. Baldari, Is malignant nodule topography an additional risk factor for metastatic disease in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer? Thyroid 24(11), 1607–1611 (2014)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. I.J. Nixon, F.L. Palmer, M.M. Whitcher, A.R. Shaha, J.P. Shah, S.G. Patel, I. Ganly, Thyroid isthmusectomy for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 18(3), 767–770 (2011)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. I. Vasileiadis, G. Boutzios, M. Karalaki, E. Misiakos, T. Karatzas, Papillary thyroid carcinoma of the isthmus: total thyroidectomy or isthmusectomy? Am. J. Surg. 216(1), 135–139 (2018)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Geron, C. Benbassat, M. Shteinshneider, S. Koren, K. Or, E. Markus, D. Hirsch, L.M. Kalmovich, Long-term outcome after hemithyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer: a comparative study and review of the literature. Cancers 11(1), E26 (2018)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Machens, H.J. Holzhausen, H. Dralle, The prognostic value of primary tumor size in papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 103(11), 2269–2273 (2005)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. S.R. Rajjoub, H. Yan, N.A. Calcatera, K. Kuchta, C.E. Wang, W. Lutfi, T.A. Moo-Young, D.J. Winchester, R.A. Prinz, Thyroid lobectomy is not sufficient for T2 papillary thyroid cancers. Surgery 163(5), 1134–1143 (2018)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Zulewski, L. Giovanella, S. Bilz, E. Christ, A. Haldemann, H. Steinert, S. Weidner, D. Oertli, F. Triponez, T. Clerici, A. Minder, M. Dettmer, P. Komminoth, Multidisciplinary approach for risk-oriented treatment of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer in Switzerland. Swiss Med. Wkly. 149, w14700 (2019)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. D.S. Cooper, G.M. Doherty, B.R. Haugen, R.T. Kloos, S.L. Lee, S.J. Mandel, E.L. Mazzaferri, B. McIver, F. Pacini, M. Schlumberger, S.I. Sherman, D.L. Steward, R.M. Tuttle, Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 19(11), 1167–1214 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. B. Amin, S. Edge, F. Greene, D. R. Byrd, R. K. Brookland, M. K. Washington, et al. (eds), AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017)

  29. K.C. Loh, F.S. Greenspan, L. Gee, T.R. Miller, P.P. Yeo, Pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) staging for papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of 700 patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82(11), 3553–3562 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. E.L. Mazzaferri, R.T. Kloos, Clinical review 128: current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86(4), 1447–1463 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. N.A. Samaan, P.N. Schultz, R.C. Hickey, H. Goepfert, T.P. Haynie, D.A. Johnston, N.G. Ordonez, The results of various modalities of treatment of well differentiated thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective review of 1599 patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 75(3), 714–720 (1992)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. A.M. Sawka, K. Thephamongkhol, M. Brouwers, L. Thabane, G. Browman, H.C. Gerstein, Clinical review 170: a systematic review and metaanalysis of the effectiveness of radioactive iodine remnant ablation for well-differentiated thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89(8), 3668–3676 (2004)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. J.H. Chung, Low iodine diet for preparation for radioactive iodine therapy in differentiated thyroid carcinoma in Korea. Endocrinol. Metab. (Seoul) 28(3), 157–163 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. H.R. Maxon, S.R. Thomas, A. Boehringer, J. Drilling, M.I. Sperling, J.C. Sparks, I.W. Chen, Low iodine diet in I-131 ablation of thyroid remnants. Clin. Nucl. Med. 8(3), 123–126 (1983)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. J.T. Park 2nd, J.V. Hennessey, Two-week low iodine diet is necessary for adequate outpatient preparation for radioiodine rhTSH scanning in patients taking levothyroxine. Thyroid 14(1), 57–63 (2004)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. C. Tomoda, T. Uruno, Y. Takamura, Y. Ito, A. Miya, K. Kobayashi, F. Matsuzuka, N. Amino, K. Kuma, A. Miyauchi, Reevaluation of stringent low iodine diet in outpatient preparation for radioiodine examination and therapy. Endocr. J. 52(2), 237–240 (2005)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. D. Barbaro, F.A. Verburg, M. Luster, C. Reiners, D. Rubello, ALARA in rhTSH-stimulated post-surgical thyroid remnant ablation: what is the lowest reasonably achievable activity? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37(7), 1251–1254 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. S.Y. Sohn, J.Y. Choi, H.W. Jang, H.J. Kim, S.M. Jin, S.W. Kim, S. Suh, K.Y. Hur, J.H. Kim, J.H. Chung, S.W. Kim, Association between excessive urinary iodine excretion and failure of radioactive iodine thyroid ablation in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Thyroid 23(6), 741–747 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Campenni, L. Giovanella, S.A. Pignata, M.A. Violi, M. Siracusa, A. Alibrandi, M. Moleti, E. Amato, R.M. Ruggeri, F. Vermiglio, S. Baldari, Thyroid remnant ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer: searching for the most effective radioiodine activity and stimulation strategy in a real-life scenario. Nucl. Med. Commun. 36(11), 1100–1106 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. W. Cheng, C. Ma, H. Fu, J. Li, S. Chen, S. Wu, H. Wang, Low- or high-dose radioiodine remnant ablation for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98(4), 1353–1360 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. P. Du, X. Jiao, Y. Zhou, Y. Li, S. Kang, D. Zhang, J. Zhang, L. Lv, R. Patel, Low versus high radioiodine activity to ablate the thyroid after thyroidectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine 48(1), 96–105 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. B. Fallahi, D. Beiki, A. Takavar, A. Fard-Esfahani, K.A. Gilani, M. Saghari, M. Eftekhari, Low versus high radioiodine dose in postoperative ablation of residual thyroid tissue in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a large randomized clinical trial. Nucl. Med. Commun. 33(3), 275–282 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Campenní, E. Amato, R. Laudicella, A. Alibrandi, D. Cardile, S.A. Pignata, F. Trimarchi, R.M. Ruggeri, L. Auditore, S. Baldari, Recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) versus levo-thyroxine withdrawal in radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer patients: differences in abdominal absorbed dose. Endocrine 65(1), 132–137 (2019)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. C. Dueren, M. Dietlein, M. Luster, F. Plenzig, R. Steinke, J. Grimm, P. Groth, W. Eichhorn, C. Reiners, The use of thyrogen in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: an intraindividual comparison of clinical effects and implications of daily life. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 118(8), 513–519 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. H. Hänscheid, M. Lassmann, M. Luster, S.R. Thomas, F. Pacini, C. Ceccarelli, P.W. Ladenson, R.L. Wahl, M. Schlumberger, M. Ricard, A. Driedger, R.T. Kloos, S.I. Sherman, B.R. Haugen, V. Carriere, C. Corone, C. Reiners, Iodine biokinetics and dosimetry in radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer: procedures and results of a prospective international controlled study of ablation after rhTSH or hormone withdrawal. J. Nucl. Med. 47(4), 648–654 (2006)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Tagay, S. Herpertz, M. Langkafel, Y. Erim, L. Freudenberg, N. Schopper, A. Bockisch, W. Senf, R. Gorges, Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression in thyroid cancer patients under short-term hypothyroidism and TSH-suppressive levothyroxine treatment. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 153(6), 755–763 (2005)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. R.M. Tuttle, H. Tala, J. Shah, R. Leboeuf, R. Ghossein, M. Gonen, M. Brokhin, G. Omry, J.A. Fagin, A. Shaha, Estimating risk of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine remnant ablation: using response to therapy variables to modify the initial risk estimates predicted by the new American Thyroid Association staging system. Thyroid 20(12), 1341–1349 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. C. Evans, S. Tennant, P. Perros, Serum thyroglobulin in the monitoring of differentiated thyroid cancer. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. Suppl. 245, S119–S123 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. Trimboli, V. Zilioli, M. Imperiali, L. Ceriani, L. Giovanella, High-sensitive basal serum thyroglobulin 6-12 months after thyroid ablation is strongly associated with early response to therapy and event-free survival in patients with low-to-intermediate risk differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 176(5), 497–504 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. C. Durante, G. Costante, S. Filetti, Differentiated thyroid carcinoma: defining new paradigms for postoperative management. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 20(4), R141–R154 (2013)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. L. Lamartina, D. Deandreis, C. Durante, S. Filetti, Endocrine tumours: imaging in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer: current evidence and future perspectives for a risk-adapted approach. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 175(5), R185–R202 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. P.W. Rosario, A.F. Mineiro Filho, R.X. Lacerda, D.A. dos Santos, M.R. Calsolari, The value of diagnostic whole-body scanning and serum thyroglobulin in the presence of elevated serum thyrotropin during follow-up of anti-thyroglobulin antibody-positive patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who appeared to be free of disease after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine ablation. Thyroid 22(2), 113–116 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. A. Algeciras-Schimnich, Thyroglobulin measurement in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 55(3), 205–218 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. S. Peiling Yang, A.M. Bach, R.M. Tuttle, S.A. Fish, Frequent screening with serial neck ultrasound is more likely to identify false-positive abnormalities than clinically significant disease in the surveillance of intermediate risk papillary thyroid cancer patients without suspicious findings on follow-up ultrasound evaluation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100(4), 1561–1567 (2015)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. F.A. Verburg, U. Mader, L. Giovanella, M. Luster, C. Reiners, Low or undetectable basal thyroglobulin levels obviate the need for neck ultrasound in differentiated thyroid cancer patients after total thyroidectomy and 131I ablation. Thyroid 28(6), 722–728 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. S.P. Yang, A.M. Bach, R.M. Tuttle, S.A. Fish, Serial neck ultrasound is more likely to identify false-positive abnormalities than clinically significant disease in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients. Endocr. Pract. 21(12), 1372–1379 (2015)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. A. Campenní, M. Tulchinsky, Should the use of neck-ultrasonography be reduced during the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer patients with undetectable or low (i.e., < 1 microg/L) thyroglobulin levels and negative thyroglobulin antibody? J. Endocrinol. Investig. 42(1), 105–106 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  58. J.M. Gonzalez Carvalho, D. Gorlich, O. Schober, C. Wenning, B. Riemann, F.A. Verburg, A. Vrachimis, Evaluation of 131I scintigraphy and stimulated thyroglobulin levels in the follow up of patients with DTC: a retrospective analysis of 1420 patients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 44(5), 744–756 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. F.A. Verburg, U. Mader, C. Reiners, H. Hanscheid, Long-term survival in differentiated thyroid cancer is worse after low-activity initial post-surgical 131I therapy in both high- and low-risk patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99(12), 4487–4496 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. A.S. Alzahrani, O. AlShaikh, M. Tuli, A. Al-Sugair, R. Alamawi, M.M. Al-Rasheed, Diagnostic value of recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated 123I whole-body scintigraphy in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Clin. Nucl. Med. 37(3), 229–234 (2012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. T. Barwick, I. Murray, H. Megadmi, W.M. Drake, P.N. Plowman, S.A. Akker, S.L. Chew, A.B. Grossman, N. Avril, Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography using Iodine-123 in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: additional value over whole body planar imaging and SPECT. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 162(6), 1131–1139 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. A. Spanu, M.E. Solinas, F. Chessa, D. Sanna, S. Nuvoli, G. Madeddu, 131I SPECT/CT in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: incremental value versus planar imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 50(2), 184–190 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. L. Giovanella, P. Trimboli, F.A. Verburg, G. Treglia, A. Piccardo, L. Foppiani, L. Ceriani, Thyroglobulin levels and thyroglobulin doubling time independently predict a positive 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in patients with biochemical recurrence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 40(6), 874–880 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. S. Asa, S.Y. Aksoy, B. Vatankulu, A. Aliyev, L. Uslu, M. Ozhan, S. Sager, M. Halac, K. Sonmezoglu, The role of FDG-PET/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer patients with negative iodine-131 whole-body scan and elevated anti-Tg level. Ann. Nucl. Med. 28(10), 970–979 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Y. Liu, The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the follow-up of well-differentiated thyroid cancer with negative thyroglobulin but positive and/or elevated antithyroglobulin antibody. Nucl. Med. Commun. 37(6), 577–582 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. E. Ozkan, G. Aras, N.O. Kucuk, Correlation of 18F-FDG PET/CT findings with histopathological results in differentiated thyroid cancer patients who have increased thyroglobulin or antithyroglobulin antibody levels and negative 131I whole-body scan results. Clin. Nucl. Med. 38(5), 326–331 (2013)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. A.M. Avram, Radioiodine scintigraphy with SPECT/CT: an important diagnostic tool for thyroid cancer staging and risk stratification. J. Nucl. Med. 53(5), 754–764 (2012)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. H. Kim, H.I. Kim, S.W. Kim, J. Jung, M.J. Jeon, W.G. Kim, T.Y. Kim, H.K. Kim, H.C. Kang, J.M. Han, Y.Y. Cho, T.H. Kim, J.H. Chung, Prognosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with initial distant metastasis: a multicenter study in Korea. Endocrinol. Metab. (Seoul) 33(2), 287–295 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  69. E. Roti, R. Rossi, G. Trasforini, F. Bertelli, M.R. Ambrosio, L. Busutti, E.N. Pearce, L.E. Braverman, E.C.Degli Uberti, Clinical and histological characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: results of a retrospective study in 243 patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91(6), 2171–2178 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. J.J. Ruegemer, I.D. Hay, E.J. Bergstralh, J.J. Ryan, K.P. Offord, C.A. Gorman, Distant metastases in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 67(3), 501–508 (1988)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. A. Lorenzoni, A. Capozza, A. Campennì, L. Giovanella, E. Seregni, Multimodal therapy of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer, with emphasis on the role of radioiodine. Clin. Transl. Imaging 7(6), 427–435 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  72. F.A. Verburg, H. Hanscheid, M. Luster, Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 31(3), 279–290 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. D. Handkiewicz-Junak, J. Wloch, J. Roskosz, J. Krajewska, A. Kropinska, L. Pomorski, A. Kukulska, A. Prokurat, Z. Wygoda, B. Jarzab, Total thyroidectomy and adjuvant radioiodine treatment independently decrease locoregional recurrence risk in childhood and adolescent differentiated thyroid cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 48(6), 879–888 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. C. Reiners, J. Biko, H. Haenscheid, H. Hebestreit, S. Kirinjuk, O. Baranowski, R.J. Marlowe, E. Demidchik, V. Drozd, Y. Demidchik, Twenty-five years after Chernobyl: outcome of radioiodine treatment in children and adolescents with very high-risk radiation-induced differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98(7), 3039–3048 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. E. Ruel, S. Thomas, M. Dinan, J.M. Perkins, S.A. Roman, J.A. Sosa, Adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy is associated with improved survival for patients with intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 100(4), 1529–1536 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. J. Tang, D. Kong, Q. Cui, K. Wang, D. Zhang, X. Liao, Y. Gong, G. Wu, The role of radioactive iodine therapy in papillary thyroid cancer: an observational study based on SEER. Onco. Targets Ther. 11, 3551–3560 (2018)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. A.M. Avram, Y.K. Dewaraja, Thyroid cancer radiotheragnostics: the case for activity adjusted 131I therapy. Clin. Transl. Imaging 6(5), 335–346 (2018)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. C.M. Hong, B.C. Ahn, Factors associated with dose determination of radioactive iodine therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 52(4), 247–253 (2018)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. K. Kulkarni, D. Van Nostrand, F. Atkins, M. Aiken, K. Burman, L. Wartofsky, The relative frequency in which empiric dosages of radioiodine would potentially overtreat or undertreat patients who have metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 16(10), 1019–1023 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. R.M. Tuttle, R. Leboeuf, R.J. Robbins, R. Qualey, K. Pentlow, S.M. Larson, C.Y. Chan, Empiric radioactive iodine dosing regimens frequently exceed maximum tolerated activity levels in elderly patients with thyroid cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 47(10), 1587–1591 (2006)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. R.S. Benua, N.R. Cicale, M. Sonenberg, R.W. Rawson, The relation of radioiodine dosimetry to results and complications in the treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 87, 171–182 (1962)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. D. Deandreis, C. Rubino, H. Tala, S. Leboulleux, M. Terroir, E. Baudin, S. Larson, J.A. Fagin, M. Schlumberger, R.M. Tuttle, Comparison of empiric versus whole-body/-blood clearance dosimetry-based approach to radioactive iodine treatment in patients with metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 58(5), 717–722 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. J. Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, D. Van Nostrand, F. Atkins, K. Burman, J. Jonklaas, M. Mete, L. Wartofsky, Efficacy of dosimetric versus empiric prescribed activity of 131I for therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96(10), 3217–3225 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. G. Sgouros, H. Song, P.W. Ladenson, R.L. Wahl, Lung toxicity in radioiodine therapy of thyroid carcinoma: development of a dose-rate method and dosimetric implications of the 80-mCi rule. J. Nucl. Med. 47(12), 1977–1984 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. H. Song, B. He, A. Prideaux, Y. Du, E. Frey, W. Kasecamp, P.W. Ladenson, R.L. Wahl, G. Sgouros, Lung dosimetry for radioiodine treatment planning in the case of diffuse lung metastases. J. Nucl. Med. 47(12), 1985–1994 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. J. Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, K.D. Burman, D. Van Nostrand, M. Mete, J. Jonklaas, L. Wartofsky, Radioiodine treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer: relative efficacy and side effect profile of preparation by thyroid hormone withdrawal versus recombinant human thyrotropin. Thyroid 22(3), 310–317 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. C. Ma, J. Xie, W. Liu, G. Wang, S. Zuo, X. Wang, F. Wu, Recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) aided radioiodine treatment for residual or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010(11), CD008302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008302.pub2

  88. H. Tala, R. Robbins, J.A. Fagin, S.M. Larson, R.M. Tuttle, Five-year survival is similar in thyroid cancer patients with distant metastases prepared for radioactive iodine therapy with either thyroid hormone withdrawal or recombinant human TSH. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 96(7), 2105–2111 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. R.M. Tuttle, M.S. Brose, E. Grande, S.W. Kim, M. Tahara, M.M. Sabra, Novel concepts for initiating multitargeted kinase inhibitors in radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 31(3), 295–305 (2017)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. D. Van Nostrand, Radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: time to update the classifications. Thyroid 28(9), 1083–1093 (2018)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. C. Durante, N. Haddy, E. Baudin, S. Leboulleux, D. Hartl, J.P. Travagli, B. Caillou, M. Ricard, J.D. Lumbroso, F. De Vathaire, M. Schlumberger, Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 91(8), 2892–2899 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. R. Martins-Filho, L.S. Ward, B.J. Amorim, A.O. Santos, M.C. Lima, C.D. Ramos, P.S. Matos, L.V. Assumpcao, E.E. Camargo, E.C. Etchebehere, Cumulative doses of radioiodine in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: knowing when to stop. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 54(9), 807–812 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. L. Giovanella, D. van Nostrand, Advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: when to stop radioiodine? Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 63(3), 267–270 (2019)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sarah Greig, PhD, of Springer Healthcare Communications, who provided medical writing support funded by Sanofi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

    Alfredo Campennì

  2. U.O. Endocrinologia, ASL Nord Ovest Toscana, Livorno, Italy

    Daniele Barbaro

  3. Head and Neck Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

    Marco Guzzo

  4. Service Department Macerata Hospital, ASUR Marche AV3, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Macerata, Italy

    Francesca Capoccetti

  5. Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Competence Centre for Thyroid Diseases, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland

    Luca Giovanella

  6. Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Luca Giovanella

Authors
  1. Alfredo Campennì
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniele Barbaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Guzzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesca Capoccetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luca Giovanella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfredo Campennì.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A.C. has participated in the speaker program and acted as an advisor for Sanofi Genzyme. D.B. and M.G. have no conflicts of interest to declare. F.C. has acted as an advisor for QB Group Srl. L.G. has participated in the speaker program and acted as an advisor for Roche Diagnostics and Sanofi Genzyme, and has participated in the speaker program for IBSA SA and BRAHMS GmbH.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campennì, A., Barbaro, D., Guzzo, M. et al. Personalized management of differentiated thyroid cancer in real life – practical guidance from a multidisciplinary panel of experts. Endocrine 70, 280–291 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02418-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02418-x

Keywords

  • Differentiated thyroid carcinoma
  • Martinique Principles
  • Radioiodine therapy
  • Recommendations
  • Surgery