Abstract
This research explored phonological and morphological awareness among Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities (RD) and its effect on reading comprehension beyond phonological and word-reading abilities. Participants included 39 seventh graders with RD and two matched control groups of normal readers: 40 seventh graders matched for chronological age (CA) and 38 third graders matched for reading age (RA). We assessed phonological awareness, word reading, morphological awareness, and reading comprehension. Findings indicated that the RD group performed similarly to the RA group on phonological awareness but lower on phonological decoding. On the decontextualized morphological task, RD functioned on par with RA, whereas in a contextualized task RD performed above RA but lower than CA. In reading comprehension, RD performed as well as RA. Finally, results indicated that for normal readers contextual morphological awareness uniquely contributed to reading comprehension beyond phonological and word-reading abilities, whereas no such unique contribution emerged for the RD group. The absence of an effect of morphological awareness in predicting reading comprehension was suggested to be related to a different recognition process employed by RD readers which hinder the ability of these readers to use morphosemantic structures. The lexical quality hypothesis was proposed as further support to the findings, suggesting that a low quality of lexical representation in RD students leads to ineffective reading skills and comprehension. Lexical representation is thus critical for both lexical as well as comprehension abilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 118–152.
Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176–181.
Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39–72.
Berman, R. A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547–567.
Berman, R. A. (2000). Children’s innovative verbs versus. nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berman, R. A. (2002). Children’s lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb structure. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 243–291). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bolozky, S. (1999). Measuring productivity in word formation: The sase of Israeli Hebrew. Boston: Brill.
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65–92.
Brissolara, D., Pecini, C., Chilosi, A., Cipriani, P., Gasperini, F., Mazzotti, L., et al. (2006). Do phonological and rapid automized naming deficits differentially affect dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay? A study on Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioural Psychology, 56, 445–467.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.
Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 90–108.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects and early reading achievement (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.
Casalis, S., Cole, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–139.
Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547–567.
Curtin, S., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 515–547.
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological?” The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–129.
Defior, S. (2004). Phonological awareness and learning to read: A cross linguistic perspective. In P. Bryant & T. Nunes (Eds.), Handbook on children’s literacy (pp. 163–174). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148.
Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2003). Lexical organization and lexical access in a non-concatenated morphology: Mapping the mental lexicon. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 165–186). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
Duncan, L. G., & Johnston, R. S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 405–439.
Egan, J., & Pring, L. (2004). The processing inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 567–591.
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.
Elbro, C., & Jensen, M. N. (2005). Quality of phonological representations, verbal learning, and phoneme awareness in dyslexic and normal readers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 375–384.
First, M. B., Frances, A., Pincus, H. A., Massana Montejo, G. T., & Valdes Miyar, M. R. (2002). DSM-IV-RT. Differential diagnosis manual. Barcelona: Masson [In Spanish].
Folz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307.
Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.
Hepburn, A. (1968). The performance of normal children of differing reading ability on the ITPA. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Jiménez González, J., & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 401–413.
Joanisse, M. C., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.
Johnson, D. J., & Grant, J. O. (1989). Written narratives of normal and learning disabled children. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 40–59.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783–804.
Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.
Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.
Leikin, M. (2002). Processing syntactic functions of words in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 145–163.
Leong, C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94–115.
Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224–232.
Leong, C. K., & Parkinson, M. E. (1995). Processing of English morphological structure by poor readers. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 237–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19–44.
Mann, V. A. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 143–147.
Mann, V. A., & Singson, M. (2003). The little suffix that could: Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Morphology and reading: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: Kluver.
Mimouni, Z., Kehayia, E., & Jarema, G. (1998). The mental representation of singular and plural nouns in Algerian Arabic as revealed through auditory priming in agrammatic aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 61, 63–87.
Moats, L. (1996). Phonological spelling errors in the writing of dyslexic adolescents. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 105–119.
Müller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlated of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 757–799.
Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Education and Psychology, 98, 134–147.
Ortar, G. (1987). “Hava Nikra”. Mivhan lehavant hanikra (“Let’s Read”. A reading comprehension test). Jerusalem: Ahiever.
Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P., & Lefly, D. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypothesis for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707–755.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 1–27.
Porpodas, C. D. (1999). Patterns of phonological and memory processing in beginning readers and spellers of Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 406–416.
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (Eds.). (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Brookline.
Ransby, M. J., & Swanson, H. L. (2003). Reading comprehension skills of young adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 538–555.
Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with development dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 221–252.
Raven, J. C. (1959). Colored progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.
Ravid, D. (1990). Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 24, 289–346.
Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.
Ravid, D. (2002). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 231–256.
Ravid, D., & Hanauer, D. (1998). A prototype theory of rhyme: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 79–106.
Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–26.
Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2007). Morphological abilities in Hebrew-speaking grade-schoolers from two socio-economic backgrounds: An analogy task. First Language, 26, 381–402.
Schiff, R. (2004). Mivhan lebdikat mudaut fonologit (Phonological awareness task: An internal diagnostic test battery). Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan: Hadad Center for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities. [In Hebrew]
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2006). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 245–265.
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-Speaking University students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade-schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253.
Schiff, R., Kahta, S., & Katzir, T. (2008). Mivhan bekri’at milim: Kri’at milim menukadot velo menukadot (Single-word reading test: Pointed and unpointed word reading). Ramat-Gan: Haddad Center, Bar-Ilan University [In Hebrew].
Schwarzwald, O. R. (2001). Modern Hebrew. München: Lincom Europa.
Serrano, F., & Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 81–95.
Shalem, Z., & Lachman, D. (1998). Ma’arexet le’ivhun tahalixei kri’a be’ivrit (Diagnostic battery for reading processes in the Hebrew language). Tel Aviv: Nitzan [In Hebrew].
Shani, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., Bahat, A., & Zeiger, T. (2006). Alef ad Taf. Ma’arexet le’ivhum likuyim betahalixei kri’a vektiva (Aleph-Taf. Diagnostic test battery for written language disorders). Holon: Mofet Institute and Nitzan Association, Yesod Press [In Hebrew].
Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. E., Brady, S. A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparisons of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.
Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding and self-teaching. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
Siegel, L. S. (2008). Morphological awareness skills of English language learners and children with Dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 15–27.
Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.
Stanovitch, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604.
Stanovitch, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
Sternberg, R. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 587–625.
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.
Wimmer, H. (1996). The early manifestation of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from German children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 171–188.
Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2001). Is the reading-rate problem of German dyslexic children caused by slow visual processes? In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and brain (pp. 116–133). New York: York.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circles Pines: American Guidance Service.
Worthy, J., & Vise, N. (1996). Morphological, phonological, and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 139–159.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schiff, R., Schwartz-Nahshon, S. & Nagar, R. Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Ann. of Dyslexia 61, 44–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0046-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0046-5