Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research explored phonological and morphological awareness among Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities (RD) and its effect on reading comprehension beyond phonological and word-reading abilities. Participants included 39 seventh graders with RD and two matched control groups of normal readers: 40 seventh graders matched for chronological age (CA) and 38 third graders matched for reading age (RA). We assessed phonological awareness, word reading, morphological awareness, and reading comprehension. Findings indicated that the RD group performed similarly to the RA group on phonological awareness but lower on phonological decoding. On the decontextualized morphological task, RD functioned on par with RA, whereas in a contextualized task RD performed above RA but lower than CA. In reading comprehension, RD performed as well as RA. Finally, results indicated that for normal readers contextual morphological awareness uniquely contributed to reading comprehension beyond phonological and word-reading abilities, whereas no such unique contribution emerged for the RD group. The absence of an effect of morphological awareness in predicting reading comprehension was suggested to be related to a different recognition process employed by RD readers which hinder the ability of these readers to use morphosemantic structures. The lexical quality hypothesis was proposed as further support to the findings, suggesting that a low quality of lexical representation in RD students leads to ineffective reading skills and comprehension. Lexical representation is thus critical for both lexical as well as comprehension abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 118–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (2000). Children’s innovative verbs versus. nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (2002). Children’s lexical innovations: Developmental perspectives on Hebrew verb structure. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 243–291). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolozky, S. (1999). Measuring productivity in word formation: The sase of Israeli Hebrew. Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brissolara, D., Pecini, C., Chilosi, A., Cipriani, P., Gasperini, F., Mazzotti, L., et al. (2006). Do phonological and rapid automized naming deficits differentially affect dyslexic children with and without a history of language delay? A study on Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioural Psychology, 56, 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects and early reading achievement (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., Cole, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14, 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, S., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two subgroups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 515–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological?” The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defior, S. (2004). Phonological awareness and learning to read: A cross linguistic perspective. In P. Bryant & T. Nunes (Eds.), Handbook on children’s literacy (pp. 163–174). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defior, S., Martos, F., & Cary, L. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2003). Lexical organization and lexical access in a non-concatenated morphology: Mapping the mental lexicon. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 165–186). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. G., & Johnston, R. S. (1999). How does phonological awareness relate to nonword reading skill amongst poor readers? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 405–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J., & Pring, L. (2004). The processing inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 567–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Jensen, M. N. (2005). Quality of phonological representations, verbal learning, and phoneme awareness in dyslexic and normal readers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Frances, A., Pincus, H. A., Massana Montejo, G. T., & Valdes Miyar, M. R. (2002). DSM-IV-RT. Differential diagnosis manual. Barcelona: Masson [In Spanish].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A. (1968). The performance of normal children of differing reading ability on the ITPA. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

  • Jiménez González, J., & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joanisse, M. C., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. J., & Grant, J. O. (1989). Written narratives of normal and learning disabled children. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, M. (2002). Processing syntactic functions of words in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K., & Parkinson, M. E. (1995). Processing of English morphological structure by poor readers. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Developmental and acquired dyslexia: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic perspectives (pp. 237–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A., & Singson, M. (2003). The little suffix that could: Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Morphology and reading: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: Kluver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimouni, Z., Kehayia, E., & Jarema, G. (1998). The mental representation of singular and plural nouns in Algerian Arabic as revealed through auditory priming in agrammatic aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 61, 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (1996). Phonological spelling errors in the writing of dyslexic adolescents. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlated of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 757–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. C. (2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Education and Psychology, 98, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortar, G. (1987). “Hava Nikra”. Mivhan lehavant hanikra (“Let’s Read”. A reading comprehension test). Jerusalem: Ahiever.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P., & Lefly, D. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypothesis for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porpodas, C. D. (1999). Patterns of phonological and memory processing in beginning readers and spellers of Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (Eds.). (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Brookline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransby, M. J., & Swanson, H. L. (2003). Reading comprehension skills of young adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 538–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with development dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 221–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1959). Colored progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (1990). Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 24, 289–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2002). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Hanauer, D. (1998). A prototype theory of rhyme: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 79–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2007). Morphological abilities in Hebrew-speaking grade-schoolers from two socio-economic backgrounds: An analogy task. First Language, 26, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R. (2004). Mivhan lebdikat mudaut fonologit (Phonological awareness task: An internal diagnostic test battery). Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan: Hadad Center for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities. [In Hebrew]

  • Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2006). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-Speaking University students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade-schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., Kahta, S., & Katzir, T. (2008). Mivhan bekri’at milim: Kri’at milim menukadot velo menukadot (Single-word reading test: Pointed and unpointed word reading). Ramat-Gan: Haddad Center, Bar-Ilan University [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzwald, O. R. (2001). Modern Hebrew. München: Lincom Europa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, F., & Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalem, Z., & Lachman, D. (1998). Ma’arexet le’ivhun tahalixei kri’a be’ivrit (Diagnostic battery for reading processes in the Hebrew language). Tel Aviv: Nitzan [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., Bahat, A., & Zeiger, T. (2006). Alef ad Taf. Ma’arexet le’ivhum likuyim betahalixei kri’a vektiva (Aleph-Taf. Diagnostic test battery for written language disorders). Holon: Mofet Institute and Nitzan Association, Yesod Press [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. E., Brady, S. A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparisons of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding and self-teaching. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. (2008). Morphological awareness skills of English language learners and children with Dyslexia. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovitch, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovitch, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 587–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. (1996). The early manifestation of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from German children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2001). Is the reading-rate problem of German dyslexic children caused by slow visual processes? In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and brain (pp. 116–133). New York: York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circles Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, J., & Vise, N. (1996). Morphological, phonological, and orthographic differences between the spelling of normally achieving children and basic literacy adults. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Schiff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiff, R., Schwartz-Nahshon, S. & Nagar, R. Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Ann. of Dyslexia 61, 44–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0046-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0046-5

Keywords

Navigation