Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. While the poor phonological awareness of dyslexic children has been related to their difficulty in handling the alphabetical principle, less is known about their morphological awareness, which also plays an important part in reading development. The aim of this study was to analyze in more detail the implications of the phonological impairments of dyslexics in dealing with larger units of language such as morphemes. First, the performance of dyslexic children in a series of morphological tasks was compared with the performance of children matched on reading-level and chronological age. In all the tasks, the dyslexic group performed below the chronological age control group, suggesting that morphological awareness cannot be developed entirely independently of reading experience and/or phonological skills. Comparisons with the reading-age control group indicated that, while the dyslexic children were poorer in the morphemic segmentation tasks, they performed normally for their reading level in the sentence completion tasks. Furthermore, they produced more derived words in the production task. This suggests that phonological impairments prevent the explicit segmentation of affixes while allowing the development of productive morphological knowledge. A second study compared dyslexic subgroups defined by their degree of phonological impairment. Our results suggest that dyslexics develop a certain type of morphological knowledge, which they use as a compensatory reading strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., & Ryan, E. (1985). A metacognitive framework for the development of first and second language skills. In D. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition and human performance (vol. 1) (pp. 207–252). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Test for reception of grammar (2nd ed.). Manchester: University of Manchester Age and Cognitive Performance Centre: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S. (1995). Apprentissage de la lecture et dyslexies de l’enfant [Learning to read and dyslexia in children]. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S. (2001). Morphological awareness and phonological awareness in the onset of literacy. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Research on child language acquisition (pp. 209–223). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. A. (1984). Language structure and language use in the acquisition of word-formation. Language, 6, 542–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colé, P., Segui, J., & Taft, M. (1997). Words and morphemes as units for lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L., Seymour, P., & Hill, S. (2000). A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A(4), 1081–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1989). Morphological awareness in dyslexia. In C. Von Euler, I. Lundberg, & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Brain and reading: Structural and functional anomalies in developmental dyslexia with special reference to interactions, memory functions, linguistic processes and visual analysis in reading (pp. 189–209). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. (Ed.). (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A., & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and morphology in morphological awareness. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J.-E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B. (1996). How children learn to read and why they fail. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joanisse, M., Manis, F., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. (2000). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laxon, V., Rickard, M., & Coltheart, V. (1992). Children read affixed words and nonwords. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 407–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq, P. (1996). L’ECOSSE: une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique [The Ecosse: A syntactical semantic test]. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l’Alouette [Lark test]. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. (2000). Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 67, 1836–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K. (1994). Language deficits in “specific” reading disability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 895–916). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapala, M., & Brady, S. (1991). Reading ability and short term memory: The role of phonological processing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1976). Coloured Progressives Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segui, J., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). The syllable: Its role in speech segmentation and lexical access. In G. Altman (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 263–280). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, C., Liberman, A., Brady, S., Thornton, R., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K., Shaywitz, S., & Shaywitz B. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparisons of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self teaching: Sine qua non for reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 590–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1996). Toward a more inclusive definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia, 2, 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Spearing, D. (1995). Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 76–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire URECA (EA 1059), University Charles de Gaulle-Lille 3, France

    Séverine Casalis & Delphine Sopo

  2. Laboratoire de psychologie et neurocognition (U.M.R. 5105, C.N.R.S.), University of Savoie, France

    Pascale Colé

Authors
  1. Séverine Casalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pascale Colé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Delphine Sopo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Séverine Casalis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casalis, S., Colé, P. & Sopo, D. Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Ann. of Dyslexia 54, 114–138 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0006-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-004-0006-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation