Advertisement

Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 249–260 | Cite as

Variations in the structure of airborne bacterial communities in Tsogt-Ovoo of Gobi desert area during dust events

  • Teruya MakiEmail author
  • Yasunori Kurosaki
  • Kazunari Onishi
  • Kevin C. Lee
  • Stephen B. Pointing
  • Dulam Jugder
  • Norikazu Yamanaka
  • Hiroshi Hasegawa
  • Masato Shinoda
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Asian dust events transport the airborne bacteria in Chinese desert regions as well as mineral particles and influence downwind area varying biological ecosystems and climate changes. However, the airborne bacterial dynamics were rarely investigated in the Gobi desert area, where dust events are highly frequent. In this study, air samplings were sequentially performed at a 2-m high above the ground at the sampling site located in desert area (Tsogt-Ovoo of Gobi desert; Mongolia 44.2304°N, 105.1700°E). During the dust event days, the bacterial cells and mineral particles increased to more than tenfold of concentrations. MiSeq sequencing targeting 16S ribosomal DNA revealed that the airborne bacteria in desert area mainly belonged to the classes Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Bacilli, Alpha-proteobacteria, Beta-proteobacteria, and Gamma-proteobacteria. The bacterial community structures were different between dust events and non-dust events. The air samples collected at the dust events indicated high abundance rates of Alpha-proteobacteria, which were reported to dominate on the leaf surfaces of plants or in the saline lake environments. After the dust events, the members of Firmicutes (Bacilli) and Bacteroidetes, which are known to form endospore and attach with coarse particles, respectively, increased their relative abundances in the air samples. Presumably, the bacterial compositions and diversities in atmosphere significantly vary during dust events, which carry some particles from grassland (phyllo-sphere), dry lake, and sand surfaces, as well as some bacterial populations such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes maintain in the atmosphere for longer time.

Keywords

Dryland Bioaerosol Prokaryote MiSeq sequencing Fluorescence microscopy 

Introduction

Mineral particles originated from the Chinese desert regions frequently disperse to all around the East Asian regions during the spring season (Iwasaka et al. 1983). The major source areas of the Asian dust event are Gobi desert, Taklimakan desert, and Loess Plateau (Duce et al. 1980; Iwasaka et al. 1983; Kurosaki and Mikami 2005). Desert winds from the Gobi desert area carry several billion tons of soil-derived dust each year (Uematsu et al. 1983; Duce et al. 1980; Chung and Kim 2008; Kim and Chung 2010; Huang et al. 2010), which negatively impacts human health (Onishi et al. 2012) and downwind ecosystems (Pointing and Jayne 2014). In contrast, Asian-dust depositions have some positive effects on ecosystems for moderating acid rain and providing the nutrients to oligotrophic oceans (Pointing and Jayne 2014). Microorganisms (including viruses, bacteria, and fungi) associated with mineral-dust particles, known as “bioaerosols” (Prospero et al. 2005; Kellogg and Griffin 2006; Iwasaka et al. 2009), are also transported over long distances. The dust event dispersal of bioaerosol is linked to the increase of the allergen burden and asthma (Ichinose et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2014) and possibly the dispersal of diseases such as Kawasaki disease in humans (Rodó et al. 2011) and rust diseases in plants (Brown and Hovmøller 2002). Moreover, bioaerosols are thought to influence atmospheric processes by participating in atmospheric chemical reactions and cloud particle formation (Pratt et al. 2009; Creamean et al. 2013).

To understand the long-range transport processes of bioaerosols, the dynamics of airborne prokaryotic communities over the Asian-dust source regions should be investigated. The airborne bacteria were known to be mixed vertically at high altitudes above the oasis city, Dunhuang, in Taklimakan desert (Maki et al. 2008; Kakikawa et al. 2008). The desert sand included several kinds of bacterial species, and some of the bacterial population would be transported to atmosphere over ground surfaces (An et al. 2013; Puspitasari et al. 2015). While the airborne bacteria around the Mogao Caves in Dunhuang were also investigated, the bacterial variations depended on the numbers of tourists visiting the caves (Wang et al. 2010). Therefore, in order to study the natural origins of airborne bacteria in desert, the sampling site should be located in sandy desert area, where dust events occurred frequently and human activities can be avoided. Dust storms in the Gobi desert are more severe and occur more frequently than the storms in Taklimakan desert (Jugder et al. 2004; Kurosaki and Mikami 2005). However, there are few researches investigating the dynamics of airborne bacteria at the ground level in the Gobi desert area.

Kurosaki and Mikami (2007) analyzed East Asian meteorological observatory data and suggested that the highest frequency of dust storms in the region occurred at Tsogt-Ovoo in the middle of the Gobi desert. Located in a shallow valley, Tsogt-Ovoo exemplify topographical depressions known for significant sources of dust originated from dry lakes (Abulaiti et al. 2014). We sequentially collected bioaerosol samples at Tsogt-Ovoo during the dust events in the spring season of 2014 and 2015 to investigate the change in airborne prokaryotic communities. The variations of prokaryotic abundances and compositions in the samples were estimated using microscopic observation and high-throughput sequencing techniques.

Materials and methods

Sampling of aerosol and sand particles

Air samples were collected in Tsogt-Ovoo (Fig. 1) in Mongolia from 16 to 18 March 2014, from 7 to 11 March 2015, and from 26 to 27 April 2015. The sampling times are indicted in Table 1. Tsogt-Ovoo is located in the middle of the Gobi desert, which is a major source of dust traveling toward Japan (Fig. 1a). The sampling site (44.2304°N, 105.1700°E) was located at the desert area 5 km from downtown, and the sampling system was placed on a 2-m-high bar, which was fixed with fences (Fig. 1b). Air samples were collected using sterilized polycarbonate filters (0.22-μm pore size; Whatman, Tokyo, Japan) with a sterilized filter holder connected to an air pump. For each sample, two filters were used continuously for sampling periods ranging from 10 to 12 h (the sampling air volumes ranged from 180 to 216 L); the filters were changed after each sampling period. In total, 13 air samples were obtained during the sampling periods, which were labeled 14To-1 to 14To-4 and 15To-1 to 15To-9 (Table 1). Of the two filters used to collect each sample, one filter was used to determine the particulate abundances using fluorescence microscopy, and the other was stored at −80 °C before the extraction of genomic DNA for the analysis of prokaryotic community composition.
Fig. 1

a Sampling site of Tsogt-Ovoo City in Asian-dust source regions (Gobi desert) and b (i) metrological monitoring systems and (ii–vi) bioaerosol sampling situations

Table 1

Sampling information during the sampling periods

Sample name

Sampling time (ULAT)

Sampling time (UTC)

Total time (h)

Air volume (L)

Dusta

14To-1

March 16, 2014 10:30–17:00

March 16, 2014 02:30–09:00

6.5

468

Dust

14To-2

March 16, 2014 17:00–29:00

March 16, 2014 09:00–21:00

12

864

Dust

14To-3

March 17, 2014 17:00–29:00

March 17, 2014 09:00–21:00

12

864

Non-dust

14To-4

March 18, 2014 11:00–16:00

March 18, 2014 03:00–8:00

5

360

Non-dust

15To-1

March 7, 2015 18:00–34:00

March 7, 2015 10:00–26:00

16

1152

Dust

15To-2

March 8, 2015 10:00–22:00

March 8, 2015 2:00–14:00

12

864

Non-dust

15To-3

March 9, 2015 10:00–18:30

March 9, 2015 02:00–10:30

8.5

612

Non-dust

15To-4

March 9, 2015 19:00–33:30

March 9, 2015 11:00–25:30

14.5

1008

Non-dust

15To-5

March 10, 2015 10:30–17:30

March 10, 2015 02:30–9:30

7

504

Non-dust

15To-6

March 10, 2015 18:00–33:00

March 10, 2015 10:00–25:00

15

1080

Non-dust

15To-7

March 11, 2015 09:30–16:00

March 11, 2015 01:30–8:00

6.5

468

Non-dust

15To-8

April 26, 2015 08:00–18:30

April 26, 2015 00:00–10:30

10.5

756

Dust

15To-9

April 27, 2015 08:00–18:30

April 27, 2015 00:00–10:30

10.5

792

Non-dust

aThe occurrences of dust events are evaluated by depending on lidar data, PM10 concentrations, or wind speeds

Characteristics of atmospheric conditions

The occurrences of dust events were evaluated by measuring concentrations of particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter of 10 μm (PM10), which were measured at a height of 1.42 m using an aerosol mass monitor (DustTrak DRX 8533, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA). Wind speed and wind direction were determined at a height of 3 m using a propeller anemometer (YG-5103, R.M. Young, Traverse City, MI, USA). The dust concentration was measured only when the wind speed exceeded 8 m/s. All data were automatically measured every 0.1 s for wind speed and every second for PM10 and wind direction. The averaged measurement values over 1-min intervals were recorded to the data loggers (CR1000-XT, Campbell Scientific Inc., North Logan, UT, USA). These observation systems have been established for monitoring dust conditions and meteorological factors (Ishizuka et al. 2012).

The depolarization rates measured by the lidar system of Zamiin-Uud were also used for evaluating dust-event occurrences over the Gobi desert area.

Microscopic analysis of particle abundance

To determine the particle abundance, 0.25 mL of sterilized ultrapure water with paraformaldehyde at a final concentration of 1 % was added to one of the filter folders to fix the aerosols (Maki et al. 2014). After a 1-h incubation, the filter was stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a final concentration of 0.5 μg/mL for 15 min (Porter and Feig 1980). Particles on the filter were observed using an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an ultraviolet excitation system. A filter transect was scanned, and the mineral particles (white particles), yellow particles, and bacterial cells on the filter transect were counted. Yellow particles stained with DAPI were reported as organic matter (Mostajir et al. 1995). The detection limit of aerosols was below 5 × 103 particles/m3 of air.

High-throughput sequencing

After the sampling, the aerosols were washed off the filters by shaking with 5 mL of sterilized water containing 0.9 % (w/v) of NaCl, and the solution samples were pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000g for 5 min. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using a modified phenol-chloroform method (Maki et al. 2008). Fragments of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA; approximately 500 bp) were amplified from the extracted gDNA by PCR using universal 16S rDNA prokaryotic primers for the V4 region, 515F (5′-Seq A-TGT GCC AGC MGC CGC GGT AA-3′) and 806R (5′-Seq B-GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT-3′) (Caporaso et al. 2011). This read sequence region provides an accurate taxonomic information at the family level of bacterial composition (Liu et al. 2008). The nucleotide sequences of Seq A and Seq B represent nucleotide sequences targeted by the second set of PCR primers. PCR amplification was performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 52 °C for 2 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min for 20 cycles. Fragments of 16S rDNA in PCR products were amplified again using the second PCR forward primers (5′-adaptor C—tag sequence Seq A-3′) and reverse primer (5′-adaptor D—Seq B-3′), where adaptors C and D were used for the MiSeq sequencing reaction. The tag sequence included eight nucleotides designed for sample identification bar coding. Thermal cycling was performed under the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 59 °C for 2 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min for 14 cycles. PCR amplicons from each sample were used for high-throughput sequencing on a MiSeq Genome Sequencer (Illumina, CA, USA). The paired-end sequences obtained, with the read length of 250 bp, were grouped based on tag sequences for each sample. Negative controls (no template and template from unused filters) were prepared in all steps of the process after DNA extraction to check for contamination.

Before the analysis of bacterial community structures, USEARCH v.8.01623 (Edgar 2013) was used to process the raw Illumina sequencing reads. Anomalous sequences were removed with the following workflow. First, the forward and reverse paired-end reads were merged, and the merged reads with lengths outside 200–500-bp range or exceeding six homopolymers were discarded by Mothur v1.36.1 (Schloss et al. 2009). Next, the sequences were subjected to Q-score filtering to remove reads with more than one expected error. Reads occurring only once in the entire dataset (singleton) were then removed. Theses sequences were clustered de novo (with a minimum identity of 97 %) into 1065 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among the 13 samples. The taxonomies of the representative OTU sequences were assigned using the RDP classifier (Wang et al. 2007) implemented in QIME v9.1.1 (Caporaso et al. 2010). Greengenes release 13_8 (McDonald et al. 2012) was used as the reference taxonomic database. All sequences have been deposited in the DDBJ database (accession number of the submission is DRA005058).

Results and discussion

The depolarization rates increased between low and high altitudes on March 16, 2014; March 7 and 8, 2015; and April 26 and 27, 2015 (Fig. 2), suggesting the occurrence of dust events over the Gobi desert during those time periods. In particular, the dust event of March 16, 2014 could be observed on the satellite-monitoring chart of MODIS sensor (Fig. S1). During the sampling periods on March 2015 and April 2015, the concentrations of PM10 significantly increased under strong wind exceeding 10 m/s, indicating the occurrences of dust events on March 7, 2015 and April 26, 2015 (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, the aerosol mass monitor indicated minus values on March 2014 due to the mismatch of calculation software with device, so particulate concentration of the strong dust event on March 16, 2014 could not be used (Fig. 3a). In the Gobi desert area, wind speed is an important factor for the saltation of mineral particles from the ground surfaces (Ishizuka et al. 2012) and the occurrences of dust events (Kurosaki and Mikami 2005). The wind directions generally change at ground level in the Gobi desert, while the westerly wind is blowing at the high altitudes of more than 1000 m constantly and carry the mineral particles to the East Asia regions for long distance (Iwasaka et al. 1983). Consequently, we classified the samples of 14To-1, 14To-2, 15To-1, and 15To-8 as air samples including the dust particles transported by dust events (Table 1). The weather charts of Tsogt-Ovoo also support the occurrences of dust event on March 16, 2014; March 7, 2015; and April 26, 2015. Accordingly, the samples of 14To-1, 14To-2, 15To-1, and 15To-8 were named as “dust samples,” and the samples of 14To-3, 14To-4, 15To-2, 15To-3, 15To-4, 15To-5, 15To-6, 15To-8, and 15To-9 were named as “non-dust samples.”
Fig. 2

Lidar observation of depolarization ratio in Zamiin-Uud from 00:00 UTC on March 15 to 00:00 UTC on March 19 in 2014 (a), from 00:00 UTC on March 7 to 00:00 UTC on March 11 in 2015 (b), and from 00:00 UTC on April 23 to 00:00 UTC on April 27 in 2015 (c)

Fig. 3

Wind speed and PM10 concentrations in the atmosphere at the sampling site of Tsogt-Ovoo City from 00:00 UTC on March 15 to 00:00 UTC on March 19 in 2014 (a), from 00:00 UTC on March 7 to 00:00 UTC on March 11 in 2015 (b), and from 00:00 UTC on April 23 to 00:00 UTC on April 27 in 2015 (c). There are no data between 14:30 on March 8 and 11:00 on March 9 in 2015. The optical-particle counter had errors on March in 2014 and indicated minus values of PM10 concentrations. The dollar sign means the occurrences of dust events, which are shown on the weather charts of Tsogt-Ovoo City

Under microscopic observation using DAPI staining, some fluorescent particles were observed in the subsamples, and they were mainly composed of bright-blue fluorescence particles (prokaryotic cells), white-blue fluorescent particle (mineral particles), and yellow fluorescent particles (organic matters). During non-dust event periods, low concentrations of particles, in the orders of 104 to 105 particles/m3, were observed. The total particle concentrations of dust samples 14To-1, 14To-2, and 15To-8 increased to more than 106 particles/m3 and sometimes reaching 107 particles/m3 (Fig. 4). When dust events occurred, the airborne prokaryote maintained high concentration ranging from 106 to 107 particles/m3. The airborne bacteria in downwind environments in East Asia are reported to maintained lower cell concentrations ranging from 104 to 106 particles/m3 (Hara and Zhang 2012; Maki et al. 2014). In the dust source region, dust events would often occur increasing airborne microbial abundances, which are at least one order higher than downwind environments.
Fig. 4

Changes in fluorescent particle concentrations at a 2-m high above the ground at the sampling site of Tsogt-Ovoo City for March 16–18 in 2014 (UTC) (a), March 7–11 in 2015 (UTC) (b), and April 26–27 in 2015 (UTC) (c). The error bars were obtained from the count numbers obtained from the ten fields of microscopic observation

For the analysis of prokaryotic compositions in the air samples, we obtained a total of 2,503,780 reads. Following quality filtering, 1,113,730 merged paired-end sequences with a median length of 292 bp remained, and sequence library size for each sample was normalized at 9245. The 16S rDNA sequences were divided into 1065 phylotypes (sequences with >97 % similarity). Phylogenetic assignment of sequences resulted in overall diversity comprising 21 phyla and candidate divisions, 66 classes (and class-level candidate taxa), and 196 families (and family-level candidate taxa). The majority (>90 %) of abundance were represented by 7 bacterial phyla and the 24 classes (Fig. 5). The rarefaction curves among the 13 samples could be distinguished to 2 different patterns indicating higher and lower diversities (Fig. 6a). Non-metric multidimensional scaling plot with weighted-UniFrac distances demonstrated the distinct clustering of prokaryotic communities separating dust samples and non-dust samples (Fig. 6b). In general, among environmental prokaryotic communities, airborne prokaryotes showed the lowest diversities, whereas the terrestrial bacteria did the highest diversities (Fierer and Lennon 2011). Archaea in two phyla (Thaumarchaeota and Euryarchaeota) were detected but were in relatively low abundance compared to the dominant bacteria phyla. The bacterial compositions varied during the sampling periods and were mainly composed of the phylotypes belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and particularly Proteobacteria. These bacterial members are typically generated from atmospheric and terrestrial environments in the Gobi and Taklimakan deserts (Fig. 5a; An et al. 2013; Puspitasari et al. 2015). Dust events in desert areas may have provided terrestrial particles to the atmosphere and thus increased the diversities of airborne microbial communities. After such dust events, some of the microbial species that were resistant to atmospheric stressors would remain as dominated members of airborne microbiome.
Fig. 5

Bacterial composition at the phylum (a) and class (b) levels of the partial sequences in the MiSeq sequencing database obtained from the air samples collected at the sampling site of Tsogt-Ovoo City for March 16–18 in 2014 (from 14To-1 to 14To-4), March 7–11 in 2015 (from 15To-1 to 14To-7), and April 26–27 in 2015 (15To-8 and 15To-9)

Fig. 6

Comparison of bacterial compositions among the air samples collected at the sampling site of Tsogt-Ovoo City for March 16–18 in 2014 (from 14To-1 to 14To-4), March 7–11 in 2015 (from 15To-1 to 14To-7), and April 26–27 in 2015 (15To-8 and 15To-9). a Rarefaction curves indicating the bacterial diversity observed in the air samples. Species were binned at the 97 % sequence similarity level. b Non-metric multidimensional scaling plot with weighted-UniFrac distance matrix displaying phylogenetic clustering by the air samples

The sequences of the class Alpha-proteobacteria showed relatively high abundances ranging from 28 to 46 % in the samples collected during dust events, while they decreased to no more than 20 % in the non-dust samples except for samples 15To-5 and 15To-6 (Fig. 5b). The several members of Alpha-proteobacteria were known to account for bacterial population associated with plant body or surfaces (Fürnkranz et al. 2008). Some desert grasses randomly distribute around the ground surfaces in the Gobi desert regions (Shinoda et al. 2010; Jamsran et al. 2015). The Alpha-proteobacteria members predominately occupy the bacterial communities in high-saline environments such as marine and salt lakes (Desriac et al. 2013). In arid areas, minerals including sodium chloride are accumulated on sand-ground surfaces, causing saline conditions in desert area (Dianwu et al. 1988). The sampling site in Tsogt-Ovoo is located in a shallow valley, where some rainwater is completely desiccated forming dry lakes with high-saline conditions (Engelstaedter et al. 2003). The phyllo-sphere of desert grasses and the dry-lake environments may contribute to the airborne bacteria from ground surfaces. After dust events, weak winds hardly transport the bacterial population from desert-grass surfaces and dry-lake environments, and Alpha-proteobacteria members could not maintain their viabilities in the atmosphere, where environmental stressors such as temperature changes, UV irradiances, and extreme desiccation damaged bacterial cells.

During some sampling periods after dust occurrences, phylotypes of the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes increased to high relative abundances (Fig. 4). The abundances of Firmicutes sequences in the non-dust samples 15To-2, 15To-4, 15To-5, and 15To-7 ranged from 15.7 to 40.5 %, and those of Bacteroidetes sequences in the non-dust samples 14To-3, 14To-4, 15To-2, 15To-4, 15To-6, 15To-7, and 15To-9 ranged from 15.6 to 48.7 %, while the abundances of the both phyla in the dust samples 14To-1, 14To-2, 15To-1, and 15To-8 were no more than 12 %. The sequences of Firmicutes mainly belong to the classes Bacilli and Clostridia, which can form resistant endospores enhancing their survival in the atmosphere (Nicholson et al. 2000). Indeed, Bacilli sequences were often highly represented in the aerosol samples collected from the Chinese desert and the downwind area during dust events (Jeon et al. 2011; Maki et al. 2015; Puspitasari et al. 2015). The class Clostridia includes rumen bacteria dominated in animal guts (Tajima et al. 1999; Lopetuso et al. 2008). Animal fecal pellets are found around the Gobi desert surfaces (Batsaikham et al. 2010), suggesting that they may be a source of airborne bacterial populations. On the other hand, the sequences of Bacteroidetes were predominantly composed of the families Cytophaga and Flavobacterium, which were known to attach onto the organic aggregates in terrestrial and aquatic environments (Turnbaugh et al. 2011). The bacteria attached with coarse particles might maintain their variability more than free bacteria due to the protection of the coarse particles to attached bacteria against atmospheric stressors. In the previous investigation in dust downwind regions such as Japan, members of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were often isolated from the air samples collected during dust events (Hua et al. 2007; Maki et al. 2010; Tanaka et al. 2011; Yamaguchi et al. 2012; Hara et al. 2015). The isolates of Bacilli members in Firmicutes have been obtained from the air samples collected at an 800-m high above the ground over Dunhuang City in the Taklamakan desert (Maki et al. 2008). Accordingly, these bacteria are thought to keep their viabilities by the resistance to the atmospheric stressors and maintain their populations for longer periods after dust events.

The members of the phyla Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, and Chloroflexi appeared in regardless of dust events and had the low relative abundances of no more than 10 %. The members of Acidobacteria were often obtained from the sequence database recovered from the terrestrial environments of desert area (Smith et al. 2004) and alpine ecosystems (Lipson and Schmidt 2004). Since almost bacterial species belonging to Acidobacteria have not been cultured, their ecology and metabolism were unclear (Barns et al. 1999). However, the phylum of Acidobacteria is thought to consist of high diversity of sequences that similar is to that of Proteobacteria, suggesting their important contribution to terrestrial ecosystems (Barns et al. 1999). Members of the phylum Gemmatimonadetes, which were known to adapt to low soil moisture, were often detected from the wide range of arid environments, such as grassland, prairie, alpine soils, and pasture soil (Will et al. 2010). The bacteria of Chloroflexi were reported to be abundance bacteria in the soil of grassland (Will et al. 2010) and alpine (Costello and Schmidt 2006). Some particulates associated with bacterial cells would be consistently transported from sand or grassland surfaces around Gobi desert.

Conclusion

In this field surveys, the dynamics of airborne bacteria and archaea at a dust source region (Gobi desert) were investigated at the sampling site, which is located on the desert dune and far from city area. During non-dust event, the proportions of potentially plant-associated Alpha-proteobacteria decreased, while the members of the classes Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes increased their relative abundances. Dust events would carry the particles attached with plant bodies and the sand particle covered with the crust layers in dry lake, and atmospheric stressors are thought to eliminate the Proteobacteria members after dust events. During non-dust events, the members of the classes Firmicutes (Bacilli) and Bacteroidetes are thought to maintain to suspend in the air due to their resistance against the atmospheric stressors. Terrestrial-originated particles may be constantly transported, maintaining the abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes members. Clarifying the sources of airborne bacteria from sources, such as terrestrial particles, plant surfaces, and animal fecal, presents an important topic for future studies. In addition, fine particles should be collected separately by distinguishing from bouncing or tumbling particles for analyzing the characterization of airborne bacteria transported for long periods. Further work comparing the microbial communities collected at dust sink regions may help identify species that are transported over long distances by dust events.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Members of Fasmac Co., Ltd. helped with the MiSeq sequencing analyses. This study was funded by the Joint Research Program of Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University (No. 28C2015). This study was supported (in part) by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) from JSPS “Integrating Dryland Disaster Science” (No. 25220201), (B) (No. 26304003), and (C) (No. 26340049). The Bilateral Joint Research Projects from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science also supported this work, as did the Strategic International Collaborative Research Program (SICORP 7201006051) and Strategic Young Researcher Overseas Visits Program for Accelerating Brain Circulation (No. G2702).

Supplementary material

11869_2016_430_MOESM1_ESM.ppt (2.3 mb)
ESM 1 (PPT 2325 kb)

References

  1. Abulaiti A, Kimura R, Shinoda M, Kurosaki Y, Mikami M, Ishizuka M, Yamada Y, Nishihara E, Gantsetseg B (2014) An observational study of saltation and dust emission in a hotspot of Mongolia. Aeolian Res 15:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An S, Couteau C, Luo F, Neveu J, DuBow MS (2013) Bacterial diversity of surface sand samples from the Gobi and Taklamakan desert. Microb Ecol 66:850–860. doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0276-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barns SM, Takala SL, Kuske CR (1999) Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1731–1737Google Scholar
  4. Batsaikham N, Samiya R, Shar S, King SRB (2010) A field guide to the mammals of Mongolia. Zoological Society of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JKM, Hovmøller MS (2002) Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science 297:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon HJI, Scott GA, Kelley T, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high–throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc National Academy Sci 108:4516–4522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung YS, Kim HS (2008) Observations of massive-air pollution transport and associated air quality in the Yellow Sea region. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:69–70. doi: 10.1007/s11869-008-0014-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costello EK, Schmidt SK (2006) Microbial diversity in alpine tundra wet meadow soil: novel Chloroflexi from a cold, water-saturated environment. Environ Microbiol 8:1471–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creamean JM, Suski KJ, Rosenfeld D, Cazorla A, DeMott PJ, Sullivan RC, White AB, Ralph FM, Minnis CP, Tomlinson JM, Prather KA (2013) Dust and biological aerosols from the Sahara and Asia influence precipitation in the western U.S. Science 339:1572–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desriac F, Jégou C, Balnois E, Brillet B, Le CP, Fleury Y (2013) Antimicrobial peptides from marine Proteobacteria. Mar Drug 11:3632–3660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dianwu Z, Jiling X, Yu X, Chan WH (1988) Acid rain in southwestern China. Atmos Environ 22:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duce RA, Unni CK, Ray BJ, Prospero JM, Merrill JT (1980) Long-range atmospheric transport of soil dust from Asia to the tropical North Pacific: temporal variability. Science 209:1522–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edgar RC (2013) UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelstaedter S, Kohfeld KE, Tegen I, Harrison SP (2003) Controls of dust emissions by vegetation and topographic depressions: an evaluation using dust storm frequency data. Geophys Res Lett 30:1294. doi: 10.1029/2002GL016471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fierer N, Lennon JT (2011) The generation and maintenance of diversity in microbial communities. Amer J Bot 98:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fürnkranz M, Wanek W, Richter A, Abell G, Rasche F, Sessitsch A (2008) Nitrogen fixation by phyllosphere bacteria associated with higher plants and their colonizing epiphytes of a tropical lowland rainforest of Costa Rica. ISME J 2 5:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hara K, Zhang D (2012) Bacterial abundance and viability in long-range transported dust. Atmos Environ 47:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hara K, Zhang D, Matsusaki H, Sadanaga Y, Ikeda K, Hanaoka S, Hatakeyama S (2015) UV-tolerant culturable bacteria in an Asian dust plume transported over the East China Sea. Aerosol and air. Qual Res 15:591–599Google Scholar
  20. Hua NP, Kobayashi F, Iwasaka Y, Shi GY, Naganuma T (2007) Detailed identification of desert-originated bacteria carried by Asian dust storms to Japan. Aerobiologia 23:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang Z, Huang J, Bi J, Wang G, Wang W, Fu Q, Li Z, Tsay SC, Shi J (2010) Dust aerosol vertical structure measurements using three MPL lidars during 2008 China-U.S. joint dust field experiment. J Geophys Res 115:D00K15. doi: 10.1029/2009JD013273 Google Scholar
  22. Ichinose T, Nishikawa M, Takano H, Sera N, Sadakane K, Mori I, Yanagisawa R, Oda T, Tamura H, Hiyoshi K, Quan H, Tomura S, Shibamoto T (2005) Pulmonary toxicity induced by intratracheal instillation of Asian yellow dust (Kosa) in mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 20:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2004.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishizuka M, Mikami M, Yamada Y, Kimura R, Kurosaki Y, Jugder D, Gantsetseg B, Cheng Y, Shinoda M (2012) Does ground surface soil aggregation affect transition of the wind speed threshold for saltation and dust emission? SOLA 8:129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iwasaka Y, Minoura H, Nagaya K (1983) The transport and special scale of Asian dust-storm clouds: a case study of the dust-storm event of April 1979. Tellus 35B:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iwasaka Y, Shi GY, Yamada M, Kobayashi F, Kakikawa M, Maki T, Chen B, Tobo Y, Hong C (2009) Mixture of Kosa (Asian dust) and bioaerosols detected in the atmosphere over the Kosa particles source regions with balloon-borne measurements: possibility of long-range transport. Air Qual Atmos Health 2:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jamsran U, Okuro T, Norov M, Yamanaka N (2015) Rangeland plants of Mongolia vol. 2 desert steppe and desert zones, extra-zone. Munkhiin Useg Co. Ltd, UlaanbaatarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeon EM, Kim HJ, Jung K, Kim JH, Kim MY, Kim YP, Ka JO (2011) Impact of Asian dust events on airborne bacterial community assessed by molecular analyses. Atmos Environ 45:4313–4321. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jugder D, YS C, Batbold A (2004) Cyclogenesis over the territory of Mongolia during 1999–2002. J Korean Meteorol Soc 40:293–303Google Scholar
  29. Kakikawa M, Kobayashi F, Maki T, Yamada M, Higashi T, Chen B, Shi GY, Hong C, Tobo Y, Iwasaka Y (2008) Dustborne microorganisms in the atmosphere over Asian dust source region, Dunhuang. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:195–202. doi: 10.1007/s11869-008-0024-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kellogg CA, Griffin DW (2006) Aerobiology and the global transport of desert dust trends. Ecol Evol 21:638–644. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim HS, Chung YS (2010) On the sandstorms and associated airborne dust fall episodes observed at Cheongwon in Korea in 2005. Air Qual Atmos Health 3:83–94. doi: 10.1007/s11869-009-0054-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kurosaki Y, Mikami M (2005) Regional difference in the characteristic of dust event in East Asia: relationship among dust outbreak, surface wind, and land surface condition. J Meteoro Soc Japan 83A:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kurosaki Y, Mikami M (2007) Threshold wind speed for dust emission in East Asia and its seasonal variations. J Geophys Res 112(D17):202. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lipson DA, Schmidt SK (2004) Seasonal changes in an alpine soil bacterial community in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2867–2879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Z, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R (2008) Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e120–e120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu B, Ichinose T, He M, Kobayashi F, Maki T, Yoshida S, Yoshida Y, Arashidani K, Takano H, Nishikawa M, Sun G, Shibamoto T (2014) Lung inflammation by fungus, Bjerkandera adusta isolated from Asian sand dust (ASD) aerosol and enhancement of ovalbumin-induced lung eosinophilia by ASD and the fungus in mice. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 10:10. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-10-10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Petito V, Gasbarrini A (2008) Commensal Clostridia: leading players in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Gut. Pathogens 5:23. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-23 Google Scholar
  38. Maki T, Hara K, Kobayashi F, Kurosaki Y, Kakikawa M, Matsuki A, Bin C, Shi G, Hasegawa H, Iwasaka Y (2015) Vertical distribution of airborne bacterial communities in an Asian-dust downwind area, Noto Peninsula. Atmos Environ 119:282–293. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.052F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maki T, Puspitasari F, Hara K, Yamada M, Kobayashi F, Hasegawa H, Iwasaka Y (2014) Variation in the structure of airborne bacteria communities in a downwind area during Asian dust (Kosa) event. Sci Total Environ 488–489:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maki T, Susuki S, Kobayashi F, Kakikawa M, Tobo Y, Yamada M, Higashi T, Matsuki A, Hong C, Hasegawa H, Iwasaka Y (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of atmospheric halotolerant bacterial communities at high altitude in an Asian dust (KOSA) arrival region, Suzu City. Sci Total Environ 408:4556–4562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maki T, Susuki S, Kobayashi F, Kakikawa M, Yamada M, Higashi T, Chen B, Shi G, Hong C, Tobo Y, Hasegawa H, Ueda K, Iwasaka Y (2008) Phylogenetic diversity and vertical distribution of a halobacterial community in the atmosphere of an Asian dust (KOSA) source region, Dunhuang City. Air Qual Atmos Health 1:81–89. doi: 10.1007/s11869-008-0016-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, Andersen GL, Knight R, Hugenholtz P (2012) An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 6:610–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mostajir B, Dolan JR, Rassoulzadegan F (1995) A simple method for the quantification of a class of labile marine pico-and nano-sized detritus: DAPI yellow particles (DYP). Aqua microbial. Ecol 9:259–266Google Scholar
  44. Nicholson WL, Munakata N, Horneck G, Melosh HJ, Setlow P (2000) Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:548–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Onishi K, Kurosaki Y, Otani S, Yoshida A, Sugimoto N, Kurozawa Y (2012) Atmospheric transport route determines components of Asian dust and health effects in Japan. Atmos Environ 49:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pointing SB, Jayne B (2014) Disturbance to desert soil ecosystems contributes to dust-mediated impacts at regional scales. Biodivers Conserv 23:1659–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic 28 microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948. doi: 10.4319/lo.1980.25.5.0943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pratt KA, DeMott PJ, French JR, Wang Z, Westphal DL, Heymsfield AJ, Twohy CH, Prenni AJ, Prather KA (2009) In situ detection of biological particles in cloud ice-crystals. Nat Geosci 2:398–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prospero JM, Blades E, Mathison G, Naidu R (2005) Interhemispheric transport of viable fungi and bacteria from Africa to the Caribbean with soil dust. Aerobiologia 21:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Puspitasari F, Maki T, Shi G, Bin C, Kobayashi F, Hasegawa H, Iwasaka Y (2015) Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial species compositions in sand dunes and dust aerosol in an Asian dust source area, the Taklimakan desert. Air Qual Atmos Health. doi: 10.1007/s11869-015-0367-y Google Scholar
  51. Rodó X, Ballester J, Cayan D, Melish ME, Nakamura Y, Uehara R (2011) Association of Kawasaki disease with tropospheric wind patterns. Sci Rep 1:152. doi: 10.1038/srep00152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Horn DJV, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shinoda M, Kimura R, Mikami M, Tsubo M, Nishihara E, Ishizuka M, Yamada Y, Munkhtsetseg E, Jugder D, Kurosaki Y (2010) Characteristics of dust emission in the Mongolian steppe during the2008 DUVEX intensive observational period. SOLA 6:9–12. doi: 10.2151/sola.2010-003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith SM, Abed RMM, Garcia-Pichel F (2004) Biological soil crusts of sand dunes in Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. USA. Microb Ecol 48:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Ogata K, Nakamura M, Matsui H, Benno Y (1999) Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 29:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tanaka D, Tokuyama Y, Terada Y, Kunimochi K, Mizumaki C, Tamura S, Wakabayashi M, Aoki K, Shimada W, Tanaka H, Nakamura S (2011) Bacterial communities in Asian dust-containing snow layers on Mt. Tateyama. Japan Bull Glaciological Res 29:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turnbaugh PJ, Biomolecules SBD, Roscoff F (2011) Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection. Front Microbiol 2:93–111. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Uematsu M, Duce RA, Prospero JM, Chen JQ, Merill JT, McDonald RL (1983) Transport of mineral aerosol from Asia over the North Pacific Ocean. J Geophys Res 88:5343–5352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang W, Y M, X M, F W, X M, L A, Feng H (2010) Seasonal variations of airborne bacteria in the Mogao grottoes, Dunhuang, China. Int Biodeter Biodegr 64:309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Will C, Thürmer A, Wollherr A, Nacke H, Herold N, Schrumpf M, Gutknecht J, Wubet T, Buscot F, Daniel R (2010) Horizon-specific bacterial community composition of German grassland soils, as revealed by pyrosequencing-based analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6751–6759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamaguchi N, Ichijo T, Sakotani A, Baba, Nasu M (2012) Global dispersion of bacterial cells on Asian dust. Scientific Reports 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teruya Maki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yasunori Kurosaki
    • 2
  • Kazunari Onishi
    • 3
  • Kevin C. Lee
    • 4
  • Stephen B. Pointing
    • 4
  • Dulam Jugder
    • 5
  • Norikazu Yamanaka
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Hasegawa
    • 1
  • Masato Shinoda
    • 6
  1. 1.College of Science and EngineeringKanazawa UniversityKanazawaJapan
  2. 2.Arid Land Research CenterTottori UniversityTottoriJapan
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of YamanashiYamanashiJapan
  4. 4.School of Applied SciencesAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.Information and Research Institute of MeteorologyHydrology and EnvironmentUlaanbaatar-46Mongolia
  6. 6.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations