Abstract
To naturalize religion, we must identify what religion is, and what aspects of it we are trying to explain. In this paper, religious social institutional behavior is the explanatory target, and an explanatory hypothesis based on shared primate social dominance psychology is given. The argument is that various religious features, including the high status afforded the religious, and the high status afforded to deities, are an expression of this social dominance psychology in a context for which it did not evolve: high-density populations made possible by agriculture.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example, in the book of Judges [2:5–7], the Gileadites slay the Ephraimites, who are ethnically otherwise indistinguishable from them, based on whether they could pronounce the word ‘shibboleth’ correctly; ever since, some tribal markers are called shibboleths. The particular term used here is arbitrary and meant the seed-bearing part of a plant. It only had to be hard to fake, and accents are among the hardest.
Attempts to give historical accounts of gods include Snorri Sturluson’s Prose Edda of the thirteenth century CE, and Robert Graves’ White Goddess (Graves 1948) and The Greek Myths (1955). They have not generally been successful, understandably, since the evidence of the transformation from real a person to a deity is rarely preserved.
References
Alcorta, C., & Sosis, R. (2005). Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols. Human Nature, 16(4), 323–359.
Andrew, R. J. (1961). The displays given by passerines in courtship and reproductive fighting: a review. Ibis, 103a(4), 549–579.
Atran, S. (2006). The cognitive and evolutionary roots of religion. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (pp. 181–207). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2005). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 713–730.
Bamshad, M., Kivisild, T., Watkins, W. S., Dixon, M. E., Ricker, C. E., Rao, B. B., Naidu, J. M., Ravi Prasad, B. V., Reddy, P. G., Rasanayagam, A., Papiha, S. S., Villems, R., Redd, A. J., Hammer, M. F., Nguyen, S. V., Carroll, M. L., Batzer, M. A., & Jorde, L. B. (2001). Genetic evidence on the origins of Indian Caste populations. Genome Research, 11, 994–1004.
Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 29–34.
Barrett, J. L. (2005). Counterfactuality in counterintuitive religious concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 731–732.
Barrett, J. L. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: what is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 1(6), 768.
Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a non-natural entity: anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247.
Bellah, R. N. (2011). Religion in human evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brigandt, I., & Griffiths, P. (2007). The importance of homology for biology and philosophy. Biology and Philosophy, 22(5), 633–641.
Brown, T. S. (1946). Euhemerus and the historians. The Harvard Theological Review, 39(4), 259–274.
Bulbulia, J. (2004). The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion. Biology and Philosophy, 19(5), 655–686.
Bulbulia, J. (2007). Evolution and religion. In R. I. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bulbulia, J., Sosis, R., Harris, E., Genet, R., Genet, C., & Wyman, K. (Eds.). (2008). The evolution of religion: studies, theories and critiques. Santa Margarita: Collins Foundation Press.
Burnham, T. C. (2007). High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1623), 2327–2330.
Creel, S. (2001). Social dominance and stress hormones. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16(9), 491–497.
Cronin, A. L., & Field, J. (2007). Social aggression in an age-dependent dominance hierarchy. Behaviour, 144(7), 753–765.
de Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. London: Cape.
de Waal, F. (1989). Peacemaking among primates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. London: Allen Lane.
Dow, J. W. (2006). The evolution of religion: three anthropological approaches. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 18(1), 67–91.
Dow, J. (2007). A scientific definition of religion. anpere, http://www.anpere.net/ccount/click.php?id=13.
Dow, J. (2008). Is religion an evolutionary adaptation? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(2), 2.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22, 469–493.
Forber, P. (2009). Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence. Biology and Philosophy, 24(2), 247–266.
Frayer, D. W., & Wolpoff, M. H. (1985). Sexual dimorphism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14(1), 429–473.
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581–598.
Graves, R. (1948). The White Goddess. A historical grammar of poetic myth (p. 430). London: Faber & Faber.
Graves, R. (1955). The Greek myths, [Penguin Books. no. 1026, 1027.]: 2 vol. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gregory, R. P. (2000). God, genes, and cognizing agents. Zygon, 35(3), 469–480.
Griffiths, P. E., & Wilkins, J. S. (In press). When do evolutionary explanations of belief debunk belief? In P. Sloan (Ed.), Darwin in the 21st century: Nature, Humanity, and God. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Hall, B. K. (2012). Homology, homoplasy, novelty, and behavior. Developmental Psychobiology.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
Heun, M., Haldorsen, S., & Vollan, K. (2008). Reassessing domestication events in the Near East: Einkorn and Triticum urartu. Genome, 51(6), 444–451.
Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72.
Hodder, I. (2006). Çatalhöyük: The Leopard’s Tale: Revealing the mysteries of Turkey’s ancient ‘town’. London: Thames & Hudson.
Hodder, I. (2007). Çatalhöyük in the context of the Middle Eastern Neolithic. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 105–120.
Huxley, T. H. (1893). Evolution and ethics, The Romanes Lecture; 1893. London: Macmillan and Co.
Jaspers, K. (1951). Way to wisdom: an introduction to philosophy. London: Gollancz.
Keller, E. B. (1974). Hebrew thoughts on immortality and resurrection. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5(1), 16–44.
Ketelaar, T. (2005). Lions, tigers, and bears, oh God!: How the ancient problem of predator detection may lie beneath the modern link between religion and horror. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 740–741.
Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford Press.
Kitcher, P. (1993). Four ways of “biologizing” ethics. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Evolution und ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Leming, M. R. (1979–80). Religion and death: a death of Homans’ Thesis. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 10(4), 347–364.
Love, A. (2007). Functional homology and homology of function: biological concepts and philosophical consequences. Biology and Philosophy, 22(5), 691–708.
Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morris, D. (1967). The naked ape: A zoologist’s study of the human animal. London: Cape.
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898), 58–62.
Pyysiäinen, I. (2005). Religion is neither costly nor beneficial. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 746.
Rendall, D., & Di Fiore, A. (2007). Homoplasy, homology, and the perceived special status of behavior in evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 52(5), 504–521.
Reynolds, V., & Tanner, R. E. S. (1995). The social ecology of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rindos, D. (1984). The origins of agriculture: an evolutionary perspective. Orlando: Academic.
Rossano, M. J. (2006). The religious mind and the evolution of religion. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 346–364.
Rue, L. (2000). Religion generalized and naturalized. Zygon, 35(3), 587–602.
Schmidt, K. (2000a). Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. A preliminary report on the 1995–1999 excavations. Palæorient, 26(1), 45–54.
Schmidt, K. (2000b). Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. A preliminary report on the 2000b. »Zuerst kam der Tempel, dann die Stadt« Vorläufiger Bericht zu den Grabungen am Göbekli Tepe und am Gürcütepe 1995–1999. Istanbuler Mitteilungen, 50, 5–41.
Sengupta, S., Zhivotovsky, L. A., King, R., Mehdi, S. Q., Edmonds, C. A., Chow, C. E., Lin, A. A., Mitra, M., Sil, S. K., Ramesh, A., Usha Rani, M. V., Thakur, C. M., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Majumder, P. P., & Underhill, P. A. (2006). Polarity and temporality of high-resolution y-chromosome distributions in India identify both indigenous and exogenous expansions and reveal minor genetic influence of Central Asian pastoralists. American Journal of Human Genetics, 78(2), 202–221.
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.
Sosis, R. (2004). The adaptive value of religious ritual. American Scientist, 92(2), 166–172.
Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2005). Is religion adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(06), 749–750.
Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: a test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(2), 211–239.
Spencer, H., & MacRae, D. G. (1969). The man versus the state: With four essays on politics and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sperber, D. (2004). Agency, religion, and magic. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 750–751.
Thanseem, I., Thangaraj, K., Chaubey, G., Singh, V., Lakkakula, B., Mohan Reddy, B., Reddy, A., & Singh, L. (2006). Genetic affinities among the lower castes and tribal groups of India: inference from Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA. BMC Genetics, 7(1), 42.
Tremlin, T. (2006). Minds and gods: The cognitive foundations of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press.
Wilkins, J. S. (Ed.). (2010). Intelligent design and religion as a natural phenomenon, the international library of essays on evolutionary thought. Burlington: Ashgate Pub. Co.
Wilkins, J. S., & Ebach, M. C. (2013). The nature of classification: Kinds and relationships in the natural sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Witmer, L. M. (1995). The extant phylogenetic bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. In J. Thomason (Ed.), Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology (pp. 19–33). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkins, J.S. Gods Above: Naturalizing Religion in Terms of our Shared Ape Social Dominance Behavior. SOPHIA 54, 77–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-015-0461-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-015-0461-5