Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of homology for biology and philosophy

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. These discussions include Amundson (2005), Amundson and Lauder (1994), Brandon (1999), Brigandt (2002, 2003), Griffiths (1994, 1996, 2006), Matthen (1998, 2000), and Sober (1988).

  2. http://www.public.asu.edu/∼jrobert6/phildevo.htm

  3. http://www.ishpssb.org/

References

  • Abouheif E (1997) Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach. Trends Ecol Evol 12:405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2005) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of evo-devo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R, Lauder G (1994) Function without purpose: the uses of causal role functions in evolutionary biology Biol Philos 9:443–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong DM (1968) A materialist theory of mind. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Averof M, Cohen SM (1997) Evolutionary origin of insect wings from ancestral gills. Nature 385:627–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R (1991) Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philos Stud 61:127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) (1999) Homology. John Wiley & Sons, Chicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolker JA, Raff RA (1996) Developmental genetics and traditional homology. BioEssays 18:489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon RN 1999 The units of selection revisited: the modules of selection. Biol Philos 14:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt I (2002) Homology and the origin of correspondence. Biol Philos 17:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt I (2003) Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: the radiation of a concept. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 299B:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt I (2006) Homology and heterochrony: the evolutionary embryologist Gavin Rylands de Beer (1899–1972). J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 306B:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt I (in press) Natural kinds in evolution and systematics: metaphysical and epistemological considerations, Acta Biotheoretica

  • Cracraft J (2005) Phylogeny and evo-devo: characters, homology, and the historical analysis of the evolution of development. Zoology 108:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of the favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beer GR (1971) Homology, an unsolved problem. Oxford University Press, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue MJ (1992) Homology. In: Keller EF, Lloyd EA (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 170–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky M (ed) (1991) The units of evolution: essays on the nature of species. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky M (2001) The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy: a philosophical study of biological taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor JA (1975) The language of thought. T.Y. Crowell Co. Inc

  • Gegenbaur C (1870) Grundzüge der vergleichenden Anatomie, 2nd edn. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Bolker JA (2001) Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 291:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Opitz JM, Raff RA (1996) Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Dev Biol 173:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (1994) Cladistic explanation and functional explanation. Philos Sci 61:206–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (1996) The historical turn in the study of adaptation. Br J Philos Sci 47:511–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (1997) What emotions really are: the problem of psychological categories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (2006) Function, homology, and character individuation. Philos Sci 73:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths PE (2007) Evo-devo meets the mind: towards a developmental evolutionary psychology. In: Sansom R, Brandon RN (eds) Integrating evolution and development: from theory to practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 195–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (1991) A tradition of natural kinds. Philos Stud 61:109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel E (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. Georg Reimer, Jena

  • Hall BK (ed) (1994) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK (1995) Homology and embryonic development. In: Hecht MK, MacIntyre RJ, Clegg MT (eds) Evolutionary biology, Vol. 28. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK (2003) Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biol Rev 78:409–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK, Olsson WM (eds) (2003) Keywords and concepts in evolutionary developmental biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis DM (1994) Homology in molecular biology. In: Hall BK (ed) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 339–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1970) Contemporary systematic philosophies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:19–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1997) The ideal species concept - and why we can’t get it. In: Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR (eds) Species: the units of biodiversity. Chapman Hall, New York, pp 358–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankester ER (1870) On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and the distinction between homogenetic and homoplastic agreements. Ann Mag Nat Hist, Zool, Bot, Geol 4th Ser 6:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler M (2000) Homology in development and the development of the homology concept. Am Zool 40:777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder GV (1990) Functional morphology: Studying functional patterns in an historical context. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:317–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder GV (1994) Homology, form, and function. In: Hall BK (ed) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 151–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guyader H (2004) Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1772–1844: a visionary naturalist. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Love AC (2001) Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolution and development. Biol Philos 18:309–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love AC, Raff RA (2003) Knowing your ancestors: themes in the history of evo-devo. Evol Dev 5:327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love AC, Raff RA (2006) Larval ectoderm, organizational homology, and the origins of evolutionary novelty. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 306B:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler MD, Maienschein J (2007) From embryology to evo-devo: a history of developmental evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthen M (1998) Biological universals and the nature of fear. J Philos 95:105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthen M (2000) What is a Hand? What is a Mind? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 214:653–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1960) The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In: Tax S (ed), Evolution after Darwin, vol 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 349–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1984) Language, thought & other biological categories. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB (2003) Homology: the evolution of morphological organization. In: Müller GB, Newman SA (eds) Origination of organismal form: beyond the gene in developmental and evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 52–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Newman SA (1999) Generation, integration, autonomy: three steps in the evolution of homology. In: Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) Homology. John Wiley & Sons, Chicester, pp 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Newman S (eds) (2003) Origination of organismal form: beyond the gene in developmental and evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Wagner GP (1991) Novelty in evolution: restructuring the concept. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Wagner GP (1996) Homology, hox genes, and developmental integration. Am Zool 36:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA, Müller GB (2000) Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 288:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhart L (1995) Biology takes form: animal morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen R (1843) Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals, delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen R (1848) On the archetype and homologies of the vertebrate skeleton. John van Voorst, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (1967) The nature of mental states. In: Lycan WG (ed) Mind and cognition: a reader. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter UG, Gehring WJ (1994) Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science 265:785–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remane A (1956) Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik, 2nd edn. Geest und Portig, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2006) Modules, kinds, and homology. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 304B:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell ES (1916) Form and function: a contribution to the history of animal morphology. J. Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S (1997) Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388:639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1985) Putting the function back into functionalism. In: Lycan WG (ed) Mind and cognition: a reader. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1988) Reconstructing the past: parsimony, evolution and inference. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RA (eds) (1999) Species: new interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (1989a) The biological homology concept. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (1989b) The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology. Evolution 43:1157–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (1994) Homology and the mechanisms of development. In: Hall BK (ed) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 273–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am Zool 36:36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (2000) What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part I: why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations? J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 288:95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (2001a) Characters, units and natural kinds: an introduction. In: Wagner GP (ed) The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (ed) (2001b) The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP (2007) The developmental genetics of homology. Nat Rev Genet 8:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP, Stadler PF (2003) Quasi-independence, homology and the unity of type: a topological theory of characters. J Theor Biol 220:505–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RA, Barker MJ, Brigandt I (in press) When traditional essentialism fails: biological natural kinds, Philosophical Topics

  • Wouters A (2003) Four notions of biological function. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 34:633–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters A (2005) The functions debate in philosophy. Acta Biotheor 53:123–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ingo Brigandt’s work on this introduction and the editing of this special issue was funded with an Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Postdoctoral Fellowship by the Killam Trusts, Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, 4-115 Humanities Centre, T6G 2E5, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Ingo Brigandt

  2. School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, University of Sydney, Quadrangle A14, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Paul E. Griffiths

  3. ERSC Centre for Genomics in Society, Byrne House, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4RJ, UK

    Paul E. Griffiths

Authors
  1. Ingo Brigandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul E. Griffiths
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Brigandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brigandt, I., Griffiths, P.E. The importance of homology for biology and philosophy. Biol Philos 22, 633–641 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9094-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9094-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation