Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative proteomic analysis of Phalaenopsis leaves in the vegetative and flowering phase

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phalaenopsis, an epiphytic crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plant, requires moderate variations of day/night temperatures for flowering. In this study, changes in chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, sugar components, titratable acidity and soluble protein content in Phalaenopsis leaves during flowering were observed. Comparative proteomic analysis of Phalaenopsis leaves in the vegetative and flowering phase was performed for the first time using iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification). A total of 126 proteins were differentially expressed in Phalaenopsis leaves. Analysis of potential functions revealed that the major categories of predicted function of the up-regulated proteins were protein destination (27 %), photosynthesis (15.9 %), primary metabolism (14.3 %) and defense (12.7 %) in the flowering phase, while the major categories of predicted function of the down-regulated proteins were protein destination (33.3 %), primary metabolism (20.6 %), transportation (14.3 %) and signal transduction (11.1 %). Proteome profile analysis indicated that the proteome changes were consistent with changes in sugar and protein metabolites. Some novel proteins were differentially expressed, most of which were identified as signaling proteins, including 14-3-3 proteins, fibrillin, rapid alkalinization factors (RALF), the Ras-related protein RABB1c, calreticulin and calmodulin. Histone, importin alpha, multidrug resistance proteins and the ABC transporters were also differentially expressed. These results provide insights into the mechanisms that regulate flowering in complex flowering plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key Technology Project of Henan Province (14B180036) and the Zhengzhou Natural Science Project (141PPTGG420). We thank Dr. Liebo Shu for assistance in proteomic analysis (Shanghai Bo Yuan Biotechnology Co., LTD, China).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Cui.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Hajduch.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11738_2016_2196_MOESM1_ESM.doc

Supplementary material 1. Five phases for sampling. A: Vegetative growth (mature, no spiking plants, VG); B: Spike emergence (spiking with four nodes and on flower bud, SE); C: Floral bud differentiation (spiking with seven nodes and 2 mm floral bud at the sixth node, FBD); D: Mature flower bud (the first flower bud with the diameter of 7 mm, MFB); E: Flowering phase (FP). The youngest fully expanded leaves were collected in the middle region of leaves excepting the midribs for metabolites analysis. The leaves from the vegetative phase (A) and the flowering phase (E) were used for differential protein analysis (DOC 12124 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 66 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 22 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, XY., Xu, SP., Liang, F. et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of Phalaenopsis leaves in the vegetative and flowering phase. Acta Physiol Plant 38, 175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2196-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2196-5

Keywords

Navigation