Evolutionary Biology

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 246–260

Becoming Different But Staying Alike: Patterns of Sexual Size and Shape Dimorphism in Bills of Hummingbirds

Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11692-012-9206-3

Cite this article as:
Berns, C.M. & Adams, D.C. Evol Biol (2013) 40: 246. doi:10.1007/s11692-012-9206-3


Hummingbirds are known for their distinctive patterns of sexual dimorphism, with many species exhibiting sex-related differences in various ecologically-relevant traits, including sex-specific differences in bill shape. It is generally assumed that such patterns are consistent across all hummingbird lineages, yet many taxa remain understudied. In this study we examined patterns of sexual size and sexual shape dimorphism in bills of 32 of 35 species in the monophyletic Mellisugini lineage. We also compared patterns of bill size dimorphism in this group to other hummingbird lineages, using data from 219 hummingbird species. Overall, the presence and degree of sexual size dimorphism was similar across all hummingbird lineages, with the majority of Mellisugini species displaying female-biased sexual size dimorphism, patterns that remain unchanged when analyzed in a phylogenetic context. Surprisingly however, we found that sexual dimorphism in bill shape was nearly absent in the Mellisugini clade, with only 3 of the 32 species examined displaying bill shape dimorphism. Based on observations in other hummingbird lineages, the lack of sexual shape dimorphism in Mellisugini is particularly unusual. We hypothesize that the patterns of sexual size dimorphism observed here may be the consequence of differential selective forces that result from competition for ecological resources. We further propose that an influential mechanism underlying shape dimorphism is competition and niche segregation. Taken together, the evolutionary changes in patterns of sexual shape dimorphism observed in Mellisugini suggest that the evolutionary trends of sexual dimorphism in the Trochilidae are far more dynamic than was previously believed.


Sexual dimorphism Geometric morphometrics Sexual size dimorphism Sexual shape dimorphism Hummingbird Mellisugini 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations