Skip to main content
Log in

Inter- and intra-sexual patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in the red-billed streamertail: should symmetry always increase with ornament size?

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Recent work on fluctuating asymmetry has suggested that ornaments should have higher levels of fluctuating asymmetry than (1) non-ornaments and (2) homologous structures in the non-ornamented sex. In addition, as both ornament size and symmetry should increase with individual quality there should be a tendency for ornament symmetry to increase with ornament size. In non-ornaments, a U-shaped relationship between symmetry and size is expected, with the individuals at the extremes being more asymmetrical than individuals around the optimum. We tested these predictions in the red-billed streamertail (Trochilus polytmus), a sexually dimorphic endemic Jamaican hummingbird. The lengths of four bilaterally symmetrical traits (first and second outermost tail feathers, tarsi and wings) in 43 adult males and 42 females were measured. The second outermost tail feathers of adult males (which are elongated into streamers) were absolutely but not relatively more asymmetrical than non-ornaments (including the homologous feathers in females). When character size was controlled for, wings were shown to be relatively more symmetrical than other traits. Symmetry did not increase with increasing trait size in any of the morphological traits measured. There was a U-shaped relationship between asymmetry and trait size for four traits (adult male streamers, adult male wings and female outer tail feathers). These results do not support any of the predictions made by fluctuating asymmetry hypotheses and suggest that stabilising selection may act on ornaments as well as non-ornaments. These predictions have been supported in swallows and peafowl but not in sunbirds; this may be due to differences in female perception of tail ornaments. Perhaps male tails do not convey information about quality in some species, or there may be inter-specific differences in the relative costs of tail ornaments and the benefit of marginal increases in tail length and symmetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken M, Anderson D, Francis B, Hinde J (1989) Statistical modelling in GLIM. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Jones IL, Thomas ALR (1993a) On avian asymmetry: evidence for natural selection for symmetrical tails and wings in birds. Proc R Soc Ser B 252:245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Read AF (1991) Testing alternative models of sexual selection through female choice. Trends Ecol Evol 6:274–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Thomas ALR, Jones IL (1993b) Aerodynamics and the evolution of long tails. Nature 361:628–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR (1991) The size of adornments in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird varies with environmental conditions. Anim Behav 42:797–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR (1993) Fluctuating asymmetry and long tails; the mechanical effects of asymmetry may act to enforce honest advertisement. Proc R Soc Ser B 253:205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR, Hatchwell BJ (1992) An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird II. The role of the elongated tail in mate choice and experimental evidence for a handicap. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR, Hatchwell BJ (1993) New slants on ornament asymmetry. Proc R Soc Ser B 251:171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR, Thomas ALR (1992) Aerodynamic and mechanical effects of elongated tails in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: measuring the cost of a handicap. Anim Behav 43:337–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MR, Martins TLF, Haley M (1994) The asymmetrical cost of tail elongation in red-billed streamertails. Proc R Soc Ser B 256:97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filliben JJ (1975) The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics 17:111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990a) Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990b) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol 144: 517–546.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan M (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 107:116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning JT, Hartley MA (1991) Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock's train. Anim Behav 42:1020–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1991) Sexual ornament size and the cost of fluctuating asymmetry. Proc R Soc Lend Ser B 243:59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1993) Female choice for apparently symmetrical sexual ornaments in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Höglund J (1991) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in avian feather ornaments: implications for models of sexual selection. Proc R Soc Ser B 245:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993a) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993b) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica 89:267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, pattern. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:391–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuchmann K-L (1978) Allopatrische artbildung bei der kolibrigattung Trochilus. Ardea 66:156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1984) Identification guide to European passerines. Swedish Natural History Museum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaddle JP, Witter MS, Cuthill IC (1994) The analysis of fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav 48:986–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrell EQ (1985) Hummingbirds: their life and behavior. Crown, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection — a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1977) The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–605.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, M.R., Martins, T.L.F. & Haley, M.P. Inter- and intra-sexual patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in the red-billed streamertail: should symmetry always increase with ornament size?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37, 15–23 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173894

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173894

Key words

Navigation