Skip to main content
Log in

Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research

Abstract

Objective

To assess the anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer by questionnaire and vectorial manometry.

Methods

Twenty five patients underwent intersphincteric resection, the controls contained 25 patients of rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection and 25 healthy people. The therapeutic responses were evaluated using the Vaizey and Wexner scoring systems and vectorial manometry.

Results

The Vaizey and Wexner scores after intersphincteric resection were significantly higher than those of low anterior resection controls at one month, but had no significant difference one year after. On the other hand, the indexes of vectorial manometry still had significant difference one year later. The indexes after intersphincteric resection could not reach the normal level.

Conclusion

The anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection is lower than that after low anterior resection in short term, although the long-term results can be accepted, it still can not reach the normal level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau G, et al. Results of interspnincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma[J]. Am J Surg 1992; 163: 407–412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, et al. early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an acdtive approach to avoid a permanent colostomy[J]. Dis colon Rectum 2004; 47: 459–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1168–1175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Gohl J, et al. Functional outcome after intersphincteric resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis in low rectal cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30: 260–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chin CC, Yeh CY, Huang WS, et al. Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 640–643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gamagami R, Istvan G, Cabarrot P, et al. Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancedr: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses[J]. Surgery 2000; 127: 291–295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, et al. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems[J]. Gut 1999; 44: 77–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fucini C, Elbetti C, Petrolo A, et al. Excision of the levator muscles with external sphincter preservation in the treatment of selected low T4 rectal cancers[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1697–1705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frigell A, Ottander M, Stenbeck H, et al. Quality of life of patients treated with abdominoperineal resecdtion or anterior resedtion for rectal carcinoma [J]. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1990; 79: 26–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1036–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shibata D, Guillem JG, Lanouette N, et al. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rectal cancer after combined modality therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and sphincter preservation[J]. Dis Colon Rectumf 2000; 43: 752–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, et al. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 843–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schiessel R, Novi g, Holzer b, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1858–1867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hallbook O, Nystrom PO, Sjodahl R. Physiologic characteristics of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 332–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sangwan YP, Solla JA. Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1297–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, et al. Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma[J]. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 341–345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Jin-chun  (丛进春).

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the Education Department of Liaoning Province (No. 05L484).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cong, Jc., Dai, Xw., Chen, Cs. et al. Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 19, 295–298 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-007-0295-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11670-007-0295-y

CLC number

Key words

Navigation