Skip to main content
Log in

Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standard surgical treatment for low rectal cancer situated below 5 cm from the anal verge or at less than 1 cm from the anal ring is abdominoperineal resection. This is because of the necessity both to achieve a sufficient distal margin and to preserve the whole of the anal sphincter. The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity, oncologic, and functional results of intersphincteric resection with excision of the internal anal sphincter and low coloanal anastomosis for carcinomas of the anorectal junction. METHODS: From January 1990 to December 1996, 16 patients were studied prospectively. All patients had an infiltrating adenocarcinoma (5 T2 and 11 T3), located between 2.5 and 4.5 (mean, 3.6) cm from the anal verge. Rectal resection with a minimum distal margin of 2 (mean, 2.4) cm was performed in all cases; six patients underwent partial resection of the internal sphincter, and ten patients had a subtotal resection. A colonic J-pouch was associated with coloanal anastomoses in eight cases. Twelve patients had preoperative radiotherapy, 3 with concomitant chemotherapy; 5 patients had postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was no post-operative mortality. Morbidity occurred in four patients, of whom two underwent permanent colostomy after pelvic hemorrhage or anovaginal fistula. After a median follow-up of 44 (range, 11–92) months, no local recurrence was observed, and two patients died of distal metastases. The five-year actuarial survival rate was 75 percent. Continence was normal in one-half of patients and was altered in the other patients who suffered from occasional minor leaks. The median resting pressure was lower after subtotal than after partial resection of the internal sphincter (40vs. 70 cm H2O;P=0.02), but functional results were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that intersphincteric resection can be an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for selected rectal tumors situated at the anorectal junction, without compromising chance of cure. Functional results and continence were not altered by subtotal resection of the internal anal sphincter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;2:1479–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Improve survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1997;336:980–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Lancet 1986;1:38:996–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams NS, Johnston D. Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg 1984;71:278–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rullier E, Laurent C, Carles J, Saric J, Michel P, Parneix M. Local recurrence of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal and anterior resection. Br J Surg 1997;84:525–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abel ME, Rosen L, Kodner IJ,et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:989–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Calan L, Mosnier H, Gouillat C. Cancer du rectum: bilan d'extension et traitement chirurgical à visée curative. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1996;20:645–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freedman LS, Macaskill P, Smith AN. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for operable rectal cancer. Lancet 1984;29:733–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pilipshen SJ, Heilweil M, Quan SH, Sternberg SS, Enker WE. Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer. Cancer 1984;53:1354–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parks AG, Percy JP. Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:301–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rullier E, Carles J, Laurent C, Saric J, Parneix M. What is the main predictive factor of sphincter-saving resection for low rectal cancer, the patient or the tumour [abstract]? Br J Surg 1996; 83(Suppl 2):34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (International Union Against Cancer), eds. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987:47–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Astler VB, Coller FA. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1954;139:846–52.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rich TA, Skibber JM, Ajani JA,et al. Preoperative infusional chemoradiation therapy for stage T3 rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;32:1025–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation for incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kirwan WO, Turnbull RB, Fazio VW, Weakley FL. Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1978;65:695–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lazorthes F, Fages P, Chiotasso P, Bugat R. Synchronous abdominotrans-sphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: new technique for direct colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:573–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McAnema OJ, Heald R, Lockhart-Mummery HE. Operative and functional results of total mesorectal excision with ultra-low anterior resection in the management of carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:517–21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Masoni L, Montori A. High-dose preoperative radiation therapy as the key to extending sphincter-preservation surgery for cancer of the distal rectum. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1992;1:71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Léo E, Belli F, Baldini MT,et al. New perspective in the treatment of low rectal cancer: total rectal resection and coloendoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37(Suppl):S62–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rouanet P, Fabre JM, Dubois JB,et al. Conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation. Functional and oncologic results. Ann Surg 1995;221:67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cavalière F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr. Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer: long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:807–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M.Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40(Suppl):S43–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Enker WE, Paty PB, Minsky BD, Cohen AM. Restorative or preservative operations in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1992;1:57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lewis WG, Martin IG, Williamson ME,et al. Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:259–63.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for cancer. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ikeuchi H, Kusunoki M, Shoji Y,et al. Clinicophysiological results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal carcinoma. Int J Colorect Dis 1996;11:172–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM,et al. Long-term functional results of coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1994;167:90–5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Graf W, Ekström K, Glimelius B, Påhlman L. A pilot study of factors influencing bowel function after colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:744–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Milsom JW, Ludwig KA. Surgical management of rectal cancer. In: Wanebo HJ, ed. Surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:639–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rullier, E., Zerbib, F., Laurent, C. et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 1168–1175 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238569

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238569

Key words

Navigation