Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. METHODS: This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3±0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. RESULTS: Complications: Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). Follow-up: During the follow-up period of 6.8±3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n=18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n=4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n=9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105±37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75±19 cm H2O;P<0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailemtn of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heald RJ, Karanjia ND. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg 1992;16:848–57.
Paty PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Lauwers GY. Treatment of rectal cancer by low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1994;219:365–73.
Williams NS, Durdey P, Johnston D. The outcome following sphincter-saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:595–8.
Bruch HP, Kolbert G. Results of deep rectum resection and intersphincteric rectum excision [in German]. Chirurg 1997;68:689–92.
Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. J R Soc Med 1972;65:975–6.
Parks AG, Percy JP. Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:301–4.
Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8.
Schumpelick V, Braun J. Intersphincteric rectum resection with radical mesorectum excision and colo-anal anastomosis [in German]. Chirurg 1996;67:110–20.
Hildebrandt U, Lindemann W, Kreissler Haag D, Feifel G. Intersphincteric rectum resection with colosphincter pouch [in German]. Chirurg 1995;66:377–84.
Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG. Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 1987;206:600–5.
Miller AS, Lewis WG, Williamson ME, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Finan PJ. Factors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1995;82:1327–30.
Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ. Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 1992;79:114–6.
Athanasiadis S, Girona J, Gandji D, Gerlach F. Long-term follow-up of mechanical anastomoses in surgery of the large intestine. Prospective study of 683 patients [in German]. Zentralbl Chir 1983;108:1502–14.
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–60.
Benchimol D, Chazal M, Mouroux J, Bernard JL, Maalouf J. Oncological and functional results of direct coloanal anastomosis after total resection of the rectum for cancer. Ann Chir 1994;48:596–603.
Cavaliere F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr. Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer: long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:807–12.
Cohen Z, Myers E, Langer B, Taylor B, Railton RH, Jamieson C. Double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:231–5.
Sweeney JL, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. Resection and sutured peranal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:103–6.
Surtees P, Ritchie JK, Phillips RK. High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1990;77:618–21.
Parkkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 1994;160:293–7.
Heald RJ, Ryall RD, Husband E. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 1982;69:613–6.
Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H, Riedl S, Staimmer D, Hermanek P. Long-term results of surgical therapy of colon cancer. Results of the Colorectal Cancer Study Group [in German]. Chirurg 1994;65:287–97.
Hallböök O, Påhlmann L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of strait and colonic j-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224:58–65
Ho Y-H, Tan M, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis. Br J Surg 1996;83:978–80.
Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P. Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1997;84:1449–51.
Dehni N, Tiret E, Singland JD,et al. Long-term functional outcome after low anterior resection: comparison of low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:817–23.
Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:740–6.
van Tets WF, Kuijpers JH, Tran K, Mollen R, van Goor H. Influence of Parks' anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1042–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Köhler, A., Athanasiadis, S., Ommer, A. et al. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 843–850 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238025
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238025