Abstract
With the growing nature of the ecological footprint, research studies focus on exploring new determinants of environmental degradation. Moreover, the role of natural resources and energy consumption in environmental quality has gained much attention in the literature. However, tourism raises the demand for energy consumption and extraction of natural resources. This research study investigates the influence of natural resources, tourism, and renewable energy in MINT countries, using novel Cross-Sectional Auto Regressive Distributive Lag (CS-ARDL) methodological techniques and employing yearly data from 1995 to 2018. The study also applied recently developed Kónya (Econ Model 23:978–992, 2006) causality to identify the causal relationship between the variables of the heterogenous panel. The result shows that tourism, natural resources, and economic growth are positively associated with the ecological footprint in the long-run. However, renewable energy consumption negatively impacts ecological footprint in both in short-run and the long-run. Further, the study explored a bidirectional causality between economic growth and ecological footprint in MINT countries. Finally, based on the empirical results, the study recommends that the authorities in MINT countries revisit their tourism, natural resources, and economic activities policies to enhance the environmental quality and reduce the ecological footprint.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data is available from the world bank data bank (https://data.worldbank.org/country).
Change history
15 September 2023
Present address text removed in affiliation 5
Notes
Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey.
References
Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Umar M, Khan Z, Muhammad S (2020) The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation. Resour Policy 69(September):101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
Ahmed Z, Asghar MM, Malik MN, Nawaz K (2020a) Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resour Policy 67(Novemeber 2019):101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S, Danish (2020b) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: An empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Ajani F, Kalu KE (2017) Economy diversification: a potent tool for tourism development in Nigeria. AFRREV STECH: an Int J Sci Technol 6(2):94–114. https://doi.org/10.4314/stech.v6i2.7
Ali A, Ramakrishnan S, Faisal (2022a) Financial development and natural resources. Is there a stock market resource curse? Resour Policy 75(July 2021):102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102457
Ali A, Ramakrishnan S, Faisal F, Ghazi H, Sulimany H, Bazhair AH (2022b) Stock market resource curse: The moderating role of institutional quality. Resour Policy 78(March):102929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102929
Alvarez-Herranz A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Cantos JM (2017) Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105:386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.009
Awosusi AA, Adebayo TS, Altuntaş M, Agyekum EB, Zawbaa HM, Kamel S (2022) The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence. Energy Rep 8:1979–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.022
Aziz N, Sharif A, Raza A, Jermsittiparsert K (2021) The role of natural resources, globalization, and renewable energy in testing the EKC hypothesis in MINT countries: new evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):13454–13468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11540-2
Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Abbas J, He C, Pilař L, Shah SAR (2023) Tourism, urbanization and natural resources rents matter for environmental sustainability: The leading role of AI and ICT on sustainable development goals in the digital era. Resour Policy 82(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103445
Baltagi BH, Feng Q, Kao C (2012) A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model. J Econom 170(1):164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.04.004
Baz K, Xu D, Ali H, Ali I, Khan I, Khan MM, Cheng J (2020) Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: Using asymmetric and nonlinear approach. Sci Total Environ 718:137364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137364
Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2001) Law, politics, and finance. Available at SSRN 269118
Bekhet HA, Matar A, Yasmin T (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: Dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089
Bekun FV (2022) Mitigating Emissions in India: Accounting for the Role of Real Income, Renewable Energy Consumption and Investment in Energy. Int J Energy Econ Policy 12(1):188–192. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12652
Bi C, Zeng J (2019) Nonlinear and spatial effects of tourism on carbon emissions in China: a spatial econometric approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(18):3353
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Caglar AE, Guloglu B, Gedikli A (2022) Moving towards sustainable environmental development for BRICS: Investigating the asymmetric effect of natural resources on CO2. Sustain Dev 30(5):1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2318
Chaabouni S, Saidi K (2017) The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: A case study for 51 countries. Environ Res 158:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.041
Chudik A, Mohaddes K, Pesaran MH, Raissi M (2016) Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Adv Econ 36:85–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-905320160000036013
Dada JT, Adeiza A, Ismail NA, Arnaut M (2022) Financial development–ecological footprint nexus in Malaysia: the role of institutions. Manag Environ Qual: An Int J 33(4):913–937. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-10-2021-0251
Danish, Wang B, Wang Z (2018) Imported technology and CO2 emission in China: Collecting evidence through bound testing and VECM approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82(September):4204–4214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.002
Danish, Hassan ST, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustain Cities Soc 47(January):101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516
Danish, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO 2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
Dogan E, Aslan A (2017) Exploring the relationship among CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption and tourism in the EU and candidate countries: Evidence from panel models robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.111
Faisal F, Rahman SU, Khan A, Ali A, Irshaid MA, Amin MY (2023) Exploring the N-shaped EKC in the top tourist destinations. Empirical evidence from cross-country analysis. Int Soc Sci J 73(248):479–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12397
Field CB, Barros, VR (eds) (2014) Climate change 2014–Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Regional aspects. Cambridge University Press
Godil DI, Sharif A, Rafique S, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(32):40109–40120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09937-0
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) 2 Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. The Mexico-US Free Trade Agreement 11(2):13
Gujarati DN, Porter D (2009) Basic Econometrics Mc Graw-Hill International Edition
Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3
Ibrahim RL, Ajide KB, Usman M, Kousar R (2022) Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? Renew Energy 200:244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.134
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Contribution ofWorking Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Inter- governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
Islam MM, Sohag K, Shahbaz M (2022) Assessment of Nexus between energy consumption and sustainable development in Russian Federation: A disaggregate analysis. World Dev Sustain 1:100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100027
Jaforullah M, King A (2017) The econometric consequences of an energy consumption variable in a model of CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 63:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2017.01.025
Jahanger A, Hossain MR, Usman M, Chukwuma Onwe J (2023) Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist? Resour Policy 81:103382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103382
Jiang C, Ma X (2019) The Impact of Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: A Global Perspective. Sustainability 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195241
Katircioglu ST (2009) Testing the tourism-led growth hypothesis: The case of malta. Acta Oeconomica 59(3):331–343. https://doi.org/10.1556/AOecon.59.2009.3.4
Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S, Altun O (2018) The moderating role of oil price changes in the effects of service trade and tourism on growth: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(35):35266–35275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3448-2
Katircioglu S, Cizreliogullari MN, Katircioglu S (2019) Estimating the role of climate changes on international tourist flows: evidence from Mediterranean Island States. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(14):14393–14399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04750-w
Katircioğlu ST, Taşpinar N (2017) Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:572–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.127
Kihombo S, Ahmed Z, Chen S, Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(43):61235–61245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1
Kokotović F, Kurečić P (2014) The MINT Countries: A Regression Analysis of the Selected Economic Features. Int J Manag Sci Bus Adm 2(5):21–31. https://doi.org/10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.25.1003
Kongbuamai N, Bui Q, Yousaf HMAU, Liu Y (2020a) The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(16):19251–19264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x
Kongbuamai N, Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Liu Y (2020b) Determinants of the ecological footprint in Thailand: the influences of tourism, trade openness, and population density. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(32):40171–40186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09977-6
Kónya L (2006) Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Econ Model 23(6):978–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008
Levine R (1997) Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda. J Econ Lit 35(2):688–726. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1678
Liddle B (2018) Consumption-Based Accounting and the Trade-Carbon Emissions Nexus in Asia: A Heterogeneous, Common Factor Panel Analysis. Sustainability 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103627
Magnani E (2001) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: development path or policy result? Environ Model Softw 16(2):157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00079-7
Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(2):487–514
Manning WG (1998) The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J Health Econ 17(3):283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00025-3
Munasinghe M (1999) Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 29(1):89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00062-7
Nasreen S, Anwar S, Ozturk I (2017) Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.021
Nathaniel SP, Adedoyin FF (2022) Tourism development, natural resource abundance, and environmental sustainability: Another look at the ten most visited destinations. J Public Aff 22(3):e2553. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2553
Nathaniel SP, Barua S, Ahmed Z (2021) What drives ecological footprint in top ten tourist destinations? Evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(28):38322–38331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13389-5
Nazlioglu S, Lebe F, Kayhan S (2011) Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: Cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel causality analysis. Energy Policy 39(10):6615–6621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.007
O’Neill J (2013) Who you calling a BRIC. Bloomberg View 12:63–79
Osinubi TT, Olomola PA (2020) Globalization and Income Inequality in Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey: A Dynamic GMM Approach. Asian J Econ Emp Res 7(1):91–104. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.501.2020.71.91.104
Osinubi TT, Ajayi AO, Osinubi OB, Olaniyi CO (2021) A New Intuition into Tourism-Inclusive Growth Nexus in Turkey and Nigeria (1995–2018). Economics 9(1):221–241. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2021-0006
Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U, Saboori B (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1916–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 61(S1):653–670
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Quito B, del Río-Rama MC de la, Álvarez- García J, Bekun FV (2023) Spatiotemporal influencing factors of energy efficiency in 43 european countries: A spatial econometric analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 182(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113340
Rahman SU, Faisal F, Sami F, Ali A, Chander R, Amin MY (2022) Investigating the Nexus Between Inflation, Financial Development, and Carbon Emission: Empirical Evidence from FARDL and Frequency Domain Approach. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01076-w
Rahman SU, Faisal F, Ali A, Sulimany HGH, Bazhair AH (2023) Do Financial Technology and Financial Development Lessen Shadow Economy? Q Rev Econ Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.06.005
Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38(5):2528–2535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.048
Sahoo M, Sethi N (2021) The intermittent effects of renewable energy on ecological footprint: evidence from developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(40):56401–56417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14600-3
Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Rep 1:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.01.003
Salahuddin M, Habib MA, Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Marshall M, Ali MI (2020) Renewable energy and environmental quality: A second-generation panel evidence from the Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Res 191(May):110094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110094
Saqib N, Ozturk I, Usman M, Sharif A, Razzaq A (2023) Pollution Haven or Halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint. Gondwana Res 116:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.12.018
Sarkodie SA, Adams S (2018) Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 643:1590–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A, Sumayya (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Shahbaz M, Shahzad SJH, Ahmad N, Alam S (2016) Financial development and environmental quality: The way forward. Energy Policy 98:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.002
Shahbaz M, Song M, Ahmad S, Vo XV (2022) Does economic growth stimulate energy consumption? The role of human capital and R&D expenditures in China. Energy Econ 105:105662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105662
Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G, Ozturk I, Sinha A (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
Shen C, Li S, Wang X, Liao Z (2020) The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 254:120122
Sinha A, Sengupta T, Alvarado R (2020) Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. J Clean Prod 242:118549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549
UNWTO (2011) Tourism towards 2030 global overview. UNWTO, Madrid
Usman M, Hammar N (2021) Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(12):15519–15536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z
Usman M, Radulescu M (2022) Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: Does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Sci Total Environ 841:156662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156662
Usman M, Kousar R, Makhdum MSA (2020) The role of financial development, tourism, and energy utilization in environmental deficit: evidence from 20 highest emitting economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(34):42980–42995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10197-1
Usman M, Jahanger A, Makhdum MSA, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Bashir A (2022) How do financial development, energy consumption, natural resources, and globalization affect Arctic countries’ economic growth and environmental quality? An advanced panel data simulation. Energy 241:122515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122515
Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Jahanger A, Ahmad P (2023) Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions. Gondwana Res 113:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.10.018
Wang J, Dong K (2019) What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Sci Total Environ 656:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354
Wang R, Usman M, Radulescu M, Cifuentes-Faura J, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2023) Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in developing European countries. Gondwana Res 119:138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.023
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data*. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Zafar MW, Saud S, Hou F (2019) The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: Evidence from selected countries in the organization for economic co-operation and development (OECD). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(13):13246–13262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7
Zellner A (1962) An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. J Am Stat Assoc 57(298):348–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Editor and reviewers for their valuable comments that greatly improved the quality of the paper. The authors would like to thank the Scientific Research Deanship Taif University (TU).
Funding
The study received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr Faisal has focused on the Conceptualization, Investigation, Data Collection, & Project administration. Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—Original Draft, incoproated the revisions.
Mr. Sami Ur Rahman has focused on Supervision, Investigation, Data Collection, & Project administration. Writing—Review & Editing, & Validation, incoproated the revisions.
Dr Adnan Ali has focused on Conceptualization, Investigation, Data Collection, & Project administration.
Dr. Hamid Ghazi H Sulimani & Ayman Hassan Bazhair have focussed on supervision, Investigation and identified the review, editing and Project administration.
Dr Ruqiya Pervaiz reviewed the manuscript and facilitated the team in review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix I
Appendix I
This equation represents the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL), while adding cross-sections, the above equation can be change to the Eq. 10 to incorporate CSD issue.
All variables’ averages can be stated as;
\({H}_{i,t}\) represents the dependent variables (EFP), \({a}_{w}\), \({a}_{z}\) and \({a}_{x}\) shows the lags of predictors, and \({Z}_{i,t}\) indicates the independent variable. Additionally, X displays CSD average to take control of the occupied possessions (Liddle 2018). Further, the following are the equations for the mean group (MG) and long-run values.
Similarly, equations for CS-ARDL short-run can be states as follows;
whereas, \({\Delta }_{I}=t-(t-1)\)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
FAISAL, F., Rahman, S.U., Ali, A. et al. Do natural resources affect environmental quality in MINT Economies? The role of tourism and financial development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 103958–103971 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29520-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29520-7