Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying the impacts of industrial convergence on air pollution: a quasi-experimental analysis of evidence from China’s “Triple Play” reform

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial structure change is an important cause of air pollution in China. Regarding the “Triple Play” reform (TPR) led by the Chinese government as a quasi-natural experiment of industrial convergence, this study constructs an analysis framework for the impact of industrial convergence on air pollution. Based on panel data at the Chinese city level from 2004 to 2016, this paper empirically examines the impact of industrial convergence on air pollution by using a difference-in-difference model, the propensity score matching method, and a mediation model. The results show that (1) the TPR significantly alleviates air pollution of cities; (2) the TPR reduces air pollution by improving green technological innovation and industrial structural upgrading; (3) the TPR significantly reduces air pollutants in the southern, coastal, non-resource-based cities and cities with higher technological absorption capacity, but its impact in the northern, inland, resource-based cities and cities with lower technological absorption capacity is not remarkable. This research provides feasible suggestions for the government to promote industrial convergence through deregulation policies and then reduce air pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. See https://www.cnopendata.com/.

  2. We show the difference of covariates between pilot cities and non-pilot cities before and after the PSM phase with Kernel matching and nearest-neighbor matching. The result shows that before Kernel or nearest-neighbor matching, there are significant differences between pilot cities and non-pilot cities, while after Kernel or near-neighbor matching, the differences among the two groups are insignificant.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yang Zhihao (YZ): methodology, software, conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation; Wang Jianda (WJ): data curation, visualization, investigation, writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianda Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 7, 8 and 9

Table 7 Comparison between samples before and after applying the Kernel matching algorithm
Table 8 Comparison between samples before and after applying the 1:2 nearest-neighbor matching algorithm
Table 9 Comparison between samples before and after applying the 1:3 nearest-neighbor matching algorithm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Wang, J. Quantifying the impacts of industrial convergence on air pollution: a quasi-experimental analysis of evidence from China’s “Triple Play” reform. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 40964–40983 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18330-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18330-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation