Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Air pollution and technological innovation in China: a two-way dynamic perspective

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study establishes a simultaneous equations model to identify the bi-directional causal relationship between technological innovation and air pollution from a two-way dynamic endogenous perspective, and empirically through a three-stage least squares estimator using panel data from China’s 175 cities over 2008–2019. We find a significantly negative bi-directional relationship between technological innovation and air pollution, with the regression coefficients of −0.378 and −0.440. Economic development level, foreign direct investment, innovation fund and personnel inputs, and government financial support all positively, significantly affect innovation. Air pollution level produces significantly negative effects on invention, utility model, and design patents’ output with regression coefficients of −0.128, −0.070, and −0.117. It indicates that air pollution produces more obvious negative influences on invention patent output than non-invention patent output. An inverted-U-shaped relationship exists between emissions and economic development level. Foreign trade and secondary industry development (infrastructure level) increase (decrease) emissions. Decision-makers should consider the joint influences of all factors; invest to help firms reduce air pollution control and innovation costs; improve the environment, infrastructure, and policies to attract talents; enhance trade and investment liberalisation and facilitation; attract more foreign direct investment inflows; and improve secondary industry development’s quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Full Text of Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan on 12 September 2013. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm

  2. Full Text of the 13th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-03/17/content_5054992.htm

  3. Full Text of Report on the Work of the Government on 5 March 2017. Available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2017-03/16/c_136134017.htm

  4. Full Text of Three-Year Action Plan on Defending the Blue Sky. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/03/content_5303158.htm

  5. Full text of the outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan and Vision 2035 for the National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/13/content_5592681.htm

  6. Communique of the Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. Available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-10/29/c_1116983078.htm

  7. Full text of Xi Jinping's report at 19th CPC National Congress on 18 October 2017. Available at: http://www.china.org.cn/20171105-002.pdf

  8. In 2020, China's total investment in environmental pollution control is 1,063.89 billion yuan. Available at: https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2022-02/23/1302817378.html

  9. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. 2020 Report on the State of Ecological Environment in China. May 2021. Available at: http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/

Abbreviations

TIL:

Technological innovation level

APL:

Air pollution level

EDL:

Economic development level

FDI:

Foreign direct investment

IFI:

Innovation fund input

IPI:

Innovation personnel input

GFS:

Government financial support

FTL:

Foreign trade level

INL:

Infrastructure level

ISL:

Industrial structure level

IPG:

Invention patent granted

UPG:

Utility model patent granted

DPG:

Design patent granted

SDP:

Smoke and dust emissions per capita

NPA:

The number of patent applications per 10,000 people

References

  • Ai, H. S., Wang, M. Y., Zhang, Y. J., & Zhu, T. T. (2022). How does air pollution affect urban innovation capability? Evidence from 281 cities in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 61(6), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Herranza, A., Balsalobre-Lorenteb, D., Shahbazc, M., & María Cantos, J. (2017). Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy, 105(6), 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beevers, S. D., & Carslaw, D. C. (2005). The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London. Atmospheric Environment, 39(1), 1–5.

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Belsley, D. A. (1988). Two- or three-stage least squares? Computer Science in Economics and Management, 1(1), 21–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, M., Casadei, B., Harrington, R. A., Kovacs, R., & Sliwa, K. (2021). Taking a stand against air pollution -the impact on cardiovascular disease. European Heart Journal, 42(15), 1460–1463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 2, 442–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278–293.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buera, F. J., & Kaboski, J. P. (2012). Scale and the origins of structural change. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(2), 684–712.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carrión-Flores, C. E., & Innes, R. (2010). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 27–42.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Chen, T. (2014). Air pollution and public health: evidence from sulfur dioxide emissions of coal-fired power stations in China. Economic Research Journal, 49(8), 158–169.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. Y., & Hsu, P. H. (2016). In the mood for creativity: Weather-induced mood, inventor productivity, and firm value. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2782918

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. D., Wang, M. C., & Pu, Z. M. (2022). The impact of technological innovation on air pollution: Firm-level evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177(4), 121521.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. Y., & Chen, D. K. (2018). Smog pollution, government regulation and high-quality economic development. Economic Research Journal, 53(2), 20–34.

    CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chintrakarn, P. (2008). Environmental regulation and U.S. states’ technical inefficiency. Economics Letters, 100(3), 363–365.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., et al. (2017). Estimates and 25 year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the global burden of diseases study 2015. The Lancet, 389(10082), 1907–1918.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki, D., & Almus, M. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., Colome, S. D., & Shearer, D. F. (1988). Psychological reactions to air pollution. Environmental Research, 45(1), 1–15.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, D., Wang, Q., Li, H., Yu, Y., Lu, Y., & Qian, X. (2016). Mortality effects assessment of ambient PM2.5 pollution in the 74 leading cities of China. Science of The Total Environment, 569–570(1), 1545–1552.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-Vanden, K., & Wing, I. S. (2008). Accounting for quality: Issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing economies. Energy Economics, 30(6), 2771–2784.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Yam, R. C. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China, evidences from Beijing in the 1990s’. Research Policy, 44(1), 273–282.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., & Pottelsberghe, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(3), 225–243.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, R., & Yun, S. J. (2017). South Korean green growth and the Jevons paradox: An assessment with democratic and degrowth policy recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 239–247.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M., Saini, S., & Sahoo, M. (2022). Determinants of ecological footprint and PM2.5: role of urbanization, natural resources and technological innovation. Environmental Challenges, 7(4), 100467.

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Wu, Y. R., Wu, H. T., & Ren, S. Y. (2020). How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 7835–7850.

    Article  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Feng, B., Wu, Y., & Wang, K. L. (2016). Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China’s high-tech industries? Technovation, 57–58, 4–13.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Honjo, K. (1996). R&D for technology to solve global warming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 59(3), 218–220.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. Y., & Gu, X. (2015). Research on the adjustment effect of innovation environment and economic openness on regional sci-tech innovation output. Statistics and Decision, 2, 64–67.

    CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K. N., & Park, H. (2012). Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32(1), 68–78.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R., & Lim, K. (2007). The impact of acquisitions on the productivity of inventors at semiconductor firms: A synthesis of knowledge-based and incentive-based perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1133–1155.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, A., Shirmardi, M., Hadei, M., et al. (2019). Concentrations and health effects of short- and long-term exposure to PM2.5, NO2, and O3 in ambient air of Ahvaz city, Iran (2014–2017). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 180(9), 542–548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (2009). Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing. American Economic Review, 99(5), 2177–2192.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Wang, J., Chen, R. X., Xia, Y. Q., Liu, S. Q., Wu, F. M., Masoud, M., & Wu, X. P. (2019). Innovation-driven industrial green development: The moderating role of regional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222(6), 344–354.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q. (2019). FDI, fiscal decentralization and regional technological innovation. East China Economic Management, 33(5), 43–49.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S. F., Cai, S. C., Sun, J., Wang, S. Y., & Zhao, D. T. (2019). Influencing mechanism and achievement of manufacturing transformation and upgrading: Empirical analysis based on PLS-SEM model. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 213–232.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S. F., Xiao, L., & Wang, X. J. (2021). Does air pollution hinder technological innovation in China? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278(1), 123326.

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, N. S., Xu, M. Y., & Wang, Y. Z. (2019a). Does air pollution affect business innovation? Economic Review, 215(1), 19–32.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. G., Yang, J. Y., & Chen, S. Q. (2019b). Air pollution, human capital flow and innovative vitality: Evidence from individual patent inventions. China Industrial Economy, 10, 99–117.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). National statistical database. Beijing, China. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2021/indexch.htm

  • Pu, S., Shao, Z., Fang, M., Yang, L., Liu, R., Bi, J., & Ma, Z. (2019). Spatial distribution of the public’s risk perception for air pollution: A nationwide study in China. Science of the Total Environment, 655, 454–462.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y., & Zhu, H. (2017). Run away? Air pollution and emigration interests in China. Journal of Population Economics, 31(1), 1–32.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rotton, J. (1983). Affective and cognitive consequences of malodorous pollution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4(2), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego, R. M., & Sun, J. Y. (2016). Productivity growth and structural transformation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 21, 266–285.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Y. C., & Xiao, C. R. (2019). Corporate tax policy and heterogeneous firm innovation: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2, 470–486.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Siami, N., & Winter, R. A. (2021). Jevons’ paradox revisited: implications for climate change. Economics Letters, 206(9), 109955.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V. (2002). Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research Policy, 31(6), 877–898.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Su, H. N., & Moaniba, I. M. (2017). Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 49–62.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Z. D., & Yan, L. N. (2021). Does air pollution impede corporate innovation? International Review of Economics and Finance, 76(11), 937–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, F. P., Withagen, C. A. M. (2005). Innovation and environmental stringency: The case of sulfur dioxide abatement. CentER discussion paper Series No. 2005–18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=670158

  • Wang, C., Liao, H., Pan, S.-Y., Zhao, L.-T., & Wei, Y.-M. (2014). The fluctuations of China’s energy intensity: Biased technical change. Applied Energy, 135, 407–414.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Wu, M. (2021). Does air pollution affect the accumulation of technological innovative human capital? Empirical evidence from China and India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285(2), 124818.

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K. L., Miao, Z., Zhao, M. S., Miao, C. L., & Wang, Q. W. (2019). China’s provincial total-factor air pollution emission efficiency evaluation, dynamic evolution and influencing factors. Ecological Indicators, 107(12), 105578.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. D., Li, Y. Y., Lu, N., Wang, D., Jiang, H. L., & Zhang, C. J. (2020). Does increasing carbon emissions lead to accelerated eco-innovation? Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. L., Zhang, T. Y., Nathwani, J., Yang, F. M., & Shao, Q. L. (2022). Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: Revisiting the EKC hypothesis, porter hypothesis, and Jevons’ paradox in china’s iron & steel industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176(3), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, D., & Feng, C. (2021). The impact of air pollution on regional technological innovation: Evidence based on big data of patent authorization. South China Journal of Economics, 8, 112–134.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., et al. (2020). 2020 Environmental performance index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. https://epi.yale.edu/

  • Xu, X., & Sylwester, K. (2016). Environmental quality and international migration. Kyklos, 69(1), 157–180.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. Z., Wang, M. M., & Guan, J. (2019). Influencing mechanism of carbon emissions from energy consumption and green innovation efficiency at a perspective of dynamic endogenous: Empirical analysis based on Chinese equipment manufacturing industry. Management Review, 31(9), 81–93.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, D. M., Ning, J., & Wei, S. Y. (2017). How does the population aging affect technology innovation? The Journal of World Economy, 40(4), 105–128.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, K. (2018). The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind energy consumption on environmental cost of doing business in a panel of BRICS countries: Evidence from three-stage least squares estimator. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 4479–4490.

    Article  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M., Tan, L. R., Zhang, W. G., Ji, M. H., Liu, Y. A., & Yu, L. Z. (2010). Decomposing the influencing factors of industrial carbon emissions in Shanghai using the LMDI method. Energy, 35(6), 2505–2510.

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. F., Wang, Z. L., Yang, J., & Zhu, L. L. (2020). Does renewable energy technological innovation control China’s air pollution? A spatial analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250(3), 119515.

    Article  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China under Grant [No.20BJL139] and Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [No.2021J01175]. New Author-I agree to the proposed new authorship shown in Section 4 and the addition of my name to the authorship list.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanyong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, S., Xie, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Air pollution and technological innovation in China: a two-way dynamic perspective. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04535-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04535-3

Keywords

Navigation