Abstract
Using environmental regulation to control air pollution is one of the essential means to resolve economic growth bottlenecks and ecological environment constraints. We construct a theoretical framework to analyse the impact of environmental regulation on air pollution by using balanced panel data from 2003 to 2016 of 248 Chinese cities. The results show that both formal and informal environmental regulations can significantly reduce air pollution in prefecture-level cities. Formal environmental regulation indirectly improves air pollution level by promoting technological innovation and formal environmental regulation indirectly reduces local air pollution by promoting the pollution industry transfer. In addition, informal environmental regulation indirectly reduces air pollution by improving formal environmental regulation. Moreover, formal and informal environmental regulations have inhibitory effects on air pollution in high administrative-level cities and low administrative-level cities, with both the regulations having significantly stronger inhibitory effects on air pollution in low administrative-level cities than in high administrative-level cities. Furthermore, the environmental Kuznets curve is established at the level of prefecture cities in China, and the upgrading of the industrial structure will reduce air pollution, while foreign direct investment and fiscal decentralisation will worsen air pollution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Notes
PM2.5 refers to the particles with aerodynamic equivalent diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm in ambient air.
The content in square brackets is 95% confidence interval. The brackets below are the same.
“Race to the bottom” hypothesis mainly refers to the behaviour of national or local governments to relax their own environmental regulations for their own interests.
Jevons paradox is to that technological progress improves the efficiency of resource utilisation but also increases the total consumption of resources.
References
Alcott B (2005) Jevons paradox. Ecol Econ 54(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020
Arnold C (2014) Disease burdens associated with PM2.5 exposure: how a new model provided global estimates. Environ Health Perspect 122(4):397–403. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A111
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Biswas AK, Farzanegan MR, Thum M (2012) Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: theory and evidence. Ecol Econ 75:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.007
Blohmke J, Kemp R, Türkeli S (2016) Disentangling the causal structure behind environmental regulation. Technol Forecast Soc 103:174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.013
Breitung J(2001) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/61764/1/722394276.pdf
Cao YH, You JX, Liu HC (2017) Optimal environmental regulation intensity of manufacturing technology innovation in view of pollution heterogeneity. Sustainability 9(7):1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071240
Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20(2):249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
Cole MA, Elliott RJ, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):121–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.08.001
Department of urban social and economic survey, National Bureau of Statistics (2004–2017) China city statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press. https://data.cnki.net/Trade/yearbook/single/N2020050229?z=Z007
Du WJ, Li MJ (2020) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on pollution abatement and collaborative emissions reduction: micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Environ Impact Assess Rev 82:106382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106382
Fan XM, Xu YZ (2020) Convergence on the haze pollution: city-level evidence from China. Atmos Pollut Res 11(6):141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.03.004
Feng YC, Wang XH, Du WC, Wu HG, Wang JT (2019) Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 235:210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184
Féres J, Reynaud A (2012) Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environ Resour Econ 52(1):65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9520-8
Goldar B, Banerjee N (2004) Impact of informal regulation of pollution on water quality in rivers in India. J Environ Manag 73(2):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.06.008
Guo WB, Chen Y (2018) Assessing the efficiency of China’s environmental regulation on carbon emissions based on Tapio decoupling models and GMM models. Energy Rep 4:713–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.10.007
Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econ J 3(2):148–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043
Hao Y, Deng YX, Lu ZN, Chen H (2018) Is environmental regulation effective in China? Evidence from city-level panel data. J Clean Prod 188:966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.003
Hao Y, Zheng SQ, Zhao MY, Wu HT, Guo YX, Li YW (2020) Reexamining the relationships among urbanization, industrial structure, and environmental pollution in China—New evidence using the dynamic threshold panel model. Energy Rep 6:28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.029
HEI Accountability Working Group (2003) Assessing health impact of air quality regulations: concepts and methods for accountability research, Communication 11 edn. Health Effects Institute, Boston https://www.healtheffects.org/system/files/Comm11.pdf
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115(1):53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):610–619. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557196
Jiang T, Sun KP, Nie HH (2018) Administrative rank, total factor productivity and resource misallocation in Chinese cities. Manag World 34(3):38–50 + 77 + 183. http://www.niehuihua.com/uploads/soft/191009/1-191009111216.pdf (in Chinese)
Jiang L, He S, Cui Y et al (2020) Effects of the socio-economic influencing factors on SO2 pollution in Chinese cities: a spatial econometric analysis based on satellite observed data. J Environ Manag 268:110667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110667
Kathuria V (2007) Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: evidence from India. Ecol Econ 63(2-3):403–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.013
Keller W, Levinson A (2002) Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states. Rev Econ Stat 84(4):691–703. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302760556503
Langpap C, Shimshack JP (2010) Private citizen suits and public enforcement: substitutes or complements? J Environ Econ Manag 59(3):235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.01.001
Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30(2):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Li K, Lin BQ (2016) Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China’s manufacturing sector: evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Appl Energy 168:351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.104
Li RQ, Ramanathan R (2018) Exploring the relationships between different types of environmental regulations and environmental performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 196:1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.132
Liu QQ, Wang SJ, Zhang WZ, Zhan DS, Li JM (2018) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China’s cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613-614:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.110
Liu HY, Owens KA, Yang K, Zhang CH (2020) Pollution abatement costs and technical changes under different environmental regulations. China Econ Rev 62:101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101497
Lu XC, Lin CQ, Li WK, Chen Y, Huang YQ, Fung JCH, Lau AKH (2019) Analysis of the adverse health effects of PM2.5 from 2001 to 2017 in China and the role of urbanization in aggravating the health burden. Sci Total Environ 652:683–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.140
Maji KJ, Ye WF, Arora M, Nagendrad SMS (2018) PM2.5-related health and economic loss assessment for 338 Chinese cities. Environ Int 121:392–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.024
Nagashima F (2018) Critical structural paths of residential PM2.5 emissions within the Chinese provinces. Energy Econ 70:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.033
Naghavi M, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C (2017) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390(10100):1151–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9
Ouyang X, Shao QL, Zhu X, He QY, Xiang C, Wei GE (2019) Environmental regulation, economic growth and air pollution: panel threshold analysis for OECD countries. Sci Total Environ 657:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.056
Pang R, Zheng D, Shi MJ, Zhang XL (2019) Pollute first, control later? Exploring the economic threshold of effective environmental regulation in China’s context. J Environ Manag 248:109275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109275
Pargal S, Wheeler D (1996) Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. J Polit Econ 104(6):1314–1327 Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract = 615027
Pei Y, Zhu YM, Liu SX, Wang XC, Cao JJ (2019) Environmental regulation and carbon emission: The mediation effect of technical efficiency. J Clean Prod 236:117599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.074
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138392
Qian XY, Wang D, Wang J, Chen S (2019) Resource curse, environmental regulation and transformation of coal-mining cities in China. Resour Policy 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101447
Ren SG, Li XL, Yuan BL, Li DY, Chen XH (2018) The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: a cross-region analysis in China. J Clean Prod 173:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.113
Rohde RA, Muller RA (2015) Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources. PloS one 10:e0135749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135749
Shen N, Liao HL, Deng RM, Wang QW (2019) Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: empirical analysis of China’s industry. J Clean Prod 211:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.170
Shi T, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Wang K (2020) Industrial structure, urban governance and haze pollution: spatiotemporal evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 742:139228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139228
Sinn H (2008) Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach. Int Tax Public Financ 15(4):360–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z
Song Y, Yang TT, Li ZR, Zhang X, Zhang M (2020) Research on the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on environmental pollution: empirical evidence from 253 prefecture-level cities in China. J Clean Prod 269:122425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122425
Sorrell S (2009) Jevons’ paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energ Policy 37(4):1456–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003
Tang MG, Li XZ, Zhang Y, Wu YT, Wu BJ (2020) From command-and-control to market-based environmental policies: optimal transition timing and China’s heterogeneous environmental effectiveness. Econ Model 90:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.04.021
Van der Werf EV, Maria CD (2012) Imperfect environmental policy and polluting emissions: the green paradox and beyond. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 6(2):153–194 https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/47120
Wang XL, Shao QL (2019) Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: evidence from panel threshold regression. Sci Total Environ 660:1346–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.094
Wang H, Wei W (2020) Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: the optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies. Energy Econ 87:104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104510
Wang XY, Zhang CT, Zhang ZJ (2019a) Pollution haven or porter? The impact of environmental regulation on location choices of pollution-intensive firms in China. J Environ Manag 248:109248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.019
Wang Y, Sun XH, Guo X (2019b) Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: empirical evidence on the Porter hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energ Policy 132:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.016
Xie RH, Yuan YJ, Huang JJ (2017) Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on “green” productivity: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 132:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019
Yang QY, Song DY (2019) How does environmental regulation break the resource curse: theoretical and empirical study on China. Res Policy 64:101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101480
Yang GL, Zha DL, Wang XJ, Chen Q (2020) Exploring the nonlinear association between environmental regulation and carbon intensity in China: the mediating effect of green technology. Ecol Indic 144:106309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106309
Yi M, Wang YQ, Sheng MY, Sharp B, Zhang Y (2020) Effects of heterogeneous technological progress on haze pollution: evidence from China. Ecol Econ 169:106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106533
Yu BB, Shen C (2020) Environmental regulation and industrial capacity utilization: an empirical study of China. J Clean Prod 246:118986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118986
Yuan B, Xiang Q (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 176:895–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.034
Zhang QF, Crooks R (2012) Toward an environmentally sustainable future: country environmental analysis of the Peoples Republic of China. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/asdwpaper/rpt113974.htm
Zhang K, Zhang ZY, Liang QM (2017) An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization. Energ Policy 103:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.023
Zhang M, Liu XX, Ding YT, Wang WW (2019) How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance? An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data. Sci Total Environ 695:133905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133905
Zhang M, Liu XX, Sun XR, Wang WW (2020a) The influence of multiple environmental regulations on haze pollution: evidence from China. Atmos Pollut Res 11:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.03.008
Zhang W, Li GX, Uddin KM, Guo SC (2020b) Environmental regulation, foreign investment behavior, and carbon emissions for 30 provinces in China. J Clean Prod 248:119208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119208
Zhao XM, Liu CJ, Sun CW, Yang M (2020) Does stringent environmental regulation lead to a carbon haven effect? Evidence from carbon-intensive industries in China. Energy Econ 86:104631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104631
Zhou Q, Zhang XL, Shao QL, Wang X (2019) The non-linear effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution: empirical evidence for 277 Chinese cities during 2002–2010. J Environ Manag 248:109274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109274
Funding
This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (No. 26420190071).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Teng Wang: conceptualisation, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Jiachao Peng: visualisation, writing—original draft. Lei Wu: conceptualization, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Construct the theoretical analysis framework of heterogeneous environmental regulation on air pollution.
• Analyse the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on air pollution.
• Test the impact of different prefecture-level cities’ heterogeneous.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 22 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Peng, J. & Wu, L. Heterogeneous effects of environmental regulation on air pollution: evidence from China’s prefecture-level cities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 25782–25797 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12434-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12434-7