Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

WEEE closed-loop supply chain network management considering the damage levels of returned products

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 04 December 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Due to economic, social, and environmental concerns, managing waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) has become an important research area. The WEEE directive gives responsibility to producers for developing a system for recycling and disposal activities and handle all associated costs. This study proposes a mixed integer programming model for decision-makers to manage their activities on the WEEE closed-loop supply chain network. A decision-maker may be a single producer of any size or a managing body formed by a group of producers and/or third-party companies in the network. The model contributes to the research field by integrating product returns with different quality and damage levels. A set of scenarios was designed to evaluate the effects of the directive and the network design related issues (e.g., the minimum collection rates, the number of producers and stores in the network) on the objective function. The results indicate that the capacity balance among stores, producers, and recovery centers is vital to make the network profitable and sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 04 December 2020

    A Correction to this paper has been published: <ExternalRef><RefSource>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11851-4</RefSource><RefTarget Address="10.1007/s11356-020-11851-4" TargetType="DOI"/></ExternalRef>

References

  • Akçalı E, Çetinkaya S, Üster H (2009) Network design for reverse and closed-loop supply chains: an annotated bibliography of models and solution approaches. Networks 53:231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade DF, Romanelli JP, Pereira-Filho ER (2019) Past and emerging topics related to electronic waste management: top countries, trends, and perspectives. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:17135–17151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple (2019) Apple Certified Refurbished Products. https://store.apple.com/Catalog/uk/Images/apple_certified.html. Accesed 08/01/2019

  • Balde CP, Forti V, Gray V, Kuehr R, Stegmann P (2017) The global e-waste monitor 2017: quantities, flows and resources. United Nations University, International Telecommunication Union

  • Capraz O, Polat O, Gungor A (2015) Planning of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling facilities: MILP modelling and case study investigation. Flex Serv Manuf J 27:479–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capraz O, Polat O, Gungor A (2017) Performance evaluation of waste electrical and electronic equipment disassembly layout configurations using simulation. Front Environ Sci Eng 11:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A, Abraham J (2017) Efficient management of e-wastes. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Kucukyazici B, Verter V, Sáenz MJ (2015) Supply chain design for unlocking the value of remanufacturing under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 247:804–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YT, Chan FTS, Chung SH, Park W-Y (2018) Optimization of product refurbishment in closed-loop supply chain using multi-period model integrated with fuzzy controller under uncertainties. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 50:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang C-H, Wang CX, Zhao Y (2014) Closed-loop supply chain models for a high-tech product under alternative reverse channel and collection cost structures. Int J Prod Econ 156:108–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coskun S, Ozgur L, Polat O, Gungor A (2016) A model proposal for green supply chain network design based on consumer segmentation. J Clean Prod 110:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damrongsiri S, Vassanadumrongdee S, Tanwattana P (2016) Heavy metal contamination characteristic of soil in WEEE (waste electrical and electronic equipment) dismantling community: a case study of Bangkok, Thailand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:17026–17034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das K, Chowdhury AH (2012) Designing a reverse logistics network for optimal collection, recovery and quality-based product-mix planning. Int J Prod Econ 135:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel N, Özceylan E, Paksoy T, Gökçen H (2014) A genetic algorithm approach for optimising a closed-loop supply chain network with crisp and fuzzy objectives. Int J Prod Res 52:3637–3664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diallo C, Venkatadri U, Khatab A, Bhakthavatchalam S (2017) State of the art review of quality, reliability and maintenance issues in closed-loop supply chains with remanufacturing. Int J Prod Res 55:1277–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan LTT, Amer Y, Lee S-H, Phuc PNK, Dat LQ (2019) A comprehensive reverse supply chain model using an interactive fuzzy approach—a case study on the Vietnamese electronics industry. Appl Math Model 76:87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (2003) Directive 2002/96/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)—joint declaration of the European parliament. Off J Eur Union L037:24–39

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2011) Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast). Official J Eur Union L 174:88–110

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2012) Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (recast). Official J Eur Union L 197:38–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Soleimani H (2017) A review of reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains: a Journal of Cleaner Production focus. J Clean Prod 142:371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan K, Soleimani H, Kannan D (2015) Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur J Oper Res 240:603–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant DB, Banomyong R (2010) Design of closed-loop supply chain and product recovery management for fast-moving consumer goods: the case of a single-use camera. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 22:232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond D, Beullens P (2007) Closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium under legislation. Eur J Oper Res 183:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour A, Bagherinejad J, Bashiri M (2019) A robust leader-follower approach for closed loop supply chain network design considering returns quality levels. Comput Ind Eng 136:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He K, Sun Z, Hu Y, Zeng X, Yu Z, Cheng H (2017) Comparison of soil heavy metal pollution caused by e-waste recycling activities and traditional industrial operations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:9387–9398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Stevels A, Baldé K, Magalini F, Kuehr R (2019) The e-waste development cycle, part III—policy & legislation, business & finance, and technologies & skills, waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) handbook. Elsevier, pp 93–141

  • Huscroft JR, Hazen BT, Hall D, Skipper JB, Hanna JB (2013) Reverse logistics: past research, current management issues, and future directions. Int J Logist Manag 24:304–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MT, Huda N (2018) Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)/e-waste: a comprehensive literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl 137:48–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail H, Hanafiah MM (2019) An overview of LCA application in WEEE management: current practices, progress and challenges. J Clean Prod 232:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayant A, Gupta P, Garg S (2012) Perspectives in reverse supply chain management (R-SCM): a state of the art literature review. JJMIE 6:87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi N, Modak NM, Govindan K (2018) A review of reverse logistics and closed loop supply chain management studies published in IJPR: a bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Production Research1-24

  • Khatami M, Mahootchi M, Farahani RZ (2015) Benders’ decomposition for concurrent redesign of forward and closed-loop supply chain network with demand and return uncertainties. Trans Res E 79:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiddee P, Naidu R, Wong MH (2013) Electronic waste management approaches: an overview. Waste Manag 33:1237–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Jeong B (2016) Closed-loop supply chain planning model for a photovoltaic system manufacturer with internal and external recycling. Sustainability 8:596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krikke H (2011) Impact of closed-loop network configurations on carbon footprints: a case study in copiers. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:1196–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krikke H, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Concurrent product and closed-loop supply chain design with an application to refrigerators. Int J Prod Res 41:3689–3719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Holuszko M, Espinosa DCR (2017) E-waste: an overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices. Resour Conserv Recycl 122:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li Y, Govindan K (2014) An incentive model for closed-loop supply chain under the EPR law. J Oper Res Soc 65:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Lei M, Deng H, Keong Leong G, Huang T (2016) A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy. Omega 59:290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra A, Cesaro A, Belgiorno V (2019) Recovery opportunities of valuable and critical elements from WEEE treatment residues by hydrometallurgical processes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:19897–19905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Özceylan E, Demirel N, Çetinkaya C, Demirel E (2017) A closed-loop supply chain network design for automotive industry in Turkey. Comput Ind Eng 113:727–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozgur Polat L, Gungor A (2019) Network design problems in E-waste management. In: Prasad MNV, Vithanage M (eds) Electronic waste management and treatment technology. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 77–102

  • Özkır V, Başlıgıl H (2012) Modelling product-recovery processes in closed-loop supply-chain network design. Int J Prod Res 50:2218–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Belis V, Bovea M, Ibáñez-Forés V (2015) An in-depth literature review of the waste electrical and electronic equipment context: trends and evolution. Waste Manag Res 33:3–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phuc PNK, Yu VF, Chou S-Y (2013) Optimizing the fuzzy closed-loop supply chain for electrical and electronic equipments. Int J Fuzzy Syst:15

  • Polat O, Capraz O, Gungor A (2018) Modelling of WEEE recycling operation planning under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 180:769–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quariguasi Frota Neto J, Walther G, Bloemhof J, Van Nunen J, Spengler T (2010) From closed-loop to sustainable supply chains: the WEEE case. Int J Prod Res 48:4463–4481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REC (2016) Atık Elektrikli ve Elektronik Eşyalarin Kontrolü Yönetmeliği Belediye Uygulama Rehberi, Bölgesel Çevre Merkezi (REC) Türkiye

  • Robinson BH (2009) E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Sci Total Environ 408:183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garcia G, Weil M (2016) Life cycle assessment in WEEE recycling, WEEE Recycling. Elsevier, pp. 177-207

  • Samuel CN, Venkatadri U, Diallo C, Khatab A (2020) Robust closed-loop supply chain design with presorting, return quality and carbon emission considerations. J Clean Prod 247:119086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16:1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaharudin MR, Govindan K, Zailani S, Tan KC, Iranmanesh M (2017) Product return management: linking product returns, closed-loop supply chain activities and the effectiveness of the reverse supply chains. J Clean Prod 149:1144–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani H, Kannan G (2015) A hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for closed-loop supply chain network design in large-scale networks. Appl Math Model 39:3990–4012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talaei M, Farhang Moghaddam B, Pishvaee MS, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Gholamnejad S (2016) A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry. J Clean Prod 113:662–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleizadeh AA, Moshtagh MS, Moon I (2017) Optimal decisions of price, quality, effort level and return policy in a three-level closed-loop supply chain based on different game theory approaches. Eur J Ind Eng 11:486–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansel B (2017) From electronic consumer products to e-wastes: global outlook, waste quantities, recycling challenges. Environ Int 98:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Engeland J, Beliën J, De Boeck L, De Jaeger S (2020) Literature review: strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains. Omega 91:102012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Ding J, Sun H (2018) Reward-penalty mechanism for a two-period closed-loop supply chain. J Clean Prod 203:898–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer R, Oswald-Krapf H, Sinha-Khetriwal D, Schnellmann M, Böni H (2005) Global perspectives on e-waste. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:436–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue M, Xu Z (2017) Application of life cycle assessment on electronic waste management: a review. Environ Manag 59:693–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo SH, Kim BC (2016) Joint pricing of new and refurbished items: a comparison of closed-loop supply chain models. Int J Prod Econ 182:132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng AZ, Hou J (2018) Procurement and coordination under imperfect quality and uncertain demand in reverse mobile phone supply chain. Int J Prod Econ

  • Zoeteman BC, Krikke HR, Venselaar J (2010) Handling WEEE waste flows: on the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:415–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Askiner Gungor.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Loubet

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article was revised: In the pdf version, the equations in pages 5 and 6 contain additional data.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 presents unit selling prices of refurbished and new products, unit inspection costs, weights of products, the minimum recovery rates, the minimum collection quantities, unit production costs, production capacities, the minimum production amounts, transportation costs of products according to different transporter alternatives and revenue coefficients of satisfying disassembly and refurbishment requirements for product i, respectively. The weight percentages of products are taken from Polat et al. (2018). Table 5 contains data for purchasing costs of collected products from stores and probabilities of the various types of damage conditions of the collected products and unit refurbishing costs and productivity rates for each recovery centers.

Table 4 Data related to product i
Table 5 Data related to collected products according to damage condition j

Table 6 presents the demand amounts for new and refurbished products and capacities of stores for collected products.

Table 6 Data related to stores

Table 7 shows disassembly costs, the minimum disassembly amounts and disassembly capacities of recovery center r for collected product i, and on hand amount and buying prices of product i in collection center k.

Table 7 Data related to recovery centers and collection centers

The marginal revenues, unit selling prices, demands, transportation costs, revenue coefficients, and CO2 emission penalty coefficients of transportation according to usable part/component u are presented in Table 8.

Table 8 Data related to usable parts/components

Table 9 shows transportation capacities of transporters and related CO2 emission penalty coefficients for new or refurbished product i.

Table 9 Data related to transporters

Table 10 presents unit storage costs, storage capacities and distances according to distribution center d, the distances according to recovery center r and the data for disposal costs, and transportation costs and CO2 emission penalty imposed by the transportation of harmful material h.

Table 10 Data related to distribution centers, recovery centers and harmful materials

Table 11 contains weight percentages of usable part/component f and harmful materials h for collected product i. Weight percentages of collected products for the first type of damage condition are also obtained from Polat et al. (2018).

Table 11 Data related to f and h according to product i

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozgur Polat, L., Gungor, A. WEEE closed-loop supply chain network management considering the damage levels of returned products. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 7786–7804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10249-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10249-6

Keywords

Navigation