Skip to main content
Log in

Performance evaluation of waste electrical and electronic equipment disassembly layout configurations using simulation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recycling of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) is crucially important since it handles hazardous waste according to ever tightening laws and regulations and it adds benefits to economy and sustainable environment. Disassembly is one of the most important processes performed during the recovery of WEEE. The overall goal of disassembly is to maximize the retrieval of various metals and plastics contained in WEEE in order to reduce their negative effects on human health and environmental sustainability and to increase economic gains. This study aims to evaluate alternative layout configurations for WEEE disassembly systems (WDS). In this context, various configurations were compared in terms of pre-defined performance criteria, such as the total number of disassembled WEEE and the total revenue from sales, using simulation models. The results of this study show that the performance of a WDS was significantly affected by output transfer systems along with the specialization of operators on certain types of WEEE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dinler E, Güngör Z. Planning decisions for recycling products containing hazardous and explosive substances: A fuzzy multiobjective model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 117 (Part B): 93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. EC. Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2000, L 269: 34–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. EU. Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Official Journal of the European Union, 2003, L 37: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. EU. Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast). Official Journal of the European Union 2011, L 174: 88–110

    Google Scholar 

  5. EU. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (recast). Official Journal of the European Union, 2012, L 197: 38–71

    Google Scholar 

  6. EU. Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official Journal of the European Union, 2003, L 37: 24–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang H Y, Schoenung J M. Electronic waste recycling: A review of U.S. infrastructure and technology options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2005, 45(4): 368–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams J A S. A review of electronics demanufacturing processes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2006, 47(3): 195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ilgin M A, Gupta S M. Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(3): 563–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gungor A, Gupta S M. Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: A survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1999, 36(4): 811–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gungor A, Gupta S M. An evaluation methodology for disassembly processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1997, 33(1–2): 329–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gungor A, Gupta S M. A solution approach to the disassembly line balancing problem in the presence of task failures. International Journal of Production Research, 2001, 39(7): 1427–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Altekin F T, Kandiller L, Ozdemirel N E. Profit-oriented disassembly-line balancing. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(10): 2675–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Güngör A, Gupta S M. Disassembly line in product recovery. International Journal of Production Research, 2002, 40(11): 2569–2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ilgin M A, Gupta S M, Battaïa O. Use of MCDM techniques in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: State of the art. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 37(Part 3): 746–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pérez-Belis V, Bovea M D, Ibáñez-Forés V. An in-depth literature review of the waste electrical and electronic equipment context: Trends and evolution. Waste Management & Research, 2015, 33(1): 3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. UNEP. Call for Global Action on E-waste. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  18. UNEP. E-waste 2.0: Recycling for Sustainability. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seliger G, Kernbaum S. Planning for remanufacturing and recycling. In: Seliger G, ed. Sustainability in Manufacturing: Recovery of Resources in Product and Material Cycles. Berlin: Springer, 2007, 313–341

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Opalić M, Kljajin M, Vučković K. Disassembly layout in WEEE recycling process. Strojarstvo. Journal for Theory and Application in Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 52(1): 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lim H H, Noble J S. The impact of facility layout on overall remanufacturing system performance. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2006, 1(3): 357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma H, Tang Y, Li L, Li C. An optimal solution to the remanufacturing facility layout problem. In: Proceedings of 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Shenyang, China: IEEE, 2014, 1729–1734

    Google Scholar 

  23. Noble J S, Lim H H. Evaluation of facility layout alternatives for a remanufacturing environment. In: Proceedings of Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing II, 2002. Boston, MA: SPIE, 2002, 158–166

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scharke H. Comprehensive Information Chain for Automated Disassembly of Obsolete Technical Appliances. 1st ed. Berlin: GITO Verlag, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  25. Opalić M, Vučković K, Panić N. Consumer electronics disassembly line layout. Polimeri, 2004, 25(1–2): 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  26. Limaye K, Caudill R J. System simulation and modeling of electronics demanufacturing facilities. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 1999. Danvers, MA: IEEE, 1999, 238–243

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hesselbach J, Westernhagen K V. Disassembly simulation for an effective recycling of electrical scrap. In: Proceedings of First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 1999. Tokyo: IEEE, 1999, 582–585

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ranky P G, Morales L C, Caudill R J. Lean disassembly line layout, and network simulation models. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2003. Boston, MA: IEEE, 2003, 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  29. Herrmann C, Luger T, Ohlendorf M. SiDDatAS-Analysis and economic evaluation of alternative disassembly system configurations. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2005. Tokyo: IEEE, 2005, 210–215

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Sim E, Kim H, Park C, Park J. Performance analysis of alternative designs for a vehicle disassembly system using simulation modeling. In: Baik D K, ed. Systems Modeling and Simulation: Theory and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, 59–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiendahl H P, Scholz-Reiter B, Bürkner S, Scharke H. Flexible disassembly systems-layouts and modules for processing obsolete products. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2001, 215(5): 723–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Drira A, Pierreval H, Hajri-Gabouj S. Facility layout problems: A survey. Annual Reviews in Control, 2007, 31(2): 255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Capraz O, Polat O, Gungor A. Planning of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling facilities: MILP modelling and case study investigation. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2015, 27(4): 479–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chung C A. Simulation Modeling Handbook: A Practical Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2003

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright T P. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1936, 3(4): 122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) under the grant number 111M428.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Askiner Gungor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capraz, O., Polat, O. & Gungor, A. Performance evaluation of waste electrical and electronic equipment disassembly layout configurations using simulation. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 11, 5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0992-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0992-9

Keywords

Navigation