Skip to main content
Log in

A New Apparatus for Testing Shear-Slip Properties of Rock Joint Subjected to Dynamic Disturbance

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the stability of jointed rock masses subjected to dynamic disturbance, laboratory dynamic shear test on rock joint is necessary. Developing dynamic shear test equipment for rock joint is currently a pressing issue.

Objective

To address this issue, a new apparatus is developed to reproduce the shear-slip process of rock joint subjected to dynamic disturbance under various initial stress state.

Methods

The disturbance load, which has a dominant frequency close to that of seismic waves, is generated by an electromagnetic-driven disturbance generator, and its amplitude and duration can be accurately controlled in a stable manner. The initial normal and shear stresses can be applied in the shear test under dynamic disturbance using servo-controlled loading unit, which facilitates the simulation of the real stress state of rock joint.

Results

The shear tests under dynamic disturbance show that when an initial shear stress is applied to rock joint, an additional deformation stage of stress recovering can also trigger a slip displacement, which contributes to the destabilization of jointed rock masses. With increasing initial shear stress, the dynamic slip displacement, stress drop and post-disturbing deformation increase. The feasibility of the apparatus to conduct quasi-static direct shear tests with both the constant normal loading (CNL) and constant normal stiffness (CNS) boundaries is also verified.

Conclusions

Test results demonstrate that using the new apparatus, shear-slip properties of rock joint subjected to dynamic disturbance can be tested in various initial stress states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Hopkins DL (2000) The implications of joint deformation in analyzing the properties and behavior of fractured rock masses, underground excavations, and faults. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(1):175–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00100-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. He MC, Cheng T, Qiao YF, Li HR (2022) A review of rockburst: experiments, theories, and simulations. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 15:1312–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang Y, Xiao J, Tanabashi Y, Mizokami T (2004) Development of an automated servo-controlled direct shear apparatus applying a constant normal stiffness condition. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Konietzky H, Frühwirt T, Luge H (2012) A new large dynamic rock mechanical direct shear box device. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(3):427–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0214-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Si XF, Luo Y, Luo S (2024) Influence of lithology and bedding orientation on failure behavior of D shaped tunnel. Theor Appl Fract Mech 129:104219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton N (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13:255–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(76)90003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MacDonald NR, Packulak TRM, Day JJ (2023) A critical review of current states of practice in direct shear testing of unfilled rock fractures focused on multi-stage and boundary conditions. Geosciences 13:172. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13060172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muralha J, Grasselli G, Tatone B, Blümel M, Chryssanthakis P, Yujing J (2013) ISRM suggested method for laboratory determination of the shear strength of rock joints: revised version. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0519-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao W, Wang CL, Xia KW, Zhang X (2021) An experimental system to evaluate impact shear failure of rock discontinuities. Rev Sci Instrum 92(3):034501. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0032003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawford AM, Curran JH (1981) The influence of shear velocity on the frictional resistance of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90514-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang FL, Xia KW, Yao W, Wang SH, Wang CL, Xiu ZG (2021) Slip behavior of rough rock discontinuity under high velocity impact: experiments and models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 144:104831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu YG, Wang G, Li AQ, Chen HY, Liu TF, Guan H (2023) Effects of joint roughness, shear rate, and normal stress on shear behavior and acoustic emission characteristics in two parallel coplanar intermittently jointed rock: an experimental study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56:1289–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03137-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi SW, Zheng BW, Wu FQ, Huang XL, Guo SF, Zhan ZF, Zou Y, Barla G (2020) A new dynamic direct shear testing device on rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(10):4787–4798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02175-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ricker N (1953) The form and laws of propagation of seismic wavelets. Geophysics 18:10–40. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1437843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu W (2015) Slip initiation of granular gouge friction in a rock discontinuity induced by static and dynamic loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soomro MHAA, Indraratna B, Karekal S (2022) Critical shear strain and sliding potential of rock joint under cyclic loading. Transp Geotech 32:100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui GJ, Zhang CQ, Ye JP, Zhou H, Li LY, Zhang LS (2022) Influences of dynamic normal disturbance and initial shear stress on fault activation characteristics. Geomech Geophys Geo 8:159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-022-00463-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fathi A, Moradian Z, Rivard P, Ballivy G, Boyd AJ (2015) Geometric effect of asperities on shear mechanism of rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(3):801–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0799-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao J (1997) Joint surface matching and shear strength part A: joint matching coefficient (JMC). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(2):173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00062-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao J (1997) Joint surface matching and shear strength part B: JRC-JMC shear strength criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00063-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jahanian H, Sadaghiani MH (2015) Experimental study on the shear strength of sandy clay infilled regular rough rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:907–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0643-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang ZC, Huang RQ, Liu QS, Wong LNY (2015) Effect of contact state on the shear behavior of artificial rock joint. B Eng Geol Environ 75(2):761–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0776-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seidel JP, Haberfield CM (2002) A theoretical model for rock joint subjected to constant normal stiffness direct shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 39:539–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00056-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Indraratnal B, Haque A (1997) Experimental study of shear behavior of rock joints under constant normal stiffness conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00068-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang CQ, Cui GJ, Deng L, Zhou H, Lu JJ, Dai F (2020) Laboratory investigation on shear behaviors of bolt-grout interface subjected to constant normal stiffness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(3):1333–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01983-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang CS, Jiang YJ, Wang G, Luan HJ, Zhang YC, Zhang SH (2022) Experimental investigation on the shear behavior of the bolt-grout interface under CNL and CNS conditions considering realistic bolt profiles. Geomech Geophys Geo 8(4):111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-022-00416-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang M, Hong CJ, Du SG, Luo ZY (2020) Experimental technology for the shear strength of the series-scale rock joint model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:5677–5695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02241-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barbero M, Barla G, Zaninetti A (1996) Dynamic shear strength of rock joints subjected to impulse loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(2):141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00049-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dang WG, Tao K, Huang LC, Li X, Ma JJ, Zhao TTG (2022) A new multi-function servo control dynamic shear apparatus for geomechanics. Measurement 187:110345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Banthia N, Mindess S, Bentur A, Pigeon M (1989) Impact testing of concrete using a drop-weight impact machine. Exp Mech 29:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02327783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li L, Hagan PC, Saydam S, Hebblewhite B, Zhang C (2019) A laboratory study of shear behaviour of rockbolts under dynamic loading based on the drop test using a double shear system. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:3413–3429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01776-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2001) A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials. Exp Mech 41(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu W, Zhao J (2013) A dynamic-induced direct-shear model for dynamic triggering of frictional slip on simulated granular gouges. Exp Mech 54(4):605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-013-9823-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu TT, Li JC, Li HB, Li XP, Zheng Y, Liu H (2017) Experimental study of S-wave propagation through a filled rock joint. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(10):2645–2657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1250-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li JC, Yuan W, Li HB, Zou CJ (2022) Study on dynamic shear deformation behaviors and test methodology of sawtooth-shaped rock joints under impact load. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 158:105210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xie H, Pariseau WG (1992) Fractal estimation of the joint roughness coefficients. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Fractured and Jointed Rock Masses. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 125–131

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wu Q, Xu YJ, Tang HM, Fang K, Jiang YF, Liu CY, Wang LQ, Wang XH, Kang JT (2018) Investigation on the shear properties of discontinuities at the interface between different rock types in the Badong formation, China. Eng Geol 245:280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Atapour H, Moosavi M (2013) The influence of shearing velocity on shear behavior of artificial joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1745–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0481-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xia CC, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Lee CF, Sun ZQ (2003) Quantifying topography and closure deformation of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(2):197–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00134-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Patton FD (1966) Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. In: Proceedings of 1st Congress of International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal. pp 509–515

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hudson JA, Harrison JP (2000) Engineering rock mechanics: an introduction to the principles. Elsevier, pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yuan W, Li JC, Zheng YL, Wang ZJ (2023) Experimental study on shear characteristics of a rock joint subjected to dynamic shear load. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03692-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang C, Feng XT, Zhou H, Qiu S, Wu W (2013) Rockmass damage development following two extremely intense rockbursts in deep tunnels at Jinping II hydropower station, southwestern China. B Eng Geol Environ 72:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0470-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42220104007, 42377160), the Innovative and Entrepreneurial Team Program of Jiangsu Province, China (JSSCTD202140), and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX20-0117).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.C. Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, W., Li, J., Zou, C. et al. A New Apparatus for Testing Shear-Slip Properties of Rock Joint Subjected to Dynamic Disturbance. Exp Mech (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-024-01060-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-024-01060-2

Keywords

Navigation