Skip to main content
Log in

A New Dynamic Direct Shear Testing Device on Rock Joints

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Barla G, Barla M, Martinotti ME (2010) Development of a new direct shear testing apparatus. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(1):117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7(4):287–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10(1):1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cen DF, Huang D (2017) Direct shear tests of sandstone under constant normal tensile stress condition using a simple auxiliary device. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1425–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford AM, Curran JH (1981) The influence of shear velocity on the frictional resistance of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr Pergamon 18(6):505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang WG, Konietzky H, Frühwirt T (2016) Direct shear behavior of a plane joint under dynamic normal load (DNL) conditions. Eng Geol 213:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathi A, Moradian Z, Rivard P et al (2016) Shear mechanism of rock joints under pre-peak cyclic loading condition. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo SF, Qi SW (2015) Numerical study on progressive failure of hard rock samples with an unfilled undulate joint. Eng Geol 193:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans J, Boulon M (2003) A new device for investigating the hydro-mechanical properties of rock joints. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 27(6):513–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu YX, Liu SC, Dong W (1996) Earthquake engineering. CRC Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Zhu TT (2018) Experimental and numerical study on the strength and hybrid fracture of sandstone under tension-shear stress. Eng Fract Mech 200:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Zhu TT (2019) Experimental study on the shear mechanical behavior of sandstone under normal tensile stress using a new double-shear testing device. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(9):3467–3474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indraratna B, Haque A, Aziz N (1998) Laboratory modelling of shear behaviour of soft joints under constant normal stiffness conditions. Geotech Geol Eng 16(1):17–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, international society for rock mechanics, compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish national group. Kozan Ofset, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Xiao J, Tanabashi Y et al (2004) Development of an automated servo-controlled direct shear apparatus applying a constant normal stiffness condition. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleepmek M, Khamrat S, Thongprapha T et al (2016) Displacement velocity effects on rock fracture shear strengths. J Struct Geol 90:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konietzky H, Frühwirt T, Luge H (2012) A new large dynamic rockmechanical direct shear box device. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(3):427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HB, Feng HP, Liu B et al (2006) Experimental studies on mechanical properties of rock joints under dynamic loading. Key Eng Mater 326–328:1709–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Ma GW, Zhao J (2011) Analysis of stochastic seismic wave interaction with a slippery rock fault. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44(1):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Li HB, Jiao YY, Liu YQ, Xia X, Yu C (2014) Analysis for oblique wave propagation across filled joints based on thin-layer interface model. J Appl Geophys 102:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrishal S, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K et al (2016) An experimental study on normal stress and shear rate dependency of basic friction coefficient in dry and wet limestone joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(12):4607–4629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton FD (1966) Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. In; Proceedings of the 1st Congress of International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, 25 September–1 October. pp. 509–513

  • Qi SW, Xu Q, Lan HX et al (2010) Spatial distribution analysis of landslides triggered by 2008.5.12 Wenchuan earthquake. China Eng Geol 116:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi SW, Xu Q, Zhang B et al (2011) Source characteristics of long runout rock avalanches triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. J Asian Earth Sci 40:896–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi SW, Lan HX, Dong JY (2015) An analytical solution to slip buckling slope failure triggered by earthquake. Eng Geol 194:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider HJ (1977) The time dependence of friction of rock joints. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 16:235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng BW, Qi SW (2016) A new index to describe joint roughness coefficient (JRC) under cyclic shear. Eng Geol 212:72–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu TT, Huang D (2019) Experimental investigation of the shear mechanical behavior of sandstone under unloading normal stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 114:186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to remember Prof. Barla, who unexpectedly passed away. This paper was encouraged positively and revised meticulously by Prof. Barla in the process of its submission. Unfortunately, during the modification of the manuscript after review, the grievous news of Prof. Barla came suddenly and we are all in extreme grief. This article is dedicated to distinguished Prof. Barla to cherish our memory for him. This research was supported with funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 41825018, 41672307 and the Chinese Academy of Sciences under Knowledge Innovation Project Grant No. KZZD-EW-05-02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengwen Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

To elaborate the key technique of “cyclic loading”, an example of cyclic shear test results of the granite joint with the specimen length of 1000 mm (along shear direction), the width of 250 mm and the height of 300 mm under the CNL condition is shown in Fig. 7. The granite joint has the regular sawtooth shape with five identical and isosceles saw teeth, and each one possesses the undulated angle of 13°, the height of 23.09 mm as well as the length of 200 mm, as depicted in Fig. 7a. Fig. 7b–d illustrate the load-displacement-time relations of the cyclic shear test results of the granite joint. From Fig. 7b, c, it can be found that there are three cyclic shear processes, where the shear rate and the normal load remain constant at values of 1 mm/s and 25 kN, respectively, which reveals the reliability of the “cyclic loading” technique. In Fig. 7b, c, it shows that the shear loading amplitude and the frequency are 30 mm and 0.0083 Hz, respectively. It indicates that the shear resistance (the peak shear load) in both the forward positive and backward positive shear processes decreases slightly from the first cycle to the third cycle, as depicted in Fig. 7b, d.

To give a detailed description of the key technique of “CNS loading”, an example of shear test results of the granite joint with the specimen length of 200 mm (along shear direction), the width of 100 mm and the height of 150 mm under the CNS condition is depicted in Fig. 8. The granite joint has the tilted flat and straight shape with the inclination angle of 14°, as shown in Fig. 8a. Fig. 8b–d illustrate the load-displacement relations of the shear test results of the granite joint under the CNS condition. According to Fig. 8b, c, it can be found that in CNS tests with the kn of 0, i.e., CNL tests, the normal load retains constant at the value of 10 kN with the increase of the normal displacement and the shear displacement. In comparison with the kn of 1.56 kN/mm and 3 kN/mm of CNS tests, the normal load and the normal displacement are well proportioned with the normal displacement increasing at different shear rate values of 0.1 mm/s and 1 mm/s, which reflects the reliability of the “CNS loading” technique. It indicates that the joint shows an elastic-plastic behavior in CNL tests, while the shear load increases gradually with the shear displacement increasing in CNS tests (kn = 1.56 kN/mm and kn = 3 kN/mm), as depicted in Fig. 8d.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, S., Zheng, B., Wu, F. et al. A New Dynamic Direct Shear Testing Device on Rock Joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 4787–4798 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02175-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02175-3

Keywords

Navigation