Abstract
In our joint theoretical piece (Lamb and Peterson 2011), we attempted to find points of agreement and further elucidate points of disagreement in relation to the challenging issue of adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. In particular, we evaluated the divisive question of whether girls’ subjective feelings of sexual empowerment qualify as some useful version of empowerment. We are grateful to the commentators for joining us in this productive and collaborative conversation. In this response, we summarize some of the themes raised by the commentators, and we look for points of agreement around which we, as feminists, can continue to build a conversation on this polarizing issue. We also attempt to better explore the possible relationship between subjective empowerment and political empowerment by resurrecting the idea that “the personal is political.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2009). Orgasm in college hook ups and relationships. In B. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 362–377). New York: Norton.
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bay-Cheng, L. (2011). Recovering empowerment: De-personalizing and re-politicizing adolescent female sexuality. Sex Roles, this issue.. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0070-x.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Lewis, A. E., Stewart, A. J., & Malley, J. E. (2006). Disciplining “girl talk”: The paradox of empowerment in a feminist mentorship program. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 13, 73–92. doi:10.1300/J137v13n02_05.
Brown, L. (2004). Raising their voices: The politics of girls’ anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chloe (2011, May 16). A few words about reclaiming “slut”. Feministing. Retrieved from http://feministing.com/2011/05/16/a-few-words-about-reclaiming-“slut”/
Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How pornography has hijacked our sexuality. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Dines, G., & Long, J. (2011, December 1). Moral panic? No. We are resisting the pornofication of women. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/01/feminists-pornification-of-women
Drummond, S. (no date/2000). Hairy legs freak fishy liberal. In R. Baxandall & L. Gordon (Eds.), Dear sisters: Dispatches from the Women’s Liberation Movement (pp. 187–188), NY: Basic Books.
Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women’s engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 114–131. doi:10.1177/0959353509351854.
Fine, M., & McClelland, S. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 297–338.
Gavey, N. (2011). Beyond "empowerment"? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, this issue.. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0069-3.
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 35–60.
Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the 'sexualization of culture' debates. Sex Roles, this issue.. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hanisch, C. (1969/2007). The personal is political: The women’s liberation movement classic with a new explanatory introduction. Retrieved from http://www.carolhanisch.org/CHwritings/PersonalisPol.pdf
Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Howze, Y., & Weberman, D. (2001). On racial kinship. Social Theory & Practice, 27, 419–36.
Jack, D. (1991). Silencing the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lamb, S. (2006). Forgiveness, women, and responsibility to the group. Journal of Human Rights, 5, 1–16. doi:10.1080/14754830500485874.
Lamb, S. (2008). The right sexuality for girls. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54, B14–B15.
Lamb, S. (2010a). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1.
Lamb, S. (2010b). Porn as a pathway to empowerment? A response to Peterson’s commentary. Sex Roles, 62, 314–317. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9756-8.
Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2011). Adolescent girls' sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, this issue.. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 552–567. doi:10.1080/00224490903171794.
Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). Social considerations related to adolescent girls' sexual empowerment: A response to Lamb and Peterson. Sex Roles, this issue.. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0079-1.
Muscio, I. (2001). Cunt: A declaration of independence. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
Pease, B. (2002). Rethinking empowerment: A postmodern reappraisal for emancipatory practice. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 135–147. doi:10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135.
Peterson, Z. D. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307–313. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9725-2.
Redfern, C., & Aune, K. (2010). Reclaiming the F word: The new feminist movement. London: Zed Books.
Riger, S. (1993). What‘s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292. doi:10.1007/BF00941504.
Smith, S., & Watson, J. (1998). Introduction. In S. Smith & J. Watson (Eds.), Women, autobiography, theory: A reader (pp. 3–52). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, this issue.. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.
Whitehead, K., & Kurz, T. (2009). “Empowerment” and the pole: A discursive investigation of the reinvention of pole dancing as a recreational activity. Feminism & Psychology, 19, 224–244. doi:10.1177/0959353509102218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Zoë D. Peterson and Sharon Lamb contributed equally to this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peterson, Z.D., Lamb, S. The Political Context for Personal Empowerment: Continuing the Conversation. Sex Roles 66, 758–763 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0150-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0150-6