Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disentangling Empowerment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond Peacebuilding

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 354 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter centres on the conceptual and theoretical analysis of empowerment. As empowerment is a concept inextricably related to power, the chapter first discusses the literature on power and debates the basic features that are used to define what ‘power’ is. Subsequently, it explores the specific literature on empowerment. Using two fundamental ontological approaches to power (power-to and power-over), it identifies two main approaches of empowerment—the ‘technical’ and ‘emancipatory’ approaches. After discussing the pros and cons of each of these approaches, and after identifying three main gaps in the empowerment literature, the chapter concludes by proposing a framework of analysis that encompasses multiple levels of analysis, embraces a dialectical view of power, and acknowledges the of role the actors’ subjectivities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Articles, Books, Book Chapters and Reports

  • Alsop, R. (Ed.) (2004). Power, rights, and poverty: Concepts and connections. A working meeting sponsored by DFID and the World Bank. Washington: The World Bank. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R., Bertelsen, M. F., & Holland, J. (2006). Empowerment in practice. From analysis to implementation (pp. 9–44). The World Bank: Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. Reprinted with permission in Haugaard, M. (Ed.) (2002). Power a reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1988). The nature of power. Cambridge/Oxford: Polity Press, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the power out of empowerment—An experiential account. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2005). Emancipation. In K. Booth (Ed.), Critical security studies and world politics (pp. 181–187). Lynne Rienner: Boulder/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2007). Theory of world security. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1990). Three faces of power. Newbury Park/London/New Delhi: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1987). Social space and symbolic power. Reprinted with permission in Haugaard, M. (Ed.) (2002). Power: A reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in denial. The politics of state-building. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2013). Freedom vs. necessity in international relations. Human-centred approaches to security and development. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2001) Chutando a Escada. A Estratégia do Desenvolvimento em Perspectiva Histórica. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Ed.), Participation. The new tyranny? (pp. 36–55). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (2012). Development through bricolage. Rethinking institutional resource management. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. (2001). The social psychological limits of participation? In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation. The new tyranny? (pp. 102–121). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The case for participation as a tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Ed.), Participation. The new tyranny? (pp. 1–15). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). Beyond buzzwords, “poverty reduction”, “participation” and “empowerment” in development policy. Overarching concerns. Programme paper number 10. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/F25D3D6D27E2A1ACC12570CB002FFA9A/$file/cornwall.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2010.

  • Dahl, R. A. (1968). Power. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 12, pp. 405–415). Crowell Collier and Macmillan. Reprinted with permission in Haugaard, M. (Ed.) (2002). Power a reader (pp. 8–25). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2001). Global governance and the new wars. The merging of development and security. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2007). Development, security and unending war. Governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2006). The White man’s burden. Why the efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyben, R., Kabeer, N., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Conceptualising empowerment and the implications for pro poor growth. A paper for the DAC poverty network. http://www.ids.ac.uk/index.cfm?objectid=3971D3FA-E0D0-E6A1-174C0169D5AF39AE. Accessed 18 May 10.

  • Fielding, M. (1996). Empowerment: Emancipation or enervation? Journal of Education Policy, 11(3), 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power. Essential works of Foucault (Vol. 3) (pp. 326–348). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000). Subjectivity and truth. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics. Subjectivity and truth. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (trans: Hurley, R. and others, Vol. 1, pp. 87–92). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2004). In Bertani, M. & Fontana, A. (Eds.), Society must be defended (trans: Macey, D., pp. 167–185). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2004). Empowerment and institutional change: Mapping “virtuous circles” of state-society interaction. In R. Alsop (Ed.), Power, rights, and poverty: Concepts and connections (pp. 68–86). A working meeting sponsored by DFID and the World Bank. DFID, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. (2010). From pacification to peacebuilding. A call to global transformation. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. [1970] (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment the politics of alternative development. Cambridge/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Houndmills/London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill, J. (2000). Power and its disguises. Anthropological perspectives on politics (2nd ed.). London/Sterling/Virginia: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. (2008). From poverty to power. How active citizens and effective states can change the world. Oxford: Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugaard, M. (1997). The constitution of power. A theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugaard, M. (Ed.). (2002). Power a reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., & Brook, S. (2004). Measuring empowerment: Country indicators. In R. Alsop (Ed.), Power, rights, and poverty: Concepts and connections (pp. 93–110). A Working Meeting Sponsored by DFID and the World Bank. DFID, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2010). Change the world without taking power. The meaning of revolution today. London/Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. [1937] (2002). Traditional and critical theory. (trans: O’Connell, M. J.). In M. Horkheimer (Ed.), Critical theory. Selected essays (pp. 188–243). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (2001). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. In A. Sisask (Ed.), Discussing women’s empowerment: Theory and practice (SIDA studies, Vol. 3, pp. 17–57). Stockholm: SIDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, U. (2001). Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development. In B. Cooke, & U. Kothari (Ed.), Participation. The new tyranny? (pp. 139–152). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Baron, B. (1971). Marx on human emancipation. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 4(4), 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamzon, C. (1997) An Overview of the Concept of Empowerment. In: IRED Nord People’s Empowerment – Grassroots Experiences in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Rome: Innovations et Réseaux pour le Développement (IRED), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, C. (2002). Should we mind the gap? In S. Fukuda-Parr, C. Lopes, & K. Malik (Eds.), Capacity for development: New solutions to old problems (pp. 121–146). New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, C., & Theisohn, T. (2003). Ownership, leadership, and transformation: Can we do better for capacity development? New York: United Nations Development Programme, Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. [1974] (1994). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell, C., & Quiroz, S., with Scrutton, C., & Bird, K. (2009). Understanding and operationalising empowerment (Working paper 308). Results of ODI research presented in preliminary form for discussion and critical comment. London: Overseas Development. https://www.odi.org/resources/docs/5500.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2013.

  • Marx, K. (1844). On the Jewish question. Works of Karl Marx 1844. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/index.htm. Accessed 08 June 2010.

  • Millar, G. (2013). Expectations and experiences of peacebuilding in Sierra Leone: Parallel peacebuilding processes and compound friction. International Peacekeeping, 20(2), 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, G. (2001). Beyond participation: Strategies for deeper empowerment. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation. The new tyranny? (pp. 153–167). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (2001). Empowerment at last? Journal of International Development, 13, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. (2001). ‘People’s knowledge’, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation. The new tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, P. (Ed.) (2001a). Evaluating empowerment. Reviewing the concept and practice (INTRAC NGO Management and Policy Series No. 13). Oxford: INTRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, P. (2001b). Understanding empowerment. In: Oakley, P. (Ed.), Evaluating empowerment. Reviewing the concept and practice (INTRAC NGO Management and Policy Series, Vol. 13, pp. 11–24). Oxford: INTRAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, N., & Czuba, C. E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it? Journal of Extension, 37(5). www.joe.org. Accessed 6 Apr 2010.

  • Parsons, T. (1963). On the conception of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophy Society, 107, 232–58. Reprinted with permission in Haugaard, M. (Ed.) (2002). Power a reader (pp. 67–112). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. (2013). Power and the twenty-first century activist: From the neighbourhood to the square. Development and Change, 44(3), 639–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, J. N. (1992). Emancipations, modern and postmodern. Development and Change, 23(3), 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, J. N. (2010). Development theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles/London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijnenburg, B. (2004). Keeping it vague. Discourses and practices of participation in rural Mozambique. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M. (2010) Welfare in War-Torn Societies: Nemesis of the Liberal Peace? In Richmond, O.P. (eds.) Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding: Critical Developments and Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan: 262–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M., Cooper, N., & Turner, M. (Eds.) (2011). Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding (2nd ed.). New security challenges series. In S. Croft (Ed.), Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, S. (2007). The other side of agency. Philosophy, 82, 579–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2012). Beyond local ownership in the architecture of international peacebuilding. Ethnopolitics, 11(4), 354–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment. Working with women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scrutton, C., & Luttrell, C. (2007). The definition and operationalisation of empowerment in different development agencies. www.poverty-wellbeing.net. Accessed 28 June 2010.

  • Sen, G. (1997). Empowerment as an approach to poverty (Working Paper Series No. 97.07). Background Paper to the Human Development Report. http://www.ieham.org/html/docs/Empowerment_as_an_approach_to_Poverty.pdf. Accessed: 12 July 2016.

  • Sen, A. (1999). Desenvolvimento como Liberdade. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. (1979) Black Empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N., Dethier, J.-J., & Rogers, F. H. (2005). Growth and empowerment: Making development happen (pp. 83–108, 167–242). Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirk, P. M. R. (2000). Critical theory, politics and society. An introduction. London/New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power. The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. L. (2013). Symbolic power, politics and intellectuals. The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1993). The sociology of social change. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. (2007). Power and empowerment (Theory into practice). Dorset: Russell House Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn Jones, R. (2005). On emancipation: Necessity, capacity, and concrete utopias. In K. Booth (Ed.), Critical security studies and world politics (pp. 1–25). Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individuals and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Roberta Holanda Maschietto

Authors
  1. Roberta Holanda Maschietto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2016 Roberta Holanda Maschietto

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maschietto, R.H. (2016). Disentangling Empowerment. In: Beyond Peacebuilding . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94951-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation