Abstract
In my article on the idealization of female adolescent sexuality, I raised questions for feminist theorists and researchers about our theorizing about “desire”, “pleasure”, and “subjectivity”. Zoe Peterson’s commentary on this article responds to one of 5 critical points I make, that the description of the ideal sexual adolescent who feels pleasure, desire, and subjectivity may be ironically similar to the commodified, sexualized, marketed teen girl. Here I correct some misrepresentations of my point of view in Peterson’s commentary and reply to first her warning that to interpret girls differently than they interpret themselves is akin to dismissing their voices and second to her idea that a porn-influenced expression of sexuality can be seen as a step in the direction of sexual empowerment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating and relationships on campus. NY: New York University.
Brown, L. M. (2003). Girlfighting: Betrayal and rejection among girls. New York: New York University.
Dines, G. (in press). Pornland: How pornography has hijacked our sexuality. Boston: Beacon Press.
England, P., & Thomas, R. J. (2006). The decline of the date and the rise of the college hook up. In A. S. Skolnick & J. Skolnick (Eds.), Families in transition (14th ed., pp. 151–162). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–53.
Fine, M. (2005). X. Desire: The morning (and 15 years) after. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 54–60. doi:10.1177/0959353505049708.
Fine, M., & McPherson, P. (1992). Over dinner: Feminism and adolescent female bodies. In M. Fine (Ed.), Disruptive voices (pp. 172–204). Albany: SUNY.
Girls Incorporated. (2006). The supergirl dilemma: Girls grapple with the mounting pressure of expectations. NY: Girls.
Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–268. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.
Lamb, S. (2002). The secret lives of girls: What good girls really do—sex play, aggression, and their guilt. New York: The Free Press.
Lamb, S. (2006). Sex, therapy, and kids: Addressing their concerns through talk and play. NY: Norton.
Lamb, S. (2010). Towards a sexual ethics curriculum: Bringing philosophy and society to bear on individual development. Harvard Educational Review. (in press)
Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A crtitique. Sex Roles, this issue.
Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketers’ schemes. New York: St. Martin’s.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Peterson, Z. D. (2005). III. Wanting and not wanting sex: The missing discourse of ambivalence. Feminism & Psychology, 15(1), 15–20. doi:10.1177/0959353505049698.
Pastor, J., McCormick, J., & Fine, M. (2007). Makin’ homes: An urban girl thing. In B. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 75–96). New York: New York University.
Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is changing our lives. NY: Times Books.
Peterson, Z. D. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, this issue.
Riger, S. (1993). What‘s wrong with empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292. doi:10.1007/BF00941504.
Thompson, S. (1995). Going all the way: Teenage girls’ tales of sex, romance, and pregnancy. New York: Hill and Wang Winter.
Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Lyn Mikel Brown and Gail Dines for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamb, S. Porn as a Pathway to Empowerment? A Response to Peterson’s Commentary. Sex Roles 62, 314–317 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9756-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9756-8