Abstract
International collaboration has played an important role in the development of nanotechnology. Patents encompass valuable technological information and collaborative efforts. Thus, this paper examines international collaboration development in nanotechnology using patent network analysis. The results show that the number of international collaboration nanotechnology patents has increased steadily and the proportion of them of total nanotechnology patents has likewise exhibited an upward trend. USA has always been the most influential participant with largest number of international collaboration patents. Asian countries/regions have shown an obvious increase in the number of international collaboration patents. By contrast, there have shown a generally decline in European countries. More and more countries have become actively engaged in international collaboration in nanotechnology with increasingly closer relationships. Two styles of international collaboration exit: while USA, Germany, UK and Japan collaborate with a wide range of countries/regions; Spain, Israel, Russia, Singapore and Taiwan are more selective in their collaboration partners. Though International collaboration has yet to find global significance in terms of patent citation impacts, it has nevertheless been incremental in improving patent citation impacts for most of the top 20 countries/regions since 2004.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa, & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics, 93(1), 59–87.
Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321–325.
Chang, Y. W. (2012). Tracking scientometric research in Taiwan using bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 10(2), 1–20.
Chen, Z. F., & Guan, J. C. (2010). The impact of small world on innovation: an empirical study of 16 countries. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 97–106.
Chen, J. H., Jang, S. L., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: the case of China. Scientometrics, 94(2), 481–495.
Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938–954.
Graham, B. S., & Thomas, F. H. (2000). A process perspective of international research collaboration. Journal of Employment Counseling, 37(2), 88–97.
Guan, J. C., & Chen, Z. F. (2012). Patent collaboration and international knowledge flow. Information Processing and Management, 48(1), 170–181.
Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. (2007). China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’. Research Policy, 36(6), 880–886.
Guan, J. C., & Shi, Y. (2012). Transnational citation, technological diversity and small world in global nanotechnology patenting. Scientometrics, 93(3), 609–633.
Guan, J. C., & Zhao, Q. J. (2012). University-industry collaboration networks: The impact of network structure on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.013.
Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z. K., & RoCo, M. C. (2004). International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 325–354.
Huang, Z., Chen, H., Li, X., & Roco, M. C. (2006). Connecting NSF funding to patent innovation in nanotechnology (2001–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(6), 859–879.
Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507–527.
Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007). Technical structure of the global nanoscience and nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(5), 701–724.
Kostoff, R. N., Stump, J. A., Johnson, D., Murday, J. S., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2006). The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(3–4), 301–321.
Lee, L. L., Chan, C. K., Ngaim, M., & Ramakeishna, S. (2006). Nanotechnology patent landscape 2006. Nanotechnology, 1(2), 101–113.
Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3), 693–713.
Liu, H. I., Chang, B. C., & Chen, K. C. (2012). Collaboration patterns of Taiwanese scientific publications in various research areas. Scientometrics, 92(1), 145–155.
Marinova, D., & McAleer, M. (2003). Nanotechnology strength indicators: International rankings based on US patents. Nanotechnology, 14(1), R1–R7.
Mehta, A., Herron, P., Motoyama, Y., Appelbaum, R., & Lenoir, T. (2012). Globalization and de-globalization in nanotechnology research: The role of China. Scientometrics, 93(2), 439–458.
Melkers, J., & Kiopa, A. (2010). The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 389–414.
Meyer, M. (2000). Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions of emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48(2), 151–178.
Meyer, M. (2001). Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics, 51(1), 163–183.
Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology-Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195–205.
Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Onel, S., Zeid, A., & Kamarthi, S. (2011). The structure and analysis of nanotechnology co-author and citation networks. Scientometrics, 89(1), 119–138.
Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633–650.
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.
Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.
Sin, S. C. J. (2011). Longitudinal trends in internationalisation, collaboration types, and citation impact: A bibliometric analysis of seven LIS journals (1980–2008). Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(1), 27–49.
Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1–16.
Wang, X., Xu, S., Liu, D., & Liang, Y. (2012). The role of Chinese-American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: A study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 737–749.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Chan, C. K. (2007). Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(3), 715–737.
Ye, X. T., Liu, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2012). International collaborative patterns in China’s nanotechnology publications. International Journal of Technology Management, 59(3–4), 255–272.
Yin, L. C., Hildrun, K., Robert, A. H., & Liu, Z. Y. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1599–1613.
Zhao, Q. J., & Guan, J. C. (2011). International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals. Scientometrics, 87(1), 159–170.
Zheng, J., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Chen, D., Huang, M., & Lei, X., et al. (2012). International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: A perspective from paper and patent analysis. Scientometrics, 91(1), 65–80.
Zhou, P., & Loet, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Search strategy for nanotechnology patents
((CCL/977/$ OR ABST/((((((((((((((((((((((Nano$ OR “Self assemble”) OR “Self assembly”) OR “Self-assembl$”) OR “Atomic force microscope”) OR “Atomic force microscopy”) OR “Atomic-force-microscop$”) OR “Scanning tunneling microscope”) OR “Scanning tunneling microscopy”) OR “Scanning-tunneling-microscop$”) OR “Atomistic simulation”) OR Biomotor) OR “Molecular device”) OR “Molecular electronics”) OR “Molecular modeling”) OR “Molecular motor”) OR “Molecular sensor”) OR “Molecular simulation”) OR “Quantum computing”) OR “Quantum dot”) OR “Quantum dots”) OR “Quantum effect”) OR “Quantum effects”)) AND APD/19910101- > 20101231)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, J., Zhao, Zy., Zhang, X. et al. International collaboration development in nanotechnology: a perspective of patent network analysis. Scientometrics 98, 683–702 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1081-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1081-x